PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Plusnet
Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
using it. Thankyou

  

-- 
Best regards
Barry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Robert Golovniov
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:49:47 PM, Plusnet wrote:

P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
P using it. Thankyou

Simply  put,  this  is  a program that allows you to 1. Digitally sign
your   messages,   so  that your recepients could check whether or not
they  were somehow changed en route to them, and 2. Exchange encrypted
messages with other PGP users. Hope that helps.

-- 
 -=Robert  Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
~~
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Embedded%20key
~~
   Raise your eyes high up and see. Who has created these things?
(Isaiah 40:26)



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello Plusnet,

On 19 October 2003, at 14:49:47 (GMT +0100) you wrote:

P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
P using it. Thankyou

For  more information (and details) you may visit www.pgpi.org where you
find  more  info  about  PGP  (first  I  advise  you  to  read  FAQ  and
Documentation  on  this  site,  then  you may brows link for other sites
devoted to PGP).

-- 
Best regards,
 Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP advice

2001-04-22 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Shauna!

On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 1:25:17 AM you wrote:


SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous
 message, the
SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the
 message
SS after signing it?

To counter this weird wrapping, go to PGP-Keys/Edit/Options/Email and
uncheck Word Wrap at. TB! does wrapping all on itself.


- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/10

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Jede Änderung des Sinnes muß davon ausgehen, daß die neue Ansicht die
richtige und gute sei, nicht davon, daß sie Annehmlichkeiten und
äußere Vorteile schafft. (Marc Aurel)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOuKY6fTo1oA8g8dLEQJndwCg8vGpErEO+J7IACX4uek7gPWc0jIAoLcP
OO1w8wLzDVI4O6olDZkMu2mH
=PgIZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-22 Thread Roland Burger

Hi Shauna,

on  Sat,  21  Apr 2001 16:36:26 -0600 GMT (which was 22.04.2001, 00:36
+0100 GMT where I live) Shauna Scott wrote:


 So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
 downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
 get it to work with The Bat.

*** PGP Signature Status: bad
*** Signer: Shauna Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Signer Key ID: 0x365A6190
*** Signer Key Fingerprint: 0216 8184 91A2 A44E BE2A  EC6D 2BF8 FCC0 365A 6190
*** Signer Key Status: Invalid
*** Signed: 22.04.01 01:35:37
*** Verified: 22.04.01 09:05:27
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

I  don't  understand  this because I have 8.5.8.ckt Build 04. What are
the differences between 04 and 05?

-- 
Best regards,
Roland   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45

I use The Bat! v1.51 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A !

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Nick!

On Saturday, April 21, 2001 at 3:07:40 AM you wrote:

 Freeware or Payware?

If you want to use it in a non-business environment stick to freeware.

 PGP is available in both flavours and in versions
 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your security needs? Do you currently have a
 Firewall? If not, be advised that PGP 7.0.4 has a very good rules-based
 Firewall along with an IDS (Intrusion Detection System), but they are only
 available in the payware version.

AFAIK, the NAI 7.0.x version has only minor changes concerning
security: the firewall is one. For NAI, PGPDisk is only available in
the paid version, if they did not change it again.

6.5.8ckt also uses algorithms recently added to NAI 7.0.x. For
compatibility reasons you are not advised to use them. One should (for
now) stick to RSA and DH/DSS, not necessarily in that order.

 Good choice of Mail Client BTW. ;o) At this moment, there is no PGP Plugin
 for any of the 7.x versions, freeware or payware. However, from what I've
 read, there is a current problem with the PGP Plugin (which *had* worked
 nicely with both NAI and the CKT builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest
 Beta's. I see you are using Beta 7. :o(

No problem for 6.5.8ckt in beta 7 and 9.



- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/9

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Life is like a sewer: What you get out of it, depends on what you  put
into it! (Tom Lehrer)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOuFI1vTo1oA8g8dLEQIJxwCgiD45czCcKO/z6VvEa7uAyolggIQAoIpQ
uD1wHSzJ5MNWcPo6mU+hlRJ+
=B5fv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Thomas

Hallo Shauna,

On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:39:36 -0600 GMT (21/04/2001, 10:39 +0800 GMT),
Shauna Scott wrote:

SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home
SS computer is still on 1.51).

Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Auf einem Superman-Kostuem fuer Kinder: "Das Tragen dieses Kleidungsstuecks
ermoeglicht es nicht, zu fliegen".

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.52 Beta/9
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott

Hello Thomas,

Friday, April 20, 2001, 8:58:43 PM, you wrote:

SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home
SS computer is still on 1.51).

T Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-)

That's the joy of being the one who makes the rules for computer use.
Actually, I normally do it the other way around too, but my office
computer is the laptop, and I was sitting bored in a hotel room when
the last group of betas started coming out. And I wanted to test them
on W2K since I'm going to upgrade the home computer from NT as soon as
I find both the time and the courage.

-- 
Best regards,
 Shaunamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! version 1.51 on Windows NT 4.0 SP6

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott

Hello Nick,

Friday, April 20, 2001, 10:31:46 PM, you wrote:


 I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the
 others on this list (I'm in Edmonton).

NA Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!!  :o)

Number 1, of course! (I'm not the rabid hockey fan I used to be, but
at this time of year the old feelings still stir up a bit.)

-- 
Best regards,
 Shaunamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[3]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

P.S.

Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the
signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message
after signing it?


Best regards
Shauna

- -- 

Shauna Scott
Vice President - Finance  Administration
Rocky Mountain Skiing Inc.

Using The Bat! version 1.52 Beta/10 on Windows 2000 SP1


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQA/AwUBOuINsyv4/MA2WmGQEQIYtwCgvjbvhWQD9R9L8YlH6v/sfjdoKiMAoJiR
W7SIBxYnFP4lfFYigG8EldPv
=E5NV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:36 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:

SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
SS get it to work with The Bat.

I'm sorry not to be able to help with your question. But I'm getting a bad
sig result:

*** PGP Signature Status: bad
*** Signer: Shauna Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Invalid)
*** Signed: 22.04.01 01:35:37
*** Verified: 22.04.01 01:06:52
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

Cheers
Peter
- --
PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication

iQA/AwUBOuIFLgM2UgbhB3TOEQLxrwCg+751m8wcBvr1M9Qr2kgCxn+NRZ4AnjHG
Ah/HWVY7nyvo9WFk0aQtU85T
=HBTO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:46 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:

SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the
SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message
SS after signing it?

Hi Shauna,
that's what PGP signing is for. All alterations made by whom ever _after_
signing the message will produce a bad signature, because it is not
exactly the signed message.

Cheers
Peter
- --
PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication

iQA/AwUBOuIGigM2UgbhB3TOEQLwCQCgmScUs5yijdSY77bJYZeR+kHvwaIAoMQh
7CvNTdCbO11z0q168iJB0OJF
=VBzv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread 60 Gunner

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Peter,

Saturday, April 21, 2001, 19.09.48, you wrote:

PM I'm sorry not to be able to help with your question. But I'm getting a bad
PM sig result:

PM *** PGP Signature Status: bad

Shauna stated earlier that the text was changed after the message was signed,
that would make the signature bad.

- -- 
Cheers,

~Chris

PGP DH/DSS 0x3C3D49B3 PGP RSA 0x535D3933 ICQ 113641590
TB! 1.52 Beta/9 Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 AMD K6-2 400 320MBRAM
You might be an Engineer if:
If you don't even know where the cover to your personal computer is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQEVAwUBOuIUyLpIRaxTXTkzAQFFnQf9FSQzIqyiT2ZlvYh5RBEnM/xM9YW3wEyk
KrM4ZXGSpNVJyl7GAykldWkUVdi0No5zaXPodCkSStn1MHHx4+k52tIo1EDN0PRU
t7+TaU09kkOwpkN6h3BkiFpmWfqxFAGygjh15NmPO3RCIuQ+uxOFmGFosm0Tq8yA
GICPaIDSA3gXTji+HuMbW038HRYxH720qsOZ//A5WoVFYGYQ2Iah12zEedpV34j6
n6/pbKO/ftXIDhaEGVDjjWhaU/SVHhzXJw7q0XZWRy7X+Vi4onfmbGJY2Gm47BJ6
SFtLnxh88qjVgyEb9AjQWyxeO54y0Mq9MckkuMrK2DgzSNN5AaijHA==
=XDuH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[3]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread George F Schoelles

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hello Shauna,

Saturday, April 21, 2001, 3:36:26 PM, you wrote:

SS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SS Hash: SHA1

SS Hello All

SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
SS get it to work with The Bat.

SS If I look under Tools-OpenPGP-Choose OpenPGP Version, the only
SS choices available are Internal and PGP Command Line, neither of
SS which appears to be what I want. Is there something else I have to do
SS to make PGP 6.0.x/6.5.x Plugin available?

SS Best regards
SS Shauna


Download the PGP dll's from ritlabs and install them.

- --
Best regards,
 George   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**
*Thawte authorized WOT Notary  * ICQ: 122492 *
**

I'm an incorrigible punster, so don't corrige me!

Finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQEVAwUBOuIWsDYFY6kvWSqxAQGPZwf/akafq67D6vC5GRCqz0KRleWQ8aUIhH1R
LE0vI7jq9GBsEM9J05r1yxO9hJrKvUeV1Sf71xa7UpG1Lf8ogXXEgJPZ/55Bxdpb
t3MQ+1i8SQCQSd+PP7IJQg4fPMo9e9zyM5zE4DdRAK9WERLhjcaYp4PdBMv2lQoy
3vJk9gA1QxD6vnDN3Pr29GSHPgnrDv7rnA1WXKWtufxGbva6zNoojRMZMLSxTKEd
uTx4Va91RsBON3lK/LVEHEBNnASpqVksfa3dGRXL8LcZKcd/3LLIKezg//VIlVS0
eFislof82G5DZbn7jmreI/wdbXSnkmul3giBueJzZYjfzv+3O5kWdg==
=IZdK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello All,

On 2001-04-21, Peter Meyns wrote:


SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous
message, the
SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the
message
SS after signing it?

PM Hi Shauna,
PM that's what PGP signing is for. All alterations made by whom ever
_after_
PM signing the message will produce a bad signature, because it is
not
PM exactly the signed message.

That's what I figured, but, of course, I didn't think of it until
after I hit send the first time.

Thanks.

Best Regards
Shauna

- -- 

Shauna Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! Version 1.52 Beta/10 on Windows 2000, SP1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt build 05 http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQA/AwUBOuIWWiv4/MA2WmGQEQIZRQCfZ0d+46mPC31cr2RTEHYmsqR2qxoAoIkV
vgcM8uCGEeG94QbGPvQYrx5w
=I5E+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[4]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello All,

On 2001-04-21, George F Schoelles wrote:



GFS Download the PGP dll's from ritlabs and install them.

That did it - thanks George.


Best Regards
Shauna

- --

Shauna Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! Version 1.52 Beta/10 on Windows 2000, SP1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOuIY9Sv4/MA2WmGQEQKDKwCdGRSxJnHDjpTCuQgjPAmg1WEh7a4AoK/p
eh6+TXnmgMV/M34d8W8U5+XO
=39/R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Karin Spaink

On 22-04-2001 at 00:36, Shauna Scott kindly wrote:

 So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
 downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
 get it to work with The Bat.

 If I look under Tools-OpenPGP-Choose OpenPGP Version, the only
 choices available are Internal and PGP Command Line, neither of
 which appears to be what I want. Is there something else I have to do
 to make PGP 6.0.x/6.5.x Plugin available?

You have downloaded the TB PGP plugin, I assume? It is
available from http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
You need to unzip the files, and put batpgp60.dll and/or
batpgp65.dll in your TB program directory.

If you now check Tools -- PGP -- Choose Version, you can
tick the PGP 6.0/6.5 option.


- K -

-- 

Another complication is that the subconscious mind is 
always changin'. Like an encyclopaedia that keeps puttin' 
out a whole new edition every day. 
  - Haruki Murakami: The Hard-Boiled Wonderland



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 01:25 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
...
SS That's what I figured, but, of course, I didn't think of it until
SS after I hit send the first time.

SS Thanks.

You're welcome.

*** PGP Signature Status: good
*** Signer: Shauna Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Invalid)
*** Signed: 22.04.01 02:23:05
*** Verified: 22.04.01 01:40:17

If you have more questions regarding PGP in particular you might like to
join this list too:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found it to be at least as friendly as TBUDL. :o))

Cheers
Peter
- --
PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: PGP-signed for better authentication

iQA/AwUBOuIN9AM2UgbhB3TOEQL8rgCfTa3dsQtf47uQbcDctBoTY5O8ZCMAmwUR
t5OBccTyCL+0NGvhFbgtoS+T
=pqge
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Shauna Scott

Hello All

I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP - which version should I
use? I'm running The Bat on W2K and WinNT 4.0, and most of the people I
deal with are running Outlook/Outlook Express on Win95/98.

Thanks
Shauna

-- 

Shauna Scott
Vice President - Finance  Administration
Rocky Mountain Skiing Inc.

Using The Bat! version 1.52 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 SP1

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Nick Andriash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On April 20, 2001, at 4:54:21 PM, Shauna Scott wrote:

 I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP -

Good to hear, and welcome to the PGP Community. :o)

 which version should I use?

Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in versions
6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your security needs? Do you currently have a
Firewall? If not, be advised that PGP 7.0.4 has a very good rules-based
Firewall along with an IDS (Intrusion Detection System), but they are only
available in the payware version.

 I'm running The Bat on W2K and WinNT 4.0, and most of the people I deal
 with are running Outlook/Outlook Express on Win95/98.

Good choice of Mail Client BTW. ;o) At this moment, there is no PGP Plugin
for any of the 7.x versions, freeware or payware. However, from what I've
read, there is a current problem with the PGP Plugin (which *had* worked
nicely with both NAI and the CKT builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest
Beta's. I see you are using Beta 7. :o(

As for the freeware side PGP 6.5.8/7.0.3 you can choose the NAI version,
or the CKT version, but the only CKT version available is 6.5.8. The CKT
version is more feature rich than the NAI offering, and includes (but is
not limited to) a greater choice of Symmteric Algorithms and I do believe
offers PGP Disk.

Here are the URL's where you can download/read about both:

http://www.ipgpp.com/ for the CKT build of PGP 6.5.8

http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/versions/freeware/ for the NAI versions.


Nick

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=N.J. Andriash  |  Vancouver, B.C. Canada=-
 PGP-Basics List Moderator | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
GnuPG v1.0.4-2 (MingW32) | TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win98 SE 


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-2 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v1.71
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iD8DBQE64N1MxQKEdHuj/c4RAmFiAKC3Oy4pDUboZXRqPXqo3EN8WeUGEwCgiG2a
BM4+Htw9GVYWsb6R6woA4XA=
=g7TS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Brian Clark

Hi Nick,

@ 9:07:40 PM on 4/20/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:

...
NA However, from what I've read, there is a current problem with the
NA PGP Plugin (which *had* worked nicely with both NAI and the CKT
NA builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest Beta's. I see you are using
NA Beta 7. :o(

The plug-ins work with the latest betas. There's just a small pain in
the rear for me as a keyboard-person, rather than a mouse-person (and
that small bug should be corrected regardless, though). But everything
is still functioning just fine, AFAIK.

...
NA The CKT version is more feature rich than the NAI offering, and
NA includes (but is not limited to) a greater choice of Symmteric
NA Algorithms and I do believe offers PGP Disk.

Yep, it does offer PGP Disk. :)

-- 
 Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer
 PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
 [TB! 1.52 Beta/9, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A]



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Shauna Scott

Hello Nick,

Thanks to you and Brian for your input.


NA Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in versions
NA 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your security needs? Do you currently have a
NA Firewall? If not, be advised that PGP 7.0.4 has a very good rules-based
NA Firewall along with an IDS (Intrusion Detection System), but they are only
NA available in the payware version.

I'm mainly playing with it for now, so I'll stick to freeware. My
security needs aren't very high at the moment, but I expect them to
increase before long. I do have a firewalls in place. I just got
everyone at work on e-mail about 18 months ago (I'm considered the
resident "computer genius", which is pretty scary, considering how
little I know), and they're finally starting to make good use of it.
Since our head office and our operations are about 400km apart,
there's a lot of potential for e-mail use there. So far, I haven't
worried a lot about security - we don't transmit anything that's
really sensitive or that would be of much use to outsiders, and,
frankly, few, if any, of the staff currently have the computer skills
to get past the most elementary precautions. However, I expect both
the skill level and the sensitivity of the material to increase, so I
figure it's time to look into beefing up security, hopefully without
overwhelming people with complexity.

NA Good choice of Mail Client BTW. ;o) At this moment, there is no PGP Plugin
NA for any of the 7.x versions, freeware or payware. However, from what I've
NA read, there is a current problem with the PGP Plugin (which *had* worked
NA nicely with both NAI and the CKT builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest
NA Beta's. I see you are using Beta 7. :o(

I've been using The Bat for a couple of years now, and I'm extremely
happy with it. (I'm actually only using the beta on the office
computer, the home computer is still on 1.51).

NA -=N.J. Andriash  |  Vancouver, B.C. Canada=-

I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the
others on this list (I'm in Edmonton).

Thanks again for the input and I'll check out the PGP list.

-- 
Best regards,
 Shaunamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Nick Andriash

On April 20, 2001, at 7:39:36 PM, Shauna Scott wrote:

 I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the
 others on this list (I'm in Edmonton).

Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!!  :o)


Nick

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=N.J. Andriash  |  Vancouver, B.C. Canada=-
 PGP-Basics List Moderator | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
GnuPG v1.0.4-2 (MingW32) | TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win98 SE 

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org