[Talk-us] How is it that a way is deleted but doesn't show up for undeletion? (horribly screwed up area in northern Pennsylvania)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.73928lon=-79.88822zoom=15layers=B000FTF All around here there are missing ways. I can't tell exactly what happened, but edits such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3128411 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3125973 (done at about the same time) seem to have majorly screwed up the area. That's bad enough, but if I go to edit and hit U to undelete, I can't find any of these ways. I guess it's possible that they were never imported in the first place, but... http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.64047lon=-76.87988zoom=17layers=B000FTF Here it's clearer what happened - botched dupe node deletion: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3138125 At least we've stopped that crap, but the scars remain. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] How is it that a way is deleted but doesn't show up for undeletion? (horribly screwed up area in northern Pennsylvania)
most likely the way itself isn't always deleted. if a way is reduced to a one node way it will be just a single dot on the map. nearly impossible to edit and get the history without seeing a real way and where it should be. Maybe better to revert these whole changesets. This can be tricky if people have started to fix things already. On 25 Jun 2010, at 2:59 , Nathan Edgars II wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.73928lon=-79.88822zoom=15layers=B000FTF All around here there are missing ways. I can't tell exactly what happened, but edits such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3128411 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3125973 (done at about the same time) seem to have majorly screwed up the area. That's bad enough, but if I go to edit and hit U to undelete, I can't find any of these ways. I guess it's possible that they were never imported in the first place, but... http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.64047lon=-76.87988zoom=17layers=B000FTF Here it's clearer what happened - botched dupe node deletion: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3138125 At least we've stopped that crap, but the scars remain. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] How is it that a way is deleted but doesn't show up for undeletion? (horribly screwed up area in northern Pennsylvania)
If you have the way number you can try to get it back using the undelete plugin in JOSM. Thanks, N. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] How is it that a way is deleted but doesn't show up for undeletion? (horribly screwed up area in northern Pennsylvania)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe better to revert these whole changesets. No can do - I don't have the programming skills to handle a revert, and JOSM's changeset manager doesn't seem to be able to do it. This can be tricky if people have started to fix things already. Yep. If I had a .osm file of the previous state I could use JOSM's conflict resolution. On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Nakor nakor@gmail.com wrote: If you have the way number you can try to get it back using the undelete plugin in JOSM. Ot the undelete feature in Potlatch. But I don't have the way number. Can you find the way that extended from http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.73928lon=-79.88822zoom=15layers=B000FTF west-southwesterly to Blooming Valley? But let's start with an easier problem - reverting changeset 3138125. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Percentage of data imported vs mapped
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:56 AM, McGuire, Matthew matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote: It would be fun to see the relative state to state activity and, of course, compare it to international activity not having to reverse engineer the map since the TIGER was available (and other sources are coming available some faster some slower Eg, MASS was loaded from state data not Tiger) results in much more 'studio' work (fixing TIGER overpasses to pass over not intersect, fixing TIGER ramps to intersect the motorway so oneways go right) and much less of what the rest-of-OSM call 'real mapping' field work. Every year in any community, there are a few new streets, some new big buildings, a few realigned intersections, but there are no vast areas of white empty map to go on a mapping expedition. My biggest challenge is figuring out a workflow for fixing turn restrictions on existing intersections. -- Bill n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
