Re: PGP/GnuPG

2005-05-03 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Mon, 2 May 2005, at 17:20:54 [GMT -0700] (which was 2:20 where I
live) Nick Andriash wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160

> On Monday, May 02, 2005, at 5:18:04 PM, Peter wrote:

>> I don't find any respective option (to turn off) in GPGshell.

> Peter, if you right click GPGTray and go to Launch/GPGShell Prefs/GPGTray,
> you will find the word wrap setting there... set it to zero.


I checked that and it has the simular value as the Bat!, works for
me...

--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! Natural E-Mail System version 3.5 RC1 Pro on Windows XP SP2
Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x6C9F6CE78C32408B
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust



pgpE8uZqMXL4S.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP/GnuPG

2005-05-02 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nick,

on Mon, 2 May 2005 17:20:54 -0700GMT, you wrote:

NA> Peter, if you right click GPGTray and go to Launch/GPGShell Prefs/GPGTray,
NA> you will find the word wrap setting there... set it to zero.

Thank you Nick. I must have suffered partial blindness that I didn't
see it... ;-)

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCdxgjAzZSBuEHdM4RAlFcAJ0fPq1AoO4CC+EVtLRP83lArjO4jQCfUsK7
0QdlohfWOcur3V3ECp1AJ1E=
=Nqoc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: PGP/GnuPG

2005-05-02 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Monday, May 02, 2005, at 5:18:04 PM, Peter wrote:

> I don't find any respective option (to turn off) in GPGshell.

Peter, if you right click GPGTray and go to Launch/GPGShell Prefs/GPGTray,
you will find the word wrap setting there... set it to zero.

- -- 
 -=Nick Andriash=-
  -=Creston, B.C. Canada=-
The Bat! Pro v3.5 Return RC1 on Win XP Pro

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.41
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=nKHy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


PGP/GnuPG

2005-05-02 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

this is the same message manually re-wrapped and signed with PGP
built-in support.

the GnuPG implementation of The Bat! still doesn't allow secondary
user IDs.

So I tried to sign my previous message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with GPGshell, and
it returned MS type funky wrapping. So I refrained from signing it.
But I'll do it with this one, so you can see. TB! is set to wrap at 70
chars, and I don't find any respective option (to turn off) in
GPGshell.

Any ideas?

- --
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org

iQA/AwUBQnZvpAM2UgbhB3TOEQIpNwCg3vbe7kzFF7WCRTJ/4KmXQ18DgVcAoINp
GeakgLLlN/6AmXv8tqxXKAgV
=CLHc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


PGP/GnuPG

2005-05-02 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

the GnuPG implementation of The Bat! still doesn't allow
secondary
user IDs.

So I tried to sign my previous message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with GPGshell, and it returned MS type funky wrapping. So I
refrained
from signing it. But I'll do it with this one, so you can see.
TB! is
set to wrap at 70 chars, and I don't find any respective option
(to
turn off) in GPGshell.

Any ideas?

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1012 MHz, 512 MB RAM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.42
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE

iD8DBQFCdnwdAzZSBuEHdM4RAssTAJ42akbV/cfS1+tfdkrlG/zCTbYVlgCdEO3R
P+UUXFwvafMmsCcGNp36tsc=
=OuFR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: PGP/GNUPG ?

2004-09-10 Thread Stefano Zamprogno
Hello Martin,

Thursday, September 9, 2004, 8:35:15 PM, you wrote:

MS> Strange - over here there is no problem - "Sign when completed" is
MS> enabled and when I "Send the message" GnuPG asks for the
MS> paraphrase and the message is sent immediately...

yes, also here , BUT the message was NOT signed :)

-- 
Saluti,
 Stefano

Powered by The Bat! v.3.0.0.8
AntiSPAM : BayesIt! 0.6.01
Database Regarding base: 10050 word(s)



pgp4aWsDjbqHa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

PGP/GNUPG ?

2004-09-09 Thread Stefano Zamprogno
Hello ,

I'm unable to send automatically-signed message with gnupg with TB
3.0.8, is it a bug or my fault ?
gnupg is on my path etc...

-- 
Saluti,
 Stefano

Powered by The Bat! v.3.0.0.8
AntiSPAM : BayesIt! 0.6.01
Database Regarding base: 8953 word(s)



 Current beta is 3.00.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


PGP/GnuPG

2003-10-23 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Stefan,

on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:33:50 +0300GMT (23.10.03, 19:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

ST> New build v2.01.7

ST> [-] Bug with encryption in the built-in support for PGP v6-8

Perhaps it works on XP now. But now again, it doesn't on Win98. It was
OK here in 2.01, now it is as it was before: selecting encrypt only
brings up nothing - see bug_id 1512...

I still cannot use GnuPG within The Bat!, because I cannot select the ID
of my key. It was also OK in the meantime - see bug_id 1636...

-- 
Cheers
Peter

*
This message was created using The Bat!, version 2.01.7
under OS Windows 98, 4, 10, build ,
on a Pentium II machine at 200MHz, 64 MB RAM

Winamp currently playing: Robert Wyatt - Last Straw


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 2.01.7 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

@ 13:21:41 -0600 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Joseph N. [JN] thoughtfully wrote
the following:
...
JN> My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
JN> GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in.  Reliability is
JN> better and the options are greater.

The possibilities are greater if you use both together, taking advantage
of each of their strengths. In this way, I actually much prefer using
GPG to PGP at present. My only problem is the key auto-retrieval problem
that GPG has when run on NT-based systems.

JN> I found some of TB's menu options didn't produce with GnuPG,

Yes. The plugin isn't that developed to include these components and I
suspect this is so because the existence of GPG Shell is known. :-)

JN> including poor key management.

You can't manage keys via the TB! plugin. You have to use the GPG CLI.

JN> The tray options do not produce exta work, just extra control.

Well, mostly yes. However, if you're in the habit of signing a lot of
messages in a predictable fashion, nothing beats setting this up to be
automated and forgetting about it, especially if you use multiple keys.
GPG Shell doesn't offer this automation, but TB!'s plugin does. :-)

- --
Allie C Martin -- List Moderator
PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[MUA: TB! v1.60 (*) OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600]
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAjyfid4ACgkQV8nrYCsHF+LpLgCfU5rFRl83EvlYDXXtZUdWGEyV
TEgAoLwCG7axj9IgEUJNGe0BGYuNw2gw
=h2Fz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

@ 20:09:02 +0100 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Peter Meyns [PM] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
PM> the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there
PM> are some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it
PM> refuses to encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key
PM> was not found (although it is in my keyring). I can encrypt to
PM> myself, though. GPGShell de- or encrypts without problems.

PM> Anything on my side that I can do?

TB!'s plug-in has smart-matching hard coded into how it works. What this
means is that for signing, it will only do so if it finds on your
keyring, a key with an associated UID that perfectly matches the From:
address in the message headers. When I say perfect match, I mean name
and e-mail address *together*.

For instance, if your keys UID is 'Jasper Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>',
TB!'s plugin will not sign if you fill in your messages 'from:' address
as 'Jasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'. You have to add the latter identity
as another UID. This is why I have a list of UID's on my main key:

Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The advantage of this system applies when you have multiple keys. With
this smartmatching system, the plug-in will autosign with the appropriate
key instead of a default key as in PGP. I have an alternate key for this
list with the UID 'allie_M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'. Signing of messages to
this list is template driven and the correct key to sign with is always
appropriately chosen.


The encryption/decryption of messages follows a similar system. An UID
match must occur before the encryption decryption process is done.
Otherwise you'll receive an error message. A typical example is that
you're replying to a message from someone who's public key doesn't
include their reply to name/address combo as a UID.

I don't see any advantages of including smart-matching in
encryption/decryption operations. Let the user select the relevant keys.
If it's the correct key then the person at the other end will be able to
decrypt it. If you choose the wrong key to decrypt with, then the
message will not decrypt. Simple. I don't know what's with the smart
matching and I tend to just use GPG Shell for this. However, I find the
plugin very nice for signing and signature checking once you are aware
of how it works and add your identities, which you should anyway.

- --
 
 Allie C Martin (_ List Moderator and fellow end user
__) PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
TB! v1.60 & Windows XP 5.1.2600
¯¯
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAjyfiCcACgkQV8nrYCsHF+KavQCgrUwZUoRRXPAiUQk161Ihgda2
fTgAoNK6lliW5M3xRdROGZSgnXLIUJ3A
=uKf4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Nick Andriash

Hello Peter Meyns,

On Monday, March 25 2002 at 11:09 AM PDT, you wrote:

> the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are
> some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to
> encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found
> (although it is in my keyring). I can encrypt to myself, though.

TB did have a problem with something called 'Smart Matching' where it
would look in your Key Rings for a User ID with the 'exact' matching UID
of the Recipient... or something along those lines, and in most cases
would provide the Key with the 'first' matching UID it came across,
regardless whether or not this was the Key you wanted to use.

However, you mention that you can encrypt and decrypt messages to yourself
without a problem, so this may not be the case. Perhaps TB looks up the
'exact' matching UID of 'any' Public Keys you are encrypting to and
compares it with the UID of the Recipient, and if it doesn't find an exact
match, will report that the Key cannot be found?


-- 
Nick Andriash
Courtenay, B.C. Canada


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:21:41 -0600GMT (which was 25.03.02, 20:21 +0100GMT
where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about "PGP/GnuPG in 1.60":

JN> My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
JN> GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in.  Reliability is
JN> better and the options are greater.  I found some of TB's menu options
JN> didn't produce with GnuPG, including poor key management.  The tray
JN> options do not produce exta work, just extra control.

Thank you Joseph,

if I consider this, you are perfectly right. I don't need any plugins
when the tool itself works properly... :o))

- -- 
Cheers
Peter

Winamp currently playing:  - silence - 
   
  
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.25
Comment: GnuPG-signed for better authentication. :-)
Comment: Key-ID: 0xE10774CE

iD8DBQE8n32YAzZSBuEHdM4RAtDEAKCBMx4ZW2Y78wyx4GY0jMJF2w5v2wCdHO7X
Sb4Zq7yxGmqgEOzSEfHm7ds=
=zV+n
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




Re: PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Joseph N.

My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the
GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in.  Reliability is
better and the options are greater.  I found some of TB's menu options
didn't produce with GnuPG, including poor key management.  The tray
options do not produce exta work, just extra control.

-- 
JN


 Peter Meyns wrote on Monday, March 25, 2002:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

> Hi friends,

> the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are
> some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to
> encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found
> (although it is in my keyring). I can encrypt to myself, though.
> GPGShell de- or encrypts without problems.

> Anything on my side that I can do?


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/




PGP/GnuPG in 1.60

2002-03-25 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi friends,

the plugin for PGP 6.5.8 works well here. With GnuPG however, there are
some problems. TB! lets me sign messages with GPG, but it refuses to
encrypt or decrypt, the error msg telling me that the key was not found
(although it is in my keyring). I can encrypt to myself, though.
GPGShell de- or encrypts without problems.

Anything on my side that I can do?

- --
Cheers
Peter

*
This message was created using The Bat!, version 1.60,
under Windows 98, 4, 10, build ,
on a Pentium II machine at 200MHz, 64 MB RAM :-)
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPG-signed for better authentication. :-)

iD8DBQE8n3W1AzZSBuEHdM4RAsyvAKDRmSvYPLRNpwnE3IIoGCYZ3RUqsgCcDToE
LQ6eXx/96lPUauTr6RmlUk0=
=Rsrl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/