Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

2020-08-14 Thread Erwin Olario 
Thank you to the volunteers who helped out, and the support of the OSM
community.

In this regard, we wish to call on your feedback/inputs regarding how the
community can clearly communicate whether data sources are compatible (or
incompatible) with OpenStreetMap.

I have drafted an FAQ  [1] that is eventually intended for adding to the
OSM wiki Philippine community convention page, with the hope that we can
avoid incidents like this in the future.

Feel free to add your inputs directly on the pad, or leave comments
therein, or add your responses to this thread [1]

[0]: https://hackmd.io/yDFExxTeSaW6CwSdoEu2YA?view
[1]: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2020-July/006609.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
» email: erwin@ *n**gnu**it**y**.xyz*
 | gov...@gmail.com
» mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
» OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B


On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 7:06 PM maning sambale 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> This work is finished.  It took a while due to the complexity of the
> revert.
> What this means right now is that place geocoding (via nominatim ) is
> less accurate and the visual map for boundaries has less details.
> However, our map is much better without incompatible licensed data!
> Thanks to all who helped!
> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-673892712
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM maning sambale
>  wrote:
> >
> > After reviewing initial results of the automated rollback [0] we
> > decided to do a manual process involving a couple of mappers [1].
> > Please check the workflow linked and let us know if anyone wants to help.
> >
> > [0]
> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653891322
> > [1]
> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-655266926
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://github.com/maning
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

2020-08-14 Thread maning sambale 
Hi everyone,

This work is finished.  It took a while due to the complexity of the revert.
What this means right now is that place geocoding (via nominatim ) is
less accurate and the visual map for boundaries has less details.
However, our map is much better without incompatible licensed data!
Thanks to all who helped!
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-673892712

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> After reviewing initial results of the automated rollback [0] we
> decided to do a manual process involving a couple of mappers [1].
> Please check the workflow linked and let us know if anyone wants to help.
>
> [0] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653891322
> [1] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-655266926



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

2020-07-07 Thread maning sambale 
After reviewing initial results of the automated rollback [0] we
decided to do a manual process involving a couple of mappers [1].
Please check the workflow linked and let us know if anyone wants to help.

[0] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653891322
[1] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-655266926

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

2020-07-04 Thread maning sambale 
FYI, we are starting the rollback, I advise that we don't touch any of
the related changesets until the rollback is done.
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653737739

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:18 PM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> After reviewing the edits and communicating with the mapper, we
> decided to roll-back all edits related to this issue due to
> incompatible source.
> We plan to do this as a local community.  Please see the plane here
> for comments and suggestions:
> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67
>
> cc'ed here is OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group for guidance.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:39 PM Erwin Olario  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Glen, thank you for the heads up! Boundaries are great to have, but I'll 
> > also look into the affected changesets, and reach out to the contributor
> >
> > Are you still in Pangasinan? Stay healthy and safe.
> >
> > /erwin
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz | gov...@gmail.com
> > » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> > » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:21 PM Glen Scott  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi PH mapping folks,
> >> I was just in a boring online meeting and had a chance to look at OSM 
> >> (been too busy to get to it for a while).  I noticed Barangay borders have 
> >> been added to Alaminos (and between Alaminos and other Pangasinan cities), 
> >> yet these are radically different to either Alaminos Town Hall maps or the 
> >> Cadastal survey map set I got from DENR.
> >>
> >> The borders were added by VMPanes, I'll try to contact VMPanes to 
> >> establish the basis of the borders. I think that no borders is better than 
> >> incorrect borders, unfortunately I haven't had the time to stitch the 
> >> cadastral set together in electronic format to arrive at a more accurate 
> >> border than the Alaminos City Hall map, which is at quite a small scale.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Glen
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> talk-ph mailing list
> >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
> >
> > ___
> > talk-ph mailing list
> > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://github.com/maning
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

2020-07-01 Thread Andy Townsend 

On 30/06/2020 08:15, maning sambale wrote:

After reviewing the edits and communicating with the mapper, we
decided to roll-back all edits related to this issue due to
incompatible source.
We plan to do this as a local community.  Please see the plane here
for comments and suggestions:
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67

cc'ed here is OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group for guidance.



Hi,

Thanks for letting us know,


Best Regards,

Andy, from the DWG


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

2020-06-30 Thread maning sambale 
Hi Everyone,

After reviewing the edits and communicating with the mapper, we
decided to roll-back all edits related to this issue due to
incompatible source.
We plan to do this as a local community.  Please see the plane here
for comments and suggestions:
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67

cc'ed here is OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group for guidance.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:39 PM Erwin Olario  wrote:
>
>
> Glen, thank you for the heads up! Boundaries are great to have, but I'll also 
> look into the affected changesets, and reach out to the contributor
>
> Are you still in Pangasinan? Stay healthy and safe.
>
> /erwin
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz | gov...@gmail.com
> » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:21 PM Glen Scott  wrote:
>>
>> Hi PH mapping folks,
>> I was just in a boring online meeting and had a chance to look at OSM (been 
>> too busy to get to it for a while).  I noticed Barangay borders have been 
>> added to Alaminos (and between Alaminos and other Pangasinan cities), yet 
>> these are radically different to either Alaminos Town Hall maps or the 
>> Cadastal survey map set I got from DENR.
>>
>> The borders were added by VMPanes, I'll try to contact VMPanes to establish 
>> the basis of the borders. I think that no borders is better than incorrect 
>> borders, unfortunately I haven't had the time to stitch the cadastral set 
>> together in electronic format to arrive at a more accurate border than the 
>> Alaminos City Hall map, which is at quite a small scale.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Glen
>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph