Re: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database
For as long as the imagery coverage map exists, I see no reason to oppose the removal of imagery outlines. Tony Montana: Me, I want what's coming to me. Manny Ribera: Oh, well what's coming to you? Tony Montana: The world, chico, and everything in it. - Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/ OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115 Facebook: ian.lopez From: Eugene Alvin Villar To: OpenStreetMap Philippines Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 6:09 PM Subject: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database Hi guys, I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special "outline=imagery" tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing, are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really belong in the database in the first place.. If there's new imagery, we just trace the outlines and then I can take them and merge them into the coverage map. What do you think? [1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/ ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database
+1 On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Hi guys, > > I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently > in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special > "outline=imagery" tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage > map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these > outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing, > are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't > correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really > belong in the database in the first place.. > > If there's new imagery, we just trace the outlines and then I can take > them and merge them into the coverage map. > > What do you think? > > [1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/ > > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database
+1 ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database
+1 As long as Eugene will continue updating his website. :) >> I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently >> in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special >> "outline=imagery" tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage >> map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these >> outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing, >> are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't >> correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really >> belong in the database in the first place.. -- cheers, maning -- "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database
+1 On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Hi guys, > > I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently > in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special > "outline=imagery" tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage > map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these > outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing, > are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't > correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really > belong in the database in the first place.. > > If there's new imagery, we just trace the outlines and then I can take > them and merge them into the coverage map. > > What do you think? > > [1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/ > > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the OSM database
Hi guys, I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special "outline=imagery" tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing, are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really belong in the database in the first place.. If there's new imagery, we just trace the outlines and then I can take them and merge them into the coverage map. What do you think? [1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/ ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
