On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:02:58AM -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
This is one of the topics we discussed at UDS, with the conclusion that
while we may not be quite as strict as Debian, we will follow most of
their guidelines, as a well-tested procedure for ensuring that the
software is legally distributable.
Ah, thank you. Do you have a reference to a gobby document or something
like that?
We're setting up a Security Checklist wiki page now, and may need a
similar Legal Checklist, so it's completely transparent what we're
accepting and rejecting. (We might be able to refer to the
PackagingGuide's Copyright content instead, will re-review with an eye
to how straightforward it is to apply it to our process.)
Normally I'm a fan of incorporating things by reference, but I think it
would be a little confusing in this case - you'd have to say this
document, except for X, Y, and Z.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
