Re[2]: Lost message
Hello Dierk, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at07:51:57[GMT +0200](which was 06:51 where I live) you wrote: Why should that be when all other mails, certainly to this particular person, all go into the Inbox without any fuss whether they are replies or new mails? DH Because one of your filters misbehaves. DH Take it again step by step: DH 1. You send out a message from the Outbox. DH 2. This message ends up (automatically) in the Sent Mail folder. DH 2a. Only if you use a filter for Outgoing mail something else can DH happen (i.e. moving the message to another folder or getting deleted). I never had a rule in the Outbox, that's what's so baffling. I just expected (and originally got) a return copy as happened in my other mail programme. I've now started amending my rules so that sent messages are directed to the relevant folders. Thanks. -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Lost message
Hello Marck, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at02:18:50[GMT +0100](which was 02:18 where I live) you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- RW ... The messages from TB! still remain missing. after years of RW never losing a message I have 3 in the space of 24 hours. A bit RW worrying, especially when my other programme copes perfectly RW well. MDP Then the only explanation is a difference in configuration - you MDP have TB set up to send the message to the wrong server or are MDP putting invalid addresses into the messages in TB such that TB MDP considers them valid but the SMTP relay server encounters a MDP non-permanent failure and puts the messages into a retry queue. No, addresses fine and messages normal text. It's my misunderstanding of the rules and their hierarchy :-( -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Lost message
Hello Dierk, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at07:53:33[GMT +0200](which was 06:53 where I live) you wrote: DH I am not sure the messages have been lost. From your other messages I DH deduce (perhaps wrongly) that you use the wrong method to test wether DH a message has been sent/delivered. I'll agree with that. I'm learning, oh so slowly :-) -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Lost message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:40:16 PM RE: Lost message Greetings Sudip, On Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 1:14:16 AM, you wrote: SP Couple of months ago, I came across an article that propounded about a SP web service that allowed for a reliable way to confirm mail delivery. SP I don't know what kind of technology is involved or what modus SP operandi the service uses - anyone heard or know about such SP service(s)? In order to accomplish that they would have to be somehow notified of 1] the e-mail 2] the sender and 3] the receiver. If your e-mail is sent through them then I would bet they can monitor 1] content 2] the number of e-mails sent by you and 3] recipient information. Should this web site's technology be true I, personally, would stear WAY clear of such monitoring and allowing person(s) unknown to integrate their technology into my daily e-mail activities. If what I send is so important that I need to know the recipient received it then it is sent US Postal registered, receipt request, UPS or Fedex should I need track such receipt. MHO. - -- Regards, DG Raftery Sr. A Life? Cool! Where can I download one of those from? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Business Security 6.0 iQA/AwUBPaTAQGGmTEg4iItaEQKbggCgrg4y6fe8P7wp9nPJgzlwMnru9U8AoKrP J8P2iF8AEyRpeGB0AGlHzC+L =FYqI -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Lost message
Hello Marck, On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at09:53:35[GMT +0100](which was 09:53 where I live) you wrote: RW Some queue, it's still missing 8 hours lateer :-( MDP Have you checked your account log in TB to make sure the message was MDP actually sent? Too late, it's gone from the log. I've never looked there before so have now set it higher so that message details last longer in it. -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Lost message
Hi, Gerard! Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:48:20 AM, you wrote: G I have had this happen. I sent and email and it was moved to the inbox G but never was sent. I know this because I use a SMTP server and it just G didn't get there. G I found that if I removed about 2 lines from the bottom the mail would G be sent. Is it possible that you had a line with only a single space on it, and TB! didn't fix it to conform to RFC standards? Failing to fix might have had that result with certain anti-spam servers. -- --Scott. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Lost message
Hello Scott, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live) you wrote: SM Email is not guaranteed to get there. If you want to be sure that it SM got there, request a receipt. Some software and users don't send SM receipts, so even that is no guarantee. OK, it's just that it's never happened before and, as I'm new to TB, I was just wondering if I'd done something wrong but, as it's a one off, it seems not. -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
