For as long as the imagery coverage map exists, I see no reason to oppose the
removal of imagery outlines.
Tony Montana: Me, I want what's coming to me.
Manny Ribera: Oh, well what's coming to you?
Tony Montana: The world, chico, and everything in it.
-
Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/
OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115
Facebook: ian.lopez
From: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
To: OpenStreetMap Philippines talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 6:09 PM
Subject: [talk-ph] Proposal to delete the imagery coverage outlines from the
OSM database
Hi guys,
I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently
in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special
outline=imagery tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage
map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these
outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing,
are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't
correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really
belong in the database in the first place..
If there's new imagery, we just trace the outlines and then I can take
them and merge them into the coverage map.
What do you think?
[1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
