Re: Seti@home

2004-08-11 Thread Robin Anson
On Wed 11 August 2004, 13:55:00 +1000, Chris wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] may be causing your problem. Try turning it off and see if
> your folders display at the right speed. I had this problem when I ran
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the time.

I only run it as a screensaver, so it should make no difference while I
am working on the system.

>> Are you running the new version?
> Yes I am. The SETI Team is having some problems with the new servers
> (not being able to get work units, not being able to return work
> units, not getting credit for work units, loosing work units, etc.),
> so my experience has been less than great. I would wait to upgrade
> until they work some of the bugs out.

Okay, sounds like waiting for a while is a good idea. Thanks

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Seti@home (was: Re: Folders don't display contents immediately)

2004-08-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris,

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:55:00 -0400 GMT (11/08/2004, 10:55 +0700 GMT),
Chris wrote:

C> It probably doesn't add much value; however, [EMAIL PROTECTED] may be causing
C> your problem. Try turning it off and see if your folders display at
C> the right speed. I had this problem when I ran [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the time.

I turned it off and the larger folders still open with the same delay.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

"When they broke open molecules, they found they were only stuffed
with atoms. But when they broke open atoms, they found them stuffed
with explosions."

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM





Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Seti@home (was: Re: Folders don't display contents immediately)

2004-08-10 Thread Chris

Robin Anson @ 2004-Aug-10 7:58:27 PM
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] (was: Re: Folders don't display contents immediately)" 

>> Are you still running [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes, I took out the lines in my sig because of complaints about the
> size of signatures. I figured it didn't add much value to the TB!
> mailing lists.
It probably doesn't add much value; however, [EMAIL PROTECTED] may be causing
your problem. Try turning it off and see if your folders display at
the right speed. I had this problem when I ran [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the time.

> Are you running the new version?
Yes I am. The SETI Team is having some problems with the new servers
(not being able to get work units, not being able to return work
units, not getting credit for work units, loosing work units, etc.),
so my experience has been less than great. I would wait to upgrade
until they work some of the bugs out.

-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Today's Oxymoron: Definite maybe


pgpKklRnp4VGz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Seti@home (was: Re: Folders don't display contents immediately)

2004-08-10 Thread Robin Anson
On Wed 11 August 2004, 9:08:59 +1000, Chris wrote:
> Are you still running [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes, I took out the lines in my sig because of complaints about the size
of signatures. I figured it didn't add much value to the TB! mailing
lists.

> If so, what version are you running? Are you running the new
> BOINC-based version?

No, I didn't know about it until I read your email. I will look at it
when I have some time.

Are you running the new version?

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-15 Thread Dan Grunberg
Sat, 15 May 2004 21:43:34 +1000 (7:43 AM  here) Robin Anson wrote:

> On Sat 15 May 2004, 1:25:39 +1000, Dan Grunberg wrote:
>> Another, probably much simpler possibility has occurred to me.

>> Download "MyMacros" from http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/ .



> Not a bad approach. The QT I used (see below) is

BEGIN ROBIN'S FILTER

,- [ GetSetiSig QT ]
| %Run("d:\program files\setisig\ssiglite.exe")%-
| Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu)
|%Getline("4","%Include='e:\temp\setisig.txt")
|%Getline("5","%Include='e:\temp\setisig.txt")
`-

END ROBIN'S FILTER


FWIW:

I haven't any experience with Seti, but this discussion inspired me to
add %Run line to a macro I use.

I found that when the macro ran a batch file that runs sorts on two
short (10 line +/-) text files, the text files were included in my
message before the sorts took place. I found that I could fix the
problem by specifying a 15 second timeout:

%Run("c:\batches\thebatch.bat","ACTIVE","15000")






Using: The Bat! v2.10.03, BayesIt! 0.5.4, MyMacros 1.10
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4



-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Sat 15 May 2004, 1:25:39 +1000, Dan Grunberg wrote:
> Another, probably much simpler possibility has occurred to me.
> 
> Download "MyMacros" from http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/ .

Not a bad approach. The QT I used (see below) is

,- [ GetSetiSig QT ]
| %Run("d:\program files\setisig\ssiglite.exe")%-
| Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu)
|%Getline("4","%Include='e:\temp\setisig.txt")
|%Getline("5","%Include='e:\temp\setisig.txt")
`-


-- 
Robin Anson
Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see: www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu)
   No of SETI units returned: 283
   Processing time: 1 years, 218 days, 7 hours.





Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-14 Thread Dan Grunberg
Fri, 14 May 2004 11:25:39 -0400 (11:25 AM  here) Dan Grunberg wrote:

> %Getline("n","%Include="Path...File")
Fix to read: %Getline("n","%Include="Path...File"")
.
.
.
> %Getline("1","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile")
Fix to read: %Getline("1","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile"")

> %Getline("5","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile")
Fix to read: %Getline("5","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile"")

> %Getline("8","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile")
Fix to read: %Getline("8","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile"")






Using: The Bat! v2.10.03, BayesIt! 0.5.4, MyMacros 1.10
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4



-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-14 Thread Dan Grunberg
Fri, 14 May 2004 02:46:10 -0400 (2:46 AM  here) David wrote:

> On Monday, May 10, 2004, 7:10:23 AM, you wrote:

TA>> Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress
TA>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature?

> Not a macro, but a snappy little program called setisig is what I
> use. It creates a little text file with your seti done information.

> It outputs to a file. I have The Bat! set up to grab that file into
> smart bat! so I can edit it (only because I don't like to use ALL
> the information that setisig outputs) and then in my templates, I
> just grab that file.

> So after editing, mine looks like: No of SETI units returned: 701
> Processing time: 1 years, 147 days, 11 hours.

> Alas, as you notice, this does take a few steps - running setisig
> then editing through smart bat!. But, unless you are obsessed with
> having every email have an absolutely up to the moment record of
> your seti work, this is good enough for me. I run it once or twice a
> week, when I think about it.

Another, probably much simpler possibility has occurred to me.

Download "MyMacros" from http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/ .

Plug "MyMacros" into TheBat!

"MyMacros" adds some advanced macros to TheBat!'s repertoire, so, for
example, you can do the following in a TheBat! template:

 %Run("PathToSetsig")   Will run Setisig.

 %INCLUDE="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile" Will include the file's
text.

 %Getline("n","%Include="Path...File")  where n=1,2,3,... I THINK
will include line n of
Setisig's output text
file.

So, a template to include lines 1, 5, and 8 of the file in your
message, MIGHT look like:

%REM="%-
BEGIN QUICK TEMPLATE "Seti135"
"%-
%Run("PathToSetsig")%-
%Getline("1","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile")
%Getline("5","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile")
%Getline("8","%Include="PathToSetisigOutputTextFile")
%REM="%-
END TEMPLATE "Seti135"
"%-









Using: The Bat! v2.10.03, BayesIt! 0.5.4, MyMacros 1.10
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4



-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-14 Thread Dan Grunberg
Fri, 14 May 2004 02:46:10 -0400 (2:46 AM  here) David wrote:

> On Monday, May 10, 2004, 7:10:23 AM, you wrote:

TA>> Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress
TA>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature?

> Not a macro, but a snappy little program called setisig is what I
> use. It creates a little text file with your seti done information.

> It outputs to a file. I have The Bat! set up to grab that file into
> smart bat! so I can edit it (only because I don't like to use ALL
> the information that setisig outputs) and then in my templates, I
> just grab that file.

> So after editing, mine looks like:
> No of SETI units returned: 701
> Processing time: 1 years, 147 days, 11 hours.

Please post which Windows your system is using.

Please post the path to the text file created by setisig?

Please post an example of setisig's unedited output text file, and the
edited version that corresponds to that setisig output?

> Alas, as you notice, this does take a few steps - running setisig
> then editing through smart bat!. But, unless you are obsessed with
> having every email have an absolutely up to the moment record of
> your seti work, this is good enough for me. I run it once or twice a
> week, when I think about it.

I'd like to try to write a Basic program to edit the file. If your
system can support Basic, then (hopefully) it will be possible to use
my program to automate the editing of setisig's output.

If your system can support batch files (or an equivalent to them), a
batch file might be written to:

  Call setisig to create (unedited) stsigout.txt
  Call my Basic program to create stsigedt.txt
  
Then a TheBat! template could be written to include stsigedt.txt in
your message.


I'm Using: The Bat! v2.10.03, BayesIt! 0.5.4, MyMacros 1.10
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4


--

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-13 Thread David
On Monday, May 10, 2004, 7:10:23 AM, you wrote:

TA> Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress for
TA> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature?

Not a macro, but a snappy little program called setisig is what I use.
It creates a little text file with your seti done information.

It outputs to a file. I have The Bat! set up to grab that file into
smart bat! so I can edit it (only because I don't like to use ALL the
information that setisig outputs) and then in my templates, I just grab
that file.

So after editing, mine looks like:
No of SETI units returned: 701
Processing time: 1 years, 147 days, 11 hours.

Alas, as you notice, this does take a few steps - running setisig then
editing through smart bat!. But, unless you are obsessed with having
every email have an absolutely up to the moment record of your seti
work, this is good enough for me. I run it once or twice a week, when
I think about it.

And it's free.


-- 
David


We despise all reverences and all objects of reverence which are
outside the pale of our list of sacred things. And yet, with strange
inconsistency, we are shocked when other people despise and defile the
things which are holy to us. - Mark Twain, author and humorist
(1835-1910)




Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-11 Thread Chris

Thomas Andersson @ 2004-May-10 7:10:23 AM
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] plugin for The Bat?" 

> Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature?
You could write a plug-in that parses the state.sah file for relevant
information.

-- 
Chris - Nun mi Esperanton lernas.
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

This message transmitted on 100% recycled electrons.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas,

On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:10:23 +0200 GMT (10/05/2004, 18:10 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Andersson wrote:

TA> Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress for
TA> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature?

I don't think there is a macro. I just played with SetiSpy
http://cox-internet.com/setispy/ but it doesn't seem to provide a text
output. Anyway, the website also offers the source code for download,
so maybe that helps you build an interface between [EMAIL PROTECTED] and TB. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

"I have an excellent track record, although I am not a horse,"

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.10.01
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM





Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


SETI@home plugin for The Bat?

2004-05-10 Thread Thomas Andersson
Hi list!

I've been using The Bat! for some time now and I love it. Especially
the ability of using macros to create mail signatures.

Does anyone know of a macro that I can use to insert my progress for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in my mail signature?

Cheers!
-- 
Thomas Andersson - Sweden
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running The Bat! 2.10.03
on Windows XP Build number 2600 Service Pack 1



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0419-2, 2004-05-09
Tested on: 2004-05-10 13:10:28
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html