Re: Apache's FAQ.html
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Rares Aioanei wrote: > > > >Index: mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html > >=== > >RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html,v > >retrieving revision 1.12 > >diff -u -r1.12 ssl_faq.html > >--- mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html 18 Jun 2008 05:42:29 - 1.12 > >+++ mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html 27 Jan 2012 18:34:58 - > >@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ > > are done with full year value instead of abbreviating to two digits. > > > > Additionally according to a >-href="http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#year2000";>Year 2000 > >+href="../../misc/FAQ.html#year2000">Year 2000 > > statement from the Apache Group, the Apache webserver is Year > > 2000 > > compliant, too. But whether OpenSSL or the underlaying Operating > > System > > (either a Unix or Win32 platform) is Year 2000 compliant is a > > different > > > > > >Looking at latest online FAQ for Apache 1.3 it looks even worse than > >in-tree manual/FAQ.html > > > >http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html > > > >so I'm also not sure what's the option here. > > > I think it's "underlying", because underlaying means something not > really OS-related. :) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underlay > note also that underlaying is the past tense of underlie. that's probably where the confusion arises. regardless, underlying is the correct word, so i've fixed it. two birds, ;) jmc
Re: Apache's FAQ.html
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:44:10PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:42:08AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > hmm. there are more problems than this: > > > > - some of the pages in htdocs refer to a FAQ page at > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html. the link doesn;t work > > though. > > > > - misc/index.html refers to FAQ.html, the file you propose to remove. > > > > your intention seems correct though (i agree misc/FAQ.html looks > > broken). > > > > the reference in misc/index.html can be trivially fixed. i've no idea > > about the apache link though. > > > > jmc > > > I would also change link in ssl faq too: > > Index: mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html,v > retrieving revision 1.12 > diff -u -r1.12 ssl_faq.html > --- mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html 18 Jun 2008 05:42:29 - 1.12 > +++ mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html 27 Jan 2012 18:34:58 - > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ > are done with full year value instead of abbreviating to two digits. > > Additionally according to a -href="http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#year2000";>Year 2000 > +href="../../misc/FAQ.html#year2000">Year 2000 > statement from the Apache Group, the Apache webserver is Year 2000 > compliant, too. But whether OpenSSL or the underlaying Operating System > (either a Unix or Win32 platform) is Year 2000 compliant is a different > > > > > Looking at latest online FAQ for Apache 1.3 it looks even worse than > in-tree manual/FAQ.html > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html > > so I'm also not sure what's the option here. > > -- > best regards > q# > my point about misc/index.html was incorrect. not to worry... i've committed your suggestion to moving FAQ.html to misc/, and updated the link in ssl_faq.html. when i have time, i'll look at what we can do with the broken links. of course, if someone beats me to it i won't be in any way offended. jmc
Re: Apache's FAQ.html
On 01/27/2012 08:44 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:42:08AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote: hmm. there are more problems than this: - some of the pages in htdocs refer to a FAQ page at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html. the link doesn;t work though. - misc/index.html refers to FAQ.html, the file you propose to remove. your intention seems correct though (i agree misc/FAQ.html looks broken). the reference in misc/index.html can be trivially fixed. i've no idea about the apache link though. jmc I would also change link in ssl faq too: Index: mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 ssl_faq.html --- mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html18 Jun 2008 05:42:29 - 1.12 +++ mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html27 Jan 2012 18:34:58 - @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ are done with full year value instead of abbreviating to two digits. Additionally according to ahttp://www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#year2000";>Year 2000 +href="../../misc/FAQ.html#year2000">Year 2000 statement from the Apache Group, the Apache webserver is Year 2000 compliant, too. But whether OpenSSL or the underlaying Operating System (either a Unix or Win32 platform) is Year 2000 compliant is a different Looking at latest online FAQ for Apache 1.3 it looks even worse than in-tree manual/FAQ.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html so I'm also not sure what's the option here. I think it's "underlying", because underlaying means something not really OS-related. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underlay Best regards, -- Rares Aioanei
Re: Apache's FAQ.html
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:42:08AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote: > hmm. there are more problems than this: > > - some of the pages in htdocs refer to a FAQ page at > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html. the link doesn;t work > though. > > - misc/index.html refers to FAQ.html, the file you propose to remove. > > your intention seems correct though (i agree misc/FAQ.html looks > broken). > > the reference in misc/index.html can be trivially fixed. i've no idea > about the apache link though. > > jmc I would also change link in ssl faq too: Index: mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 ssl_faq.html --- mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html18 Jun 2008 05:42:29 - 1.12 +++ mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html27 Jan 2012 18:34:58 - @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ are done with full year value instead of abbreviating to two digits. Additionally according to a http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#year2000";>Year 2000 +href="../../misc/FAQ.html#year2000">Year 2000 statement from the Apache Group, the Apache webserver is Year 2000 compliant, too. But whether OpenSSL or the underlaying Operating System (either a Unix or Win32 platform) is Year 2000 compliant is a different Looking at latest online FAQ for Apache 1.3 it looks even worse than in-tree manual/FAQ.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html so I'm also not sure what's the option here. -- best regards q#
Re: Apache's FAQ.html
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:02:59PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:51:00PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looking at the /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual files I think file > > misc/FAQ.html should be overwritten by FAQ.html and then FAQ.html can be > > removed as nothing reference to that location. All links point to > > misc/FAQ.html. > > In other words, this is what I mean: > > > $ cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual > $ ls -l FAQ.html misc/FAQ.html > -rw-r--r-- 1 build build 153831 Jun 21 2009 FAQ.html > -rw-r--r-- 1 build build5463 Jun 21 2009 misc/FAQ.html > $ cat FAQ.html > misc/FAQ.html > $ rm -f FAQ.html > $ cvs rm FAQ.html > > > I didn't run make release with above, so not sure are there any > additional changes needed, by looking at the source of html files only > misc/FAQ.html file is used, other one isn't. However as you can see > above from the sizes, content of misc/FAQ.html is much smaller and if > you open that file in the browser, file looks broken. > > > PS. Please CC me in any replies. > > -- > best regards > q# > hmm. there are more problems than this: - some of the pages in htdocs refer to a FAQ page at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html. the link doesn;t work though. - misc/index.html refers to FAQ.html, the file you propose to remove. your intention seems correct though (i agree misc/FAQ.html looks broken). the reference in misc/index.html can be trivially fixed. i've no idea about the apache link though. jmc
Re: Apache's FAQ.html
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:51:00PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at the /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual files I think file > misc/FAQ.html should be overwritten by FAQ.html and then FAQ.html can be > removed as nothing reference to that location. All links point to > misc/FAQ.html. In other words, this is what I mean: $ cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual $ ls -l FAQ.html misc/FAQ.html -rw-r--r-- 1 build build 153831 Jun 21 2009 FAQ.html -rw-r--r-- 1 build build5463 Jun 21 2009 misc/FAQ.html $ cat FAQ.html > misc/FAQ.html $ rm -f FAQ.html $ cvs rm FAQ.html I didn't run make release with above, so not sure are there any additional changes needed, by looking at the source of html files only misc/FAQ.html file is used, other one isn't. However as you can see above from the sizes, content of misc/FAQ.html is much smaller and if you open that file in the browser, file looks broken. PS. Please CC me in any replies. -- best regards q#
Apache's FAQ.html
Hi, Looking at the /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual files I think file misc/FAQ.html should be overwritten by FAQ.html and then FAQ.html can be removed as nothing reference to that location. All links point to misc/FAQ.html. PS. Please CC me in replies. -- best regards q#
