Re: Searching on Contacts
Hi MFPA, Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:25:03 PM, you wrote: If I type in something that it can't find it automatically changes to the last successful entry (same as bat!! would change back to bat!). If you have the same behaviour in your version of TB!, the above would suggest the AB or group you are searching does not contain the letter x. If you clear the search box and type a space, presumably it can match that and subsequently your x will change to a space instead of to targ? Ok, that makes sense, however I find it quite confusing when compared with how many other applications work. However this functionality only works at the group level. When I have an AB selected and type into the search am I correct in presuming that TB should be searching all contacts in all groups beneath the AB? -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.71.03 on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Upgrade from 1.62
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 5 Mar 2006, @ @ at 20:17:26 -0500, when Dave Goodman wrote: I've been running the now antique v.1.62r and am about to upgrade to the newest v.3.n. But there is a complication. For various reasons, v.1.62r is installed on my D: drive, where it lives happily with all it's data. However, I now want to install the new v.3.n in the more customary C:\Program Files\xxx. It is essential that the mail databases be left on the D: drive and be accessible to the new installation on C:. I've been uncertain whether to just install the newer version to C:, then tell it where the .TBB files, etc. are, and then perhaps uninstall the old version. Or vice versa. Or whatever. Any words of wisdom on the best way to accomplish this in as pain-free a way as possible would be greatly appreciated. A pain-free way, as to (de)installation itself, would be something like this... Copy your mail databases (usually the folder Mail) somewhere on D: drive. Deinstall the old TB. Install the new TB (and tell it where the mail database is). *** The rest of the happenings is not necessarily pain-free though, so if you have some more complex/specific filtering system or similar, it's good then to do another copy of your Mail folder (just in case), since automatic transfer into the new filtering systems and file formats, coming with version 3, will not work always, so the pain might be present woohoo.[1] ___ [1] Studying recently again some works of Monsieur de Sade (Comte Donatien Alphonse Francois) though, I could not say for sure verily what a proper treatments and estimations of the matters of a pain could be in particular individual cases. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 551 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBRAv8vLSpHvHEUtv8AQOyFggAgGjgOTvuyGnFMPaW6T4UINBM6QExZb7/ As7/ZnY9lxXGafOerkVb3Ph6tmKc4T1TNCLnx85h06ahW3CWHlRj8XnziAi/DVmb FnpH4I6U2b2gEPa2XFaCjPxWOZbEnd/2gItg/cg/mw/oi1qWfMNkHspC+H0F/ZHD GLfB2MFy6V0KC233yXgm0l8H5xU2+i+HMWTBDBNB8lSj9bK0cVDs8WEzuzHHQr9c BDOD3E57CgEmZswPvXcUtHELiEjjSZl9QsFfZU1ZpUA0Gu/DzfjE9/UqkbHr+Xyx QrBqOIToJIIDOhGQ0gUmEIvcMtJj81JDS7O8MMdTlQ45QbGLNqaWjw== =Mwdo -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Putting a reply into the same folder where the original message is stored?
hi, Friday, March 3, 2006, 10:45:50 PM, you wrote: You must create a sent filter for each recipient that will move the reply to the appropriate folder. move? in Maksim's setup, this works okay only until he'll reply to 2 or more customers in one message. -- regards, vitaliemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: User Dictionary/Correction Dictionary Language
Hi Bob, Thursday, February 23, 2006, 11:03:25 AM, you wrote: In view of the release date some 5 days ago and most of the regulars here apparently not knowing that it existed sort of confirms my thoughts about RITLABs failure to advise users of the update. I agree, it is certainly discourteous not to advise the list when a public release has been made. All of the other Beta's which I participate in regularly do this. -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.71.03 on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Need to upgrade?
Hi, I'm relatively new to TB! and have a question about upgrading version releases. I'm currently running 3.65.03 Home and haven't had any major problems. I use POP3 only and no IMAP. For my home use I don't see any real practical advantage to changing to Pro version. I see a 3.7 (presumably includes Home version) is out but I don't see any new features nor addressing any bugs I've experienced. Generally I upgrade my software when there are known issues or new features added and occasionally, just because it's there, but with TB I don't know if that's necessarily the best plan. Any thoughts and recommendations? Upgrade at each release or stay with what's working? Thanks, Larry -- TheBat! 3.65.03 Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Hello all, Monday, March 6, 2006, Larry Wing wrote: I'm currently running 3.65.03 Home and haven't had any major problems. I use POP3 only and no IMAP. For my home use I don't see any real practical advantage to changing to Pro version. I see a 3.7 (presumably includes Home version) is out but I don't see any new features nor addressing any bugs I've experienced. Generally I upgrade my software when there are known issues or new features added and occasionally, just because it's there, but with TB I don't know if that's necessarily the best plan. upgrade to 3.71 is recommended because included security fix related to Subject Header Buffer Overflow Vulnerability caused by bug in Delphi. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Generally I upgrade my software when there are known issues or new features added and occasionally, just because it's there, but with TB I don't know if that's necessarily the best plan. upgrade to 3.71 is recommended because included security fix related to Subject Header Buffer Overflow Vulnerability caused by bug in Delphi. I just bought up to 3.65.03 after using 2.02.3 for a very long time. Are you saying I should be looking for a newer version already? I just paid for 3.65.03 a couple of days ago, went to the website and don't even see the version you are referring to. -- Elaine Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Hello Elaine, On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] E I just paid for 3.65.03 a couple of days ago, went to the website and E don't even see the version you are referring to. It's there alright. It was released last month, version 3.71. http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=1324 -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.71.03 with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Hello all, Monday, March 6, 2006, ETM wrote: upgrade to 3.71 is recommended because included security fix related to Subject Header Buffer Overflow Vulnerability caused by bug in Delphi. I just bought up to 3.65.03 after using 2.02.3 for a very long time. Are you saying I should be looking for a newer version already? I just paid for 3.65.03 a couple of days ago, went to the website and don't even see the version you are referring to. 3.71.03 is available on www.ritlabs.com. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Hello Elaine! On Monday, March 06, 2006, 11:04 AM, you wrote: upgrade to 3.71 is recommended because included security fix related to Subject Header Buffer Overflow Vulnerability caused by bug in Delphi. I just bought up to 3.65.03 after using 2.02.3 for a very long time. Are you saying I should be looking for a newer version already? I just paid for 3.65.03 a couple of days ago, went to the website and don't even see the version you are referring to. Look here: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php Your new license is good for this latest release of the 3.xx series. And v. 3.71,0 is running well for me on my two POP3 TB! accounts. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.71.03 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Your new license is good for this latest release of the 3.xx series. And v. 3.71,0 is running well for me on my two POP3 TB! accounts. I downloaded and had used the trial version when all these goodies were released. I will learn if I ever upgrade again to check to see if something came out in the 30+days between download/trial and the payment grin. Thanks all. -- Elaine What do you do when you see an endangered animal eating an endangered plant? Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Default Folder View mode
Hi all, One quick question for those of you who are more well versed in TB, is there anyway of setting a default folder view for all new folder? I would like all new folders to default to a particular view. TIA for any help! -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.71.03 on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
grouping by date doesn't work correctly
Hi Batters, I just created an account for Gmail. POP works fine and after about three or four POP sessions (why that many, I don't know) I had downloaded all 900 messages to my Inbox. I turned on grouping by date and tried threded and non-threaded view modes, but grouping by date doesn't work correctly. Initially all mails were in the Today group, a day later most messages were in the Yesterday group, even though sort by sent date is selected, not sorting by received date. Any hints what may be the problem? Thanks! Roman -- Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Default Folder View mode
Hi ETM, Monday, March 6, 2006, 7:02:43 PM, you wrote: You also when creating a new folder should use the drop down list to use folder specific settings. Thanks for the reply. I can see that option, however rather than having to set the view each time, I would like a default. Now it appears that there maybe a default hidden away somewhere, because when adding a folder in the drop down list, to which you refer, there is an option Use the account default column setting. However looking through the Account properties screens I cannot find where it is - perhaps I've missed it or misunderstood what this option does. Does anyone know? -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.71.03 on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need to upgrade?
Hello Larry Wing everyone else, on 06-Mrz-2006 at 15:03 you (Larry Wing) wrote: Any thoughts and recommendations? Upgrade at each release or stay with what's working? It is fairly easy to try a new version - just create a backup copy of your thebat.exe file (in the program directory), then install the new version with the installer. If you encounter any problems, you can simply exchange the executable with the backup you made. The 3.71 release is running just fine here. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The religion that is afraid of science dishonors God and commits suicide. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wish: Two-rows for messages in Message List Pane like in MS Outlook useful in Horizontal split
MFPA, On 05-03-2006 21:39, you [M] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: M Vertical split gives me three full-width panes, one above another. M Horizontal spilt gives three full-height panes side by side. To me, vertical means top to bottom. The splits are vertical when there are 3 columns. M Why anybody would want anything other than full-height account M tree is beyond me. (-; Which I am currently using, too. But if the wish is implemented, you could have a very high preview pane doing away with scrolling is most instances. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.71.01 Pro /thebat version env. ~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Putting a reply into the same folder where the original message is stored?
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:. ASK on 06-Mrz-2006 at 12:08 you (vitalie vrabie) wrote: You must create a sent filter for each recipient that will move the reply to the appropriate folder. move? in Maksim's setup, this works okay only until he'll reply to 2 or more customers in one message. ASK Additional restrictions may apply, sure. ASK I for one never reply to two individual customers in one message. :-) Fair enough. Usually, I don't do that either. Regards, Maksym -- Maksym Kozub(+380 44)424-1792(tel./fax), (+380 67)466-5174(mob.) Translations Interpreting Editing MK881-UANIChttp://kozub.in.ua[EMAIL PROTECTED] (website temporarily unaccessible) Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Force the use of SMTP?
Hi All, Recently I set up an account for a friend's small office and ran into an interesting problem. TB! sits on three different computers with one acting as a server. Basically the other computers' accounts are set up to point to the Messages.tbb and Messages.tbi on the server for each of their respective accounts. He has 3 different accounts, i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would seem that whenever one account e-mails another it doesn't use SMTP and then POP3 to send and receive the message, but rather puts the message directly into the other account. The to: and from: addresses are right, but a copy of the RFC 822 headers looks like this: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:42:17 -0500 From: x [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.03) Business Reply-To: x [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: x X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test 1441 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm no expert in deciphering the 822s, but in this case it doesn't seem to have most of the information I see in normal 822s (i.e. received from). Is TB! being smart and realizing that it's really not going anywhere so it just puts it into the appropriate local account? Any help or suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -- Best regards, Nick Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Force the use of SMTP?
Hello Nick, Monday, March 6, 2006, 2:34:22 PM, you wrote: Is TB! being smart and realizing that it's really not going anywhere so it just puts it into the appropriate local account? Correct.. From the TB Help File - Network and Administration - The Bat! Networking Course: Local Delivery Technology is provided by The Bat! when the appropriate option is turned on. To activate it, open the Network Administration dialog box on the server, and tick the Allow Local Delivery checkbox. This option allows several machines to work in a local network exchanging messages without using n SMTP/POP server at all. This feature provides a very efficient solution for building corporate mail-exchange networks without using Internet Mail Transfer Protocols. When the Allow Local Delivery option is on, outgoing messages addressed to local users are delivered directly into the appropriate message bases instead of having to send them to an SMTP server. -- TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B __ Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org As I said before, I never repeat myself. Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Polish emails
Hi Roland, Thursday, March 2, 2006, 6:48:25 PM, you wrote: Have you set under regions- and language options - lanugage - details - installed services - the keyboard for Polish? I have now. Have you activated under regions- and language options - additional - in the codepage converting tables 28952 (ISO 8859-2) Central Europe? Yes, but it still isn't showing correctly, as you can see by the screenshot. The thing that puzzles me is that before I made any of the changes that you suggested I could see the text in the correct script when I pasted it into a new mail. Do you have any more suggestions Roland? -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.71.03 on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Force the use of SMTP?
Hello Leif, Monday, March 6, 2006, 4:46:35 PM, you wrote: LG Hello Nick, LG Monday, March 6, 2006, 2:34:22 PM, you wrote: Is TB! being smart and realizing that it's really not going anywhere so it just puts it into the appropriate local account? LG Correct.. From the TB Help File - Network and Administration - The LG Bat! Networking Course: Thanks for your quick reply. In this case, the network isn't set up in any of TB!'s server modes. All 3 are in stand alone mode with each of the clients sharing the messages.tbb and message.tbi for each account on the server, so I don't have access to the Allow Local Delivery option. Are there any other possibilities that you might be able to think of? Again, thanks for your help. -- Best regards, Nick Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Force the use of SMTP?
Hello Nick, Monday, March 6, 2006, 3:16:12 PM, you wrote: Thanks for your quick reply. In this case, the network isn't set up in any of TB!'s server modes. All 3 are in stand alone mode with each of the clients sharing the messages.tbb and message.tbi for each account on the server, so I don't have access to the Allow Local Delivery option. In that case, I'll just attribute it to Bat Magic (tm). grin If each machine connects directly to the internet to send and receive e-mail but saves it to a network shared drive, then I don't know how TB knows that it's really not going outside of the local system. This is what I hear you saying. Tell me if I got it wrong. 1. There are three machines with TB installed on them. (Clients x,y,z) 2. There is a fourth machine which is acting as a file server. (Server) 3. The server has a shared folder containing the messages.tbb and .tbi files for the three accounts (x,y,z). 4. Each client has an account set up under TB for whichever mailfile it uses. i.e. Client A uses a.tbb and a.tbi on the server. Client B uses b.tbb and b.tbi on the server etc. (I used b.tbb just as shorthand, I know they're still called messages.tbb etc and are just in different folders). 5. Each client can send and receive SMTP / POP traffic directly to the internet without using the server and the mail is then stored in the respective mail file on the server. SHRUG You got me how each TB standalone installation would know which accounts are local and therefore not use the internet. What SMTP server are the clients using? What POP server? Are there any other possibilities that you might be able to think of? Not really. I mean, if you had a local SMTP and POP server on the same network that the clients were configured to use, you should still see that box as a hop in the headers. i.e. Received from clientA (IP) on SMTP server address blah, blah. Now, if each client had all three accounts set up under each and there was an outgoing filter to move the message to one of the other accounts, then maybe I could see this happening. Another idea is that if all three accounts are set up under each client, then maybe TB is smart enough to realize the accounts are local and does a local delivery. I don't recall that happening when I had multiple e-mail accounts under one TB installation, but that was a long time ago too. Again, thanks for your help. No problem, but I don't know that I've really helped with anything. grin -- TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B __ Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org Studies show that studies cause cancer in laboratory animals. Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wish: CC to always stay where it is
Hi On Monday 6 March 2006 at 12:28:15 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Curtis wrote: However, it's an annoyance, an unnecessary one, and one that can be fixed. Indeed. Let's hope it gets sorted. -- Best regards, MFPA Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Force the use of SMTP?
Hello Leif, Monday, March 6, 2006, 6:09:36 PM, you wrote: LG Hello Nick, Again, thanks for your help. LG No problem, but I don't know that I've really helped with anything. LG grin Again, thanks for your help and suggestions. It seems on first look that all your assumptions are correct. At this point I have to run out, but I would really appreciate discussing this you (and/or the rest of the group) in greater detail tomorrow. I've been on the list for quite a number of years and your advice on all matters (mine and others) have always be very helpful. I personally think TB! is a perfect fit for small offices that can't justify a full blown Exchange server. Just have to get rid of some of the kinks. Nick Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wish: Two-rows for messages in Message List Pane like in MS Outlook useful in Horizontal split
Hi On Monday 6 March 2006 at 8:25:35 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fjelsten wrote: To me, vertical means top to bottom. And to me, meaning that as you move from the top to the bottom the screen is split into 3. The splits are vertical when there are 3 columns. That to me is a horizontal split: as you move from left to right the screen is split. I suspect neither of us will convince the other... But if the wish is implemented, you could have a very high preview pane doing away with scrolling is most instances. You mean a full-height one? (!) -- Best regards, MFPA Roses smell better than onions but don't make such good soup Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wish: Two-rows for messages in Message List Pane like in MS Outlook useful in Horizontal split
On 5/3/2006 at 3:39:04 PM [GMT -0500], Mfpa wrote: Why anybody would want anything other than full-height account tree is beyond me. (-; I don't use one. I use a full-width message list. I prefer when the message list gets full width of the Window. My account tree doesn't need all of the full-height of my TB! window. -- -= Curtis =- The Bat! v3.71.03 / http://specs.aimlink.name PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name ...Oxymoron: Reinvent. pgpOpRyOFiMA0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Putting a reply into the same folder where the original message is stored?
Hello MFPA, Sunday, March 5, 2006, 5:57:55 PM, you wrote: M The condition is ADDRESS GROUP 'SHS' CONTAINS first recipient. M ADDRESS GROUP = SHS would not say whether you were testing the M sender, the recipient, cc, bcc,... Well, actually it doesn't matter because the sender is a member of the group and any CC or BCC would also be a member of the group. M Perhaps all the entries in the SHS AB group could have an entry of M SHS in the memo field, for example. Then you could try filtering M on the condition memo matches SHS. That would probably work but you never know with TB! I may try it, thanks. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v3.65.03 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Polish emails
Hi Paul, on Monday, March 6, 2006 at 22:45 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: Have you set under regions- and language options - lanugage - details - installed services - the keyboard for Polish? You know that you can change the language then on the left side of the systray! I have now. Have you activated under regions- and language options - additional - in the codepage converting tables 28952 (ISO 8859-2) Central Europe? Yes, but it still isn't showing correctly, as you can see by the screenshot. I have not seen a screenshot. I think that the mailinglist doesn't support screenshots. You can send it to me by private mail! The thing that puzzles me is that before I made any of the changes that you suggested I could see the text in the correct script when I pasted it into a new mail. Do you have any more suggestions Roland? -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x2187626E I use The Bat! v3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2! Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wish: Two-rows for messages in Message List Pane like in MS Outlook useful in Horizontal split
MFPA, On 07-03-2006 00:57, you [M] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: M I suspect neither of us will convince the other... I think you may be right :-) But if the wish is implemented, you could have a very high preview pane doing away with scrolling is most instances. M You mean a full-height one? (!) Yes. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.71.04 Pro /thebat version env. ~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
