advanced auto reply
I am one of those people who play an active role in trying to stop spammers. I filter all incoming messages not sent to me specifically into a spam folder. never fails. Each day I parse the email headers and report them to their ISP and email host. Suppose I wanted to forward, resend, or auto reply to the senders ISP rather than to the sender..?? For instance any spam coming from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would get forwarded to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> complete with all header information. Sending all this back to the sender is easy.. How do I automatically send it to their Isp or email host..?? Would sure save me alot of time. Get 250 color business cards for FREE! http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/ -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The "Sent" Folder
Greetings, Does anyone know how to stop the bat from putting copies of sent mail into the sent folder..?? I did look for an answer to this simple question in the Bat FAQ.. If I missed it maybe it would be easier to just send me the link. best regards Get 250 color business cards for FREE! http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/ -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
Forward "vs" Redirect
Can someone please tell me the difference between forwarding an email and redirecting one...?? I am reffering to the different actions available for filters. Thanks Get 250 color business cards for FREE! http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/ -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d
A simple question
When sending an email the Bat and most other email clients have a choice between High, Normal, low priority. Can anyone give me any insight as to why this is..?? I know the obvious answer, One gets there faster than the other. But why do they do this..?? Why not just have 1 speed "high priority" and increase the overall production for everyone.. Why would someone send an email low priority when they could send it high priority just as well..?? If high priority has an adverse effect on the email system then why not just have 1 speed as low priority..?? There must be more to it. I have been wondering about this for some time and assumed I would run across an answer sooner or later, but I never have. Thanks, Fusiontunes http://www.Fusiontunes.net -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: A simple question
I just sent 3 emails to myself using all 3 priority options and I did receive them all nearly the same time... So if this is just to let the recipient know the urgency of your message, where is this indicated..?? I cant tell any difference in any of the 3 emails I sent.. I even looked at the complete header information and none of them were labeled "High Priority" or say anything else about priority... Maybe this is why I have been confused for so long. "it just gives the recipient a sign that this mail is important, it catches more attention. Vice versa with low priority mail." -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
