Re: The Bat! vs Exchange
On 05-08-10 (18:15), you wrote:
Maybe it is only our Exchange server configuration,
This is highy probably I guess - NT administrators make sometime strange
things ;[
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
\/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
3.51.10 : Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Dodatek Service Pack 2
:krk:
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MS Hello tbbeta, MS Can anyone confirm this: a message marked MS [x] read, [ ] receive, [ ] delete MS in dispatcher does not show up any more when dispatching all MS messages. MS Full story: MS Just had a look into my pop3 mailbox on an exim4 server with another MS client (nPOP) and saw some messages still hanging around. No problem MS I thought to myself and did a Dispatch mail on server - all messages. MS But only one mail was reported (one I sent to the list a minute ago), MS the older messages did not show up. So I activated the pop.log in TB! MS and saw the server correctly reports 35 messages, but TB! only asks MS for the header of the last one: MS [23:14:04] S: +OK Maildrop locked and ready MS [23:14:04] C: STAT MS [23:14:04] S: +OK 35 175917 MS [23:14:04] C: LIST MS [23:14:04] S: +OK scan listing follows MS [23:14:04] S: 1 4978 MS [23:14:04] S: 2 4742 MS [23:14:04] S: 3 3023 MS ... and so on ... MS [23:14:04] S: 35 3598 MS [23:14:04] S: . MS [23:14:04] C: UIDL MS [23:14:04] S: +OK unique-id listing follows MS [23:14:04] S: 1 1088526495.12513 MS [23:14:04] S: 2 1088526495.12514 MS [23:14:04] S: 3 1088526495.12515 MS ... and so on ... MS [23:14:04] S: 35 1088526495.12958 MS [23:14:04] S: . MS [23:14:04] C: TOP 35 0 MS [23:14:04] S: +OK Message follows MS [23:14:04] S: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MS rest of the message header 35 MS All those messages were sent while I was on the road and I guess I MS removed checkmarks receive and delete in the dispatcher for MS those messages to download them later. But I remember seeing messages MS marked like this when using dispatch all messages. MS Just tried it again with another account (a webmail account at gmx MS germany) and the same behaviour there. MS This makes retrieving those mails impossible from withing TB! I had a similar event, If I understood you correctly. I had 4 messages that TB was unable to retrieve not matter how. One was sent by TB itself. I had to use Outlook to DL them, then upload them and only after that TB was able to DL those msgs. I was working with an Exchange Environment using POP3. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Only AMIGA makes the possible improbable Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
Hello Martin, On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:38:30 +0200 GMT (11/08/2005, 04:38 +0700 GMT), Martin Schuster wrote: Can anyone confirm this: a message marked [x] read, [ ] receive, [ ] delete in dispatcher does not show up any more when dispatching all messages. Not confirmed over here. MS Already found a workaround: when I activate Account Properties - MS Mail Management - Show all messages on server and check the account MS normally, all messages show up (as they should). Have you set the account to always use the dispatcher? This might be the difference between you and me. MS If I cancel dispatcher then and use Dispatch mail on Server - MS all messages again the lost messages show up there, too, MS suddenly, while they did not before the properties change! My accounts do not invoke the dispatcher automatically, so this is the only I use. MS Mysterious. My guess is that something goes wrong when the dispatcher is invoked automatically according to the account settings (if that is your setting). -- Cheers, Thomas. I was arrested for selling illegal-sized paper. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.51.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
Hello Thomas! On Thursday, August 11, 2005, 10:21 AM, you wrote: MS Mysterious. My guess is that something goes wrong when the dispatcher is invoked automatically according to the account settings (if that is your setting). I have the dispatcher invoked automatically in my account settings and yet I have never encountered Martin's problem. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
Hello Thomas, MS Already found a workaround: when I activate Account Properties - MS Mail Management - Show all messages on server and check the account MS normally, all messages show up (as they should). Have you set the account to always use the dispatcher? This might be the difference between you and me. Hey, that was a good guess: this seems to be the problem. Try this (I just checked this here): - set Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check on an account you know has new mails - check mail, dispatcher opens. Set only read for some mails - use dispatch all messages: the mail does not show up even though it should - remove Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check - use dispatch all messages again: the message shows up If anyone can confirm I'll look for / open a bug report -- Martin TB! 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
Hello Martin! On Thursday, August 11, 2005, 11:10 AM, you wrote: - set Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check on an account you know has new mails - check mail, dispatcher opens. Set only read for some mails - use dispatch all messages: the mail does not show up even though it should Testing with this message. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
Hello Martin! On Thursday, August 11, 2005, 11:10 AM, you wrote: Hey, that was a good guess: this seems to be the problem. Try this (I just checked this here): - set Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check on an account you know has new mails - check mail, dispatcher opens. Set only read for some mails - use dispatch all messages: the mail does not show up even though it should - remove Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check - use dispatch all messages again: the message shows up If anyone can confirm I'll look for / open a bug report Confirmed, when settings are: !) Invoke mail dispatcher automatically is checked 2) Show all messages on server is *not* checked 3) Leave messages on server for x days is *not* checked List of mails did disappear from Message (Mail) Dispatcher window. When I went back to my former settings, with show all messages and leave messages on server checked, the list of mails did reappear. Post your BT issue report link here, and I'll support it. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
PGP/MIME, digest conflict
I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message from, let's say, Thunderbird. I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 -- Cheers Peter Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3 Dell Latitude C600, P III at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM Public key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt ' signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all
Hello Peter, Answering a 1 day old message (Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 23:32) Good evening Martin, MS Can anyone confirm this: a message marked MS [x] read, [ ] receive, [ ] delete MS in dispatcher does not show up any more when dispatching all MS messages. Hey, man, I am more than happy to see you posting this! I have reported this bug AGES ago and wrote certain messages to Max and 9Val about this in the past. There were some betas in between where it had been fixed (at least it seemed so) - but in the current version it IS still present. I can fully confirm it (again!). If the mail dispatcher is invoked automatically AND show all messages is NOT checked, it does NOT show all messages if you press shift+ctrl+f2! It suppresses those messages marked as read before. That is a very good short form to describe what I needed so many words for ;-) do you have the link to the bug at your fingertips, so I can support it? -- Martin TB! 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Good day, Peter. PM I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error PM in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message PM from, let's say, Thunderbird. Did you received it with my signed message? Because I did. PM I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype inside_r] The Bat! 3.51.10 OTFE @ Windows 2003 (5.2.3790.) [uptime :: 0d 0h 38m] pgpZ5CSdo1mM6.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
binq5pFmLluQw.bin Description: application/pgp-encrypted binLIQb629DzP.bin Description: Binary data Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:58 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ViP This is a PGP encrypted message. ViP Click the security button to decrypt/verify it This is my return: gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:58:04 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 gpg: BAD signature from \xc2\xeb\xe0\xe4\xe8\xec\xe8\xf0 'insider' \xcf\xf0\xee\xf5\xee\xf0\xee\xe2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please, don't send encrypted messages to the list. Nobody can read them... :-( - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45 Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE iD8DBQFC+4ZUAzZSBuEHdM4RA//oAJ9oGz23J4x1ghvaU147ru/AgXAPfgCfTS5d cRnt21oa5drhyNLtowRYhDI= =8l20 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:49:15 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:49 +0200GMT here), you wrote: PM I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error PM in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message PM from, let's say, Thunderbird. ViP Did you received it with my signed message? Because I did. Yes, I did too: gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:49:14 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error PM I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 Did my PGP/MIME signed message verify with you? This one won't be MIME signed, but inline using GPGshell, because The Bat! doesn't accept secondary user IDs for her own GPG implementation. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45 Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE iD8DBQFC+4WUAzZSBuEHdM4RAw2OAKCc4i17QzaTOq4skhxKc3ceytjMjQCgsDqm bomISuXZovsXsQyepTkkhR0= =1OeD -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Hallo Vladimir, On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11-8-2005, 18:58 +0200, where I live), you wrote: So, apparently something goes wrong when you encrypt a message. I can't see a decrypt button anywhere. While the decrypt function from the menu doesn't do zip either. BTW I can't decipher your comments header either. -- Groetjes, Roelof '95 - The number of calls to tech support before you can get it to run The Bat! 3.51.10 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpLfICpfVhwY.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[3]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Good day, Vladimir. ViP This is a PGP encrypted message. ViP Click the security button to decrypt/verify it Undecriptable with PGP8.1. And PGP signature check using PGP8.1 always set message to Fail. I receive digest conflict only with GPG. -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype inside_r] The Bat! 3.51.10 OTFE @ Windows 2003 (5.2.3790.) [uptime :: 0d 1h 2m] pgpH1jBA4yOzI.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
I have 3 IMAP accounts. Often times when I switch from one to the other, I'll get the infamous No Message Loaded view that can last from one second to a Task Manager Force Shutdown of TB!. I recently noticed that if I'm stuck in the No Message Loaded mode, I can hit the Configure Account icon and it will somehow kick-start the IMAP session and I will notice the messages magically load behind the configuration screen I just opened. 9Val/programmers...any idea on why such a thing would load the message? -- Regards, Matt Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Good day, Peter. PM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- PM Hash: RIPEMD160 PM Hi Vladimir, PM on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:58 +0200GMT here), PM you wrote: ViP This is a PGP encrypted message. ViP Click the security button to decrypt/verify it PM This is my return: PM gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:58:04 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 PM gpg: BAD signature from \xc2\xeb\xe0\xe4\xe8\xec\xe8\xf0 PM 'insider' \xcf\xf0\xee\xf5\xee\xf0\xee\xe2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PM Please, don't send encrypted messages to the list. Nobody can read PM them... :-( But this message passes signature check... And quotation bug works. -- С уважением, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype inside_r] The Bat! 3.51.10 OTFE @ Windows 2003 (5.2.3790.) [uptime :: 0d 1h 11m] pgpFDun0Zd6HK.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov schrieb: PM gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:58:04 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 PM gpg: BAD signature from \xc2\xeb\xe0\xe4\xe8\xec\xe8\xf0 PM 'insider' \xcf\xf0\xee\xf5\xee\xf0\xee\xe2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PM Please, don't send encrypted messages to the list. Nobody can read PM them... :-( I missed a little... hmm this one shows good so far with Enigmail: OpenPGP Security Info UNTRUSTED Good signature from Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov (Alive and kickin') [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 0x66D309C9 / Signed on: 08/11/2005 07:17 PM Key fingerprint: F7E9 3CA6 878C 1D3A 8E16 10F6 65D3 0796 -- Cheers Peter Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3 Dell Latitude C600, P III at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM ' signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Good day, Peter. PM hmm this one shows good so far with Enigmail: PM OpenPGP Security Info PM UNTRUSTED Good signature from Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov (Alive and PM kickin') [EMAIL PROTECTED] PM Key ID: 0x66D309C9 / Signed on: 08/11/2005 07:17 PM PM Key fingerprint: F7E9 3CA6 878C 1D3A 8E16 10F6 65D3 0796 I can say where dog is buried. There is necessary to remove extra CR/LF's before signature part when using GPG. I manually did that and gpg: Signature made 11.08.2005 20:45:06 using DSA key ID E10774CE gpg: Good signature from Peter Meyns gpg: aka GSWoT:49:30:E10774CE gpg: aka peterX [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: F1C4 6EFD A577 749E F375 4706 0336 5206 E107 74CE File: C:\_net\soft\system\_crypto\signature.asc Time: 11.08.2005 21:39:19 (11.08.2005 17:39:19 UTC) But in this case PGP says that signature is bad... Manually splitted message attached. -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype inside_r] The Bat! 3.51.10 OTFE @ Windows 2003 (5.2.3790.) [uptime :: 0d 1h 31m] signature.asc Description: Binary data Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message from, let's say, Thunderbird. I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 -- Cheers Peter Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix 2005-3 Dell Latitude C600, P III at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM Public key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt ' Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:17:32 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 19:17 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ViP I missed a little... The Bat! returns: gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 19:17:31 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error *sigh* - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45 Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE iD8DBQFC+5CQAzZSBuEHdM4RA0dzAJ0SQULvIGpCRthn+8MWPNuSWAd/0QCdGflj 6POvtTLNcRhArd6mxWi5MWU= =1xSt -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:45:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 19:45 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ViP I can say where dog is buried. There is necessary to remove extra ViP CR/LF's before signature part when using GPG. I manually did that and gpg: Signature made 11.08.2005 20:45:06 using DSA key ID E10774CE gpg: Good signature from Peter Meyns Why doesn't The Bat! do this herself? hmm - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.51.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.45 Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE iD8DBQFC+5RVAzZSBuEHdM4RA97MAKCIiyXoWfE+ZchH1n1NFg9S0SCBCQCgocfa H5e6OkDh/PUwgkvgNw3xDks= =J9WS -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict
Good day, Peter. ViP I can say where dog is buried. There is necessary to remove extra ViP CR/LF's before signature part when using GPG. I manually did that and gpg: Signature made 11.08.2005 20:45:06 using DSA key ID E10774CE gpg: Good signature from Peter Meyns PM Why doesn't The Bat! do this herself? hmm It was a sample, where this method works. But on some other messages it failed... -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [email only]|[3MB inbox]|[ICQ #179598229]|[RLU #389152]|[Skype inside_r] The Bat! 3.51.10 OTFE @ Windows 2003 (5.2.3790.) [uptime :: 0d 2h 2m] pgpCjCp5Snmvz.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
On Thursday, August 11, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Matt Thoene wrote: I recently noticed that if I'm stuck in the No Message Loaded mode, I can hit the Configure Account icon and it will somehow kick-start the IMAP session and I will notice the messages magically load behind the configuration screen I just opened. Are you sure that isn't just a coincidence? Sometimes TB! takes a little time loading a message, especially the first message on entering a large folder. -- -= Curtis=- Using TB! v3.51.10 System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Oxymoron: Split level. Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
On Thursday, August 11, 2005 @ 11:28:04 AM [-0700], -=Curtis=- wrote: I recently noticed that if I'm stuck in the No Message Loaded mode, I can hit the Configure Account icon and it will somehow kick-start the IMAP session and I will notice the messages magically load behind the configuration screen I just opened. Are you sure that isn't just a coincidence? Definitely not a coincidence. I've tested it thoroughly over the last couple of weeks. Should have mentioned that. Sometimes TB! takes a little time loading a message, especially the first message on entering a large folder. It sure does. Sometimes it takes so long that I have to completely restart TB! to get it to load again. In my example above, I can clearly see something happening as soon as my config screen opens. It's like TB! is saying Oh don't go changing anything, I was just about to open anyway. -- Matt Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Thoene: It sure does. Sometimes it takes so long that I have to completely restart TB! to get it to load again. In my example above, I can clearly see something happening as soon as my config screen opens. It's like TB! is saying Oh don't go changing anything, I was just about to open anyway. It's more like TB! gets back from its deep sleep, thinking something like *yawn* ok, ok .. i'm awake, really, i'm awake .. don't hurry .. yeah, i'm up to it .. wait a second .. IMAP's still a mess althouhg it developed well in the last months. (Just two years behind the original schedule) Michael - -- 11.08.2005, 20:36 Glück ist ein Stuhl, der plötzlich dasteht, wenn man sich zwischen zwei andere setzen will. (George Bernard Shaw) PGP oder S/MIME-Verschlüsselung erwünscht! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC+5r0wSeWjeWf1Q0RAkP3AJ9gk0rq3IcMn2eXZnxe+jsZScIlJQCfWABE ORNxQGLA1vmVcv2QHHdlOPE= =mA0r -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
On Thursday, August 11, 2005, at 01:32 PM, Matt Thoene wrote: Are you sure that isn't just a coincidence? Definitely not a coincidence. I've tested it thoroughly over the last couple of weeks. Should have mentioned that. Since posting my last message, a few problems have occurred giving perfect opportunity for me to test your method. It doesn't work here. What works for me when things are stuck is a server disconnect/reconnect operation. -- -= Curtis=- Using TB! v3.51.10 System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Ignorance is temporary; Stupidity lasts forever! Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
On Thursday, August 11, 2005 @ 12:16:16 PM [-0700], -=Curtis=- wrote: Definitely not a coincidence. I've tested it thoroughly over the last couple of weeks. Should have mentioned that. Since posting my last message, a few problems have occurred giving perfect opportunity for me to test your method. It doesn't work here. What works for me when things are stuck is a server disconnect/reconnect operation. Yes. Unfortunately with TB!, the issues with IMAP seem to be different for just about everyone. I just happened to notice that the open Configure Account trick is one that works about 98% of the time for me. The disconnect/reconnect does work sometimes but it is sporadic. -- Matt Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=Curtis=-: What works for me when things are stuck is a server disconnect/reconnect operation. Doesn't work every time here. Sometimes I really have to shut down and restart TheBat! if I want to continue working on the server. Michael - -- 11.08.2005, 21:40 Glück ist ein Stuhl, der plötzlich dasteht, wenn man sich zwischen zwei andere setzen will. (George Bernard Shaw) PGP oder S/MIME-Verschlüsselung erwünscht! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC+6mtwSeWjeWf1Q0RAlTSAJ40xhifJJHds377qNsiMFR4xHaMwACg5cNa UagMPQ0cHebP9zDUchx5Av0= =Xz+8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
