Antisniper and checking on the server
Hello, For two days I had the free version of Antisniper and, this evening, downloaded the full trial version. If I select either of the first two checking on server options in the Servers/Edit section, TB! checks only 20 messages and then sticks. If I restart the connection it checks the next 20 and so on until the end when it completely gets stuck and does nothing. Even though it tells me that it's deleted, in the last case, 3 messages from the server (and they showed up on the log as being deleted), no messages were downloaded because of the final glitch. This happens with both the normal TB! and also Voyager. Oh yes, another little point. Even though I installed it for the first time today, instead of 30 days trial, it only says that I have 12 :-( -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello rich, Sunday, July 30, 2006, 9:24:57 PM, you wrote: rg> At any rate... Is AntispamSniper a plug-in or a proxy? plugin. rg> I suppose I do not care much which it is BUT if not a proxy I would be rg> able to use X-RAY. It's a proxy and I have yet to get TWO proxies to rg> work together. ,--/ From Marek Mikus' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \ | Hello all, | developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this | version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server, | Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial. | | Download: | http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html | | Upgrade info: | http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html `-8<--- -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
>> Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the >> same favorable input as the K9 converts do? MC> I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC> now onto AntispamSniper. Increasingly useless? I do not understand. At any rate... Is AntispamSniper a plug-in or a proxy? I suppose I do not care much which it is BUT if not a proxy I would be able to use X-RAY. It's a proxy and I have yet to get TWO proxies to work together. Thx RG -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: A snooze button is a poor substitute for no alarm clock at all. Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello Mic, On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 you wrote in MC> I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC> now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess. I've just installed AntispamSniper on my Voyager set up and, if it goes well, will move from SpamPal and use it on my main TB! set up. Did you ever find a way to copy across the whitelists (all the lists, in fact) from SpamPal, as they aren't text files are they, so how are they copied, if at all? -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello Mark, On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:18:39 +0200 GMT (30/07/2006, 23:18 +0700 GMT), Mark Partous wrote: MP> I did have 2 false positives (of which 1 message from Thomas Fernandez!), That was not a false positive. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Falls Sie Kettenbriefe in der Post finden, denken Sie daran: Nur die Briefe kommen ins Altpapier, die Ketten kommen in die gelbe Tonne. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.81.11 Beta under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello Mic, Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:27:53 PM, you wrote: MC> I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC> now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess. MC> I prefer it to K9 because it seems just as accurate, if not more so, and MC> if something slips through, marking it as junk both teaches the plugin MC> and deletes it in one act, rather than having to go back out to K9 to MC> change it there after deleting it in TheBat. More efficient. Well, I installed it (trial commercial version) a couple of days ago. I still do have K9 for other mail-clients, but AntispamSniper does a rather good job until now. I did have 2 false positives (of which 1 message from Thomas Fernandez!), while I did not have even 1 false positive with K9. But, as mentioned above, marking as junk (or correcting a false positive) is easier than in K9. Moreover, mail handling seems to go quicker than through K9. So, unless problems should occur during evaluation, I think I will go for the commercial version. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: unsubscribe
At 07:28 [GMT+1000] on Sunday July 30 (actual time - 5:28am on Sunday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: > How do I unsubscribe from this list? Bloody Aussies! -- cheers, mic "I have the heart of a child. I keep it in a jar on my shelf." Robert Bloch Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
At 22:33 [GMT-0400] on Saturday July 29 (actual time - 10:33am on Sunday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: > Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the > same favorable input as the K9 converts do? I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess. I prefer it to K9 because it seems just as accurate, if not more so, and if something slips through, marking it as junk both teaches the plugin and deletes it in one act, rather than having to go back out to K9 to change it there after deleting it in TheBat. More efficient. -- cheers, mic "Many people dream of success. To me success can only be achieved through repeated failure and introspection. In fact, success represents 1 percent of your work, which results from the 99 percent that is called failure." Soichiro Honda (1906-1991) Industrialist Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Is Anyone Able to Send Korean Email?
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 00:10:53GMT +0100 (which was 5:10 PM where I live) MFPA wrote and made these points on the subject of "Is Anyone Able to Send Korean Email?": > Hi > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 at 5:49:45 AM, in > , Keith Russell wrote: >> As you can see from the following, it seems to work just fine: >> ьЭ+ъ-ГьЭ+ эХЬъжнызРьЮЕыЛИыЛд. >> This is readable in both The Bat! and in Thunderbird. > Here it does not display in any of the 7 Korean character sets > listed under "more character sets": some show squares, some > question marks and others message and most of headers blank. > However, using "auto-detect" it displays in Cyrillic (DOS)- cp866. Thanks very much for your reply. After receiving it, I checked my original message again, and was puzzled to see that it no longer displayed hangeul, but just a string of boxes. Then I realized that I had been running NJStar Communicator when I viewed it the first time. So it appears that The Bat! still does not allow the viewing of Korean hangeul. Interesting, viewing it in the quote above, it displays natively as Cyrillic characters; with NJStar running, it displays garbage Chinese characters mixed with hangeul. Where did you find 7 Korean character sets? I only see 4 when viewing a message (EUC, ISO, Johab, and Mac)--none at all when composing a message. Assuming that ISO means ISO-2022, the first 3 are common encodings. Conspicuously missing, however, is KSC, which is very common, and standard. Is that one of the ones you have? -- Keith ...What if the Hokey Pokey really IS what it's all about? Using The Bat! 3.81.11 Beta under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on a 2.4 GHZ Pentium IV with 512 MB. Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
