[Talk-gb-westmidlands] SotM: Call for session proposals and Scholarship fund

2016-04-25 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi all,

(cross-post to the lists I am member of)

I'm delighted to report that the planning for State of the Map 2016 is
going well. We have now opened the call for session proposals
(presentations). You have until Saturday 21st May to submit your idea.
Please see:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/04/19/propose-your-session-to-state-of-the-map-2016/

We have also opened the scholarship programme. This has the same deadline
so don't hesitate. The option is there if you need it so don’t let the cost
of travel stand in your way!
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/04/25/we-want-you-at-state-of-the-map-apply-for-a-scholarship/

Best regards,
*Rob*

p.s. There are still sponsorship opportunities should your business want to
support OSM via this route. If interested drop me a note.
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Incorrect 'suburb' in 'reverse nominatim' search

2016-04-25 Thread Andy Townsend
(top-posting because it probably does make sense to keep the whole of 
the previous email together at the end)


I suspect that this might be partly related to this enhancement request:

https://github.com/twain47/Nominatim/issues/231

The tl;dr of that is "nominatim works much better with areas rather than 
nodes".


and of course I suspect from what you're saying that 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8096746 shouldn't be tagged "place=suburb".


Another thing to think about might be that even when you fix it in the 
data, I'm not sure that Mapquest's nominatim will update (they recently 
changed the technology they're using and tile layers such as 
https://otile2-s.mqcdn.com/tiles/1.0.0/osm/17/64777/42820.png don't seem 
to be being updated; not sure if their nominatim is still being updated 
too).


Answering the questions:

> 1. Is there any recognised use of 'suburb' in the UK (or West 
Midlands) for smaller towns ?


I think so - there's certainly been discussion in London over what is a 
"suburb" and what a "town".  I can't comment on the West Mids though - 
not really a local.



> 2. Why is this appearing in the description for places well away from 
the location ?


That's the issue above I believe.

> 3. I assume that it is OK just to delete the 'place=suburb' tag (I 
haven't done any OSM editing for some time &

> I'm a bit out of touch) ?

That "place=suburb" on a way looks wrong to me too - I'd just delete 
it.  That mapper has made relatively few edits, and the last was over 8 
years ago so I doubt they'll be contactable.


Cheers,

Andy



On 24/04/2016 11:26, Iain Simpson wrote:
I'm creating a database of all my geotagged photos and using a 
'reverse nominatim' search to describe the location (using Mapquest).


Some of the descriptions are peculiar in that they return a 'suburb' 
which is inaccurate.


Example

lat="52.8186007" lon="-2.1179502"
returns :

Marston Road
Salcombe Avenue
Stafford
Staffordshire
West Midlands
England
ST16 3BT
United Kingdom
gb

'Salcombe Avenue' is a minor residential street 2km to the SE.
(52.795,-2.0818)

Much of east Stafford is designated as part of this 'suburb'

On investigation the only 'suburb' ref is for way 8095766 changeset 
35344 created in 2007 and never changed.




Questions
1. Is there any recognised use of 'suburb' in the UK (or West 
Midlands) for smaller towns ?


2. Why is this appearing in the description for places well away from 
the location ?


3. I assume that it is OK just to delete the 'place=suburb' tag (I 
haven't done any OSM editing for some time & I'm a bit out of touch) ?


(I'm now going to try and find out how the Reverse Nominatim actually 
works.)






___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands