Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

2021-04-30 Thread Anna Brunström
Hi all,

I fell a bit behind, but have now finished up my review. Overall I think the 
document is in very good shape.

I have filed issues in github for a few smaller things to resolve and for a 
number of needed editorial fixes.

BR,
Anna

From: Aaron Falk 
Sent: den 26 april 2021 15:10
To: Anna Brunström 
Cc: taps WG ; Theresa Enghardt ; 
Zaheduzzaman Sarker 
Subject: Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)


Hi Anna-

Your review is more important than the specific date. If you need a couple 
additional days, please take them.

--aaron

On 25 Apr 2021, at 16:38, Anna Brunström wrote:

Hi Aaron,



I started reading earlier this week, but got sidetracked by something urgent 
that came up in my day job. I was still aiming to finish in time, i.e tomorrow, 
but one or two extra days could be helpful ☺



BR,

Anna



From: Taps mailto:taps-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of 
Aaron Falk
Sent: den 25 april 2021 18:51
To: taps WG mailto:taps@ietf.org>>
Cc: Theresa Enghardt mailto:i...@tenghardt.net>>; 
Zaheduzzaman Sarker 
mailto:zaheduzzaman.sar...@ericsson.com>>
Subject: Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)



Wrapping up WGLC:

• Does anyone need more time to finish their review?

• Other than the issues logged in 
github<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAPI>,
 are there any significant concerns that would discourage publishing this draft?

• Would anyone like to express support for publishing this draft who hasn’t?

--aaron

On 11 Apr 2021, at 10:13, Aaron Falk wrote:

Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review the draft 
and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to publish’ affirmations) or 
post issues/PRs to github<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts>. Thanks to 
the authors, editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to this point!

Forwarded message:

From: IETF Secretariat 
ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>
To: 
draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org>, 
taps-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:taps-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to "In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/

När du skickar e-post till Karlstads universitet behandlar vi dina 
personuppgifter<https://www.kau.se/gdpr>.
When you send an e-mail to Karlstad University, we will process your personal 
data<https://www.kau.se/en/gdpr>.
___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps


Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

2021-04-26 Thread Aaron Falk

Hi Anna-

Your review is more important than the specific date.  If you need a 
couple additional days, please take them.


--aaron

On 25 Apr 2021, at 16:38, Anna Brunström wrote:


Hi Aaron,

I started reading earlier this week, but got sidetracked by something 
urgent that came up in my day job. I was still aiming to finish in 
time, i.e tomorrow, but one or two extra days could be helpful ☺


BR,
Anna

From: Taps  On Behalf Of Aaron Falk
Sent: den 25 april 2021 18:51
To: taps WG 
Cc: Theresa Enghardt ; Zaheduzzaman Sarker 

Subject: Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 
26-Apr-2021)



Wrapping up WGLC:

· Does anyone need more time to finish their review?

· Other than the issues logged in 
github<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAPI>, 
are there any significant concerns that would discourage publishing 
this draft?


· Would anyone like to express support for publishing this draft 
who hasn’t?


--aaron

On 11 Apr 2021, at 10:13, Aaron Falk wrote:

Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review 
the draft and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to 
publish’ affirmations) or post issues/PRs to 
github<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts>. Thanks to the 
authors, editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to 
this point!


Forwarded message:

From: IETF Secretariat 
ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>
To: 
draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org>, 
taps-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:taps-cha...@ietf.org>

Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to "In 
WG

Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/

När du skickar e-post till Karlstads universitet behandlar vi dina 
personuppgifter<https://www.kau.se/gdpr>.
When you send an e-mail to Karlstad University, we will process your 
personal data<https://www.kau.se/en/gdpr>.



___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps


Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

2021-04-25 Thread Anna Brunström
Hi Aaron,

I started reading earlier this week, but got sidetracked by something urgent 
that came up in my day job. I was still aiming to finish in time, i.e tomorrow, 
but one or two extra days could be helpful ☺

BR,
Anna

From: Taps  On Behalf Of Aaron Falk
Sent: den 25 april 2021 18:51
To: taps WG 
Cc: Theresa Enghardt ; Zaheduzzaman Sarker 

Subject: Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)


Wrapping up WGLC:

· Does anyone need more time to finish their review?

· Other than the issues logged in 
github<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAPI>,
 are there any significant concerns that would discourage publishing this draft?

· Would anyone like to express support for publishing this draft who hasn’t?

--aaron

On 11 Apr 2021, at 10:13, Aaron Falk wrote:

Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review the draft 
and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to publish’ affirmations) or 
post issues/PRs to github<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts>. Thanks to 
the authors, editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to this point!

Forwarded message:

From: IETF Secretariat 
ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>
To: 
draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org>, 
taps-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:taps-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to "In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/

När du skickar e-post till Karlstads universitet behandlar vi dina 
personuppgifter<https://www.kau.se/gdpr>.
When you send an e-mail to Karlstad University, we will process your personal 
data<https://www.kau.se/en/gdpr>.
___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps


Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

2021-04-25 Thread Aaron Falk

Wrapping up WGLC:

* Does anyone need more time to finish their review?

* Other than the issues logged in 
[github](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAPI), 
are there any significant concerns that would discourage publishing this 
draft?


* Would anyone like to express support for publishing this draft who 
hasn’t?


--aaron

On 11 Apr 2021, at 10:13, Aaron Falk wrote:

Working group last call for the API draft starts now.  Please review 
the draft and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to 
publish’ affirmations) or post issues/PRs to 
[github](https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts).  Thanks to the 
authors, editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to 
this point!




Forwarded message:


From: IETF Secretariat 
To: draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org, taps-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to 
"In WG

Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/
___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps


Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

2021-04-14 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
Even though I’m an author I did another quite review of the doc. I opened a few 
small issues but otherwise I think this is ready to go!



From: Taps  on behalf of Aaron Falk 

Date: Sunday, 11. April 2021 at 16:14
To: taps WG 
Cc: Theresa Enghardt , Zaheduzzaman Sarker 

Subject: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)


Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review the draft 
and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to publish’ affirmations) or 
post issues/PRs to 
github.
 Thanks to the authors, editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to 
this point!

Forwarded message:

From: IETF Secretariat 
ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org
To: 
draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org, 
taps-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to "In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/
___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps


Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-interface (to conclude 26-Apr-2021)

2021-04-12 Thread Gorry Fairhurst

On 11/04/2021 15:13, Aaron Falk wrote:


Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review 
the draft and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to publish’ 
affirmations) or post issues/PRs to github 
. Thanks to the authors, 
editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to this point!


Forwarded message:

From: IETF Secretariat ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org

To: draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org
, taps-cha...@ietf.org

Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to
"In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/



___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps


I've just read this carefully, and it seems nearly ready to me.

I did notice a few issues, now in github:

Some of which relate to text from text I originally proposed (sorry):

No Segmentation  #782
More thoughts on network Fragmentation  #781
To me, Safely Replayable text seems unclear ( 7.1.3.4.)  #780

UDP-Lite and Zero UDP Checksum (sect 6.1.1 and 7.1.3.6)    #776

Editorial:

Priority property "represents a hierarchy of priorities"?   #779
Update ref to dplpmtud  #778
Editorial: is Constant-Rate Streaming a path characteristic or appl 
traffic?  #777

There could be more definitions@ API #775
What is "entangled"?  #774
Editorial API NiT #773
Is Appendix A actually implementation?  #772

Gorry


___
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps