Re[4]: Purchasing Norton Anti Virus 2001
Sunday, February 24, 2002, 12:21:22 AM, you wrote: JD Does 2002 have the virtual pop server like 2001 does?? No JD one ever mentioned that in any of the posts. Please excuse my JD ignorance. JD Everyone seemed so happy with 2001, I figured JD that would be best. :) JD Thanks 2002 does not have a configurable virtual pop server and no mail accounts need any changes to them. Other changes include outbound email scanning, greater flexibility in specifying file extensions for autoprotect and background update checks. These are the only advantages over 2001 as far as I can see and I can live without them for the sake of autodeleting infected mail. John Rainer -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: export to outlook express
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello chas, You wrote on 2/23/2002, 7:22 PM: chas I am trialling thebat version 1.41 windows 98 second edition. You may want to try the latest official version instead (1.53d). It's better, offers much more functionality, quicker etc. Please notice that there was a change in the message base format going from 1.41 - 1.42, so you can either reinstall TB if you don't have too much messages in it yet, or first download 1.42, let it convert the message bases, then install 1.53d. - -- Cheers, SyP ...Computer illiteracy? You mean my computer's supposed to READ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 ckt build 5 iQA/AwUBPHiYbtkgnrcJiuwTEQKBQgCg8QmXyPDP+BjAJRpr7kg6bC8zOyMAnAh3 IsUEgOmgcP/OaRUfqAQEBFYf =saV4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Smart Bat!
On 24 February 2002 at 03:21 Stuart wrote: It looks to me like a little memo/notepad or daily journal app. TheBat has always had some of the features of a PIM and this is just one more. :-) It is, and it's strangely useful (I first thought 'oh dear, another bell and whistle' but, as a sort of permanent Clipboard, it comes in handy when developing macros). Alastair -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: does anyone have the secure bat? and can you tell me something about it's features
On 18 February 2002 at 08:05 David wrote: On 17 February 2002 at 14:58:02 -0600 (which was 20:58 where I live) yahoo 1 wrote I have seen the webpage for secure bat i was wondering if someone actually paid that huge amount for secure bat and was wondering if the money is actually worth it. Depends wether you think that it is worth it? My office is my lap top. I don't want any one to get access to my mail. Any positive or negative comments about secure bat is appreciated (1) Don't forget to take your iKey with you. (2) I have found it slightly slower than The Bat! but then it does have to decrypt the mail base . I put up a feature request that the .TBB (message base) files are, by default, encrypted (using a simple algorithm; something powerful but slow isn't what's needed); at the moment they are effectively in plain text. That, plus the existing startup password, would provide good enough security for most people, I think, without the cast-iron SmartBat! On encrypting chunks of the hard disk: there are two classic applications. I used the first in an earlier incarnation, and it worked brilliantly; it is also reasonably cheap. http://www.drivecrypt.com/ http://www.controlbreak.co.uk/products/safeboot.html Alastair -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[4]: Purchasing Norton Anti Virus 2001
Hi John, Sunday, February 24, 2002, 12:21:22 AM, John wrote: John Doe It seems that 2001 is better in the fact that it requires no user John Doe input, and will continue to download in the event that a virus is John Doe detected. Also I am interested in an auto delete function, which John Doe 2002 doesnt seem to have according to Mr. Rainer. I am of the beleif, John Doe that if there is *any* threat of a virus at all, I would much rather John Doe have it deleted before I ever get to see it. It seemed to me, following the thread as it developed, that 2002 is an inconvenience if one has a dial up connection and a virus comes along. Using broadband, I don't think it matters if a download is halted as there is an always on connection anyway. Also, a point I made during the thread was that if you can get SystemWorks Pro (incl. AV and Ghost) for £15 via ebay, and have broadband, then it's a much better deal than paying normal retail for AV 2002 only ... or even AV 2001. It's swings and 'roundabouts. With best wishes, Dave -- David Conroy MSW Personal Life and Business Coaching World-wide http://www.e-coaching-only.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member International Coach Federation, ID 1006660. PGP Key on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_pgp Instant Messaging on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_im Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/42 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: export to outlook express
Hi SyP, thanks for thathowever i can only find 1.49 do you know source of 1.42. Bye, chas ORIGINAL MESSAGE 24/02/2002,08:38, you wrote : S -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- S Hash: SHA1 S Hello chas, S You wrote on 2/23/2002, 7:22 PM: chas I am trialling thebat version 1.41 windows 98 second edition. S You may want to try the latest official version instead (1.53d). It's S better, offers much more functionality, quicker etc. S Please notice that there was a change in the message base format going S from 1.41 - 1.42, so you can either reinstall TB if you don't have S too much messages in it yet, or first download 1.42, let it convert S the message bases, then install 1.53d. S - -- S Cheers, SyP S ...Computer illiteracy? You mean my computer's supposed to READ? S -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- S Version: PGP 6.5.8 ckt build 5 S iQA/AwUBPHiYbtkgnrcJiuwTEQKBQgCg8QmXyPDP+BjAJRpr7kg6bC8zOyMAnAh3 S IsUEgOmgcP/OaRUfqAQEBFYf S =saV4 S -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: does anyone have the secure bat? and can you tell me something about it's features
SK There are a number of ways to encrypt filesystems or parts SK thereof that offer more general utility. I question why you SK would spend the money on something that only protects your SK e-mail. While not a direct answer to the original post, I tried to use the PGP approach several months back and not a single client could install it. It is a pain for most people and not worth the trouble. Before I am flamed by the die hard element, I say for MOST people. So, I shifted over to EasyCrypto (free) which means I can write up stuff in Word, or whatever, and then have it encrypted. I then send it along as an attachment. At the other end, a client can open up easily as we have agreed a password together from the outset. http://www.handybits.com/easycrypto.htm No one has complained since and people are enthusiastic about using it. Easycrypto doesn't need a List to work out how to use it either ;-) With best wishes, Dave -- David Conroy MSW Personal Life and Business Coaching World-wide http://www.e-coaching-only.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member International Coach Federation, ID 1006660. PGP Key on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_pgp Instant Messaging on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_im Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/42 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: export to outlook express
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello chas, You wrote on 2/24/2002, 11:43 AM: chas thanks for thathowever i can only find 1.49 do you know source of chas 1.42. You're welcome. ftp://ftp.gin.cz/pub/mswindows/the_bat/ 1.42f will do, I think. - -- Cheers, SyP In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. [John von Neumann (1903 - 1957)] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 ckt build 5 iQA/AwUBPHjH/NkgnrcJiuwTEQLY3QCgtiACVLbdUp/69m1vqw+ARBXRCgIAoPwj OIV7sQ1R5clUroT/+yH+2dyP =vu3i -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
replace 1.42f with 1.53d - pitfalls ?
Hi users, ok i installed 1.42f on top of 1.41 and it managed to lose lots of my mail selectively and my address book. i recovered my address book aS it was still in csf format. i imported my lost letters via import msb. i now want to move up to 1.53d how can i retain all my settings including the formatting of my column widths and all. Bye chas -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: replace 1.42f with 1.53d - pitfalls ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello chas, You wrote on 2/24/2002, 2:48 PM: chas i now want to move up to 1.53d how can i retain all my settings chas including the formatting of my column widths and all. You haven't got to do any special. If you don't trust 1.53d to correctly update your installation, then first make a backup of the Bat! directory and the registry entries - but I'd be surprised if it were needed. - -- Cheers, SyP A fractal is by definition a set for which the Hausdorff Besicovitch dimension strictly exceeds the topological dimension. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 ckt build 5 iQA/AwUBPHjuxdkgnrcJiuwTEQLhUQCcD3SrPb7uGROZf2rB8uskmqRl54gAoKNM e61DMaWllLCwhLYPtDbSuZiO =VmLg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Smart Bat!
Hello Alastair Scott, On Sunday, February 24 2002 at 01:29 AM PDT, you wrote: It is, and it's strangely useful (I first thought 'oh dear, another bell and whistle' but, as a sort of permanent Clipboard, it comes in handy when developing macros). Pure bloat because it's not required. There are many Programs out there that do a much better job and don't add to the bloat.Give me customisable toolbars any day. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
address book icon placed inefficiently
Hi users, its only a tiny quibble , but anyone know if its possible to bring the address book icon to the left hand side of create new message applet ie next to To: it might save on shoe leather for me mouse having to walk 800 pixels and back!! Bye chas -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: address book icon placed inefficiently
On Sunday, February 24, 2002, 11:06:17 AM, chas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: c its only a tiny quibble , but anyone know if its possible to bring the address c book icon to the left hand side of create new message applet ie next c to To: it might save on shoe leather for me mouse having to walk 800 pixels c and back!! It's part of a bigger quibble - the much asked for feature of customizable toolbars. jon - Jonathan Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
start up tb at the inbox
Hi users, is there a way to have tb startup and by default start in inbox latest message also have cursor on latest message. that way the 'down arrow' on keyboard would bring each subsequent message for review Bye chas -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
spam on the rise
Sunday, February 24, 2002 at 8:09 PM Hello Everyone, Spam attacks are on the rise, jumping some 46 percent since November. A year ago it was estimated that spam constituted about 10 percent of all e-mail. That figure has now jumped to 20 percent. By Bob Sullivan MSNBC, February 21, 2002 http://www.msnbc.com/news/713079.asp?cp1=1#BODY I have certainly noticed this with my email accounts! Best regards, Shoebuddy Jones mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: spam on the rise
Monday, February 25, 2002, 10:09:56 AM, Shoebuddy wrote: SJ Hello Everyone, Spam attacks are on the rise, jumping some 46 SJ percent since November. A year ago it was estimated that spam SJ constituted about 10 percent of all e-mail. That figure has now SJ jumped to 20 percent. SJ I have certainly noticed this with my email accounts! I haven't. But then, I am pretty careful about two things: 1) where I post my e-mail address, and 2) never, ever, under *any* circumstance, responding to Spam, including never responding to the bait about if you want to be taken off our list . . . . Spammers sneak in under the radar once in a while of course, but they are *never*, *ever* rewarded for doing so. They get zero acknowledgement from me. No satisfaction for them at all. BTW, what does the 'ads' in your e-mail address stand for, Shoebuddy? (^_-) Best, Yuki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: spam on the rise
Sunday, February 24, 2002 at 10:50 PM Yuki, I follow the same guidelines but some silly people send stupid email postcards and bingo! You're on a list that get sold and then some. BTW, what does the 'ads' in your e-mail address stand for, Shoebuddy? It means I expect to get ads from this email address as I use it for lists such as this one ;-) I send out no ads. Best regards, Shoebuddy -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Strange crash
Hi Batmen (and women), Since a few days I got a weird problem: The Bat! works fine, as long as I do not repeat: NOT use the dictionaries. If I do, The Bat! completely crashes. I'm running W200Pro. What could be the cause of this? -- Best regards, Jos mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bangkok, Thailand -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
