Re: Vs. 3 sorting problem

2004-09-07 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gunivortus Goos,

07-Sep-2004 20:49, you wrote:

 Could that please be corrected?
 F.i. a filterstring should just sorted once.

Another note... maybe I got you wrong first... do you mean that the
priority of the new filtering system (from top to bottom) is broken in
v3? ie. is your private filter is lower in the list of filters than your
list filter?

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

The spirit of one individual can supersede and dismiss the entire
clockwords of history. (Tom Robbins)



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Vs. 3 sorting problem

2004-09-07 Thread Michael Geyer
Hi Gunivortus and list,

On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 at 20:49:40 GMT +0200 (which was 20:49
where I live) Gunivortus Goos wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of Vs. 3 sorting problem:

 A friend, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is member of a mailinglist. His contributions to that
 list are sorted in the correct listfolder.
 But we're writing also a lot in private, so I've a folder especially for his
 mails. He's writing me with the same emailaddress. Now all messages he writes to
 that mailinglist are also sorted in my private folder for him.

I guess you filter on something like his mail-address.

As Alexander wrote, most (!) mailing lists set the Reply-to Headerto
the list address. I for myself filter the Header List-Id.

You should pay attention though, that these filters are performed
prior to those which filter for the senders mail-address. This way I
have no trouble with private correspondence with list members.


-- 
Regards
Michael

powered by The BAT! 3.0.0.8, Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta, and MyMacros 1.11
with usual problems of Windows XP  Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html