Re: unencrypted voyager base?

2006-09-16 Thread SGP
Mica wrote:

S   If Voyager can't be run unencrypted, can TB be
run portable?

 The latter is probably more difficult, as The Bat!
stores a lot of
 settings in the registry. But then, as we see with
Voyager, this isn't
 impossible. For now I think, the easier way for RIT
would be to allow
 to install Voyager without encryption.

You can set and remove reg entries, before and after
use of TB. Like with GnuPG, if you remember.

Unfortunately, injecting registry entries isn't always
possible. In some of the places I work at the registry
is write protected, i.e., .reg files don't work, so
only portable programs that truly don't rely on the
registry can work.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


account.m_r

2006-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello TBUDL,

How do you say account.m_r in OTFE?

I had a corrupted Inbox in Voyager. Maintenance created a part???.bin
file, which is useless, as it cannot be imported into Voyager. The
Inbox itself is now empty.

What I want to do now is trick Voyager into thinking that it has not
downloaded any of the mails that are on the server. In TB, I guess I
would just delete the account.m_r file (would that really work?), but
in Voyager, I obviously have different file names.

Or is there a wiki page?
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-index.php?page=Program+Folders+and+Files
shows only the file names for non-OTFE.

-- 
Thanks,
Thomas.



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: account.m_r

2006-09-16 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas,

on Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:21:22 +0700GMT (16.09.2006, 10:21 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

TF What I want to do now is trick Voyager into thinking that it has not
TF downloaded any of the mails that are on the server. In TB, I guess I
TF would just delete the account.m_r file (would that really work?), but
TF in Voyager, I obviously have different file names.

How about using the Mail Dispatcher to show *all* messages?

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Sign on a repair shop door: WE CAN REPAIR ANYTHING.
(PLEASE KNOCK HARD ON THE DOOR - THE BELL DOESN'T WORK)



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: account.m_r

2006-09-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas,

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:21:22 +0700GMT (16-9-2006, 10:21 , where I
live), you wrote:

TF How do you say account.m_r in OTFE?

account.emr

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Sharewear (n.) -- Used clothing.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.03
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpfMuQL6lrpy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: account.m_r

2006-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter,

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:15:45 +0200 GMT (16/09/2006, 20:15 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:

TF What I want to do now is trick Voyager into thinking that it has not
TF downloaded any of the mails that are on the server. In TB, I guess I
TF would just delete the account.m_r file (would that really work?), but
TF in Voyager, I obviously have different file names.

PM How about using the Mail Dispatcher to show *all* messages?

That's an idea, why didn't I think of that?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

There are plenty of fish in the sea¡K well that¡Šs great for the fish.
But I date humans.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: account.m_r

2006-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof,

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:05:53 +0200 GMT (16/09/2006, 21:05 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:

TF How do you say account.m_r in OTFE?

RO account.emr

Thanks.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Did you delete and icon labelled 'The Internet' from your computer?
You did? Well, it will take years to restore the entire Internet; in
the meantime, the F.B.I. would like to have a word with you.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: unencrypted voyager base?

2006-09-16 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

   ***^\ ._)~~
 ~( __ _o   Was another beautiful day, Fri, 15 Sep 2006,
   @  @  at 23:06:39 -0700 (PDT), when SGP wrote:

 You can set and remove reg entries, before and after use of TB. Like
 with GnuPG, if you remember.

 Unfortunately, injecting registry entries isn't always possible. In
 some of the places I work at the registry is write protected, i.e.,
 .reg files don't work, so only portable programs that truly don't rely
 on the registry can work.

It is true indeed, so would be much better if for such things would be
simply used an .ini file instead, dwelling in the program folder.

The connection with Registry complicates things without real need.

(Moving settings to INI file would be a masterstroke.)

   *

Then, there is another solution even for that, but...it is a wee bit
more than unusual. Namely to put TBat on a bootable small Linux CD
(where TB is installed via Wine) with supported a RAM drive (of some 64
MB or even more if needed), and all the work could be done without
touching HDDs, and even in a machine with no any hard drive[s].

All the work (send/receive) would be done via the RAM disk, then the
mail folders burnt to a CD-RW (or copied to floppy), and that would be
it.

It might sound somewhat complicated, but is feasible.

Just depends on how far someone would want to go (in this what I would
call a relative madness).

- --
Mica
 ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given
 in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~
GPG keys/docs/software at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/
   http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/
[Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
 Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo  Vector ~ Wine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-svn-4217 o tiger192 (Cygwin/MinGW32)

iQEVAwUBRQv1Z7SpHvHEUtv8AQhFKwf+KhUxYEgKS4W3Ht3lMZf3TQPr/Gn4eBp6
YEd03kqol40+z2Pp1YiBB1oDNMMcYdoz7MKLN3DyBYGrOP4famV77Pu8pwulBnSn
gwe5krHQwYzbwn9g+/wv5LR3GrhCFKfA4CfjftjVDrhFNvVcaXZp86F3EcAwrfoc
XEW5LANwM5zltrypnLExa0LwBdPF+szPTgT9l9wgO/YiL6GSiyPPvgRdbKQOMDH1
LC/6Y4MsijXrLTw/NT5Ay05wFPPqlqnVcyfrk8qpA+0UjqvzZtiEasDIq7/nhxb5
JjZiu+vJENvmbiikUrEIBcAqj/KIE2MsJwe4bakC3HbFXjQCCNoj8A==
=VWGn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Maintenance - getting rid of deleted messages fromvariousfolders ... they seem to be stuck, for lack of a better word

2006-09-16 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

   ***^\ ._)~~
 ~( __ _o   Was another beautiful day, Fri, 15 Sep 2006,
   @  @  at 17:34:46 -0400, when subscriber2list wrote:

 Aaaah Mica, my fine friend with whom I have not bantered with in years

In years already? It's deterrent sometimes how quickly time passes.

I am for years on this list?!

 See, Mica ... you can teach An Old Dog New Tricks!  I tried your
 suggestion with another stubborn folder of sorts and it ... worked!
  Thanks for the inspiration.

You're welcome. Everything that passes through Inbox on its way to other
folders, anyway _remains_ in Inbox, until it's compressed.

With Outbox and Trash folder is similar.

All of that is easily overlooked until man (but woman too) experiences a
strange problem in TB's work and then gets into learning why is so.

 Please keep up your fine ruminations as I enjoy reading your ...
 advice and sometimes ... utterances.  LOL!  You sure you're not a
 stand-up comic somewhere on that side of the pond?

You believe me or not, I just bring to the end the consequences of what
I hear/read around. No single thought of that is my own.

This is the way for me to amuse myself, for the computing stuff is
exceptionally boring, at least to me, with all this tweaking and reading
the fine manuals, and Mañuelas.

On the other hand, the things has to be done, and hence the tweaking
is unavoidable, so if you have to pass through all this hassle, then is
better to smile, even hysterically. I recon.

(When someone makes some unnecessary complicated, or better said
disarranged software, with which I have to work, the first sweet impulse
of mine is to bite into his/her neck to check if s/he is diabetic or
not.)

Apart from that, I have inborn very strong sat{y|i}ric traits, so that
many feel much better if I am simply just angry with them than when I
start to tease them.

I don't think I would earn a cent being comic, but again I really am
convinced that I could destroy someone just by teasing him/her. I was
watching my victims, had seen them after, and I know what I am talking
about. So, maybe as an atypical hit man. (=8

Why on the earth someone would have been be asked always anew at startup
is some application default one or not? If someone needs it to be
default or not, s/he will simply set this piece of software this way,
somewhere in its settings.

- --
Mica
 ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given
 in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~
GPG keys/docs/software at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/
   http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/
[Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
 Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo  Vector ~ Wine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-svn-4217 o tiger192 (Cygwin/MinGW32)

iQEVAwUBRQxei7SpHvHEUtv8AQiPMQf9FdhS10oQd4ciRtLeRZ9YjOZQ514daZha
Z1D2BAlOvYWTZSwzq7QPwo88JRq6mZUzah7YzybO8KxoCGqKVDDq1H7DZmfD5uKk
J2o8yiYz6OuBdS3B4MyMSFTZPr2/ddqOqN3TTYS1/8xwv1SPvZKepOn9wi2niMeC
bSORl49PYzNnwRluKy2NQEz/ek3eaF8qKxhYC0vrA/ufTC+8TTxFY09c/OWjYyEu
rE93l7Xo3/NuuJLcFvgi4C5v0tRocHs2nD8a+mcJULWFvax+As44QjObkWP1JJlX
E5um5o1/0TkjjYzQOoKEG3aCU7LGOHZfvmINd9I5gPQprx7dIcDfDg==
=y078
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Sunday 10 September 2006 at 8:55:49 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Susanne wrote:

 Do I have to go back to NAV?

Entirely up to you.
Never used NAV but heard plenty bad stories about it.
Could not get on with AVG but my sister loves it.
Nod32 came highly recommended, requires no plugin, works well for
me (although its scanning slows the system noticeably).

-- 
Best regards,

MFPA

Keep them dry and don't feed them after midnight

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat Confused!!!

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Tuesday 12 September 2006 at 11:30:15 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Robin Anson wrote:

 I'm running TB! v3.85.01, and when I check for updates, I am told
 there are no updates available!

When I check the message is you have the latest version but mine
is 3.80.06

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bug: AV

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Wednesday 13 September 2006 at 7:19:32 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fjelsten wrote:

 I get these on exiting:

 ---
 The Bat!
 ---
 Access violation at address 00883959 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 
 .
 ---
 OK   
 ---

I get these AVs apparently randomly (sometimes on starting or
closing TB! and sometimes coincident with failed PGP operations or
sending/receiving messages). Usually infrequent but occasionally
enough to make TB! virtually useless for a few hours to a couple
of days.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Always borrow money from a pessimist - they don't expect it back

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [n]

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Wednesday 13 September 2006 at 11:38:54 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Munson wrote:


 Account/properties/reply/use reply numbering in subject

or %SingleRe in reply templates as required

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

The second mouse gets the cheese

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Maintenance - getting rid of deleted messages from various folders ... they seem to be stuck, for lack of a better word

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Friday 15 September 2006 at 3:38:13 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:

 Deleting a message in a folder is just setting flag which tells TB
 not to display them. to actually get them deleted from the database,
 you need to compress. That's the way it works.

It would be good if the compress on exit option in folder
properties achieved this.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

2006-09-16 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

   ***^\ ._)~~
 ~( __ _o   Was another beautiful day, Sat, 16 Sep 2006,
   @  @  at 22:18:16 +0100, when MFPA wrote:

 On Sunday 10 September 2006 at 8:55:49 PM, in
 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Susanne wrote:

 Do I have to go back to NAV?

 Entirely up to you.
 Never used NAV but heard plenty bad stories about it.
 Could not get on with AVG but my sister loves it.
 Nod32 came highly recommended, requires no plugin, works well for
 me (although its scanning slows the system noticeably).

And while I am still in the mood to give some help around...

AntiVir doesn't need any plug-in too (so you don't have to bother
yourself with it, and related problems), for it will check all and
everything dealing in any way with the machine (http, ftp, mail,
`ordinary' files and so off).

It is free (like in `free beer') for personal use.

It is (now) faster than NOD32, and slows nothing down.

If a `bad' mail is trying to enter, AntiVir will block this particular
message (no entire message base will be blocked) and will ask you what
to do with it. When it is solved it will allow further download of the
mail.

Internet update is very fast.

You just have to download new whole version every 5 or six months, since
this is the period of time the (free) licence is valid. The file is
about 12 MB.

It is very easy for handling, easier than AVG and many other AV
programs.

Once you set it up, you forget it. Silent and dangerous.

Very good for beginners, but for much more experienced ones too.

The home page is... I can't recall and there anyway is nothing special
on it.

Full name of the program is Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic.

Direct link for download is:
http://dl7.avgate.net/down/windows/antivir_workstation_win7_en_h.exe

It has a nice red umbrella, that can be open and closed, squatting on
the system's tray. (I'd prefer a dark yellow, but whatever...)

Happy anti virusing.

- --
Mica
 ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given
 in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~
GPG keys/docs/software at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/
   http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/
[Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
 Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo  Vector ~ Wine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-svn-4217 o tiger192 (Cygwin/MinGW32)

iQEVAwUBRQx7SrSpHvHEUtv8AQjMLwgAnyfcYEmfe8v+JXzInbyoDBySWQoZLpej
5n+wyr3/THztTKe3UxfDk1ISQgFCdj+VgmUfgvIiE4jpCZfkbnPMTzU9KJJUZchR
MOli23WGjhM9JtK9g7uKEf92mqMXWy9yQqFvpPoUL5vhyiNlGs/sksQCKr9ZnyHf
KblxHou2XdSc6z+tUCVBPI0hyVNdy6D3CiqdVn4xUh50OzUw0CcqhKM2aa5PJVaO
pDdyH+FaX6ESbCxmbD9LZvVaNpE86uk9mHKcgLwUARuAFcXV4JSjhbcWM4vxAqJ7
qoV0bw1qJ8liwi57/opsqZnkdxo7aN1pAD/4LgVr/FqUXJhrmibCDg==
=ML9h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Maintenance - getting rid of deleted messages from various folders ... they seem to be stuck, for lack of a better word

2006-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MFPA,

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:27:54 +0100 GMT (17/09/2006, 05:27 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:

 Deleting a message in a folder is just setting flag which tells TB
 not to display them. to actually get them deleted from the database,
 you need to compress. That's the way it works.

M It would be good if the compress on exit option in folder
M properties achieved this.

It does. Alas, compressing takes 20 minutes over on my office computer
with almost 200,000 mails in over 100 folders, I'd rather do it
manually. Usually in the lunch break, as in the evening when I shut
down TB and the rest of my computer, I just want to go home. I don't
recommend using compress on exit to anyone, but maybe you have
faster computers on your side of the Globe.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Once you've seen a shopping center, you've seen a mall.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html