Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hi Alexander, ASK> For me, proper formatting of text-only messages, including the ability to ASK> re-flow quotes, is very important, and neither Outlook nor Opera's M2 or ASK> AK-Mail or Thunderbird (haven't tried others) has any function like that ASK> of TB's "ALT-L" keyboard shortcut - I'm using it all the time. Pegasus has it, -, but the quoting is not as nice as TB's. Just ">>", no initials, no colors. -- David Win][k sp4 TheBat 3.0 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hello Dave, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 7:05:30 AM, you wrote: DG> Mark Partous wrote: >> DWG> Does The Bat 3 still have the connection center malfunction? >> >> Don't have any problem with it. What's malfunctioning for you? DG> I don't know what Deniss's problem with the CC is, but for me, if I DG> abort/delete all tasks in the CC, I am unable to close TB as it says DG> tasks are still active. Clicking Abort on the "can't close" dialog does DG> no good and I'm forced to kill TB from Task Manager. Yes this seems to happen fairly often. Cannot quite figure out what process is still running though. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
>> DWG> Does The Bat 3 still have the connection center malfunction? >> >> Don't have any problem with it. What's malfunctioning for you? > > I don't know what Deniss's problem with the CC is, but for me, if I > abort/delete all tasks in the CC, I am unable to close TB as it says > tasks are still active. Clicking Abort on the "can't close" dialog does > no good and I'm forced to kill TB from Task Manager. I can confirm that for v2.xx but not for v3. But that's the only bugfix/improvement i discovered so far. regards, Mike GnuPG fingerprint 5481 4C57 FCFE 7953 777B B8CD 58AC B95E DBBA CE86 pgpJKQkGeK2qr.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hello John, John Phillips wrote: JP> Hi Morgan, JP> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 11:15:27 [GMT+0100] (which was 20:15:27 Australian JP> Eastern Time) you wrote: >> The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!. Outlook >> 2003 has virtual folders, an excellent filtering system, secure >> e-mail reading features such as not downloading pictures or running >> scripts. JP> Does it still top post? Top posting good. Bottom posting annoying! -- Best regards, Dennis - "The people" defend freedom - not the government! The Human Race sadly using The Bat! 2.12.00 Windows 2000 Professional 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:27:17 AM, you wrote: ASK> I'm using the %SmartQuotes macro from the MyMacros ASK> pack for that: ASK> http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/ thanks .. I'll check it out! TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hello Graham, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:13:28 AM, you wrote: GD> Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ? The best suggestion that I have heard is stay with 2.12. It works well enough for me (but I don't need IMAP ... which was promised for 2 ... wasn't it? :-/ ) -- Best regards, MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hello M, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:18:01 PM, you wrote: Mark>> Does it still uses loads of memory for doing practically nothing? :-) MicCullen> But if it's already your calendar because it syncs with yer Palm... Must be you didn't try Time & Chaos (that does sync too)! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.12.03 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:54:21 PM, you wrote: > For me, proper formatting of text-only messages, including the ability > to re-flow quotes, is very important, and neither Outlook nor Opera's > M2 or AK-Mail or Thunderbird (haven't tried others) has any function > like that of TB's "ALT-L" keyboard shortcut - I'm using it all the > time. The question is - when will the Micro Ed editor have the ability to properly re-flow quoted text without the need to use the justify left (ALT-L) keyboard shortcut? It's irritating when an email client (not just The Bat!) doesn't do it for you - more so in Thunderbird than any other client. When you do Rewrap (or ALT-L in The Bat!) it does it wonderfully - but why can't it do this when you hit the Reply button so that the user is left with a beautifully formatted email ready to reply to? :) Regards, Martyn Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hello Martyn, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:38:28 PM, you wrote: >> Does it still top post? MD> Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to MD> that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues: Does it still uses loads of memory for doing practically nothing? :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.12.03 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1
Hi Graham, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:13:28 AM, you wrote: GD> Hello Cory, GD> Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:47:57 AM, you wrote: C>> On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:32:52 +0200, "Alexander S. Kunz" C>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>I have enough of Ritlabs. As soon as this v2.12 doesn't do what I need >>>anymore, I'm off for another email client ... C>> I fully agree. Add to that the lack of support from Ritlabs (we're C>> totally left on our own here at teh list, not a single fix but GD> what about all that work on Smiley's ;-) C>> Personally I've been using and advocating TB for over 5 years now, but C>> this definitely is the end. We're with 6 pro users (add to that my C>> personal), as I'm the (mail) admin and in charge with the sw to use, C>> I'll most likely transfer us to Mercury. GD> If anyone from development is listening "stop screwing your users" GD> The reason I moved was that I was fed up with Outlook, now it GD> looks like I'll have to go back to Outlook and that really pisses GD> me off GD> Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ? GD> Graham The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!. Outlook 2003 has virtual folders, an excellent filtering system, secure e-mail reading features such as not downloading pictures or running scripts. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
