Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
Hi Erwin, This QC Risk Atlas is interesting. The barangay boundaries depicted here are different in several places from a map published by QC previously that was the source of the QC barangay boundaries that are now in OSM. ~Eugene On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Erwin Olario wrote: > > @Eugene > That was too long ago. > > Anyway, check out Quezon City's Risk Atlas for interesting geospatial data: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwSM5MRaKxejOG05N0lUUHdXdEk/view > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > >> Manila's administrative and legislative districts boundaries were mapped >> because the data or information about them is available. >> >> Manila's administrative districts are defined by law in R.A. 409, which >> is the Revised Charter of the City of Manila. For example, here's the >> description of the boundary of the district of Quiapo: >> >> Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Calle Azcarraga and >>> Estero de Quiapo; thence along the center lines of Calle Azcarraga, Legarda >>> and E. Mendiola, Estero de San Miguel, the Pasig River, Puente Colgante, >>> Calles Norzagaray and Regidor, and Estero de Quiapo, to the point of >>> beginning. >>> >> >> It's then just a simple matter of determining which modern streets >> correspond to which old street name (Calle Azcarraga is C.M. Recto Avenue, >> while Puente Colgante is now Quezon Bridge, etc.) >> >> Manila's legislative districts are defined in the Ordinance section of >> the 1987 Philippine Constitution. For example, here's the description of >> the boundary of the 5th district: >> >> Barangays Nos. 649-828 N - Mouth of Pasig River inland to point Paz M. >>> Guanzon Street extending to Estero de Pandacan; NE - Estero de Pandacan up >>> to Pedro Gil Street to Tejeron Street up to boundary of Manila and Makati; >>> SE - City boundary between Manila and Makati up to Estero de Tripa de >>> Gallina; S - City boundary between Pasay and Manila down to Roxas Boulevard >>> up to edge of reclaimed areas westward to Manila Bay; W - Manila Bay up to >>> mouth of Pasig River. >>> >> >> ~Eugene >> >> >> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jherome Miguel >> > wrote: >>> As a side note, Manila's districts are not obviously marked (possibly the same as the case of Quezzn City), but official boundaries assigned by the City of Manila has been mapped (the districts of Manila are officially designated). Possibly those district boundaries are mapped based on physical features and place addresses. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jherome Miguel < jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote: > I created the Cubao boundary by extrapolating some data from > boundaries of barangays that may possibly form part of Cubao. > > Although "general areas", the approximate boundaries can be mapped. > Also, some barangays are inside a certain district, and a ground survey on > addresses of places on those barangays can be used to verify them. > > A few can be defined by surrounding streets (e.g. Santa Mesa Heights > district boundaries are formed by its surrounding roads,like Quezon > Avenue, > Araneta Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, and Mayon Avenue). and water bodies like > rivers, or both (Diliman looks like to be one example. The Diliman Creek > forms one part of the approximate boundary, while roads, like Katipunan > Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, North Avenue, West Avenue, a part of Quezon > Avenue, Don A. Roces Avenue, and a portion of Tomas Morato Avenue forms > the > rest. > > Hope this advice helps. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > >> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I >> can tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating >> these districts. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel < >> jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, >>> with every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still >>> missing, >>> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for >>> those >>> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and >>> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map >>> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the >>> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" >>> area)? >>> >>> ___ >>> talk-ph mailing list >>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>> >>> >> > >>> >> ___ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> > -- >
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
@Eugene That was too long ago. Anyway, check out Quezon City's Risk Atlas for interesting geospatial data: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwSM5MRaKxejOG05N0lUUHdXdEk/view On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Manila's administrative and legislative districts boundaries were mapped > because the data or information about them is available. > > Manila's administrative districts are defined by law in R.A. 409, which is > the Revised Charter of the City of Manila. For example, here's the > description of the boundary of the district of Quiapo: > > Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Calle Azcarraga and >> Estero de Quiapo; thence along the center lines of Calle Azcarraga, Legarda >> and E. Mendiola, Estero de San Miguel, the Pasig River, Puente Colgante, >> Calles Norzagaray and Regidor, and Estero de Quiapo, to the point of >> beginning. >> > > It's then just a simple matter of determining which modern streets > correspond to which old street name (Calle Azcarraga is C.M. Recto Avenue, > while Puente Colgante is now Quezon Bridge, etc.) > > Manila's legislative districts are defined in the Ordinance section of the > 1987 Philippine Constitution. For example, here's the description of the > boundary of the 5th district: > > Barangays Nos. 649-828 N - Mouth of Pasig River inland to point Paz M. >> Guanzon Street extending to Estero de Pandacan; NE - Estero de Pandacan up >> to Pedro Gil Street to Tejeron Street up to boundary of Manila and Makati; >> SE - City boundary between Manila and Makati up to Estero de Tripa de >> Gallina; S - City boundary between Pasay and Manila down to Roxas Boulevard >> up to edge of reclaimed areas westward to Manila Bay; W - Manila Bay up to >> mouth of Pasig River. >> > > ~Eugene > > > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jherome Miguel >> wrote: >> >>> As a side note, Manila's districts are not obviously marked (possibly >>> the same as the case of Quezzn City), but official boundaries assigned by >>> the City of Manila has been mapped (the districts of Manila are officially >>> designated). Possibly those district boundaries are mapped based on >>> physical features and place addresses. >>> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jherome Miguel >> > wrote: >>> I created the Cubao boundary by extrapolating some data from boundaries of barangays that may possibly form part of Cubao. Although "general areas", the approximate boundaries can be mapped. Also, some barangays are inside a certain district, and a ground survey on addresses of places on those barangays can be used to verify them. A few can be defined by surrounding streets (e.g. Santa Mesa Heights district boundaries are formed by its surrounding roads,like Quezon Avenue, Araneta Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, and Mayon Avenue). and water bodies like rivers, or both (Diliman looks like to be one example. The Diliman Creek forms one part of the approximate boundary, while roads, like Katipunan Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, North Avenue, West Avenue, a part of Quezon Avenue, Don A. Roces Avenue, and a portion of Tomas Morato Avenue forms the rest. Hope this advice helps. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can > tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these > districts. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel < > jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with >> every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, >> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for >> those >> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and >> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map >> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the >> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" >> area)? >> >> ___ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> >> > >>> >> > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > -- -- Dispatched by mental telepathy via Ansible ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
Manila's administrative and legislative districts boundaries were mapped because the data or information about them is available. Manila's administrative districts are defined by law in R.A. 409, which is the Revised Charter of the City of Manila. For example, here's the description of the boundary of the district of Quiapo: Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Calle Azcarraga and > Estero de Quiapo; thence along the center lines of Calle Azcarraga, Legarda > and E. Mendiola, Estero de San Miguel, the Pasig River, Puente Colgante, > Calles Norzagaray and Regidor, and Estero de Quiapo, to the point of > beginning. > It's then just a simple matter of determining which modern streets correspond to which old street name (Calle Azcarraga is C.M. Recto Avenue, while Puente Colgante is now Quezon Bridge, etc.) Manila's legislative districts are defined in the Ordinance section of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. For example, here's the description of the boundary of the 5th district: Barangays Nos. 649-828 N - Mouth of Pasig River inland to point Paz M. > Guanzon Street extending to Estero de Pandacan; NE - Estero de Pandacan up > to Pedro Gil Street to Tejeron Street up to boundary of Manila and Makati; > SE - City boundary between Manila and Makati up to Estero de Tripa de > Gallina; S - City boundary between Pasay and Manila down to Roxas Boulevard > up to edge of reclaimed areas westward to Manila Bay; W - Manila Bay up to > mouth of Pasig River. > ~Eugene > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jherome Miguel > wrote: > >> As a side note, Manila's districts are not obviously marked (possibly the >> same as the case of Quezzn City), but official boundaries assigned by the >> City of Manila has been mapped (the districts of Manila are officially >> designated). Possibly those district boundaries are mapped based on >> physical features and place addresses. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jherome Miguel >> wrote: >> >>> I created the Cubao boundary by extrapolating some data from boundaries >>> of barangays that may possibly form part of Cubao. >>> >>> Although "general areas", the approximate boundaries can be mapped. >>> Also, some barangays are inside a certain district, and a ground survey on >>> addresses of places on those barangays can be used to verify them. >>> >>> A few can be defined by surrounding streets (e.g. Santa Mesa Heights >>> district boundaries are formed by its surrounding roads,like Quezon Avenue, >>> Araneta Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, and Mayon Avenue). and water bodies like >>> rivers, or both (Diliman looks like to be one example. The Diliman Creek >>> forms one part of the approximate boundary, while roads, like Katipunan >>> Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, North Avenue, West Avenue, a part of Quezon >>> Avenue, Don A. Roces Avenue, and a portion of Tomas Morato Avenue forms the >>> rest. >>> >>> Hope this advice helps. >>> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar >>> wrote: >>> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these districts. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel < jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote: > Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with > every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, > although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for > those > districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and > Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map > Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the > Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" > area)? > > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > > >>> >> > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
You should have taken a picture of that map! :) On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Erwin Olario wrote: > > It could be based on barangay membership to a district, I remeber > encountering some map from city hall about that a few years back. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:48 PM Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > >> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can >> tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these >> districts. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel >> wrote: >> >>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with >>> every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, >>> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those >>> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and >>> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map >>> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the >>> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" >>> area)? >>> >>> ___ >>> talk-ph mailing list >>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>> >>> >> ___ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> > -- > > -- Dispatched by mental telepathy via Ansible > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jherome Miguel wrote: > As a side note, Manila's districts are not obviously marked (possibly the > same as the case of Quezzn City), but official boundaries assigned by the > City of Manila has been mapped (the districts of Manila are officially > designated). Possibly those district boundaries are mapped based on > physical features and place addresses. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jherome Miguel > wrote: > >> I created the Cubao boundary by extrapolating some data from boundaries >> of barangays that may possibly form part of Cubao. >> >> Although "general areas", the approximate boundaries can be mapped. Also, >> some barangays are inside a certain district, and a ground survey on >> addresses of places on those barangays can be used to verify them. >> >> A few can be defined by surrounding streets (e.g. Santa Mesa Heights >> district boundaries are formed by its surrounding roads,like Quezon Avenue, >> Araneta Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, and Mayon Avenue). and water bodies like >> rivers, or both (Diliman looks like to be one example. The Diliman Creek >> forms one part of the approximate boundary, while roads, like Katipunan >> Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, North Avenue, West Avenue, a part of Quezon >> Avenue, Don A. Roces Avenue, and a portion of Tomas Morato Avenue forms the >> rest. >> >> Hope this advice helps. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar >> wrote: >> >>> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can >>> tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these >>> districts. >>> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel >> > wrote: >>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" area)? ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>> >> > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Jherome Miguel wrote: > I created the Cubao boundary by extrapolating some data from boundaries of > barangays that may possibly form part of Cubao. > > Although "general areas", the approximate boundaries can be mapped. Also, > some barangays are inside a certain district, and a ground survey on > addresses of places on those barangays can be used to verify them. > > A few can be defined by surrounding streets (e.g. Santa Mesa Heights > district boundaries are formed by its surrounding roads,like Quezon Avenue, > Araneta Avenue, Del Monte Avenue, and Mayon Avenue). and water bodies like > rivers, or both (Diliman looks like to be one example. The Diliman Creek > forms one part of the approximate boundary, while roads, like Katipunan > Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, North Avenue, West Avenue, a part of Quezon > Avenue, Don A. Roces Avenue, and a portion of Tomas Morato Avenue forms the > rest. > > Hope this advice helps. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > >> I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can >> tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these >> districts. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel >> wrote: >> >>> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with >>> every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, >>> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those >>> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and >>> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map >>> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the >>> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" >>> area)? >>> >>> ___ >>> talk-ph mailing list >>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>> >>> >> > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
It could be based on barangay membership to a district, I remeber encountering some map from city hall about that a few years back. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:48 PM Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can > tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these > districts. > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel > wrote: > >> Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with >> every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, >> although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those >> districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and >> Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map >> Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the >> Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" >> area)? >> >> ___ >> talk-ph mailing list >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> >> > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > -- -- Dispatched by mental telepathy via Ansible ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
I don't know if QC's districts have ever been defined. As far as I can tell, they are general areas and there is no hard line delineating these districts. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jherome Miguel wrote: > Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with > every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, > although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those > districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and > Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map > Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the > Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" > area)? > > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] Quezon City mapping: districts
Quezon City's political map on OpenStreetMap is mostly complete, with every barangay mapped, but the district boundaries are still missing, although district nodes are already added. I started to add nodes for those districts, like Novaliches, New Manila, Santa Mesa Heights, Diliman, and Balintawak, but district boundaries are still undefined. Can someone map Quezon City's district boundaries, while I'll add the others, like the Project areas La Loma, and Bago Bantay (possibly the same as the "Munoz" area)? ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph