Views threads by subject - apply colour to subject line?
Hæ! Is it possible to apply a colour to the subject "line" when threading by subject? It would be nice, if I could get rid of the subject line completely and thread the messages like the old behaviour of View Threads by Subject... :-( -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | <http://www.aesir.de/> | The Bat! v3.5.25 Professional & K9 v1.28 | Windows XP Pro (v5.1.2600) > Listening to: Omar Faruk Tekbilek - Three Last Words < Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
View threads by subject -- messages invisible
Hello, 2.02. CE, view threads by references, fine, view threads by subject, no headers, just the '+' boxes. Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View threads by subject does not thread original message
Some time around 6/18/2003 19:58:23, I think I heard DZ-Jay say: <-- SNIP! --> > except that the first message that starts a thread (the one without a > "Re:" in the Subject line) is not included in the threads. So I > always get, for example, a message list like this: Ugh! Nevermind, I found out what is going on with those messages: The mailing list inserts a string at the beginning of the subject line, so for TB! the subjects are different (because they do not start with "Re:"). I will create a filter to remove this string. Sorry. dZ. Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
View threads by subject does not thread original message
Hello: I'm subscribed to a particular mailing list that does not set "In-Reply-To:" or "References:" headers and so I set the "View Threads By" option for its folder to "Subject", which works pretty well -- except that the first message that starts a thread (the one without a "Re:" in the Subject line) is not included in the threads. So I always get, for example, a message list like this: -- - Re: This is message 1 <=== A thread is started | +- Re: This is message 1 | +- Re: This is message 1 This is message 1 <=== Orphaned message -- Is there any way around this? I am using TB! 1.62r on Windows 2000. Any help will be greately appreciated. -dZ. Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Threads By...Subject bug?
Hallo Ben, On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:40:50 +0100GMT (19-7-02, 10:40 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: BK> For example, rather than the first message in the thread appearing as BK> the root of the thread, the last message appears as the root! Sort on date with descending order and you're done. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
View Threads By...Subject bug?
Hi all, When I view a folder in "View Threads By...Subject" mode, the threads seem to be in a weird order. For example, rather than the first message in the thread appearing as the root of the thread, the last message appears as the root! Also, when I expand the thread, I get the oldest message at the bottom and the newest at the top (the complete opposite to View Threads By...References). Anyone else get this? I would prefer to use View Threads By..References but unfortunately I belong to quite a few mailing lists with users of dodgy MUAs. Cheers, -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Re[3]: Threads by subject
Hi Jim, On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:07:38 -0700, you wrote: > > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I believe that the In-Reply-To: field is how TB Threads, not by > subject at all. If the message with this ID does not exist in that > mailbox, it will not have a message to place this one under. If you also look, TB! appears to attach a references header too, which contains the path of the thread for construction. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[3]: Threads by subject
I have been using TB for about 2 years now, but I still consider myself a novice with it. However... Friday, July 5, 2002, 10:32:12 AM, syv wrote: S>> I had 3 messages with the subject: "Lab swap" and it did S>> not thread it. But it works on most subjects. S>> Any suggestion? > Here are the headers for 2 messages that do not thread. The > subjects are identical, mime and content-type are the same. > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I believe that the In-Reply-To: field is how TB Threads, not by subject at all. If the message with this ID does not exist in that mailbox, it will not have a message to place this one under. --- Best regards, Jim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- I can see clearly now, the brain is gone... Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Threads by subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi syv, @05 July 2002, 10:32 -0700 (18:32 UK time) syv [S] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: Look: S> Subject: Re: BGP question S> Subject: Re: BGP Question ^ Case sensitivity is stopping these threading. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60q/Post3 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9JdpKOeQkq5KdzaARAuXHAKC8uNl64OUsq+Cw3neVfcrgYnNM4wCfRe4n nnMQ6oD8zMfxNi99nW+wgik= =S9XZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Threads by subject
On Friday, July 05, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Threads by subject -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi syv, @05 July 2002, 09:13 -0700 (17:13 UK time) syv [S] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S> I had 3 messages with the subject: "Lab swap" and it did S> not thread it. But it works on most subjects. S> Any suggestion? ,- [Threads by subject] | Check the source view. It may be differences in encoding. | True, the threading algorithm should look at the final ASCII | text rather than the Subject header content, but I don't | think it does. `- Here are the headers for 2 messages that do not thread. The subjects are identical, mime and content-type are the same. Received: from spooler by s142-179-109-244.bc.hsia.telus.net (Mercury/32 v3.31); 1 Jul 02 06:46:34 -0700 X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from groupstudy.com (66.220.63.9) by 911networks.com (Mercury/32 v3.31) with ESMTP ID MG000AD6; 1 Jul 02 06:46:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA31135; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:40:46 GMT Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:23:56 + Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA27802 GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:23:55 GMT Received: from cisco.com (munich.cisco.com [144.254.40.32]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA27776 GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:23:53 -0400 Received: from OBOEHMER-W2K1.cisco.com (mun-pan-usr-vlan10-dhcp15.cisco.com [144.254.26.29]) by cisco.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA17591; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:23:18 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 15:22:32 +0200 To: "atul pawar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Oliver Boehmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: BGP question CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Oliver Boehmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: bulk Received: from spooler by s142-179-109-244.bc.hsia.telus.net (Mercury/32 v3.31); 28 Jun 02 12:39:09 -0700 X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from groupstudy.com (66.220.63.9) by 911networks.com (Mercury/32 v3.31) with ESMTP ID MG000905; 28 Jun 02 12:38:56 -0700 Received: from localhost (mail@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA01449; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:13:25 -0400 Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:56:36 -0400 Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA29940 GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:56:36 -0400 Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net (mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA29887; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:56:33 -0400 Received: from user-11fa83j.dsl.mindspring.com ([66.245.32.115] helo=david.ix.netcom.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17O1G9-00089t-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:18:21 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:18:04 -0700 To: Annu Roopa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Georg Pauwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: David Luu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: BGP Question CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: David Luu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: bulk Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Threads by subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi syv, @05 July 2002, 09:13 -0700 (17:13 UK time) syv [S] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S> I had 3 messages with the subject: "Lab swap" and it did S> not thread it. But it works on most subjects. S> Any suggestion? Check the source view. It may be differences in encoding. True, the threading algorithm should look at the final ASCII text rather than the Subject header content, but I don't think it does. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60q/Post3 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9JcnTOeQkq5KdzaARAgExAJ4/029OCyWENPcPyeicCOFdQ9k8EACaAo/C qwCL+VvSKC3NVuWb2iSeXGo= =6+OK -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Threads by subject
Hi tbudl, The threading by subject does not always work. I had 3 messages with the subject: "Lab swap" and it did not thread it. But it works on most subjects. Any suggestion? Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
