Edit subject line
Hello, Don't interpret what I write negatively, I'm very happy with SpamPal! Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages as spam and includes markers in the subject line of the received message. How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat so that filters do not grab the message each time I re-apply filters to the folder? I need to get rid of things like: **SPAM** **SPAM REGEX ID#363100123-86** **SPAM** **SPAM DSBL 24.5.91.52** **SPAM** **SPAM SBL 218.32.192.211** **SPAM** **SPAM SBL 192.117.172.25 BODY** Hopefully a small script, with a keyboard shortcut, could do it? -- Best regards, Happy new year cs4l mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Log when re-apply filter
Hello, Is there an option that allows to write in the log file when re-applying filters on a folder? The filter activity goes to the log when receiving new mail, but apprently not when re-applying filters to a folder. -- Best regards, cs4l mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Stuck Connection Centre
I have been having the problem lately that if I delete or abort a task in the connection center, it will stay open with nothing listed. When I close it, then try to quit thebat, it says some tasks are now active but the connection centre is still showing empty. Since this does not seem normal, what can I do to correct this? Scott Windows 2000 The Bat 2.01.3 Popfile Spam Filter http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit subject line
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 03 January 2004, 09:57 +0100 (03/01/2004 08:57 local time) cs4l [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C Don't interpret what I write negatively, I'm very happy with SpamPal! C Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages as spam C and includes markers in the subject line of the received message. C How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat so that filters do C not grab the message each time I re-apply filters to the folder? C I need to get rid of things like: C **SPAM** **SPAM REGEX ID#363100123-86** C **SPAM** **SPAM DSBL 24.5.91.52** C **SPAM** **SPAM SBL 218.32.192.211** C **SPAM** **SPAM SBL 192.117.172.25 BODY** C Hopefully a small script, with a keyboard shortcut, could do it? I've stopped using SpamPal but did use it a few months ago. I never had these headers because I configured SpamPal not to show them; I used the headers instead. Checkout SpamPal options etc. - -- As ever, Martin Webster The Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 | BayesIt! 0.4gm (Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBP/aR1zknq5PWREYNEQI9EgCgtf3JEJNXwAd9FijeSHfGAuJpGvQAnR3s j5MEO+2IdgFXndEhTnLG4ssw =E6dg -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log when re-apply filter
Hi Cs4l, @3-Jan-2004, 09:59 +0100 (03-Jan 08:59 UK time) cs4l [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: C Is there an option that allows to write in the log file when C re-applying filters on a folder? C The filter activity goes to the log when receiving new mail, but C apprently not when re-applying filters to a folder. No, but it's a good question and a good idea. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
deleting a thread
Hi Batters, how do I delete a thread (normally Shift-Ctrl-Del) and don't use alternative deletion (Shift-Del) at the same time? I want to be able to delete threads to the Trash folder without expanding them first. Roman -- Roman Katzer, Aachen, Germany Resisting temptation is easier when you think you'll probably get another chance later on. Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit subject line
* cs4l [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nevertheless, my spampal sometimes mis-identifies messages as spam and includes markers in the subject line of the received message. How can I get rid of the added marker in the Bat This is not possible without exporting, editing and reimporting of those messages. I would not do that. Why don't you configure SpamPal to add the markers as additional header lines? so that filters do not grab the message each time I re-apply filters to the folder? If you extend your TB! spam filter to only touch mails that have no color group set you'll just need to assign an arbitrary color group to any false positive -- and your filter won't grab them anymore. HTH. Carsten -- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log when re-apply filter
* cs4l [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The filter activity goes to the log when receiving new mail, but apprently not when re-applying filters to a folder. Write your own log file. Use the filter action »Export message to file« and write your log information [1] into the template. HTH. Carsten [1] helpful macros are %FolderName, %AccountName, %DateEn, ... -- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit subject line
Hello Martin, Saturday, January 3, 2004, 10:56:33 AM, you wrote: MW I've stopped using SpamPal but did use it a few months ago. I never had MW these headers because I configured SpamPal not to show them; I used the MW headers instead. Checkout SpamPal options etc. Actually, this would not solve my issue. SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the header instead of the subject tags. Any idea? -- Best regards, cs4lmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: deleting a thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roman, Hi Batters, how do I delete a thread (normally Shift-Ctrl-Del) and don't use alternative deletion (Shift-Del) at the same time? this one is working here, i I delete a thread by Shift-Ctrl-Del the messages are moved to Trash, even if the thread is unexpanded. I want to be able to delete threads to the Trash folder without expanding them first. The thing not possible is to have an alternative deletion(not deleting to trash) Thomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 Comment: iQA/AwUBP/bu8vUSbjIy5cRnEQIA7ACfYBYSx0ZWZ9m3+9Ads1vK9KEediAAoMky Q4RUvAUo8XNWPWnZsBae9+fu =1SeS -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Restore Help Needed!
Hello Leif, Friday, January 2, 2004, 11:18:11 PM, Leif Gregory wrote: PO I have asked before, but still don't know _why_at_all_ PO shift-ctrl-alt-L should be used. I know the 'what for' PO description, but not the 'why' explanation. LG Oooo, o, ... I know... I know!!! LG Because! Not quite correct. Because, because!!! -- Best regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit subject line
ON Saturday, January 3, 2004, 3:37:39 PM, you wrote: c Actually, this would not solve my issue. c SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would c want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the c filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the header instead c of the subject tags. c Any idea? That can be done by X-Ray. I and many others on this list use it to remove, add or modify headers on outgoing emails. www.xrayapp.com/xray/xray.shtml -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Golf is a game played by human beings. Therefore, it is a game of mistakes. Successful golfers know how to respond to mistakes. Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Restore Help Needed!
Friday, January 2, 2004, 7:50:40 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote: ... in moving computers Wednesday, I did a backup, then tried to install and restore on the new machine. None of the common folders were restored by the backup. I moved them manually, then did the shft-alt-ctrl-L. It found the common folders, and set up a set of common folders which duplicate all my accounts. This is almost exactly what happened to me. I recently had to move everything over to a new computer and decided to also upgrade from TB 1.62r to 2.02.3 at the same time. Backing up the old TB files and restoring them on the new computer after installing the Xmas edition was fairly straight forward. I had the same problem, however, that none of the common folders got restored. I also moved them manually and soon had everything running fineuntil I did the CRTL-ALT-SHFT-L several days later. That's when the dupe mail accounts showed up. I don't know what the easy fix is, if one exists. It seems buggy to me that this should happen when invoking the C-A-S-L key combo didn't seem to cause problems in version 1.62r. Anyway, I was able to work my way thru it so I'm able to get some work done now. :) Cheers. -- Chris Montgomery Airtight Web Services http://www.airtightweb.com Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales 210-490-2415 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: deleting a thread
Hello Thomas, On Saturday, January 3, 2004, 17:33:48, Thomas Speer wrote: I want to be able to delete threads to the Trash folder without expanding them first. The thing not possible is to have an alternative deletion(not deleting to trash) This works when you _don't_ have folder-specific deletion settings. Well, the question is how to delete a thread to trash and how do you use alternative deletion on a thread without touching folder-specific deletion settings. Roman -- Roman Katzer, Aachen, Germany We confide in our strength, without boasting of it; we respect that of others, without fearing it. -- Thomas Jefferson Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat or Pocomail
On Friday, January 2, 2004, 5:24:28 PM, S J Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SJL Hi Bat Persons, SJL This may not be an appropriate question to ask on this list - and one SJL impossible to answer anyway - but I will ask anyway... SJL What is 'better': The Bat! or Pocomail? SJL I have been using both for some months now - The Bat! for over a year - SJL and I find I like and dislike features of both... SJL Presumably most are on this list because they are The Bat! SJL devotess and would opine that The Bat! is a winner by a country mile! SJL Anyway, this is an honest question I'm not endorsing TB over Pocomail because I haven't tried the latter (tho it does look like Pocomail has a more polished exterior.) And I don't really think that this list is the best place for an impartial opinion! But search for bat on the Pocomail forums http://www.pocosystems.com/forum/index.php and see what folks there say. I checked out 4 postings at random (posting headers follow:) 1) leaving Poco until Bayesian filtering (mentions even the bat! has a bayesian freeware plugin) 2) disappointed (a user who had problems setting up pocomail and found it buggy and ended up registering tb!) 3) virus protection (no AVG plugin for Poco but there is one for TB) 4 no longer wants to check Yahoo (more than one Yahoo _POP_ can't get their messages, POPfile and TB work fine) jon -- jwayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources?
Hi, I recently upgraded to the CE, and now find myself constantly restarting the computer, because I'm running out of resources. Is this a known issue with this version, and if yes, is there a beta version available that has dealt with it? -- Best regards, Susanne Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources?
Hi Susanne, @3-Jan-2004, 19:51 -0800 (04-Jan 03:51 UK time) Susanne [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: S I recently upgraded to the CE, and now find myself constantly S restarting the computer, because I'm running out of resources. S Is this a known issue with this version, and if yes, is there a S beta version available that has dealt with it? No, this isn't a known or reported issue with this release AFAIR. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Can I import TB into Outlook?
Greetings, Unfortunately, my employer has recently decided to disable pop access forcing me to use their exchange server via Outlook. Problem is, I've been using TB for my work mail for a while now and have thousands of messages which I need to refer back to from time to time. Is there a way to import TB messages into Outlook? I looked under export, but none of the file formats seem to be supported by Outlook. Any help with this greatly appreciated. Thanks, Steve Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources?
On Saturday, January 3, 2004 at 11:24:36 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote in the message Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: S I recently upgraded to the CE, and now find myself constantly S restarting the computer, because I'm running out of resources. S Is this a known issue with this version, and if yes, is there a S beta version available that has dealt with it? No, this isn't a known or reported issue with this release AFAIR. It is a Windows 95\98\ME issue only. Windows 2000 and XP don't run out of system resources (unless the run all the way out of memory). -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. You're never too old to become younger. Using The Bat! v2.02 CE on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources?
Hi, Saturday, January 3, 2004, 10:28:09 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is a Windows 95\98\ME issue only. Windows 2000 and XP don't run out of system resources (unless the run all the way out of memory). Well, I'm stuck with WindowsME for the time being, and had no problems with the older version of TB. Does this mean I have to go back to the previous version, or is there another way to deal with this problem? -- Best regards, Susannemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.02.3 CE OS: Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
