Re[2]: how to do this with sorting-office?

2003-10-01 Thread Samson
Hello Edgar,

E 1) You can enter a new headerfield in your mail called projectid
E 2) You  can also make a reply template that gives this projectid the name
Eof the folder where you answered the original message.
E 3) Then you can filter on projectid for outgoing mails.

This sounds like a good solution. At least it unifies the way to
create outgoing filters.

Will adding a non-standard header in the mail affect compatibility?

Thanks Edgar. Anyway I'll try this first.

(Using The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 )

-- 
Best regards,
 Samsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: how to do this with sorting-office?

2003-09-30 Thread Samson
Hello Martin  MAU,

MW Can't you create a corresponding outgoing mail filter based on similar
MW rules as incoming mail?

yes, this is also the idea that pops up in my head at the first time.
but the problem is that it cost too much time.

for example, if i have 10 projects, i'll create 10 filters for
incoming mail. this is ok because i have to do that. but i need to
create another 10 outgoing filter. this looks a little unnecessary
because the mail is already filtered. if thebat can support some kind
of filter based on the original message, it would be much easier.

anyway, thanks for your comments. i'm afraid i have to do this until
some day thebat adds this feature.


(Using The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 )

-- 
Best regards,
 Samsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: how to do this with sorting-office?

2003-09-30 Thread Joseph N.
   On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 for example, if i have 10 projects, i'll create 10 filters for
 incoming mail. this is ok because i have to do that. but i need to
 create another 10 outgoing filter. this looks a little unnecessary
 because the mail is already filtered.

TF What I do is the following: When I filter incoming mail on sender or
TF subject, I check Presence in Kludges. Then I just cp the filter into
TF Outgoing and I'm done.

I do the same, but this always has seemed to me an unnecessary PITA.
The issue is not only creating the filter(s), but also maintaining
them.

It would be more sensible and I assume not too difficult to provide
two extra options when a user filters on a string in the headers:
filter outgoing and incoming the same way; or, as an alternative,
filter outgoing and read msgs the same way.

-- 
JN



Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html