Re: [Talk-us] NYC administrative boundaries and Nominatim

2012-07-30 Thread Richard Welty

On 7/30/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:

On 07/29/2012 11:56 PM, Skye Book wrote:


Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?


http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/districtsmetadata.shtml


there also should be boundaries in TIGER. most of the problems i've seen
with nominatim and boundaries have to do with half-assed boundaries
based on the USGS stuff. i've been gradually replacing boundaries
in the capital district with TIGER based boundaries which are much better.

i have no opinion on the boundaries in the nyc.gov site, it might be 
worthwhile

to compare them with the boundaries from tiger. i can probably give you
.osm files based on the tiger boundaries if you want them for that purpose.
it'd be good to look at the spot where nyc boundaries end and match them
up with the tiger boundaries to see how good the fit is.

richard


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] NYC administrative boundaries and Nominatim

2012-07-30 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
 On 07/29/2012 11:56 PM, Skye Book wrote:

 Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?


 http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/districtsmetadata.shtml

I'm not sure of the license situation with any of the NYC.gov
datasets. I've gotten different answers from different people I've
talked to. Some people in some offices say that it's fine as long as
we take certain steps, others say it's not, and others have different
views altogether.

I'm working to get some authoritative data on this.

While I'm generally not a big fan of imports, administrative boundries
are hard to do in another way, and as Richard Welty points out, it's
generally a good thing to replace these nodes with true polygons, and
then we can also use data sources to fill in population tags.

 And what are boroughs in terms of place? I'm thinking county- though
 that's not right. Certainly the populations should be added.


 The boroughs of New York are counties; confusingly, the borough names
 and the (coterminous) county names don't always match:

 BoroughCounty

 The Bronx  Bronx County
 Manhattan  New York County
 Staten Island  Richmond County
 Brooklyn   Kings County
 Queens Queens County

Indeed that is confusing. Off the top of my head, I see two simple solutions:

1. We tag the areas as counties, but use the common names as the
primary name, and these official names as alt_name.

2. We create a new administrative relation that has the same geometry
as the county.

I would lean towards the first, as it means less data and more clarification.

Thoughts?

- Serge

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] NYC administrative boundaries and Nominatim

2012-07-29 Thread Serge Wroclawski
Hi all,

I'm going to discuss this with the local NYC community (some of which
are on this list) but I'm going through NYC and I'm looking for things
that aren't right.

I've tried to do some nominatim queries and the results have been
frustrating at best.

Some of these appear to be TIGER related, some Nominatim related, but
the result is pretty awful.

Let's begin two symptoms, then we can drill down:

1. Brooklyn doesn't show up in Nomiminatim, at all. To put this in
context, Brooklyn is the most populated borough of NYC, with a
population of 2.5 million people, and it doesn't show up when doing a
search.

2. Manhattan shows up, twice, but only after places like Manhattan,
Montana. Manhattan is New York, New York- and the most densely
populated borough in New York. It's also major business and cultural
hub known around the world.

3. The other boroughs also show up twice, as islands and hamlets. This
is wrong, of course, but at least they show up on a search.

So, what comes up when you look for Manhattan are two place IDs:

http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3137519
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=520672

Those are two nodes, one claiming Manhattan is an island, the other
claiming it's a hamlet.

Perhaps we need a proper administrative boundry for the borough?

Brooklyn, I did find reference to in the NYC place ID:

http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=128848728

But for some reason it didn't show up in the search!



Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?

And what are boroughs in terms of place? I'm thinking county- though
that's not right. Certainly the populations should be added.

Thoughts?

- Serge

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] NYC administrative boundaries and Nominatim

2012-07-29 Thread Skye Book
Brooklyn actually does come up way down in the Nominatim list..  I
think part of the confusion may be that this is technically Kings
County (which renders invalid the possibility of using the
administrative level of county as the key for the boroughs).

Boroughs are somewhat unique beasts to New York I think.  Each Borough
has a president, a Borough Hall and it's own very well defined
boundaries.  Categorically speaking they are under county in terms
of land mass but for recognizability the boroughs - and their
politicians and administrative errata - are both more visible and
recognizable to most people.

If anyone knows of anywhere with a similar situation I'd be very
interested to see how that place is structured and defined.

On Jul 29, 2012, at 11:47 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'm going to discuss this with the local NYC community (some of which
 are on this list) but I'm going through NYC and I'm looking for things
 that aren't right.

 I've tried to do some nominatim queries and the results have been
 frustrating at best.

 Some of these appear to be TIGER related, some Nominatim related, but
 the result is pretty awful.

 Let's begin two symptoms, then we can drill down:

 1. Brooklyn doesn't show up in Nomiminatim, at all. To put this in
 context, Brooklyn is the most populated borough of NYC, with a
 population of 2.5 million people, and it doesn't show up when doing a
 search.

 2. Manhattan shows up, twice, but only after places like Manhattan,
 Montana. Manhattan is New York, New York- and the most densely
 populated borough in New York. It's also major business and cultural
 hub known around the world.

 3. The other boroughs also show up twice, as islands and hamlets. This
 is wrong, of course, but at least they show up on a search.

 So, what comes up when you look for Manhattan are two place IDs:

 http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3137519
 http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=520672

 Those are two nodes, one claiming Manhattan is an island, the other
 claiming it's a hamlet.

 Perhaps we need a proper administrative boundry for the borough?

 Brooklyn, I did find reference to in the NYC place ID:

 http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=128848728

 But for some reason it didn't show up in the search!



 Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?

 And what are boroughs in terms of place? I'm thinking county- though
 that's not right. Certainly the populations should be added.

 Thoughts?

 - Serge

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us