Re: Reset Toolbar to default
Hi Nikolay, on Sun, 7 May 2006 14:09:28 +0300GMT, you wrote: NC How can I reset the toolbars and put them to their default positions? Delete or rename the file tbuser.def in your Mail directory and restart The Bat!. In case you use OTFE the filename is tbuser.eef. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.80.03 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: GnuPG - free form primary UID not recognized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, on Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:19:48 +0100GMT, I wrote: PM I played around with GnuPG a bit, and set up a free form primary user PM ID (just my name, no e-mail, no comment). TB! doesn't seem to like PM this. If I have to sign or decrypt anything, TB! shows a window Enter PM passphrase for Unknown Recipient, resp. with decrypting, only the PM sender's ID. When I enter my passphrase, it signs/decrypts anyway... PM Is this intentionally (then why?) or a minor bug? PM When I change the primary UID to one with an e-mail address, TB! works PM properly. I observed this a bit further and found, that when the primary UID is set to an e-mail address, all other UIDs with addresses are recognized. When the primary UID is free form, only the first following e-mail address is accepted, and for the other ones I get ,- [ OpenPGP Error ] | gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available | gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available `- I can use GPGshell for inline signing then, but there is no way to PGP/MIME sign. - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) - GPGshell v3.20 Comment: *Use OpenPGP for privacy and authentication* iD8DBQFBvy5xAzZSBuEHdM4RAlUtAJ9t3NmVGUGhwyMSyEpXOLCw1TXfnwCg/JtK 4HEiP4raEeX1k3BL9YnmyPg= =cmP9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
GnuPG - free form primary UID not recognized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I played around with GnuPG a bit, and set up a free form primary user ID (just my name, no e-mail, no comment). TB! doesn't seem to like this. If I have to sign or decrypt anything, TB! shows a window Enter passphrase for Unknown Recipient, resp. with decrypting, only the sender's ID. When I enter my passphrase, it signs/decrypts anyway... Is this intentionally (then why?) or a minor bug? When I change the primary UID to one with an e-mail address, TB! works properly. - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.2.10 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM See headers for my most actual public PGP key. ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) - GPGshell v3.20 Comment: *Use OpenPGP for privacy and authentication* iD8DBQFBu0g9AzZSBuEHdM4RAsxHAJsEtbeGM/FWG74X8/WFeiQ3+xWbDwCgrZwY E1iPvLo5/miGFynG+kIalSQ= =EF7u -END PGP SIGNATURE- http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Eicar Test
Hi there, I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. Thank you, Johannes! :-) But how about a virus code coming with a different character set? I'm just curious... ;-) [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVPNE-FGNAQNEQ-NAGVIVEHF-GRFG-SVYR!$U+U* -- Cheers Peter Those TLAs drive me crazy! Winamp currently playing: Sonata Arctica - I Want Out http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Eicar Test
Hi Luigi, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:19:44 +0100GMT, you wrote: LR Sunday, November 21, 2004, 4:43:37 PM, you wrote: PM [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVPNE-FGNAQNEQ-NAGVIVEHF-GRFG-SVYR!$U+U* LR This is NOT the correct TEXT eicar string. You can find it at LR http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm No, of course it isn't. The correct one would have been rejected by the list server. This is the string encoded in ROT13 charset. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Eicar Test
Hi Johannes, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:07:03 +0100GMT, you wrote: JMP On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:43:37 +0100, Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. Thank you, Johannes! :-) JMP 2004-11-21 16:05:29 1CVtHN-0003c1-0v H=moutng.kundenserver.de JMP [212.227.126.171] F=[EMAIL PROTECTED] rejected after DATA: This message JMP contains malware (Eicar-Test-Signature) Yes, exactly, that's the one I meant. But how about a virus code coming with a different character set? I'm just curious... ;-) JMP It seems neither our ClamAV nor your providers JMP X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0447-1, 19.11.2004), Outbound message JMP X-Antivirus-Status: Clean JMP caught it. ;-) Strictly speaking, this is not a problem because the JMP antivirus usually only scans (MIMEd) attachments. When copying the JMP EICAR virus test code, your local antivirus will warn you. Yes, that's what I thought. I don't really believe, someone will try to distribute virus codes via ROT13, nor that someone on these lists might be interested in receiving them. It was a rather academically thought of mine... ;-) -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Eicar Test
Hi Sean, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:59:52 +GMT, you wrote: Caught by AntiVir here (Worm/DocIRC.B.1) in two messages, yours and Sean's. While TB was downloading messages, AVir asked what to do with the message, I told it to rename and to stack it in the calaboose, since I was curious to know WHO is sending it. (-; SR I did a scan and nothing showing here No need to worry. See Chris' message in this thread: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers Peter I'm sick! I ought to be home in bed with a nurse. Winamp currently playing: Hot Tuna - Hesitation Blues http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: To all virus code resenders (-:
Hi Mica, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:55:03 +0100GMT, you wrote: MM Please do not feel singled out, (-; but all re-senders of the virus MM code will be for the next 24 hours in my temporary Selective Download MM filter. I'm sorry if I caused any inconvenience at your side. It was meant to test the mailing list server. I chose TBTECH, because it is the least frequented list... hmm -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP Key Request
Hi Britt, on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:32:44 +0200GMT, you wrote: BM Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote: Herb Warren, James W. Sewall Company BM One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic BM messaging ;-) He most probably is. I remember that only few users got The Bat! running under WINE... ;-) BM Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind. Yes, indeed. LOL -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.0.18, on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM The irony of life is that no one gets out alive... Winamp currently playing: Strawbs - Hero and Heroine http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP and GNUpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Barry, on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:12:20 +0100GMT, you wrote: BJ Can you use PGP and GNUpg on the same computer I'm just starting out BJ using PGP with TB but i also use Mulberry which uses GNUpg. Just BJ wondering if they would conflict No problems here using both. BTW, you can also use GPG with The Bat!. The implementation works quite well. - -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.0.16, on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: *Use OpenPGP for privacy and authentication* iD8DBQFBT8qHgl3Hs54Zv8IRAro9AKCLJPqFic6vbkaXCYcPI+WbE6XlCwCcD9DI yXLgUPC00W+onNmGUy277/E= =iuW4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP and GNUpg
Hi Barry, on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:17:19 +0100GMT, you wrote: MDP Why not even more simply use GnuPG with TB (as I - and others - do)? MDP The only conflict is having to cross-load PGP keys between PGP and MDP GnuPG's keyrings. Not so much a conflict as an overhead and a chore. BJ Well i would Marck but I've gone and purchased PGP now so it would BJ seem like wasting money if i don't use it You can still use it for PGP disk, so the money is not completely waisted... ;-) -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.0.16, on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Duplicate Messages
Hi Chris, on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:45:50 -0400GMT, you wrote: C How does The Bat! determine if two messages are duplicates of each C other? Do it use the message ID? Does it use a hash? I'd like to learn that too. It can't be the MID alone. It must be the MID plus some headers or a hash. I saw this most recently when I downloaded a part of TBUDL and TBBeta messages from GMane, that I missed due to an overflow of my pop account. Of course, I had some overlapping messages whose MIDs were the same, but they were not recognized as dupes. I had to sort them out manually. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.0.0.7, on Win2K, 5, 0, build 2195, SP4, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1800MHz, 512 MB RAM Winamp currently playing: Van der Graaf Generator - Pioneer Over C http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: batxxx.tmp files
Hi Wilfried, on Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:23:07 +0100GMT, you wrote: WM I had certainly a very slow system, mostly this is because of thousands of files WM in windows tmp folder. And yes I had almost tentousand batxxx.tmp files (where WM xxx was hexadecimal number. WM When and wy are these files generated ? I'm not sure about their origin, but I see these files quite often, many of them of 0 bytes size. To keep my temp folder from being cluttered I added this line to my autoexec.bat: del *TEMP\*.t* Now on each reboot all .tmp or .txt files in the temp folder are deleted without confirmation prompt. -- Cheers Peter This message was created with The Bat!, version 2.05 Beta/1 under OS Windows 98, 4, 10, build , on a Pentium II machine at 200MHz, 64 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bypass Reply Template?
Hi Mike, on Sun, 9 Nov 2003 21:28:26 -0800GMT (which was 10.11.03, 06:28 +0100GMT where I live), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MD I would occasionally like to bypass my reply templates when I'm reply to MD a message and just have it quote the text with no other template MD processing. Is this possible? Create a Quick Template as Januk suggested. Hit Reply on the message you want to reply to. Select all of the body by typing ctrl+A. Type your QT's handle and hit ctrl+space. -- Cheers Peter There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and those who don't. http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML Mailto: syntax question
Hi Dan, on Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:51:20 -0500GMT (which was 08.11.03, 15:51 +0100GMT where I live), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : DG I'd like to include e-mail feedback on our community organization's DG Web page. To simplify things, I'd like to the feedback message's DG subject and a small bit of the text to be generated automatically. DG I'd like to include a short bit of canned text. I tried: DG a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DG YES?text=canned textYES indeed/a Additional entries are started with instead of ? , and you should use %20 for a space: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]body=canned%20text -- Cheers Peter Winamp currently playing: Charlatans UK - The Belle And The Butterfly http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: De-duplicates
Hi Graham, on Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:44:11 +0100GMT (which was 09.10.03, 14:44 +0200GMT where I live), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : FG Is there any way of de-duplicating a whole message base, folder by FG folder, on message ID only? That's what Kill Dupes does. Right click the folder and select it. Or use Maintenance in the folder menu and do it for all at once. -- Cheers Peter * This message was created using The Bat!, version 2.00.22 under OS Windows 98, 4, 10, build , on a Pentium II machine at 200MHz, 64 MB RAM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
New address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm trying to get some more order in my mail system, and The Bat! indeed helps a lot! :) For those who want to be sure that it is still _me_, I'll have this message PGP-signed. - -- Cheers Peter Originality is the art of concealing your sources. Winamp currently playing: Soft Machine - Sly Monkey -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt iQA/AwUBPjV0bwM2UgbhB3TOEQLzCwCg0ucnxdx4g85dTIK+ghTcHIVOs7EAoORZ LC6aLeX1ciDf0dsPdB6utnob =u9BY -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBTECH information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: view own headers
Hi Brano, on Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:27:54 +0100GMT (which was the same where I live), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : B it is possibility to always view own (special) headers ? For example, B I want see X-Message-Flag:, but I dont want use ctrl+shift+k, or f9, I B want see that just like I see FROM: or so. All I found within TB! is in View menu -- Message Header. No X-Message-Flag option there. Don't know what X-ray offers here... -- Cheers Peter Winamp currently playing: Aphrodite's Child - Rain and tears If God dropped acid, would he see people? Current version is 1.61 | Using TBTECH information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB!'s plugin for GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi friends, it seems, that I have overlooked something when installing the recent GPG. The Bat!'s plugin works fine for signing or verifying, but not for encrypting. The following message is displayed: ,- [ ] | gpg: LoadLibrary failed ec=1157 | gpg: c:/lib/gnupg\C:/GnuPG/Ext/sha2: error loading extension: 1157 | gpg: LoadLibrary failed ec=1157 | gpg: c:/lib/gnupg\C:/GnuPG/Ext/tiger: error loading extension: 1157 | gpg: LoadLibrary failed ec=1157 | gpg: c:/lib/gnupg\C:/GnuPG/Ext/idea: error loading extension: 1157 `- The according .dll files are present. What does the extension thing mean? Although PGPckt works flawlessly for me, I'd like to have GPG working as well. ;-) - -- Cheers Peter . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 98) Comment: Key-ID: 0xE10774CE iD8DBQE9LboMAzZSBuEHdM4RAvp6AJ48ODdQG7esptpWOU9TdoLgx23yVACeJN+x gLaqOwosStB1Z7bYrh1Of4Y= =loHZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB!'s plugin's storing passphrase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, there is another item that the plugin doesn't seem to handle right: It keeps storing the passphrase for signing, although I only entered it once in an older version, and never set the checkmark to save it. Well, in a way it's convenient, as no-one else uses this computer. ;-) Still, I would like to have the *option* to turn it off. - -- Cheers Peter . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 98) Comment: Key-ID: 0xE10774CE iD8DBQE9LcB6AzZSBuEHdM4RAmyMAJ9W3mPwOX/0KjTHbqgqvrlnA0G4sACgw1tZ uk09w8q8iExQFlNaTwY0Dz4= =7KBe -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB!'s plugin's comment lines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi friends, today I have time for testing GnuPG with The Bat!. :-) In GPG's options I can enter two comment lines to be displayed with the signature. The TB! plugin only shows the first, as you can see in my previous messages of today. For illustration I'll sign this message with GPG tray. - -- Cheers Peter . -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 98) - GPGshell v2.41 Comment: Key-ID: 0xE10774CE Comment: *GnuPG-signed for better authentication* iD8DBQE9LcQcAzZSBuEHdM4RAkVzAJ9MWZKt1GJWb+/emFy7leVZMw1ZgwCdHdkF 4m8xI7LqQlgmQ7H+tfKSgcY= =CueU -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TB!'s plugin for GnuPG
Hi Ingrid, on Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:33:26 +0200GMT (which was 11.07.02, 19:33 +0200GMT where I live), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : IS Try this path (for example) in your options file: IS C:\GnuPG\Ext\idea No difference. IS Tiger and Sha2 are precompiled within the GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 binary. IS But it wouldn't work with slashes ;) Where should I avoid the slashes? I see, there's a lot more to learn for me... ;o) -- Cheers Peter __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: quote prefix - how change it?
Hi Krzysztof, on Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:46:34 +0200GMT (which was 13.06.02, 09:46 +0200GMT where I live), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : KK Question: how can I change this: X KK my answer KK Into this cllasic mode: KK my answer In your reply template use the Macro %QUOTESTYLE=none and place it above %QUOTES. -- Cheers Peter __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: quote prefix - how change it?
Hi Krzysztof, on Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:46:34 +0200GMT (which was 13.06.02, 09:46 +0200GMT where I live), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : KK Question: how can I change this: X KK my answer KK Into this cllasic mode: KK my answer In your reply template use the Macro %QUOTESTYLE=none and place it above %QUOTES. -- Cheers Peter __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RegExp question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 04 Oct 2001 21:50:54 +0200GMT (which was 04.10.2001, 21:49 +0200GMT
where I live), Januk Aggarwal wrote this about RegExp question:
PM since I moved my english lists to another email account the reply regexp
PM doesn't work as it did. It doesn't display the sender's time correctly.
JA Can you please paste in your current macro/template that generates
JA these lines? Also, please paste in the Date: header from the problem
JA message.
Hi Januk,
I was hoping on you. :o)
I have it as a quick template and it works well with my GMX-received
messages. But not with Puretec. It's the same one I used here with your
msg... Here it is:
On%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPMATCH=%HEADERSGMT
(which was %ODateShort, %OTime +0200GMT
where I live), %OFROMNAME wrote this about %OSUBJ:
This is the excerpt from the headers regarding time:
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 12:09:36 +0200
Received: from [203.130.233.9] (helo=home.worldless.net)
by mxng01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)
id 15p5Ra-0003Bf-00; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 12:09:31 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=thebat.dutaint.com)
by home.worldless.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2001)
id 15p5JE-Ec-00; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:00:52 +0700
Received: from [62.172.35.210] (helo=silverstones.com)
by home.worldless.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2001)
id 15p5JC-ES-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:00:51 +0700
Received: from SILVERASUS.silverstones.com [192.168.4.2] by silverstones.com
[127.0.0.1]
with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.6.0a.R)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 11:08:58 +0100
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:06:00 +0100
From: Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.54/9/iKey1000)
... etc.
So the exact date/time is given, but the regexp takes Delivery-date
instead of Date. As I can see from messages to my GMX account, the GMX
server doesn't add a Delivery-date ... And it doesn't Envelope-to
(whatever again that means...)
I'm very glad about your concern - thus I can hope for a solution. :o))
- --
Cheers
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.91
Comment: GnuPG for better authentication. Key-ID: 0xE10774CE
Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt
iD8DBQE7vMrpAzZSBuEHdM4RArW9AJ0Q3Uw8lurkTD/RgpHCtZsQItE85gCeJVSA
CP3kEGsDYLvm8qJbu8S2X94=
=WPna
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
__
Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RegExp question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:31:54 -0700GMT (which was 00:31 +0200GMT where I live), Januk Aggarwal wrote this about RegExp question: JA You just need to add one character to your regular expression Hello Januk, thanks ever so much. It's amazing how easy it can be when you know the solution! :o) - -- Cheers Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.91 Comment: GnuPG for better authentication. Key-ID: 0xE10774CE Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt iD8DBQE7vT+MAzZSBuEHdM4RAskUAJ4+YU8TOU6AdafuFaaHMluGXEtnzACg5Ooa 6stu90uDv6/s97MASUZguYI= =liCF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB! crashes on viewing large JPEGs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Techies, today I received several large .jpg files attached to mails. Upon trying to view them in the preview pane TB! is closed for some illegal operation. Here are the details coming with the error msg (I'm sorry, it's in German like my system...): THEBAT verursachte eine allgemeine Schutzverletzung in Modul Unbekannt bei :822b57b3. Register: EAX=c9fb9014 CS=209f EIP=822b57b3 EFLGS=00010286 EBX=00384100 SS=2097 ESP=822b9890 EBP=822b9a64 ECX=822b70f7 DS=2097 ESI=00384100 FS=70f7 EDX=00ff ES=2097 EDI=c9fb9010 GS=4e97 Bytes bei CS:EIP: 64 8b 0b 89 48 fc 83 c0 04 64 8b 4b 03 89 48 fc Stapelwerte: 822b309b 00ff 0074 ffe0 0003 01e9 0100 000fe000 Does anyone have an idea what this means or why this happens? Best regards Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication :o) Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Comment: Key-ID:0xE10774CE Comment: Have a lot of fun! :-) iQA/AwUBO64IZgM2UgbhB3TOEQJkNgCeLilgMFZkMrqhF0JxCN5eixNYKJ8AmgK4 pDdGUEOf85gSdPMXwYuIeXJr =B1zM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nimda?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:29:28 -0400GMT (which was 17:29 +0200GMT where I live), Brian Clark wrote this about Nimda?: BC Aside, almost every S/MIME signed email I've ever received BC displayed as being Invalid, including yours. :-( His S/MIME certificate show as completely valid on my version of TB!. BC Yours also shows as Invalid. Hello Brian, that's strange. Both Gerry's and Leif's S/MIME sigs appear valid here. How about mine? Cheers Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication :o) Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Comment: Key-ID:0xE10774CE Comment: Have a lot of fun! :-) iQA/AwUBO6jFlgM2UgbhB3TOEQJszQCgyQ2EKWTPfX8ZAj+DozQxF/zlgTgAoN9T iaKuIGJiDRhdodZMRPqcHtTX =xksi -END PGP SIGNATURE- S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
invalid S/MIME sigs (was: Nimda?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:32:52 -0400GMT (which was 19:32 +0200GMT where I live), Brian Clark wrote this about Nimda?: that's strange. Both Gerry's and Leif's S/MIME sigs appear valid here. How about mine? BC It's Invalid as well.. Hi Brian, this should only happen, when something of the content has been altered. Have you checked the PGP sigs as well? Here they all are good. Should we move to TBOT? Or perhaps to PGP-Basics-OT, as this is more about signatures than about TB!... ;-) Cheers Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication :o) Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Comment: Key-ID:0xE10774CE Comment: Have a lot of fun! :-) iQA/AwUBO6jUYwM2UgbhB3TOEQICswCgirS2mVG0GotM0dd7So5OyOtTn0AAnjUi AOygyxmLNRmKFjl7hCP4hjlG =UoEk -END PGP SIGNATURE- S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: invalid S/MIME sigs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:39:31 -0400GMT (which was 20:39 +0200GMT where I live), Brian Clark wrote this about invalid S/MIME sigs: Ah, :-) I tend to think it's directly related to TB! and/or SB! or something I've done in my configuration. *I* doubt this would be off-topic for tbtech@, but, of course, I could be wrong. As far as altered content, etc., I use PGP daily, and all of the signature checks turn out just fine. :-\ There's definitely something going on with the S/MIME internals of my copy of SB!. Ok Brian, let's keep it here. I just hate to see the Nimda? thread expanding more and more... Maybe the techies can find out what kind of trouble exist within SB! with S/MIME. My plain 1.53d doesn't show any problems... Cheers Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication :o) Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Comment: Key-ID:0xE10774CE Comment: Have a lot of fun! :-) iQA/AwUBO6jdFQM2UgbhB3TOEQL6fwCg/U2xhQM+1/oZhOJTa5S7Vne5LpcAoMd1 c7zuNFt9oOiytKONmSd2/LZb =yWEw -END PGP SIGNATURE- S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: invalid S/MIME sigs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:26:29 +0100GMT (which was 21:26 +0200GMT where I live), Marck D Pearlstone wrote this about invalid S/MIME sigs: PM Maybe the techies can find out what kind of trouble exist within PM SB! with S/MIME. MDP None. It S/MIME works fine with SB here. I use it a lot (although I'm MDP testing the latest beta right now). It's something else that's wrong. MDP I'm communicating with Brian off-list to see if we can figure it out. I'm glad someone takes care of it. :-) MDP Current theories include a loss of the CA certificates from the MDP address book. I don't understand that yet, but I don't have to, I assume... *S* Cheers Peter -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06 Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication :o) Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Comment: Key-ID:0xE10774CE Comment: Have a lot of fun! :-) iQA/AwUBO6jq0gM2UgbhB3TOEQIXkgCfRZTWNumqHZLtmXQOSO6/iu8TNdQAoJ7q YtFMGpkCoJ2n0IgwqPk5ZvNR =TMcy -END PGP SIGNATURE- S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: timeout when sending e-mails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, May 07, 2001 at 20:36 (my local time), Torsten Stedem wrote about timeout when sending e-mails: TS First of all thanks for the answer! TS This is a good idea... but the main idea of this modem is to be only TS online when it is really needed... about up to five times a day to TS check and send e-mails..not more.. TS is there maybe some other solution? Hi Torsten, in Options - Network Administration you can set TB! to automatically connect to the internet every -whatever you want- minutes, and disconnect afterwards. Maybe this helps. Cheers Peter - -- PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication! Key-ID: 0xE10774CE iQA/AwUBOvbgHQM2UgbhB3TOEQLQ4wCeOY3N3YKNeapbS0K/qgVJuFKa+V8Anjgf Lx38YZVVpdv3tCLtr2Gb4BVJ =aDPb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
