Re: Security newby and yellow circles

2004-10-15 Thread Paul C
On 10/15/2004 04:17 pm, MFPA wrote:
 Hi

 On Tuesday, 28 September, 2004, at 11:25:57 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
  but basically, you call up PGPKeys, and see if you have the keyservers:
  keyserver.pgp.com
  europe.keys.pgp.com

  pgp.mit.edu is a useful addition to that list, IMHO

yes it is, if you depend on keyservers.
I don't put my key on the keyservers, I tell you how to get it using my sig  
kludges ( headers).
right now I am setting up a new Xandros Linux setup, so I don't have my PGP 
info here, but if you look in the archive I know you will find it.

-- 
Paul Cartwright
Linux registered user # 367800



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: BayesIt download?

2004-08-31 Thread Paul C
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:59:29 +0200, Andre Wichartz wrote:

 Hello Peter,
 
 On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
 
 PK Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
 
 PK The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab.
 
 PK TIA
 
 http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit0511.rar

I have downloaded 053 from the ritlabs site:

Version 0.5.3
[http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit053.rar]
(20.04.2004)

- when installing from The Bat! preferences menu it was necessary to
configure the filter manually. Now it assumes all default settings itself.
- The window about can't create folder were shown in some false cases.
+ The filter assumes it's interface language during installation and tries
to load appropriate language from the file bayesit.lng. The file is checked
in the filter's working folder, filter's program folder, The Bat's program
folder and finaly in the main The Bat! mail folder.
* some strings in English interface were changed and official source files
for translators are now commited to CVS. Together with previous feature it
makes BayesIt easy-localizable.



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB and XP new SP2...

2004-08-31 Thread Paul C
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:32:03 +0200, MAU wrote:

 I don't use XP, but in a daily security newsletter I get they recommend
 delaying (or blocking) the installation of SP2 because some applications
 may cease to work.
I use Office, TB, MS Streets  Trips, a few imaging programs, a fefw
newsreaders.. no problem here ( so far :)



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: v3.0 b1

2004-08-31 Thread Paul C
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:00:49 +0100, AceMan wrote:

 Needless to say, it appears A LOT of people are not impressed with this
 decision. Further discussion on this topic can be found here:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta%40thebat.dutaint.com/
 
 I'm not getting any wiser reading that. Can anyone shed some light on the
 issue? Whats going on?
 
 Well, this is merely my take on it but, to cut a long story short
 
 TB! v3 (Yes, that's right. Final release apparently) is out tomorrow.

it's out, I'm running it :)
 
 Bugs still remain in v2 (and considering Beta 1 of v3 came out yesterday, it is 
 assumed v3 *probably* contains a fair few bugs too)
 
so mush for a long beta cycle :)

 Supposedly promised features for v2 will now not be delivered for v2.

I haven't heard this yet.
 
 Registered users are expected to pay for the upgrade to v3.bugs included.
 
unless they send you a registration key...
 



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB and XP new SP2...

2004-08-31 Thread Paul C
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:05:00 +0200, WilWilWil wrote:

 I see in the footer of some mails that some of you use TB on XP with new Service
 Pack 2. Have you seen some troubles with TB 2.12 or higher under SP2 ?
 
 Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and
 Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? Because this upgrade seems to
 be very heavy !

I have SP2 installed, and have used all the new V2.13 betas, the V3.0
Beta/1 and now the V3.0 final version, without a problem.



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Posting Through GMane

2004-03-11 Thread Paul C
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:35:17 + (UTC), Joseph N. wrote:

 Although this post is an inquiry into whether posting straight from a 
 newsreader into GMane will work, it's also a test, since it *is* a 
 post straight from a newsreader into GMane.  So:  if this appears, 
 then all is well and no response is necessary.  Subscribers can just 
 point and post.  (If this does not appear, I'll re-post an inquiry 
 the traditional.)
did I get it right???



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Posting Through GMane

2004-03-11 Thread Paul C
X-Archive: encrypt
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:38:58 -0700, Leif Gregory wrote:

 Hello Paul,
 
 Thursday, March 11, 2004, 2:12:47 PM, you wrote:
 Paul did I get it right???
 
 Yes and no. You posted correctly, but you didn't set your encryption.
I think I got it now.. 40tude is new to me, but I was able to add the
X-header X-archive, and ( hopefully) set it to encrypt



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html