Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
On Mon, 8 May 2000 22:41:11 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: He he he!! Nor mine... but I must admit, I waited for a few more people to download and install 1.42c before I ventured into it. ;o) I trust Allie, so when I saw that he had the version, I figured it was safe to install it. The file tb142uc.rar is a protected archive of the /uncompressed/ TB!1.42c executable. Stefan placed it there when I wrote to him about the problems I was having with the compression. They compressed the executable for security reasons, based on the fact that the uncompressed version is more easily hacked by 'unfavourables'. Version 1.42c uses a different method of compression from that of version 1.42 and a couple minor fixes that I'm uncertain about were also made. -- Allie Martin Using TB! v1.42c on Win2k Pro PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=GetAlliePGPKey Tag: "Life is a series of very rude awakenings. " -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Lost link associations with 1.42c
Since the installation of 1.42c, clicking on http links within messages results in absolutely nothing. Wonder how the associations were lost. More importantly, how to get them back. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
Hi Curt, On Mon, 8 May 2000 06:06:17 -0400GMT (08/05/2000, 18:06 +0800GMT), Curt wrote: C Since the installation of 1.42c, clicking on http links within C messages results in absolutely nothing. I cannot confirm this. Links open as usual. My browser is Netscape 4.7. -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.42c under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 on a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
Hi Curt,
On Monday, May 08, 2000 at 12:06:17 PM you wrote:
Since the installation of 1.42c,
What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;)
Oliver Sturm
--
% If I had a ( for every $ Congress spent, what would I have?
Too many ('s.
--
Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key ID: 71D86996
Fingerprint: 8085 5C52 60B8 EFBD DAD0 78B8 CE7F 38D7 71D8 6996
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
Hi Curt Since the installation of 1.42c, clicking on http links within messages results in absolutely nothing. Can't confirm this. I work with IE. The problem that I've now with 1.42c is that using Shift and a double click on a http link won't cause IE to open a new window anymore. No, this is opening IE in my hex editor! Not really useful ;-) So short, Beat -- Using The Bat! 1.42c under Windows 95 4.0 Build 950 -- PGP public key available: Send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or get it on keyservers: 0x4E0B0777 (DH/DSS) -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
On Monday, May 08, 2000, 10:41:42 AM, Oliver Sturm wrote: What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) That is a good question Oliver. I had asked the same question a few days ago, and was basically told that it was the 1.42 Final... with a few bug fixes. Huh? Anyway, if you go to their FTP Server, and download/install the latest offering, you'll see you Help/About will then say 1.42c instead of just 1.42 I still don't understand why RitLabs didn't mention something specific about this change, either on this, or the TB BETA List. Nick -- --=N.J. (Nick) Andriash=-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x2924D361 --- -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Lost link associations with 1.42c
Hello Nick, Monday, May 08, 2000, 6:18:02 PM, you wrote: What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) NA NA Anyway, if you go to their FTP Server, and download/install the latest NA offering, you'll see you Help/About will then say 1.42c instead of just NA 1.42 I did that earlier but saw a file named 1.42uc, I think. My access to it was denied. Best regards, Quinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- "I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts, and beer." - Abraham Lincoln --- Using The Bat! 1.42 under Windows 95 4.0 Build 950 on a Pentium 133 with 88MB RAM.(¹ªÞ²æìr¸yÖ¬j·!÷£iº+
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
Hi Quin, On Mon, 8 May 2000 19:42:44 -0600GMT (09/05/2000, 09:42 +0800GMT), Quin Selman wrote: What the $§% is 1.42c (pardon me ;) NA Anyway, if you go to their FTP Server, and download/install the latest NA offering, you'll see you Help/About will then say 1.42c instead of just NA 1.42 QS I did that earlier but saw a file named 1.42uc, I think. My access to it QS was denied. You have to download the_bat.exe from the main ftp site, not from the beta site. If access is still denied, check spelling of the word "anonymous". ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.42c under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 on a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
Hi Nick, On Mon, 8 May 2000 20:26:50 -0700GMT (09/05/2000, 11:26 +0800GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: NA This still doesn't answer the basic question... and that is, how does NA 1.42c differ from 1.42? There has been nothing from RitLabs on this issue. NA Now are you saying that there is yet another version out there... 1.42uc? Something ending on "uc" is on the beta page, dunno what it is, so won't download it. No, there was no announcement about the difference between 1.42 and 1.42c. I was told there are "minor bug fixes", and I just love cyptic answers, so I didn't pursue it further. Didn't crash my system, though. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.42c under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 on a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Lost link associations with 1.42c
On Monday, May 08, 2000, 8:43:53 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: No, there was no announcement about the difference between 1.42 and 1.42c. I was told there are "minor bug fixes", and I just love cyptic answers, so I didn't pursue it further. Didn't crash my system, though. ;-) He he he!! Nor mine... but I must admit, I waited for a few more people to download and install 1.42c before I ventured into it. ;o) I trust Allie, so when I saw that he had the version, I figured it was safe to install it. Nick -- --=N.J. (Nick) Andriash=-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID: 0x2924D361 --- -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
