Re: [OT] Info about TBOT needed
Hello Lore, Sunday, February 21, 2021, 7:17:18 PM, you wrote: > I'd just be glad to see the Yahoo group replaced with a Google > group. I do wonder how many members we have in TBOT, and whether > they are all in this group as well. I have some feeling that even if TBOT would reincarnate under the fluffy paw of Google, it could be a longish delivery. I couldn't know how many members TBOT had exactly, but for sure it was above one hundred. -- Mica (Micchah) Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] Info about TBOT needed
Hello Mica, Sunday, February 21, 2021, 4:51:52 AM, you wrote: > Hello Lore, > Saturday, February 13, 2021, 7:10:22 PM, you wrote: >> We should get a Google Group made. That has solved the issue for >> another Y group I've been in. > I don't know if the previous owner of the Yahoo TBOT is willing to do > this, but there, already almost two months passed with no news in this > regard, so that if someone could contact him / her and see, would not > be bad I guess. > I could create it myself but would accept anyone else willing to do > this, although could be fine if we contact the previous TBOT owner > first. > Tell me what you (and all) think... I'd just be glad to see the Yahoo group replaced with a Google group. I do wonder how many members we have in TBOT, and whether they are all in this group as well. Lore Galore -- The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs v9.3.3 Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] Info about TBOT needed
Hello Lore, Saturday, February 13, 2021, 7:10:22 PM, you wrote: > We should get a Google Group made. That has solved the issue for > another Y group I've been in. I don't know if the previous owner of the Yahoo TBOT is willing to do this, but there, already almost two months passed with no news in this regard, so that if someone could contact him / her and see, would not be bad I guess. I could create it myself but would accept anyone else willing to do this, although could be fine if we contact the previous TBOT owner first. Tell me what you (and all) think... -- Mica (Micchah) Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] Info about TBOT needed
Hello Jack, Was Saturday, February 13, 2021, 7:05:41 PM, when you wrote: > Does t...@yahoogroups.com not work anymore? Nope. Yahoo has cooled it's groups service off. Yahoogroups threw the spoon. Into the bucket. And then kicked the bucket. I recon it is now doubly dead. ✔ I guess we could design a new incarnation in Googlegroups, as Lore mentioned. -- Cordially, Mica Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] Info about TBOT needed
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, at 10:05 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > Hello Mica, > > On Saturday, February 13, 2021 you wrote: > > MM> Hello TBUDL, > > MM> Could Anyone inform me (PM is acceptable too) where we could address > MM> related to off topic content now? > > MM> Thanks much, > > Does t...@yahoogroups.com not work anymore? > > -- > Regards, > Jack > Central Alabama USA > > The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs version 6.0.12 > Windows 10 Home Build 9200 > > > > Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: > http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html > We should get a Google Group made. That has solved the issue for another Y group I've been in. Lore Galore Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] Info about TBOT needed
Hello Mica, On Saturday, February 13, 2021 you wrote: MM> Hello TBUDL, MM> Could Anyone inform me (PM is acceptable too) where we could address MM> related to off topic content now? MM> Thanks much, Does t...@yahoogroups.com not work anymore? -- Regards, Jack Central Alabama USA The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs version 6.0.12 Windows 10 Home Build 9200 Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] Info about TBOT needed
Hello TBUDL, Could Anyone inform me (PM is acceptable too) where we could address related to off topic content now? Thanks much, -- Mica .fioyica Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] I have lost a gmx address (eek! - oops? - yuck!) - advice needed
\\ Meant to be sent to TBOT, but I recalled that Yahoo groups don't
work anymore, hence resending here, if you don't mind, and possibly
someone could help me in fixing this issue. Thanks much! Gracias!
Muchas! //
Hi!
See this...please...due to not using it lately (few years now,
actually), and not logging in at all, I have found yesterday ("all my
troubles seem so...") that I have lost my GMX address (the 'famous'
bluen...@gmx.net). Forever. And ever. And probably for good too. If
not even for eternity (which is indeed a lots of the time, if you
agree). I didn't know for this GMX politics; might be it is something
relatively new; have no a faintest idea (lots of change these days in
the world, I hope for the better anyway).
I've been trying to make new one, at GMX, but found that this too is
not possible anymore - save if you are in Germany, Austria and / or
Swiss.
So...as well, I have to revoke all my GPG keys related to this
address, I guess. And when I make new key(s), I would want an address
which is equally, or nearly so, reliable as this GMX one was. I've
been searching for something like that, but haven't find anything
similar.
Anyone having some advice as for how to solve such situation?[*]
[*] Gmail is good to me for the most of things I do, but I don't think
it became that good that I could use it for GPG signed, or encrypted,
mail. Although I already guess I could do some 'workaround' by sending
GPG-ed content as attachment.
--
Cordially,
Mića
.fioyica
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: German The Bat! forum "batboard.net" seems to be down
Warning: This is off topic == Hello! The German web forum "Batboard" (https://www.batboard.net) created by volunteers seems to be down. Any confirmations about this? -- Best regards, Joerg Schiermeier Bielefeld, Germany -- productive: The Bat! pro v8.8.9.0 (32bit) - wine(at)Debian64 test environment (32bit + 64bit): The Bat! pro - latest beta wine: v5.7 - Debian64/bullseye: v5.4.19-1 (2020-02-13) emulated windows version (build number): v10.0 (17134) Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
Hi On Tuesday 7 October 2014 at 2:15:59 AM, in mid:59872763.20141006211...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote: No kidding... really? Yes, unless I completely mis-understood what I was reading. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Keep them dry and don't feed them after midnight Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
10/6/2014 7:49 AM Hi MFPA, On 10/5/2014 MFPA wrote: M I thought an SSD could be used on any box that can use a SATA disk M drive, as a drop-in replacement for that drive. I confused this with ACHI, sorry. It is needed in Windows 7. See this: https://www.google.com/#q=uefi+mode+when+installing+windows+7 M I see results saying UEFI works with 64-bit versions of Windows 7 but M not with 32-bit versions. And my quick skim-reading did not spot M anything that said Windows 7 actually needed UEFI. I have no experience with 32 bit Win 7... See this: http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/186875-uefi-unified-extensible-firmware-interface-install-windows-7-a.html - -- Paul The Bat! v.6.6.0.3 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601 No IMAP No OTFE Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
Hi On Monday 6 October 2014 at 12:53:53 PM, in mid:6994081.20141006075...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote: I have no experience with 32 bit Win 7... See this: http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/186875-uefi-unified-extensible-firmware-interface-install-windows-7-a.html I think that's one of the hits on the search results page you posted before. It tells you how to install 64-bit Windows 7 using UEFI, but does not say you can only install it that way. In fact, if you follow from its beginning the tutorial linked from Step 5 http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/1649-clean-install-windows-7-a.html, it tells you how to install Windows 7 using BIOS. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net When duty calls...hang up immediately Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
10/6/2014 9:15 PM Hi MFPA, On 10/6/2014 MFPA wrote: M I think that's one of the hits on the search results page you posted M before. It tells you how to install 64-bit Windows 7 using UEFI, but M does not say you can only install it that way. In fact, if you follow M from its beginning the tutorial linked from Step 5 M http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/1649-clean-install-windows-7-a.html, M it tells you how to install Windows 7 using BIOS. No kidding... really? - -- Paul The Bat! v.6.6.0.3 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601 No IMAP No OTFE Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
10/5/2014 9:04 AM Hi MFPA, On 10/4/2014 MFPA wrote: M UEFI-mode and Secure Boot in the BIOS are two newish features that M came out somewhere around the same time as Windows 8. I have not M encountered them myself, but saw when googling this topic that they M need to be disabled before installing Windows 7. UEFI mode is needed when using an SSD as a primary drive. It is needed in Windows 7. See this: https://www.google.com/#q=uefi+mode+when+installing+windows+7 For secure boot see this: https://www.google.com/#q=secure+boot+when+installing+windows+7 - -- Paul The Bat! v.6.6.0.3 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601 No IMAP No OTFE Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
Hello MFPA, On Sunday, October 05, 2014 you wrote: M Hi M On Saturday 4 October 2014 at 4:18:45 PM, in M mid:23685106.20141004101...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: The desktop I'm using now was purchased from EggHead or TigerDirect, I don't remember which. It was purchased as separate components and assembled by me. The HDD was blank and starting the machine with the Win 7 CD in the drive was all I had to do to get a working machine. Although I have yet to investigate the process of *downgrading* a machine's OS, I assumed I could just do a deep format on the C: drive and then load Win 7. Naive? M Windows comes packaged with a whole lot of device drivers to make the M installation process more convenient and increase the chances of a new M install working straight away. M I would think having everything work without needing to install *any* M extra drivers at must have required some advanced planning (by either M yourself or the componentt supplier) and an element of luck. And that M was a box that you built from then-current components and installed M the then-current Windows version. I have never installed or M re-installed an operating system without having some sort of driver M issue, usually minor but at least once a show-stopper. M Your laptop is newer than the Windows version you plan to install, so M could possibly contain components for which no driver was packaged M with Windows 7 (or maybe even for which no Windows 7 driver was M written). On the other hand, it might just work. M UEFI-mode and Secure Boot in the BIOS are two newish features that M came out somewhere around the same time as Windows 8. I have not M encountered them myself, but saw when googling this topic that they M need to be disabled before installing Windows 7. I ordered Win 7 early yesterday from TD and THEN ( I usually do things in the wrong order) started checking the Web for links to downgrading a computer from Win 8 to Win 7. After reading several I realized I may have been a little hasty in ordering Win 7, as much mention was made of drivers. Now frightened I may have bitten off more than I could chew, I contacted TD and cancelled the order. My plan now is to contact ASUS Tech Support to find out if that particular laptop can even BE downgraded and if so, what is required. -- Best Regards, Jack LaRosa :usflag: Central Alabama Using The Bat! ver: 5.2. Running Windows 7 Pro ver 6 build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
Hi On Sunday 5 October 2014 at 2:11:03 PM, in mid:1366095716.20141005091...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote: UEFI mode is needed when using an SSD as a primary drive. I thought an SSD could be used on any box that can use a SATA disk drive, as a drop-in replacement for that drive. It is needed in Windows 7. See this: https://www.google.com/#q=uefi+mode+when+installing+windows+7 I see results saying UEFI works with 64-bit versions of Windows 7 but not with 32-bit versions. And my quick skim-reading did not spot anything that said Windows 7 actually needed UEFI. For secure boot see this: https://www.google.com/#q=secure+boot+when+installing+windows+7 That supports my previous comment about the google results indicating Secure Boot needs to be disabled for Windows 7. Which you stated yourself in another posting. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Gypsy Dwarf Escapes Prison: Small Medium at large Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't enter registration code block [OT]
Hi On Saturday 4 October 2014 at 4:18:45 PM, in mid:23685106.20141004101...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: The desktop I'm using now was purchased from EggHead or TigerDirect, I don't remember which. It was purchased as separate components and assembled by me. The HDD was blank and starting the machine with the Win 7 CD in the drive was all I had to do to get a working machine. Although I have yet to investigate the process of *downgrading* a machine's OS, I assumed I could just do a deep format on the C: drive and then load Win 7. Naive? Windows comes packaged with a whole lot of device drivers to make the installation process more convenient and increase the chances of a new install working straight away. I would think having everything work without needing to install *any* extra drivers at must have required some advanced planning (by either yourself or the componentt supplier) and an element of luck. And that was a box that you built from then-current components and installed the then-current Windows version. I have never installed or re-installed an operating system without having some sort of driver issue, usually minor but at least once a show-stopper. Your laptop is newer than the Windows version you plan to install, so could possibly contain components for which no driver was packaged with Windows 7 (or maybe even for which no Windows 7 driver was written). On the other hand, it might just work. UEFI-mode and Secure Boot in the BIOS are two newish features that came out somewhere around the same time as Windows 8. I have not encountered them myself, but saw when googling this topic that they need to be disabled before installing Windows 7. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Don't learn safety rules by accident... Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] Selecting From address in Outlook (Was: Re: Messages queued in wrong outbox)
Hi On Monday 24 March 2014 at 7:02:30 AM, in mid:1275501464.20140324080...@gmx.net, Feli Wilcke wrote: That is wrong. When you have defined more than one addresse there is a small dropdown list to choose from besides the sending address. We do not have this small drop-down list in Outlook where I work. If we leave the from field empty the message is sent from the individual's default role account. Otherwise we have to type the address into the from field or select it from the global addressbook. If you don't have permission to send from the address you put in the from field, the message either bounces, or doesn't go at all. For sending from an address that is not in the global addressbook, the procedure is quite convoluted. I have to refer to the relevant self-help article on our intranet when my primary role email address has changed since I last did it. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Everyone makes mistakes. It is what you do afterwards that counts. Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [veering OT] Stopping E-Mail Before it gets sent
Hi On Wednesday 22 January 2014 at 12:43:52 AM, in mid:163679921.20140122074...@thebat.net, Thomas Fernandez wrote: I understood your question as stopping a message being in the process of being sent already. Sorry for my misunderstanding. It wasn't me who asked, but I think that was indeed the question. No, Outlook does not recall messages. This is simply not possible due to the way the internet works. I thought in the event the sender and recipient were both on the same exchange server it was possible but otherwise not. What Outlook does, it makes the message invisible on the recipeint's computer. Outlook on my machine at work often still has the message visible but crossed out. Sometimes they disappear if I select them, other times a dialog box appears. This is very funny, because I still see it when using TB!, and in addition, I receive a message that says abc would like to recall this message. I saw that on TB! a few times as well. I am always tempted to send this extra message back to the sender with a comment: Too late, honey. ;-) Or Glad to hear it. I would like to win last weeks lottery. But neither of us can change the past. (-; -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Only dead fish go with the flow Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] Re: Lost draft
Hi On Saturday 30 November 2013 at 4:28:16 AM, in mid:446938859.20131129222...@fastmail.fm, Dwight Corrin wrote: Actually IMAP is a very useful email format for anyone who owns more than one device which can access the internet. Fair enough. But it is still just a variation on webmail that allows the user to choose their own mail client instead of being stuck with the service provider's website in a browser. A browser, or what you refer to as webmail, is a poor substitute for a dedicated mail client That's why I said enhanced by using your own choice of MUA as the interface. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com Of course it's a good idea - it's mine! Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (Slightly OT) How to buy Version 2.12 -- that is the question, NOW!
Hi On Thursday 16 August 2012 at 5:28:38 PM, in mid:797234909.20120816182...@gmx.net, Mica Mijatovic wrote: I'd want to buy your version 2.12 of TheBat!, if is anyhow possible, as soon as possible. The Bat! 2.12.04 is downloadable from the RITLabs site http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/archive_versions/. If you no longer have access to your v2 licence key, I would hope RITLabs would be willing to re-send it if you still have access to the email address you quoted when purchasing it. Failing that, maybe they could be persuaded to sell you a v5 key and trade it for a new v2 key. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@rocketmail.com Always be on the lookout for conspicuousness Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (Slightly OT) How to buy Version 2.12 -- that is the question, NOW!
Hallo Mica, On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:28:38 +0200GMT (16-8-2012, 18:28 , where I live), you wrote: MM I'd want to buy your version 2.12 of TheBat!, if is anyhow possible, as MM soon as possible. As most of us (who have been 2.12) have upgraded their version for the upgrade fee instead of purchasing a full version, I'm afraid that selling it would be illegal. moderator on Consider this thread closed. moderator off -- Groetjes, Roelof MODERATOR.SYS detected! LOAD ON_TOPIC.COM? (Y/n) http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.1.6.13 Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 5 pop3 accounts, 2 imap accounts OTFE disabled i7-2600 3.4GHz 4 GB RAM Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(Slightly OT) How to buy Version 2.12 -- that is the question, NOW!
Hello Dear All! I'd want to buy your version 2.12 of TheBat!, if is anyhow possible, as soon as possible. You may cc to TBOT as well, as to my PM. Thanks! (-: -- Mica ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~ GPG keys/docs/software at: http://www.blueness-port.info/pgpkeys/ http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo Vector ~ Wine ~~ Profess... (-; Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[Now OT] Re: How do I set an image from a web site to display in a message?
Hi On Tuesday 6 April 2010 at 7:48:40 AM, in mid:77267241.20100406164...@wai.com.au, Ian A. White wrote: G'day MFPA, On Tuesday, April 6, 2010, at 11:03:31 AM, you (MFPA) wrote: M Much more annoying to me are the ridiculous essays M that some business people include Unfortunately they are required for legal reasons. People often include far mare than they have to. In the UK, all that is legally required on a business email that's not on a personal one is:- Business address and trading name. If the email is an invoice, it must include the VAT registration number (if applicable). Sole traders must include their own name as well as the business name (if different). In the case of a partnership, the names of all partners must be listed (or instructions where to view such a list). For limited companies, company name, registration number, place of registration, and registered office address. On many tenders Of course, some companies have a policy of appending three screenfuls of dross to their emails, and will require anybody contracting to them to be just as wasteful and inconsiderate. (-; (ask the reader to consider the environment before printing) I don't often see those, but for a long time I interpreted that to mean the *immediate* environment; eg will somebody else get to the printer first and see confidential information. It wasn't until I saw one that mentioned un-necessary printing leading to destruction of trees that the penny dropped. The problem is that many e-mail clients do not honour the sigdash and so it gets repeated. And this is not helped by the *terrible* practice of top-posting. I know that these things are disliked in the same way as reading receipts. Unfortunately again, in business they are just part of it. You need to know if a message goes through. A lot of people configure reading receipt requests to be automatically sent or automatically ignored; either way, they are no longer an annoyance to the recipient. I find reading receipts unreliable; if I send a message to somebody on Saturday, I often get a receipt on Saturday or Sunday (when the recipient definitely was not working) and another on Monday. And then another notification a couple of weeks later that the message was deleted without being read (which you often know is a lie because you have received a reply in the meantime). I do use MSGTAG, but some block it and refuse to accept it. I can understand why people use such things but don't like them myself. Well, they have to respond to a reading receipt then or they have to acknowledge the intention to receive before they get anything otherwise they claim they never received anything when it comes time to pay. Where I used to work, somebody we dealt with used to password-protect most files they sent us and we had to ring for the password (or email, and they rang us). There is a difference between business and personal e-mails. Yes. And I anticipate a trouting soon as we've moved ever-so-slightly off-topic for TBUDL (-: -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] The Bat! users' link exchange
Hi I seem to remember a few years ago reading about a TB! users' link exchange, and was just curious to know if it was still around. I had a poke around and found the links still posted in three places:- http://cgi.silverstones.com/tble.php http://www.devtek.org/tbcomm/index.php http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tble/index.php I could not find the exchanged links on any of the other linked sites, and two of the sites linked from there seem to be defunct. Also, I can't remember what was the reason for displaying the links in a different order each time the page is loaded. Could anybody enlighten me? -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com Virtual workspace, Virtual Office, Virtual Job Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC [now veering OT]
Hi On Thursday 31 December 2009 at 4:59:11 PM, in mid:1078363130.20091231145...@gmail.com, Cesar Santos wrote: I think that whenever I try again searching for information from Google I should do it using Linux that, somehow, looks to have better means of protection. Does Linux really have better means of protection, or is it simply targeted by fewer malware writers because it has fewer users? -- Best regards MFPA The second mouse gets the cheese Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC [now veering OT]
Hello MFPA, Thursday, December 31, 2009, 3:42:49 PM, you wrote: Does Linux really have better means of protection, or is it simply targeted by fewer malware writers because it has fewer users? Both, I think ;-) -- Best regards, Cesarmailto:tij...@gmail.com Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! and Windows 7 UAC [now veering OT]
Hello MFPA, Thursday, December 31, 2009, 12:42:49 PM, you wrote: Hi On Thursday 31 December 2009 at 4:59:11 PM, in mid:1078363130.20091231145...@gmail.com, Cesar Santos wrote: I think that whenever I try again searching for information from Google I should do it using Linux that, somehow, looks to have better means of protection. Does Linux really have better means of protection, or is it simply targeted by fewer malware writers because it has fewer users? Both! Security Issues are taken very seriously and patched as soon as they are found. Having the source code makes it possible for many people to tackle the issue at once. Also usually it is easy to contact the package maintainers. -- Best regards, Dangermailto:dan...@bway.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-SPAM solutions [now OT]
Hi On Monday 27 July 2009 at 9:59:48 AM, in mid:1703211512.20090727095...@privateofcourse.co.uk, Simon wrote: I have absolutely no argument there. I completely agree that 'a workman is worthy of his hire', to steal from an old religious book. People are criminally undervalued, vastly overworked, and grossly underpaid, that's how capitalism works. Only by a narrow model of capitalism driven solely by naked greed. What about the early capitalist philanthropists who provided homes and welfare for their employees? This is often no longer possible thanks to the reprehensible invention called a plc, where the profits are distributed among shareholders who do absolutely nothing to deserve having the wealth siphoned from the communities that created it into their fat, deep pockets. [...] I don't believe that it inevitably leads to nobody valuing what anybody does, rather it makes those with less money in their pockets fight much harder to get the services and 'things' cheaper, so that they can afford them. Which drives still more people to be paid far below the worth of their efforts and adds to the momentum of the downward spiral. I heard someone say that if there weren't poor people then the world would be a better place. The person saying it was a businessman running a factory with over 300 workers who had just gone on strike because of work conditions and low wage complaints. You're either on one side or the other in this world! I would guess he was more the greedy, selfish type rather than any sort of philanthropist. (-; -- Best regards, MFPA Was time invented by an Irishman named O'Clock? Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-SPAM solutions [now OT]
'Ello MFPA, On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:21:57 +0100 (your time) you said: The problem is the greedy capitalist [insert desired expletive] who pays people just enough to stop them from leaving instead of paying the value of their contribution. I have absolutely no argument there. I completely agree that 'a workman is worthy of his hire', to steal from an old religious book. People are criminally undervalued, vastly overworked, and grossly underpaid, that's how capitalism works. This leads them to expect others to also work for next to nothing and feeds into a downward spiral that leads to nobody valuing what anybody else does. To some extent I would agree, but I don't believe that it inevitably leads to nobody valuing what anybody does, rather it makes those with less money in their pockets fight much harder to get the services and 'things' cheaper, so that they can afford them. It's a con sequence of an uneven distribution of wealth, where the least wealthy have grown in massive disporportion, have less financial power to bargain with so strive to drive down prices so that they are not excluded from partipation. I heard someone say that if there weren't poor people then the world would be a better place. The person saying it was a businessman running a factory with over 300 workers who had just gone on strike because of work conditions and low wage complaints. You're either on one side or the other in this world! -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #36541. I She Row New Dog? ¶ Auxiliary Information: • The Bat! Pro 4.2.9.1 • Windows XP Pro 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 • Scanned by avast! Plugin 4.8.1335 DB 090726-1 (26.07.2009) Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-SPAM solutions [now OT]
Hi On Sunday 26 July 2009 at 11:45:14 PM, in mid:1853781609.20090726234...@privateofcourse.co.uk, Simon wrote: I'll remember to tell the altruist that gives up their free time and money that they should desist with their beneficent activities because they should be paid for their troubles, because they are the rules, and fairness demands it. At risk of being ruled off-topic, I will chip in that the issue is not the altruist who chooses to do it for nothing. The problem is the greedy capitalist [insert desired expletive] who pays people just enough to stop them from leaving instead of paying the value of their contribution. This leads them to expect others to also work for next to nothing and feeds into a downward spiral that leads to nobody valuing what anybody else does. -- Best regards, MFPA When duty calls...hang up immediately Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT Help request
Hello Rick, R There are some windows gurus on here and I think the answer if known R would benefit all R Here's what I want to do R I want certain folders, when opened from ANY APPLICATION to always R open with thumbnails enabled the way MY PICTURES does. R This can be set to happen in windows explorer or My Computer but it R will not carry over to other programs such as The Bat R I have a specific folder I use for my animations and it always R opens as a list even though it is set in windows as a photo album. R Does anyone know the setting or registry entry so I don't have to R constantly change this to Thumbnails each time I access the folder from a program? Here using Win XP pro I go to START CONTROL PANEL FOLDER OPTIONS and click on the VIEW tab. Near the bottom of the folder options is a one which says Remember each folder's view settings. Although for me that selection was already ticked, I too had been having problems with photo folders opening showing DETAILS instead of thumbnails regardless of which state they were in when I last closed them. I un-ticked the option and then re-ticked it which caused the APPLY button to become active. I clicked on APPLY and closed CONTROL PANEL. I then went to a pictures folder and opened it (it opened in DETAILS view) and changed the view to THUMBNAILS and closed the folder. When I re-opened the folder, it was still set to THUMBNAILS. I changed the VIEW to DETAILS, closed the folder and then re-opened it to find that it was still set to DETAILS. I changed the VIEW again back to THUMBNAILS, closed the folder and then re-opened it to find the view still set to THUMBNAILS. So it would seem that somewhere along the way that option became corrupted. It appears that un-ticking and re-ticking the Remember each folder's view settings has fixed the corruption. Thanks for your question, it's helped me and might help you. -- Jack LaRosa mailto:jlar...@charter.net Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 for now. Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT Help request
Hello Rick, R There are some windows gurus on here and I think the answer if known R would benefit all R Here's what I want to do R I want certain folders, when opened from ANY APPLICATION to always R open with thumbnails enabled the way MY PICTURES does. R This can be set to happen in windows explorer or My Computer but it R will not carry over to other programs such as The Bat R I have a specific folder I use for my animations and it always R opens as a list even though it is set in windows as a photo album. R Does anyone know the setting or registry entry so I don't have to R constantly change this to Thumbnails each time I access the folder from a program? Here using Win XP pro I go to START CONTROL PANEL FOLDER OPTIONS and click on the VIEW tab. Near the bottom of the folder options is a one which says Remember each folder's view settings. Although for me that selection was already ticked, I too had been having problems with photo folders opening showing DETAILS instead of thumbnails regardless of which state they were in when I last closed them. I un-ticked the option and then re-ticked it which caused the APPLY button to become active. I clicked on APPLY and closed CONTROL PANEL. I then went to a pictures folder and opened it (it opened in DETAILS view) and changed the view to THUMBNAILS and closed the folder. When I re-opened the folder, it was still set to THUMBNAILS. I changed the VIEW to DETAILS, closed the folder and then re-opened it to find that it was still set to DETAILS. I changed the VIEW again back to THUMBNAILS, closed the folder and then re-opened it to find the view still set to THUMBNAILS. So it would seem that somewhere along the way that option became corrupted. It appears that un-ticking and re-ticking the Remember each folder's view settings has fixed the corruption. Thanks for your question, it's helped me and might help you. Thanks for the reply. I'm glad it fixed your issue. I am trying to get a totally unrelated folder to show thumbnail. There has to be a way - I'll find it eventually. I smell a registry issue :)) -- Rick When you're caffeinated, all is right with the world v4.1.11.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] Unsubscribe from this Mailing List (was: [The Bat! 4.1.11.6] Find text at caret position)
[Reply to: »Denise Reed« · 2009-03-13 · 23:10 h (CET)] Moin, Denise! I do not know how you got my address but no offense, please remove it deniser...@shaw.ca Obviously your are subscribed to this Mailing List, so you are the only one who can unsubscribe from this list. Try: mailto:tbudl-requ...@thebat.dutaint.com?subject=unsubscribe Or: https://hosting.0x539.de/mailman/options/tbudl Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [The Bat!] in subject line will end in Nirvana! mailto:va%20%3...@ahrendt.net%3e?subject=[the%20bat%21]%20 Using The Bat! 4.1.11.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3. »A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.« – Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »Mostly Harmless« Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT Help request
There are some windows gurus on here and I think the answer if known would benefit all Here's what I want to do I want certain folders, when opened from ANY APPLICATION to always open with thumbnails enabled the way MY PICTURES does. This can be set to happen in windows explorer or My Computer but it will not carry over to other programs such as The Bat I have a specific folder I use for my animations and it always opens as a list even though it is set in windows as a photo album. Does anyone know the setting or registry entry so I don't have to constantly change this to Thumbnails each time I access the folder from a program? -- Rick In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell v4.1.11.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: storing new data entities
This is OT for TBBETA, so I have copied it to TBUDL and TBOT too. On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 at 11:21:47 +0100, Volker wrote: I have found that it's relatively easy to set up macros to use the Memo field to hold all sorts of useful information like that. Hey, that sounds good to me! :-) For instance I use the following structure in a Memo field: akaJoe/aka closingKind regards/closing closingnameJack Black/closingname receiptsread delivery/receipts ccjsm...@yahoo.com/cc bcctrevor.tur...@company.com.au/bcc How would such a macro look like? – Thanks in advance. As Miguel suggested, it relies on regex. So perhaps relatively easy depends upon your desire to play around with regex! The basic macro is very similar to the one that Maurice showed in mid:1974229872.20090304125...@hypercube.demon.nl The macro I use to extract the information from the memo field is [ Macro: Get_Memo_Attribute ] %Rem=' Usage: attribute value=%QInclude(Get_Memo_Attribute,Tag,Default_Value) This will return the value from a line in the address book memo field that looks like this: tagvalue/tag Or the Default_Value if no such line exists '%- %If:'%SetPattRegExp=(?im)^%_1%RegExpMatch=%ABToMemo'='':'%_2'%- :'%If:+%SetPattRegExp=(?im)^(%_1/)%RegExpMatch=%ABToMemo+++:++%- :+%SetPattRegExp=(?im)^(?:%_1)(.*?)(?:/%_1)%RegExpMatch=%ABToMemo+'%- [ End Macro ] I use this in a set of more complex macros that specify what information to retrieve (by identifying the tag) and, if necessary, identifying a default value so that I can deal with the case of no value being set. The main complexity is that I have created macros that cater for a list of multiple recipients. The macros will parse the list of recipients and extract the attribute from each recipient's memo field and then take action depending upon how many recipients have a value in the attribute, how many different values there are, etc. For instance, if one of the multiple recipients has a read or delivery receipt set, it is applied to the message using this macro which recursively processes each address in the recipient list. [ Macro: SetReceipts ] %REM=^%- Set read or delivery receipt notification flags if the recipient's addressbook memo entry contains an attribute with the tag receipts with the value read or delivery respectively ^%- %- %REM=%- %_SR_Text stores the original list of recipients %_SR_Temp stores the list of recipients yet to be processed %_RR_Flag is set to 1 if read receipt required %_DR_Flag is set to 1 if delivery receipt required %- %- %If:#%_SR_FirstTime#=##%- :#%- %_SR_FirstTime=No%- %_SR_Text=%ToList%- %_SR_Temp=%_SR_Text%- %_RR_Flag=no%- %_DR_Flag=no%- %QInclude(SetReceipts)#%- :#%- %- %REM=*** Parse the Recipient List ***%- %- %If:'%setpattregexp=@%- %regexpmatch=%_SR_Temp'''%- :'%setpattregexp=(?i)^((?:.*?)@(?:.*?))(?:,|;)\s*(.*)?%- %regexpblindmatch=%_SR_Temp,%- %SetHeader(+To+,+%subpatt=1+)%- %_SR_Temp=+%Subpatt=2+%- %- %- %REM= *** Get the receipt attribute *** %- %- %_MemoAttribute=+%QInclude(Get_Memo_Attribute,receipts,)+%- %_RR_Flag=%If:+%SetPattRegExp=(?im).*Read%RegExpMatch=%_MemoAttribute+++:+yes+:+%_RR_Flag+%- %_DR_Flag=%If:+%SetPattRegExp=(?im).*Delivery%RegExpMatch=%_MemoAttribute+++:+yes+:+%_DR_Flag+%- %QInclude(SetReceipts)'%- :'%- %If:%_RR_Flag=yes:%ReadConfirm:%NoReadConfirm%- %If:%_DR_Flag=yes:%RcptConfirm:%NoRcptConfirm%- %SetHeader(To,%_SR_Text)#%- [ End Macro ] Other macros I use set the name(s) in the greeting at the top of the message, choose the sig used at the end of the message, allow me to automatically add CC or BCC addresses, etc -- Robin Using The Bat! v4.1.11 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Popfile v0.22.4 Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Manual for The Bat! suitable for printing?
Hallo Chrille, On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:08:44 +0100GMT (30-11-2008, 9:08, where I live), you wrote: C Underligt att du förstår svenska och danska, men inte norska. C Norska är ju mer likt svenska. :) moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Chrille. ' This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) You can subscribe to TBOT by sending a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- Groetjes, Roelof Flirting with the moderator is *always* on topic. pgpTn5OKmkN4O.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.0.38.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Manual for The Bat! suitable for printing?
Hello Roelof, Sunday, November 30, 2008, 09:18:21, you wrote: Hallo Chrille, On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:08:44 +0100GMT (30-11-2008, 9:08, where I live), you wrote: C Underligt att du förstår svenska och danska, men inte norska. C Norska är ju mer likt svenska. :) moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Chrille. ' This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) You can subscribe to TBOT by sending a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator Sorry about that.:oops: -- Regards, Chrillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 4.0.38 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.38.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Tbot-subscribe: question (OT)
Hello Luc, Friday, September 19, 2008, 3:10:04 AM, you wrote: L Yesterday i sent a request to subscribe to the Tbot list... haven't L heard back ... is it still active? Yes. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 4.0.34.6 104 days remaining in 2008. Actually it's 103 days) + less than 24 hours. Yours truly residing on earth for 18574 days now. Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Tbot-subscribe: question (OT)
Good morning Mark, It was foretold that on 19/09/2008 @ 09:30:00 GMT+0200 (which was 04:30:00 where I live) Mark Partous would write: snipped a bit Yes. ok. Have to wait i suppose... -- Best regards, Luc --- Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Tbot-subscribe: question (OT)
Hi Luc, on Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:10:04 -0300GMT (19.09.2008, 03:10 +0100GMT here), you wrote: L Yesterday i sent a request to subscribe to the Tbot list... haven't L heard back ... is it still active? Yahoogroups is slow at times... :( Be patient. -- Cheers Peter This posting is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects. Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Tbot-subscribe: question (OT)
Good evening list, Yesterday i sent a request to subscribe to the Tbot list... haven't heard back ... is it still active? -- Best regards, Luc Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. Observe your enemies for they first find out your faults. Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT address
Hello one and all, Can someone direct me to the TB OT forum? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Conveying information with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT address
Hello one and all, Can someone direct me to the TB OT forum? The forums are at http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/ -- Rick The Mideast Oil Crusade did more for militant Islam than Osama EVER could have. v4.0.24.13 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT address
Hi Jack, on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 17:35 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: Hello one and all, Can someone direct me to the TB OT forum? If you mean the mailinglist: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tbot/ -- Best regards, Roland I use The Bat! v4.0.24.11 Pro under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3! Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT address
Hello Roland, Saturday, May 24, 2008, 11:02:03 AM, you wrote: RB Hi Jack, RB on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 17:35 you wrote in message RB mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RB among others: Hello one and all, Can someone direct me to the TB OT forum? RB If you mean the mailinglist: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tbot/ Yep. That's what I meant. Thanx. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v3.99.3 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Latest Betas. Where ot find 4.0.18.7
Hello List, Can some kind soul tell me where I can always find the latest Beta? I seem to only find it when someone in the list refers to it. Where do you advise the next beta is available for download. Wasn't 6 supposed to be the last in this round of testing? Thank you -- Michael J. Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using the world's best e-mail client: The Bat! Pro v4.0.18.6 OS Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 POP3 with AntispamSniper Pro v2.7.1.7 ___ www.TechniSmart.com Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Latest Betas. Where ot find 4.0.18.7
Hi Michael, on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:44 -0400GMT (28.03.2008, 18:22 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MJS Can some kind soul tell me where I can always find the latest Beta? Join the TBBeta mailing list, and you will always be informed. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers Peter Me, indecisive? I'm not so sure about that... Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Latest Betas. Where ot find 4.0.18.7
Hallo Michael, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:44 -0400GMT (28-3-2008, 18:22 +0100, where I live), you wrote: CT Can some kind soul tell me where I can always find the latest Beta? Subscribe to tbbeta, the development team announces the betas on that list. -- Groetjes, Roelof Oops. - Most feared word in Nuclear Physics and Brain Surgery... http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.0.18.7 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpnSpmCpEtAw.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Latest Betas. Where ot find 4.0.18.7
Hello Michael, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:22:44 -0400 GMT (29/03/2008, 00:22 +0700 GMT), Michael J. Sharp wrote: MJS Can some kind soul tell me where I can always find the latest Beta? Only on the beta list. To join, send a blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject=subscribe MJS I seem to only find it when someone in the list refers to it. MJS Where do you advise the next beta is available for download. Only on the beta list. MJS Wasn't 6 supposed to be the last in this round of testing? Not that I know of. I'll be happy to see you on TBBETA. -- Cheers, Thomas. Also, always avoid annoying alliteration. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.18.7 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Again gmail (if it's considered OT, please reply off-list)
Good morning list, Some days ago i asked why i can't receive the messages i post here and some kind soul replied it's a gmail thing. So i looked around on gmail and indeed: messages sent to mailing lists don't show in the inbox. Gmail automatically skips the inbox and archives the message. The message will appear in the inbox if someone responds to it or if there is an error delivering the message. If i like to view the message, you need to go to Mail or All Mail. Does anybody know how i can solve that or is the only solution (besides using another account) setting up a filter in gmail? -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com Powered by The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. Buy old masters. They fetch a better price than old mistresses. - attributed to Lord Beaverbrook(1879-1964). Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Again gmail (if it's considered OT, please reply off-list)
Hello Luc, Wednesday, March 26, 2008, 8:50:29 AM, you wrote: Some days ago i asked why i can't receive the messages i post here and some kind soul replied it's a gmail thing. So i looked around on gmail and indeed: messages sent to mailing lists don't show in the inbox. Gmail automatically skips the inbox and archives the message. The message will appear in the inbox if someone responds to it or if there is an error delivering the message. If i like to view the message, you need to go to Mail or All Mail. Does anybody know how i can solve that or is the only solution (besides using another account) setting up a filter in gmail? You can cc yourself, but you might be better off getting a different account and subscribing to the lists through the new account. You can get a free account from fastmail.fm and then you can test IMAP with us when the next beta round starts. It is supposed to be concentrating on IMAP for us very, very, very patient IMAP users. ;) -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v4.0.18.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Again gmail (if it's considered OT, please reply off-list)
Good evening Stuart, It was foretold that on 26/03/2008 @ 17:51:04 GMT-0500 (which was 19:51:04 where I live) Stuart Cuddy would write: snipped a bit SC You can cc yourself, but you might be better off getting a different account SC and subscribing to the lists through the new account. You can get a free SC account from fastmail.fm and then you can test IMAP with us when the next beta SC round starts. Tnx Stuart... i'll check fastmail out ... it's a real pain not seeing your own posts here -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com --- Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once he grows up. - Pablo Picasso. Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
list question (OT???)
Good morning list, I noticed that i don't receive my own posts to the list although i configured my settings on http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html to receive them. Anybody else has this problem? -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com Powered by The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. No goals No Glory. Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: list question (OT???)
Hello Luc, Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 9:49:33 AM, you wrote: I noticed that i don't receive my own posts to the list although i configured my settings on http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html to receive them. Anybody else has this problem? Gmail problem. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v4.0.18.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: list question (OT???)
Good afternoon Stuart, It was foretold that on 19/03/2008 @ 09:51:14 GMT-0500 (which was 11:51:14 where I live) Stuart Cuddy would write: snipped a bit SC Gmail problem. Again? lol tnx -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com --- Powered by The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: list question (OT???)
Good morning list, I noticed that i don't receive my own posts to the list although i configured my settings on http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html to receive them. Anybody else has this problem? That happens with Gmail - it realizes you sent the message so it doesn't return a copy to the inbox. I have found that if I send to a list via CC or BCC I would often get a copy back. It is flaky though, - go figure :)) -- Rick Bush - 7 years of shame v4.0.18.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: list question (OT???)
Good evening Rick, It was foretold that on 19/03/2008 @ 12:10:53 GMT-0400 (which was 13:10:53 where I live) Rick Grunwald would write: RG That happens with Gmail - it realizes you sent the message so it RG doesn't return a copy to the inbox. I have found that if I send to a RG list via CC or BCC I would often get a copy back. strange because it's the first time it happened to me... maybe better if i sign up again with another account :-) -- Best regards, Luc http://www.dzinelabs.com --- Powered by The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera. There are two theories about arguing with womenNeither one works. Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello Dwight, Monday, March 3, 2008, 3:29:02 AM, you wrote: Was there something incorrect in what I told him? No. I don't know. My response was to his question. I probably hadn't even seen your response when I responded. I had but I thought I would sit back and see when you two would run out of steam. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 8 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- the conversation was about the fact that it was a known fact the message would never hit the inbox, but whether a pop connection would be able to collect it anyway. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 8 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This was correct, but so was this as well but the above was closer to the meaning of what I had sent. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 8 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Excuse me sir, the person asked why he wasn't getting his email back when sent to a mailing list from a gmail address -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 8 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The result is that gmail will hide any of your posting to a list it you send it though there SMTP gateway with the credentials of the from address. It places all your sent mail into your sent box and will filter out the return message from the list back to you. The way to get around it is either. 1) Create a Sent filter which copiees the message back in to your inbox (or where ever you keep the list messages. or 2) Use a different SMTP service. -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 8:41:29 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote: Was there something incorrect in what I told him? I don't know. My response was to his question. I probably hadn't even seen your response when I responded. He asked about mailing lists and how they interacted. If you send a message through (say) your normal ISP account TO A MAILING LIST you will get a copy back. Not so with a Gmail account. (There are caveats to that statement since there are settings in many list manager programs to stop you from getting a copy back) -- Rick Republican Tax Cuts for the wealthy Look where it has got us so far! Lets do it some more! v4.0.14.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hi On Saturday 1 March 2008 at 8:44:34 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rick Grunwald wrote: I have never seen gmail return my mail to me on any group; Listman like this one, yahoo groups etc. That's just the way it works and I never found a way around that other than ccing myself or another account. I had wondered if CC or BCCing yourself might work -- Best regards, MFPA It's better to feed one cat than many mice Using The Bat! v4.0.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello David, Monday, March 3, 2008, 1:24:18 PM, you wrote: The way to get around it is either. 1) Create a Sent filter which copiees the message back in to your inbox (or where ever you keep the list messages. or 2) Use a different SMTP service. or (from my experience with Gmail) 3) Use IMAP access to Gmail instead of POP3 -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Saturday, March 1, 2008, 5:14:56 AM, David Elliott wrote: I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. if it doesn't get in your inbox, how could pop3 collect it from there? The conversation was about mailing lists. If I send an email to a list from most accounts my copy will hit the list and I will get a copy back as I get messages. (Forget Listman's not metoo feature for a minute). With Gmail, it since you sent it, you don't get it back in your inbox from the list server. -- Rick Are we in the Post-Bush era yet? v4.0.14.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 3:18:43 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote: The conversation was about mailing lists. the conversation was about the fact that it was a known fact the message would never hit the inbox, but whether a pop connection would be able to collect it anyway. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.9 on Windows Vista version 6,0 () Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 3:18:43 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote: The conversation was about mailing lists. the conversation was about the fact that it was a known fact the message would never hit the inbox, but whether a pop connection would be able to collect it anyway. Excuse me sir, the person asked why he wasn't getting his email back when sent to a mailing list from a gmail address -- Rick Republican tax breaks for large corporations: Remember them the next time you see a CEO with hundreds of million$ in their golden parachute All that money came from somewhere. v4.0.14.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 6:29:59 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote: The conversation was about mailing lists. the conversation was about the fact that it was a known fact the message would never hit the inbox, but whether a pop connection would be able to collect it anyway. Excuse me sir, the person asked why he wasn't getting his email back when sent to a mailing list from a gmail address here is what I read. It is straight from the message I was responding to. I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. I was hoping that would not apply to POP3 and SMTP. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.9 on Windows Vista version 6,0 () Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Excuse me sir, the person asked why he wasn't getting his email back when sent to a mailing list from a gmail address here is what I read. It is straight from the message I was responding to. I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. I was hoping that would not apply to POP3 and SMTP. Was there something incorrect in what I told him? -- Rick If one candidate’s trying to scare you, and the other one’s trying to get you to think; if one candidate’s appealing to your fears, and the other one’s appealing to your hopes; you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope. - Bill Clinton, 2004 v4.0.14.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Sunday, March 2, 2008, 8:41:29 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote: Was there something incorrect in what I told him? I don't know. My response was to his question. I probably hadn't even seen your response when I responded. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.9 on Windows Vista version 6,0 () Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello Tbudl, This may be OT, but it is to do with this (and other) list/s. I am using gMail via POP3 SMPT and I am not see my own e-mail being returned to this list. I think that it is a property of gMail as I can see it in sent items in the web interface. I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. I was hoping that would not apply to POP3 and SMTP. I have looked at the filter in gMail but can not see one to override this behaviour. I could set up filters for my out box but I don't really want to have to do that. My other option is to use a different SMTP server to sent it out. Which I might end up to doing. -- Best regards, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello Tbudl, This may be OT, but it is to do with this (and other) list/s. I am using gMail via POP3 SMPT and I am not see my own e-mail being returned to this list. I think that it is a property of gMail as I can see it in sent items in the web interface. I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. I was hoping that would not apply to POP3 and SMTP. I have looked at the filter in gMail but can not see one to override this behaviour. I could set up filters for my out box but I don't really want to have to do that. My other option is to use a different SMTP server to sent it out. Which I might end up to doing. I have never seen gmail return my mail to me on any group; Listman like this one, yahoo groups etc. That's just the way it works and I never found a way around that other than ccing myself or another account. -- Rick Republican tax breaks for large corporations: Remember them the next time you see a CEO with hundreds of million$ in their golden parachute All that money came from somewhere. v4.0.14.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello Rick, Saturday, March 1, 2008, 8:44:34 PM, you wrote: ... I am using gMail via POP3 SMPT and I am not see my own e-mail being returned to this list. I think that it is a property of gMail as I can see it in sent items in the web interface. I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. I was hoping that would not apply to POP3 and SMTP. ... I have never seen gmail return my mail to me on any group; Listman like this one, yahoo groups etc. That's just the way it works and I never found a way around that other than ccing myself or another account. Thought so. This is using a different SMTP server so we will see. -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello David, Saturday, March 1, 2008, 9:06:45 PM, you wrote: I am using gMail via POP3 SMPT and I am not see my own e-mail being returned to this list. I think that it is a property of gMail as I can see it in sent items in the web interface. I have never seen gmail return my mail to me on any group; Listman like this one, yahoo groups etc. That's just the way it works and I never found a way around that other than ccing myself or another account. Thought so. This is using a different SMTP server so we will see. And this worked. I have access to more than one SMTP server.So I used another one. :) -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
Hello Rick, On Saturday, March 1, 2008, 9:44:34 PM, you wrote: I have never seen gmail return my mail to me on any group; Listman like this one, yahoo groups etc. That's just the way it works and I never found a way around that other than ccing myself or another account. If you send your mail not with the Gmail smtp but with an other account (yahoo) then you will receive that mail through the mailing list. -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v4.0.11, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Dilbert's Words of Wisdom: Am I getting smart with you? How would you know? Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gMail and this list (May be OT)
On Saturday, March 1, 2008, 5:14:56 AM, David Elliott wrote: I know that gMail will not show your email in the inbox if you sent it to a list. if it doesn't get in your inbox, how could pop3 collect it from there? -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.14.9 on Windows Vista version 6,0 () Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(OT) Passing of Kevin Coates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dear all, as I learned today, Kevin Coates has passed away. After years of battling cancer, he finally succumbed. Here is what Mike Daigle said on the GSWoT list (Gossamer Spider Web of Trust, where Kevin was also a member): ,- | It is with heavy heart that I announce the passing of Kevin Coates. | | Kevin and I had been virtual acquaintances since the forming of the | GSWoT. We would chat almost daily, and even had our local mail servers | set to send mail to each other's PC directly. We often experimented with | new software. Two heads are better than one, after all. Kevin will be | dearly missed. `- I can only sign this. It was much alike here, albeit in 2003-2005 relating to The Bat! and PGP issues. Many of you will also remember him, as he was very active on PGP issues as well as The Bat!'s development. - -- Sad regards Peter xpost2pgp-basics,tbudl,tbbeta,tbot ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.51 Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication iD8DBQFHnj6zAzZSBuEHdM4RAx9/AKC+WUCko4+qmfF8Cf2ZUN4PCCxzwgCfSmV6 a9Jb4VDRcAPwjfV6zyxb4hw= =rLLe -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (OT) Passing of Kevin Coates
Hi Peter, Thank you for the notice, Peter. Kevin was a very helpful and honorable person and he will be missed. On Monday, January 28, 2008 at 3:45:29 PM you wrote: PM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- PM Hash: RIPEMD160 PM Dear all, PM as I learned today, Kevin Coates has passed away. After years of PM battling cancer, he finally succumbed. PM Here is what Mike Daigle said on the GSWoT list (Gossamer Spider Web PM of Trust, where Kevin was also a member): PM ,- PM | It is with heavy heart that I announce the passing of Kevin Coates. PM | PM | Kevin and I had been virtual acquaintances since the forming of the PM | GSWoT. We would chat almost daily, and even had our local mail servers PM | set to send mail to each other's PC directly. We often experimented with PM | new software. Two heads are better than one, after all. Kevin will be PM | dearly missed. PM `- PM I can only sign this. It was much alike here, albeit in 2003-2005 PM relating to The Bat! and PGP issues. PM Many of you will also remember him, as he was very active on PGP PM issues as well as The Bat!'s development. -- Regards, Maggie If I do not speak in a language that can be understood, there is little chance for a dialogue. -bell hooks Emailing with The Bat! 3.99.29 Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Is MAPI secure?
Hello Batfolk, Right now I'm considering moving from S/POP and SSL SMTP to MAPI. Is MAPI encrypted like those, or is it just a binary protocol like LDAP? Thanks for the help. -- Andrew Diederich Using Voyager v3.95.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Shortcut ot change colour flag
How would I set up a keyboard shortcut to set an email to have a specific colour group when highlighting the email in the email listing pane?? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.98.1 with K9 on Windows XP 5.1 tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Shortcut ot change colour flag
Hallo Marten, On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:58:41 +GMT (15-3-2007, 12:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MG How would I set up a keyboard shortcut to set an email to have a specific colour MG group when highlighting the email in the email listing pane?? Create a manual filter that assigns the colour group and assign a hotkey to that filter. -- Groetjes, Roelof Modem. A deterrent to phone solicitors. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.98.6 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpPPnbyECddV.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Shortcut ot change colour flag
Hello Roelof, MG How would I set up a keyboard shortcut to set an email to have a specific colour MG group when highlighting the email in the email listing pane?? Create a manual filter that assigns the colour group and assign a hotkey to that filter. Yes, that is certainly the easiest way. It can also be done through the 'Cumbersomizer', I mean Customiser, but the procedure is unclear, cumbersome, prone to making errors and will end up with double entries in the message list pop-up menu. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.98.6 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: I am sorry for your loss [Re: Hero is gone]
Mary Bull wrote: Thank you so much Mary. Yes, it was an accident to send it to the Bat. Sandy Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Viewing TBUDL threadless [was Re: Collapse thread icon?]
Hello Alexander! On Sunday, September 10, 2006, 2:13 AM, you wrote: I view these mailing lists unthreaded, sorted chronologically Blasphemy!!! ;-) :rofl2: Eccentric Mary she was knowed as in them days! (From a Fibber McGee and Molly monologue, on the old U.S. radio show) sigh I've outlived my day. :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: account properties and connection center
Hello Peter, SD 1. It's much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else MSD in account properties for changing different account quickly/directly without MSD having to close the account properties first. You're so right! Thank you for bringing it up. I put it on the wishlist to get the developers' attention. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6023 Added supporting note :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.85.03 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: account properties and connection center
Hi M, on Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:11:26 +0700GMT (06.09.2006, 05:11 +0200GMT here), you wrote: SD 1. It's much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else MSD in account properties for changing different account quickly/directly without MSD having to close the account properties first. You're so right! Thank you for bringing it up. I put it on the wishlist to get the developers' attention. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6023 -- Cheers Peter Don't humanize computers. They hate that! Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: account properties and connection center
Hello MFPA, Hi On Wednesday 6 September 2006 at 4:11:26 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], M Sulchan Darmawan wrote: 1. It's much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else in account properties for changing different account quickly/directly without having to close the account properties first. I find that feature very useful in Sorting Office / Filters. I miss it when referring to properties of multiple Accounts but I seldom do that. If you were to put this on the wish list and post a link here I would support. Ditto :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.80.06 Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: account properties and connection center
Hallo M, On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:11:26 +0700GMT (6-9-2006, 5:11 , where I live), you wrote: MSD I have a little suggestion to the function of the bat! I'm MSD sorry if I post to the wrong list since I do not know where I should MSD do it, so I just put Off Topic (OT) in the subject. It's not off topic at all, since both your questions concern TB and that's the only requirement for messages posted here. MSD But if you found that this function is useful for you, please MSD forward my request to the right list. The best place for feature requests is the wish list, you can add or support feature requests there yourself. After making a a feature request, you could post a direct link to this list, just to get it supported by fellow list members. How do you add entries to the wish list? Here follows a canned text: You can insert wishes in the wish list, by logging in to: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php Choose 'The Bat! wishes' and add a new item. First check whether someone has made the same wish, then you can support that wish. Wishes that are supported by more users are more likely to be granted than wishes by one. And the system isn't smart enough to understand that wishes might be the same. And add just one wish per entry. Makes everything easier, both for other users who want to add support and for the developers. -- Groetjes, Roelof What do you mean, you formatted the cat?!? http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.85.02 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpf2XQno0hoO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: account properties and connection center
Hi On Wednesday 6 September 2006 at 4:11:26 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], M Sulchan Darmawan wrote: 1. It's much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else in account properties for changing different account quickly/directly without having to close the account properties first. I find that feature very useful in Sorting Office / Filters. I miss it when referring to properties of multiple Accounts but I seldom do that. If you were to put this on the wish list and post a link here I would support. -- Best regards, MFPA The One with The Answer is seldom asked The Question Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: account properties and connection center
Dear all, I have a little suggestion to the function of the bat! I'm sorry if I post to the wrong list since I do not know where I should do it, so I just put Off Topic (OT) in the subject. But if you found that this function is useful for you, please forward my request to the right list. 1. It's much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else in account properties for changing different account quickly/directly without having to close the account properties first. 2. Is it possible to have an option to keep download process still visible in connection center after it's finished downloading ? So we can check easily/directly whether an account successfully downloaded or not. Both question is helpful when you have more than 3 e-mail accounts. That's all, Thank you. -- Regards, MS Darmawan ___ Using The Bat! v3.80.06 Send instant messages to your online friends http://asia.messenger.yahoo.com Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Slightly OT, rogues.zip
Hello TBUDL, Slightly OT but got a message to say there was a new rogies.zip, wne to download it but got a 404 Sean ... The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is at all comprehensible. - Albert Einstein -- Strange things happen under the midnight sun when Men and Dogs go hunting for gold To get my public GPG key send me an email with the Subject of GET GPG KEY smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Slightly OT, rogues.zip
On 24-5-2006 21:45 Sean Rima wrote: Slightly OT but got a message to say there was a new rogies.zip, wne to download it but got a 404 Hi Sean, Maybe because of uploading a new version? I just downloaded the most recent version: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip -- Henk _ Mozilla Thunderbird version 1.5.0.2 (20060308) with Enigmail 0.94.0 PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org A progressive and innovative Web of Trust signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Slightly OT, rogues.zip
Hello Henk, Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 10:02:25 PM, you wrote: On 24-5-2006 21:45 Sean Rima wrote: Slightly OT but got a message to say there was a new rogies.zip, wne to download it but got a 404 Hi Sean, Maybe because of uploading a new version? I just downloaded the most recent version: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip Working for me now, I even went to the pcwize site and tried to get it via their link but even that failed at the time Sean ... Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. - Albert Einstein -- Strange things happen under the midnight sun when Men and Dogs go hunting for gold To get my public GPG key send me an email with the Subject of GET GPG KEY smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Slightly OT, rogues.zip
Hello TheBat TBUDL List Members!!!
Someday, and that was in Thursday night, Sean wrote something like
this:
Slightly OT but got a message to say there was a new rogies.zip,
wne to download it but got a 404
Maybe because of uploading a new version? I just downloaded the
most recent version:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
Working for me now, I even went to the pcwize site and tried to get
it via their link but even that failed at the time
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [780D033C.01C59692.7F21399F.6E60E222]
Name: Roguemoticons\20update
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`7`Subject`0`Someone\20new\20has\20joined\20or\20updated\20their\20image\20on\20Roguemoticons\0D\0A}
RunExternal CmdLine Z:\5CThe\20Bat!\5CImages\5Crogues-update.bat
IsContinue
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
rogues-update.bat
@echo off
z:
cd \the bat!\images
Z:\The Bat!\Images\wget -N http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
Z:\The Bat!\Images\unzip -o rogues.zip -d Z:\The Bat!\Images
You need wget and path adapt.
Here another filter that works only with XMP plugin.
http://republika.pl/konrad_sz/tb/files/catch_rogue.txt
You must change path with %PROGRAMDIR through this bug:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5690
--
Thanks and best regards,
Sebastian Murawski
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Slightly OT, rogues.zip
Hello Sebastian,
Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 10:39:33 PM, you wrote:
Hello TheBat TBUDL List Members!!!
Someday, and that was in Thursday night, Sean wrote something like
this:
Slightly OT but got a message to say there was a new rogies.zip,
wne to download it but got a 404
Maybe because of uploading a new version? I just downloaded the
most recent version:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
Working for me now, I even went to the pcwize site and tried to get
it via their link but even that failed at the time
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [780D033C.01C59692.7F21399F.6E60E222]
Name: Roguemoticons\20update
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`7`Subject`0`Someone\20new\20has\20joined\20or\20updated\20their\20image\20on\20Roguemoticons\0D\0A}
RunExternal CmdLine Z:\5CThe\20Bat!\5CImages\5Crogues-update.bat
IsContinue
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
rogues-update.bat
@echo off
z:
cd \the bat!\images
Z:\The Bat!\Images\wget -N
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
Z:\The Bat!\Images\unzip -o rogues.zip -d Z:\The Bat!\Images
You need wget and path adapt.
Here another filter that works only with XMP plugin.
http://republika.pl/konrad_sz/tb/files/catch_rogue.txt
You must change path with %PROGRAMDIR through this bug:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5690
Wow that is ideal, will do that now, thanks
Sean
... Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. -
Albert Einstein
--
Strange things happen under the midnight sun
when Men and Dogs go hunting for gold
To get my public GPG key send me an email with the
Subject of GET GPG KEY
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] Auto-Reply from Citibank
Hello everyone, after posting replies to Tim Hamm, I got an auto-reply from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for each reply - whats going on? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) NP: Float to Breeze by LX Bliss (from the 2006 album neurowerx MMVI) Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [OT] Auto-Reply from Citibank
Hello Ian, Monday, April 17, 2006, 3:30:41 PM, you wrote: ASK after posting replies to Tim Hamm, I got an auto-reply from ASK [EMAIL PROTECTED] for each reply - whats going on? I assume everyone is receiving those... odd! I don't work for Citibank. -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Squeaky Bats and Baah-ing Sheep [was Re: Fwd: Re: still problems with Cyrillic]
Hello Robert! On Wednesday, December 28, 2005, 4:51 PM, you wrote: so I see that Windows O/S Anything *.* is tantamount to Baaah-ing like all my sheep here ... Or is it like our dear Marck Ba Humbug's ? as he plays the Scrooge at the Globe theatre. Humm, a promotion Marck, but why not? The play has had its run, but Marck's Rogue pic is still Scrooge. :) http://www.denstarfarm.us/Denstar%20Web/Sheep_1.html#Got_Hay What lovely dogs at the gate with the sheep! And what fine little lambs! Quads, Robert D.? I'd never heard of a ewe giving birth to 4 at a lambing. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Squeaky Bats and Baah-ing Sheep [was Re: Fwd: Re: still problems with Cyrillic]
Recently, Mary Bull squawked: The play has had its run, but Marck's Rogue pic is still Scrooge. :) infamy remains .. What lovely dogs at the gate with the sheep! Both rescues. Badger is quite serious about his work and HIS sheep. Lilly is deadly, but way too friendly to people. Some of the others wouldn't let you get close to their sheep or horses. And what fine little lambs! Quads, Robert D.? If you breed and select and keep for certain traits and if you feed and maintain well and if they are relaxed throughout gestation of 152 days, (usually by being guarded by the LGD's) then you get three and four lambs per .. however, note well, the good lord only gave them two teats sigh now you know -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky: _ The Bat! Version: 3.64.01 Christmas Edition Windows ME FireFox Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: Someone living in Japan who might be able to help Max (one of the developers)
Hello all, I told Max Masiutin I'd ask on the other lists if there is anyone currently living in Japan who might be willing to accept shipment of some books Max is trying to buy (about Yoga). The shipper will only deliver within Japan so he needs someone to accept delivery and then reship them to Moldova. If you can, please contact (Max AT ritlabs.com) Thanks. -- TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B __ Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org 7/5th of all people do not understand fractions. Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Yahoogroups and GMX
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:58:46 +0700 GMT (30/11/2005, 08:58 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF Testing different ISP... It was the ISP. -- Cheers, Thomas. When I wash the cat, it takes me hours to get the hair off my tongue. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.62.14 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: Yahoogroups and GMX
Hello Thomas F everyone else, on 30-Nov-2005 at 02:33 you (Thomas F) wrote: !29/11/2005, 21:53:32: SEND - Server reports it is not ready, reply: 4.3.2 and see( http://www.gmx.net/serverrules ) Yahoogroups suspended sending to me and reports Hard Bounce, with server reply: *sigh* GMX and Yahoogroups. This goes back to the time when Yahoogroups was called eGroups was called OneList. Last Bounced Message Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 ( http://www.gmx.net/serverrules ) [RCPT_TO] What is this nonsense? Has GMX gone crazy? Does anybody with a GMX address experience the same? What I noticed is: If you send to a GMX address from a GMX address, but the sending mail server is not within the GMX network, GMX will refuse the deliver the message. This is an antispam measure (goes into the same direction as SPF). Maybe YG doesn't add the propper return-path header or something, I don't know. The GMX smtp probably can't determine that it is a message from a listmailer. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The present, like a note in music, is nothing but as it appertains to what is past and what is to come. -- Walter Savage Landor Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
