Re[4]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello, Claudius I don't think any other expression is more exact -- is simply fascistic. I want to apologize for saying that. Nevertheless, the last two reactions were very dissapointing. And it's not forgot with one mail. -- Claudius Regn -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Alexander, I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing than IMAP. AVK That's only you, please speak for *yourself* only;-) Alex, do you read what you quote?? ;) "I'd" ~~~ -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, SL Sure it does. Let's take, for example, non-conformity to the CUA SL standard. Open up TB, pick a folder with 10 messages in it. Now, on the list SL view do this. Select message #1. Hold shift and select message #3. Now, SL press control and select message #6. Now, still holding control, hold also SL shift and select message #10. The end result should be messages #1-#3, #6-#10 SL selected. TB!, however, deselects #1-#3 when you do the second shift and you SL only get #6-#10. It does not recognize the CNTL-SHIFT behavior. So what? You'd change this, RITLABS doesn't, maybe it is easy to change, but is it really important? There are 10E+10 things that are more important than opening 10 mails simultaneously!! Standards are important, but if specification XY is not sooo needed, I'd skip it, too, until I find the time. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, SL No, they do not. Do you really want me to get into my rant about how SL email clients are a shadow of what they could be based on my experience with SL past software on older hardware? They serve well for people receiving/sending less than 10 emails/day and that is why they are email clients that cover the basics. I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing than IMAP. SL Neither have anything to do with the core of an email client and can be SL provided with other applications. Right! This is all optional. I wanted to make clear, that spell checking to me - personally - is more important than IMAP. You said IMAP was core. You both say that you want the core of the mailer should be worked on first; my point is that I consider different things to be basics of an email client and on that should be worked, too. Again: SL and can be provided with other applications. You want me to spell check or read html-mails with other applications? That's why I use TheBat! I want to have IMAP implemented best as it can be - as a lot of other features Stefan described. And not just IMAP. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, SL No. The standard convention is to have quotes preceded with the symbol. There are different ways to communicate, to write emails, to quote. I quote the way I want to. I exchange emails with enough people from enough countries with enough experience that I decide how to quote in what situation. If you can't cope with my quoting, don't read it. I am open to new ideas from other people, you obviously need your standard. If there would be a rule for jumping off a brindge, you probably would use it. SL It has been that way for almost as long as I can remember. 'it has always been that way - and this is the way it should be! Our grand-grand-grand father did it that way. Change is bad.' SL So let's just say for well over a decade and a half that is how things are done in this SL medium. This is how you do it. 'Change is bad. I'm not that flexible'. SL Because the standard convention in the printed medium when quoting someone is radically different SL than here. Steve, what are you talking about? What convention? I can't believe this. 'Change is bad!' The idea of exchanging news, opinions or help is similar. I read mails from other people, I read my paper mail, postcards, I answer email, paper mail, postcards and even news from news.xxx.yyy . SL And, your point? None of that refutes my statement that the way that they SL are traditionally dealt with are radically different. 'Traditionally'?? 'Change is bad!' Right! He answered to 'the ideology' with technical aspects, because there are no visual (or 'ideology') differences! SL Uh, yes, there are. Scoring, for one. Where? SL You didn't make that clear. I read it that you was saying that TB! was A+ SL software engineering. I do not consider it so given that it doesn't even SL conform to the standard CUA keys for marking items in a list context. Standard? CUA? Tradition? Is this the reason why you don't want new features in TheBat! ? You are everywhere talking about conventions, standards. It sounds to me that your 'decade and a half' in this 'culture' have made you inflexible. I help dozens of people from each age to start working with their computer, the internet, email, ftp and so on. It sometimes is hard to convince them to use and respect some conventions that make internet easier, but standards and conventions is not all there is in live. That black/white glasses is not good! Your 'standard'-mail really made me look astonished. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve Lamb, with the email you dare to post here you show your shortcomings. You are just getting really angry and aggressive; the lack of arguments or your bad mood is not a reason to become personal insulting in a public mailing list. With all your net-"culture" you are breaking netiquette and your "standards" let you forget the primary rules of social communication. Unfortunately, -- or should I say fortunately? -- this discussion is at its end. And this because I quoted in 1 out of 99 cases a different way than "" and your dozen rules. I was trying to show you that there are different opinions about what people consider to be the core of an email client, that some people see some common points in the usage of news and emails, that sometimes one can learn from people's opinions that usually do not work with the internet. If you read all my mails, you should know that I never said "I need html-writing here and now, I need a newsreader here and now, I need a spell checker here and now...". YOU sound like your position is the only possible, technically, ideologically correct position. And not just your opinion. YOU are not the online community. YOU are the only one that has problems with that one single mail. SL Because the standard convention in the printed medium when quoting someone is radically different SL than here. There is NO convention in printed media. SL The convention of the culture that you have entered. I cannot believe I SL still have to argue over this with every newbie that comes into a new culture! I am the newbie that 'entered the culture'? Watch your mouth, Steve Lamb. SL You don't know how sad that makes me considering your utter lack of SL respect for the culture, its conventions and standards. SL Good. Hopefully you'll straighten up your act. My utter lack of respect for the culture? Straighten up my act? Steve Lamb, is it time to leave this mailing list??? Do you have any respect for other people in you? Respect for my culture? -- Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello, SL Doesn't do multiple accounts nor does it have a decent overview of what is SL in even a single account. Try again. Outlook would do. Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for fetch/send/store/search mail. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[3]: Scoring (was:Re: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!)
Hello, ST Thank you for such a comprehensive explanation. I wonder why we did ST not implement this thing before :-) This thing must be very useful ST for mailing list as well... And I see our new feature rising at the horizon... -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, SL "optional" items to make it comparable to Bat v1.x? You are aware that by SL virtualizing everything in the manner they have described they are adding in SL several layers of complexity? Each layer has its own potential for bugs. Then your conclusion will be: do not try to make complex software. Doesn't work for me. SL not directly related to the main task at hand, *reading email*. They are SL doing this without that core application's full potential even being SL completely realized. If you just want to *read mail* you can use Outlook... SL I'd rather you learned how to quote properly first. This is a killer for SL me to read in any intelligible fashion. A good start for any serious discussion, he? Steve Lamb, I'd rather you had learned how to choose your words properly; please do not tell me that "I have to learn how to quote properly" that way, this is ridiculous. Are you underlining quotes in your newspaper with blue? I chose to quote that way, alright? Most of the quotes where so short, that I rather included them in my discussion, O.K.? Secondly, I wanted to make clear to everybody who I quoted. Sorry if this one time didn't fit your aesthetic feeling or the processing of chunks. SL The programmers of RITLABS only have so much time on their hands. It SL is finite. They do not live in a warp bubble where one day for them equals a SL month for us. Thank you for pointing that out. SL Time they spend coding other projects means they aren't coding SL *this* one. Let me guess: you then make the line in the relation between number of projects and quality? It doesn't always have to be an exactly negative linear relation, IMHO. BTW, it was not to be taken so seriously, and I think this was clear. SL "You can have fast service, you can SL have quality service and you can have cheap service. Pick two." Well, I'll take 'quality' and 'fast service'! Or 'Quality' and 'cheap' would be ok, too. Maybe RITLABS at least chooses 'quality'. ideology: news and mails are "somewhat the same". SL They are not. The idea of exchanging news, opinions or help is similar. I read mails from other people, I read my paper mail, postcards, I answer email, paper mail, postcards and even news from news.xxx.yyy . SL And that is my problem. *IF* that is the case then it is another company SL that is drooling over the numbers of the "newbie" market and forgetting that As exclusively for newbie market, you are right, here, but sometimes newbies or 'outsiders' to speak generally, are able to bring in new views or ideas that an involved person wouldn't have come up with. What I think when I read George's comment "Newsreading is a VERY VERY different [...] SL He never said the reading was the same, he was talking just the technical SL level. Right! He answered to 'the ideology' with technical aspects, because there are no visual (or 'ideology') differences! This is A+ software engineering! We're trying to model communication here!! SL A+? No. Good, yes. Great, no. I don't understand you. I wrote that it is A+ software engineering to think about the similarity of news and mails regarding the purpose of exchanging information, with the same properties, and you say 'good'. Ok, B+, then, but I thought you were opposed to that opinion. BTW, I never said that I'd like to have an integrated newsreader, but I can understand why RITLABS is thinking about realizing it and I wouldn't _hate_ this option. To further explain my point of view: if some friends of mine want to discuss this or that topic with equal minded people in the net, they wouldn't care if by mail or news! -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello George, GMM It doesn't go this way my friend. GMM A mail reader is made for one job. To read mail. As much as your GMM coffee machine is made to make coffee. GMM All i want is to read mail. First: in *your opinion* "it doesn't go this way", my friend. Obviously you consider a lot of features belonging to '*reading mail*' - and not just reading mail, that's why you use TheBat! You think this or that is essential 'mail reading', other people draw the line somewhere else. So be careful using 'read mail' when you don't mean Outlook... I want my coffee machine to make coffe. But since I do not regard drip 'coffee' to be coffee, I want my espresso machine to mill beans, heat water, generate pressure, cream milk and finally press the water through the coffee - And all I want my coffee machine to do is: COFFEE! GMM If I may, I don't think that Steve disagrees. Neither do I. The idea GMM is the excanging of information but the implementation of news is GMM vastly different from the implementation of mail. GMM In few words, the idea is the same, the way to do it is very different That's what I think! I never doubted the technical difference. What I think when I read George's comment "Newsreading is a VERY VERY different [...] SL He never said the reading was the same, he was talking just the SL technical level. Right! He answered to 'the ideology' with technical aspects, because there are no visual (or 'ideology') differences! GMM See above. See above. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello George, GMM Let's draw a line. GMM In order to read mail you should I did not mean hairsplitting. You do. GMM So mail reading means at least you should have a way to GMM fetch/read/write/send/organize/search mail. GMM All the other things are optional. So by that rationality 95% of TheBat! functions are by now optional. GMM If your coffee machine blew out at random times you would have rather GMM different opinion. It does not, neither does TheBat! -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, SL clients have a rotten core. Sure, they look pretty, but bite into it, really SL sink your teeth into it and you find it is sour inside with no substance. I don't think so. Almost all mail clients do perfectly offer all the options you described -- and George described to be besic features. SL TB! is good in some areas (database management) than other clients and SL worse in other areas (IMAP). I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing than IMAP. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, Either way, TheBat! is not *just* for fetch/send/store/search mail. SL No, and that is the problem. An email client should be just for that. SL Outlook would not do because it is not an email client by any stretch of the SL imagination. Hahaha, Steve -- thank you for your serious argumentation... I don't want an email client just for that. BTW, TheBat! handles all this and it should go or a lot more. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: POP before SMTP problem
Hello Jast, J Get an account at a free POP-mail service that also offers SMTP It's the POP of my very own domain, so this is not an option. Thanks for your help, though. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello George, GMM The only thing I want from my mailer to do is to GMM fetch/send/store/search mail. There'S a pretty nifty onehm, well, I think it was called PINE ;) !! -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Finally!
Hello Steve, SL And Opera sails above its competition. I don't want to see RITLABS spend SL time competing with Opera Software when they still have a LOT of work to do on SL TB!. I don't want to see Opera Software compete with RITLABS, either. RITLABS software IMHO is evolving and accepting new ideas -- Opera not. That's the advantage I see. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
POP before SMTP problem
Hello TBUsers, for one mail account I use POP before SMTP. In about 95% TheBat! handles this as well as it should. Once in a while unfortunately I get (retranslated...) 'SEND - send mail(s) - 1 mail in queue SEND - connected with SMTP server SEND - sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] SEND - last mail address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] SEND - mail was not sent. Server reply - [EMAIL PROTECTED]...Relaying Denied: Authenticate with POP first.' Any ideas? -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[3]: Digest (01/05/2000 12:18) Special Issue (#2000-171)
Hello Carsten, CD I seem to remember a test the German c't (computer magazine) made here CD a few months ago. In that (if I remember correctly) they reported some CD difficulties with IMAP4 and the then-current version of TB!. And here we go (translation mode: quick'n'dirty...) "'The Bat! 1.22' The IMAP-implementation is a joke. As for a POP account The Bat! downloads all mails on the hard drive and deletes them from the server. That has nothing to do with server-based administration." -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[3]: OT Maillita problems
Hello tracer, t not quite, the better ones though are commercial software. And the t very best are quite large and will show you anything going out/in, Sorry, - you are right, of course. I was thinking of free- or shareware, since professional network monitoring didn't seem to be the answer for Albertos question ;) -- but I forgot to mention that. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://regn.de/pgp/ Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: OT Maillita problems
Ciao Alberto, AA Second problem: how's 'bout security? How can I be sure that this AA program will not send a copy of my email, or even my ip address, or AA other persona data to someone else? AA Thank for your answer and happy y2k You can monitor your on-line traffic with a packet sniffer and have a look at the packages sent and the target IPs while sending a mail thru maillita . While most excellent tools are for Linux/Unix, there are only a few for Win/DOS-system. Unfortunately, the ones that _are_ for Win/DOS-systems are usually for command line DOS. There's one with a nice GUI: SpyNet Capture95, contact is [EMAIL PROTECTED] or http://members.xoom.com/_XOOM/Laurentiu2 . AFAI can see maillita is clean. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://regn.de/pgp/ Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: The Bat! - suggestions
Hi, SL 2: The PGP interface should not use the default key. Instead TB! should keep SL separate KeyIDs for each account and request that KeyID. This is because some SL people *cough, myself, cough* have more than one key and use different keys SL for different accounts. OS I second that. And this should be an option, too - I really do not want to enter or choose the KeyID each time I encrypt. Default key for each account would be fine. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 PGP http://regn.de/pgp/ -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: check mail for all not working?
Hi, this option is unchecked in all accounts. as i just realize, the bat doesn't check just 4 of 8 accounts, it checks sometimes 4, sometimes 1, sometimes 3 acccounts with out a system... Using "check all Alt-F2" in the drop down from the blue "check emails" button checks all 5 accounts here. Using just the blue "check emails" button checks only the first account here and the keys alt+f2 checks all 5 again. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
multiple EMail addresses / address book / favourite
Hello TBUsers, it is possible to enter more than one email addresses in the properties of an address book entry. If I create a new mail using a recipient from the arrow/drop down menu (favourites) next to the new mail button, the first email address will be in the "to" field, but the second in the "CC" field. Selecting a recipient through the address book symbol in the "to" field, only the first email address will be used (no CC). I'd like to store multiple email addresses but I don't want them to show up in "CC:" (using the favourites menu) - I just need to store them _somewhere_ for special occasions. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: problems with messages PGP signed by me
Hello Pat, PE When I send a message to myself and sign the WHOLE message with PGP PE and check the received message i get a "not valid". PE If I do the same with just a BLOCK - everything is fine. PE I suspect that the bat is changing the message when it sends it Nope - sorry, can't confirm this. Everything shows up fine, here. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: Site with links
Hello TBUsers, WK see my TB links on WK http://people.frankfurt.netsurf.de/wky/pcsoftsp.htm#table6 If you want your "TheBat!" to squeak and flapp its wings at the arrival of new mail there's a link on the site abouve to a wav-file. AFAIK the link to bat.wav on this site leads to an almost _empty_ site, but I found one (the same?) at http://voyager.cns.ohiou.edu/~mcorbin/sounds/sounds.html. -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[2]: PGP Check Signature does not work
Hi TBUsers, The version number is hardcoded into the plugin (batpgp65.dll). Ah...So it's just a typo? CG No. They obviously assumed that most people are using the CG international version of PGP... Mmmh. So since I removed any batpgp*.dll besides batpgp65.ll (I'm using PGP6.5.1) why does it display 6.0.2i in my message - if it is hardcoded in the dll, it should display the "assumed version" in the dll and not some reg junk from previous installations (see msgs earlier)? -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re[3]: PGP Check Signature does not work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Oliver, n i'm using PGP 6.0.2i and the PGP 6.0.x/6.5.x plug-in but "check n digital signature" does not work. all i get is an empty "PGPlog" n window. anyone else with the same problems? [cut] I' using PGP 6.5.1 (US, since pgpi.com announced Version i for October, 1st and nothing happens). Option "PGP-sign" writes: (a) "Version: PGP 6.0.2i" (see below) (b) adds "- " above "With best..." (see below) (c) destroys quoted block (see above) (d) "Hash: SHA1" (see above) Why (a),(b),(c) and what does (d) mean? Auto-check-signature doesn't work here with 6.5.1 (or maybe TB! thinks there's a 6.0.2i installed, which _was_ installed but I made a complete uninstall). - -- With best regards, Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.36 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.0.2i iQA/AwUBOAXtFUBdP0XmJHLbEQL0kACeNhwWXTEnCj1ViLtpie4f1qStHz0AnRN4 ptJ8hb55rgh/jMUkSdIqpMxf =MO3l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --
