Re: [Talk-us] trail tagging

2019-04-20 Thread Jmapb

On 4/20/2019 9:18 AM, Aaron Forsythe wrote:


> cycleway ; bike path ; paved path, open to bikes, & I've never seen
one that

> wasn't open to pedestrian too

These do exist.  There are a few around here (Missouri, USA). In these
cases, there’s usually a separate path for pedestrians so cyclists can
have a path off the roadway, but not have to dodge pedestrians.  They
are rare enough though that defaulting to allow pedestrians would
likely still be the best option.


The Manhattan Bridge in NYC is another example. The path on the
southwest side is for pedestrians only, and the path on the northeast
side is for bicycles only.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357260631
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46179218

(That's how they're signed anyway -- compliance with those rules is
another story.)

Personally I would encourage explicit tagging of foot=yes on
highway=cycleway if foot traffic is permitted, and discourage routing
foot traffic over cycleways without this tag.

J


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] trail tagging

2019-04-20 Thread Aaron Forsythe
> From: brad 
> 
> cycleway ; bike path ; paved path, open to bikes, & I've never seen one that
> wasn't open to pedestrian too

These do exist.  There are a few around here (Missouri, USA). In these cases, 
there’s usually a separate path for pedestrians so cyclists can have a path off 
the roadway, but not have to dodge pedestrians.  They are rare enough though 
that defaulting to allow pedestrians would likely still be the best option.

Aaron Forsythe
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us