Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-30 Thread PIXIE

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:16:27 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> AB templates are much safer. I create a new message, type TBU in the
TF> TO field, and the address will be autocompleted to TBUDL. That's why I

I've been switching to address book templates somewhat and the
autocomplete feature is flaky at best.

I created a new address book 'Mail Lists' with tbudl and tbot entries
Set autocomplete to check all address books
On a new message entering TB pops in the tbot entry and thats all I
can get.  Continuing on to spell out TBUDL doesn't help.

It's like it is only parsing the first two and then the first match it
finds simply is either it or expects me to manually enter a proper
email address.

If I remove the TBOT entry then it will find the TBUDL entry and use
it. I figure it may have something to do with the entry I have made
and the autocomplete

I've tried a few approaches thinking perhaps the entry is causing
problems. No matter what the autocomplete seems to not work reliably
with the history option off (just multiple addr books on)

I thought that I'd beaten it by deleting the addr entries and adding
them from the message via RT click.. Seemed to work for a bit then
quit. (I think that I left history autocommplete on and upon turning it
off things went bad again)

Is this behavior that has been seen before or am I just lucky and
TB is messing with me?

If anyone has dialed in the logic used in autocomplete I'd love to
hear it.. I gave up after 30 mins or so of investigating since I got
tired of fooling with it.

On a similar note, has anyone ever discovered a way to purge the
history(addy,subject etc, MRU type,etc) strings that get cached in TB?

-- Pixie
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-25 Thread PIXIE
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:44:11 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> Your time zone is fine now. And my Windows version will become
TF> obsolete come January 15 - MS already announced that. Dinos should
TF> stick together. ;-)

Well... Seems that I was in error once again.  I am in GMT-0400 until
October 26 @ 2AM.  Hadn't crossed my mind that the silly daylight
savings time hour shift was in effect.

It's quite amazing the wealth of information
http://greenwichmeantime.com/ has available.

-- 
Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/4 on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-25 Thread PIXIE
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:47:35 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> That's what you are sending:

>> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:34:01 -0400

Yes I realize that.  Kind of strange..

TF> I'm afraid that's exactly the place you want to go.

Sure enough, the TZ was set for "(GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US &
Canada)" -- W95 lingo.  Was stamping -04:00 though.. Changed to
another -0500 setting in the list and it cleared up the discrepancy I
think.

Guess that's what I get for being a hold out and using an obsolete
version of windows.. :-)

-- 
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-25 Thread PIXIE
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:19:29 +0700 GMT, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:05:46 -0400 GMT (25/08/2003, 15:05 +0700 GMT),

Thanks for the snippet from your template, I'm slightly aware of
regular expressions as I use some in other programs. One thing that
caught my attention is for some reason my mail has -0400 in the header
instead of -0500, as indicated by your template.

I'm unaware of any way to adjust this aside from the time zone setting
in windows..

Pixie
-- 
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-25 Thread PIXIE
Monday, August 25, 2003, 1:16:27 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> can add "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to that template and it will do

Correction, add %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- at least on this old
1.62r version -I- am running.. heh heh.  How do you like the beta 2.x?

-- 
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-25 Thread PIXIE
Monday, August 25, 2003, 4:55:48 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:

RO> %OFromName

Gotcha! Thanks!

RO> On some lists it's frowned upon to put names in the T0-header, so in
RO> those cases %ToName won't suffice.

I'm not real knowledgeable about e-mail headers.. So you mean to say
that what I put in the template is added to the message header?  I was
thinking the templates are basically cosmetic.  I don't recall what
was in there but my name was inserted in the message so I just
tried a few until I actually saw "Thomas Fernandez" show up.. doh!

Pixie
-- 
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Hello and a couple questions (dispatcher & this list)

2003-08-25 Thread PIXIE
Monday, August 25, 2003, 1:16:27 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> Welcome. :-)

Thanks!

TF> No, there isn't. The defaults are hard-coded.

Bummer.  Perhaps this will make its' way into version 2.x?  Seems IMAP
related and I read that the IMAP code is getting some due
consideration. The hot-keys aren't so bad. All in all I'll probably
find other features as I go that will alter how I am using TB now
anyhow.

TF> Yes, that's possible. Check out Folder / Properties / Template...

Great! I really haven't examined this area much so I appreciate the
jump-start you gave me. As you pointed out though, perhaps I should be
looking at AB templates instead.

I am still finding myself loosing my way though the various menus and
options.  Took me a while to finally find the ticker again after I hid
it. :-)

BTW: which macro is generally used in a list for "xxx wrote" reply
template?  I popped in %TONAME but want to double check.
-- 
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 95 4.0



Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html