Re: Inline spellchecker auto correct?
Hello Ian A. White everyone else, on 19-Jun-2005 at 08:22 you (Ian A. White) wrote: I have never installed the 2000 upgrade because of activation. Office 2000 needs no activation, Office XP and higher do. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) It's a dog eat dog world out there, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear. (Norm Peterson) Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hello Darrin everyone else, on 19-Jun-2005 at 03:55 you (Darrin) wrote: I am now once again a happy person :) The question that remains is... how can anybody using the faulty IE rendering engine/browser be a happy person? ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory (Paul Fix). Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hello Alexander, Sunday, June 19, 2005, 9:34:32 AM, you wrote: ASK The question that remains is... how can anybody using the faulty IE ASK rendering engine/browser be a happy person? Do you mean we have to be unhappy people by definition? :-) I don't know about Darrin, but I simply do not have much choice: Or I use IE, or I use NetCaptor. Because I have to be able to run (Microsoft) applications on the sites of insurance companies and/or bank professionally I cannot use (for those purposes that is) non-IE based browsers. No Opera, no FireFox e.a., even if I would have liked to use one of those... Then why NetCaptor (and not one of the others)? Mainly because it is the only one that supports PowerMarks (directly). Now if you were in my position: would you prefer to use IE itself? :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5.29 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hello Mark Partous everyone else, on 19-Jun-2005 at 11:08 you (Mark Partous) wrote: Now if you were in my position: would you prefer to use IE itself? :-) I know what you mean. Its the same dilemma for me when I'm at work. Therefore, I'm using Firefox wherever possible, and for the websites that absolutely insist on IE (either because of ActiveX or some stupid script that prevents me to access the site with anything but IE) I collected the bookmarks in a folder and configured them to be opened explicitely with IE. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Medicine makes people ill, math makes them sad, and theology makes them sinful. -- Martin Luther Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hello Alexander, Sunday, June 19, 2005, 11:33:57 AM, you wrote: ASK I collected the bookmarks in a folder and configured them ASK to be opened explicitely with IE. HOw do you do that? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5.29 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hello Mark Partous everyone else, on 19-Jun-2005 at 11:41 you (Mark Partous) wrote: ASK I collected the bookmarks in a folder and configured them ASK to be opened explicitely with IE. HOw do you do that? If you have a lot of shortcuts, the best would be to collect them in a single HTML document (like a link collection). Then create a shortcut to that HTML document and make sure that it is opened with IE (in the open with... line) - you then follow the links. I don't have that many sites, I simply call the start pages from a local copy. :) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Ralph's Observation: It is a mistake to allow any mechanical object to realize that you are in a hurry. Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inline spellchecker auto correct?
Ian On Sun 19 June 2005, 19:49:14 +1000, you wrote: ASK Office 2000 needs no activation, Office XP and higher do. It might not be the same as Office XP, but here are just two results of a search. I stuck with Office 2000 for two reasons * it didn't require activation (perhaps the fact that mine is not corporate explains why I don't experience your explanation of O2K activation) and * I thin it is a better, more usable product than Office 2003 Getting a bit OT here now! -- Robin Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hello Alexander, Sunday, June 19, 2005, 12:34:32 AM, you wrote: The question that remains is... how can anybody using the faulty IE rendering engine/browser be a happy person? Opera will probably always be my default browser. From time to time when required to use IE I prefer Netcaptor over IE even though it is just a shell. I have used Firefox. I just dont care for it. Im always having problems with it. So for now, it is Opera and Netcaptor. -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: opening HTML files error
Hi On Saturday 18 June 2005 at 5:42:49 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello MFPA everyone else, on 17-Jun-2005 at 22:15 you (MFPA) wrote: I have the pane showing attachments but it does not contain the HTML attachment. Is it an HTML only message without a plaintext alternative maybe? I can view plaintext but not even find the HTML version in TB! apart from in the source viewer. See extracts below... Content-Type: Multipart/related; type=multipart/alternative; boundary=Boundary-00=_MHKEG6G0 [...] --Boundary-00=_MHKEG6G0 Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary=Boundary-00=_MHKEBHK0 --Boundary-00=_MHKEBHK0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [...] --Boundary-00=_MHKEBHK0 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HTMLHEAD META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Diso-8859-= 1 META content=3DIncrediMail 1.0 name=3DGENERATOR !--IncrdiXMLRemarkStart [...] /HTML --Boundary-00=_MHKEBHK0-- --Boundary-00=_MHKEG6G0 Content-Type: image/gif; name=09_left.gif Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 -- Best regards, MFPA You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inline spellchecker auto correct?
Hi On Saturday 18 June 2005 at 10:09:12 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote: You only get the space bar when aside of TB's dictionaries you alsa can access the MS Office CSAPI ones. I believe this is only possible with Office 2000 and/or earlier. Thanks for clearing trhat up for me. -- Best regards, MFPA Did you hear? They took the word gullible out of the dictionary Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Woo-hooooops! Unleashed bunch!
Hi On Saturday 18 June 2005 at 11:01:44 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mica Mijatovic wrote: outdated messages/drafts dwelling in my Outbox were unparked and unleashedit seems all around. Is it not possible in TB! to have a specific folder for Drafts? -- Best regards, MFPA You're only young once; you can be immature forever Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Woo-hooooops! Unleashed bunch!
Hello MFPA, On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:35:15 +0100 GMT (19/06/2005, 23:35 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: M Is it not possible in TB! to have a specific folder for Drafts? No, drafts in TB are just parked messages in the Outbox. -- Cheers, Thomas. Heut debug ich, morgen brows ich, uebermorgen cast ich die Koenigin auf int. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5.29 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: setting up preferences for gmail; missing e-mail
Hi On Saturday 18 June 2005 at 2:03:11 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Victor B. Gonzalez wrote: You can always try but don't sweat it. The fault of you not getting email from your own account IF you're sending mail from the same exact account is Googles feature and not a bug. FWIW, testing here shows that email sent to my gmail account from itself is not downloaded via POP access but does appear in my inbox on the web interface (eventually). -- Best regards, MFPA A closed mouth gathers no foot Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB with OTFE Backups
Darrin @ 2005-Jun-18 12:26:37 AM TB with OTFE Backups mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now that I have OTFE enabled. My question is if I make a backup of all my accounts using TB that I keep on a separate drive, are the backups encrypted as well? There is a password option for backups. I do not know if this uses the same or similar encryption. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open. pgpG4Q3AoU35W.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB with OTFE Backups
Hello Chris, Sunday, June 19, 2005, 12:57:23 PM, you wrote: There is a password option for backups. I do not know if this uses the same or similar encryption. My concern was say I made a backup (No password) and someone else restored my backup on their version of TB, would all my accounts be available to them? or would they be encrypted because I used OTFE. ?? -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
strange addition on replies
today, each time that I use F4 to reply with selected text, quote is followed by the statement =Cannot find a quick template wrap2 Reply template follows. On %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, %OFROMNAME wrote: %SINGLERE %WRAPPED=%QUOTES=%Qinclude='wq' %Cursor -- Dwight A. Corrin [snip rest of signature] I don't understand where the statement is coming from. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using The Bat! 3.5.30 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
