Re[2]: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-06 Thread request . batuserlist

Hello,

Sunday, May 06, 2001, 12:51:50 AM, you wrote:

BC Hi Nick,

BC @ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:

BC ...
BC Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is
BC now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC aggravating.

NA The 'feature' is something Maxim calls Smart Matching, but I
NA agree with you Brian that it's a very big source of aggravation,
NA and something Max should revisit.

BC IMHO, I feel as if Smart Matching best describes its former state.
BC Now, it's forcing me to change address book entries and manually pick
BC out keys while using what is supposed to be a seamless plug-in. Surely
BC this can be some sort of option in TB!'s plugin options called Use
BC strict key matching or something along those lines. Maybe then
BC everyone could be happy.

Many Thanks for the replies, at least I know now it's not me!

Yes I too think this 'Smart Matching' may require some sort of option
switching applied. I've gone back to 1.51 until I can decide what I'm
going to do with the templates.

Also thanks for the information Brian about example.com. I've just
looked and it is registered to IANA so that domain should be okay to
use for 'examples'.


-- 
Best regards,
David Stone  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Bat! Version 1.51. Platform  Windows 98 4.10.. A

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread request . batuserlist

Hello Readers,

I've just upgraded to ver 1.52c from 1.51 and I've noticed that a
template for an address in the address book is working slightly
different with PGP.

For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as Joe
Bloggs [EMAIL PROTECTED].

I have normally been able to use a new message template from the AB
addressed to joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and using the appropriate
macro 'percent'ENCRYPTCOMPLETE the email when 'sent' or placed in the
'outbox' would pick the correct key from PGP-Keys.

But now it looks as if there is a full match required with the 'to'
address and the PGP key. Before it appeared that only that part
between  and  was checked against the PGP key-list.

The only way around it appears to be to use exactly the same address
as shown in the PGP key ring in the 'to' field or just the part
between  and  in the 'to' field. i.e must use Joe Bloggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or just [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(You can always 'drag' the key down when the PGP-Key box pop's up but
that's annoying) I don't know if this just affects AB entries or all
templates.



Does all that make sense? :)


P.S. The names and email/domain addresses in the above text are made
up and are not meant to  represent any individual/s or company.




-- 
Best regards,
David Stone  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Bat! Version 1.52 c. Platform  Windows 98 4.10.. A 
PGP Ver 6.5.8

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread Brian Clark

Hi Request,

@ 4:22:26 PM on 5/5/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

...
rbfcu For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is
rbfcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as Joe
rbfcu Bloggs [EMAIL PROTECTED].

...
rbfcu Does all that make sense? :)

Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is now
the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
aggravating.

...
rbfcu P.S. The names and email/domain addresses in the above text are
rbfcu made up and are not meant to represent any individual/s or
rbfcu company.

You can use example.com which is controlled by Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority. I remember seeing this as a standard somewhere,
but I can't find out if that is actually a fact. Anyway, that's what I
use.

--
 -Brian Clark | PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
 [SB! 1.52 Beta/12/iKey1000, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A]



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread Nick Andriash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On May 5, 2001, at 3:57:55 PM, Brian Clark wrote:

BC Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is now
BC the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC aggravating.

The 'feature' is something Maxim calls Smart Matching, but I agree with
you Brian that it's a very big source of aggravation, and something Max
should revisit.


Nick
- -- 
   -=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- 
 [ SecureBat! v1.52/iKey1000 | Win 98 SE 4.10 ] 
  [ PGP 7.1 (Build 174) | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ]  
~~

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.1 (Build 174)
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA+AwUBOvSQQcUChHR7o/3OEQJNQQCYlMYWXYfEpBfWdCC47WiyA4/ZZQCg3Ysw
C0bxE8rlgRBZCJxRBI/Xv1s=
=OWK3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread Brian Clark

Hi Nick,

@ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:

...
BC Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is
BC now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC aggravating.

NA The 'feature' is something Maxim calls Smart Matching, but I
NA agree with you Brian that it's a very big source of aggravation,
NA and something Max should revisit.

IMHO, I feel as if Smart Matching best describes its former state.
Now, it's forcing me to change address book entries and manually pick
out keys while using what is supposed to be a seamless plug-in. Surely
this can be some sort of option in TB!'s plugin options called Use
strict key matching or something along those lines. Maybe then
everyone could be happy.

--
 -Brian Clark | PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
 [SB! 1.52 Beta/12/iKey1000, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build  A]



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org