Fedora 32 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 32 Security updates need testing: Age URL 78 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4c8458e373 containernetworking-plugins-0.9.1-1.fc32 74 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16d1596c42 buildah-1.19.4-1.fc32 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7f74f0250 rust-1.51.0-3.fc32 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-444e38face jetty-9.4.40-1.fc32 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cd093f639 kernel-5.11.16-100.fc32 kernel-headers-5.11.16-100.fc32 kernel-tools-5.11.16-100.fc32 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d6b9d8497b openvpn-2.4.11-1.fc32 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-168fbed46f ceph-14.2.20-1.fc32 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1556d440ba nginx-1.20.0-2.fc32 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f71b592e07 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.292.b10-0.fc32 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-83dbc3f7da p7zip-16.02-20.fc32 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b88e86b753 java-11-openjdk-11.0.11.0.9-0.fc32 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c1116fb75e ansible-2.9.20-1.fc32 The following Fedora 32 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 136 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-345d2fd2aa iproute-5.9.0-1.fc32 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-360ad970fd koji-1.24.1-1.fc32 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5a4e02312f xdg-desktop-portal-1.8.1-2.fc32 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3f0ce2dede mtools-4.0.27-1.fc32 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b5ce87e535 libical-3.0.10-1.fc32 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cd093f639 kernel-5.11.16-100.fc32 kernel-headers-5.11.16-100.fc32 kernel-tools-5.11.16-100.fc32 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2e33c3908d evolution-data-server-3.36.5-2.fc32 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4cc9c81077 gnome-online-accounts-3.36.1-1.fc32 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 32 updates-testing R-RMariaDB-1.1.1-1.fc32 R-RPostgres-1.3.2-1.fc32 R-bitops-1.0.7-1.fc32 R-callr-3.7.0-1.fc32 R-httpuv-1.6.0-1.fc32 R-knitr-1.33-1.fc32 R-nycflights13-1.0.2-1.fc32 R-parsedate-1.2.1-1.fc32 R-reticulate-1.19-1.fc32 R-rsvg-2.1.1-1.fc32 annobin-9.27-3.fc32 cozy-0.9.4-1.fc32 drawing-0.8.0-1.fc32 gcc-10.3.1-1.fc32 grace-5.1.25-22.fc32 iaito-5.2.1-1.fc32 nordugrid-arc-6.11.0-1.fc32 preproc-rpmspec-1.3-1.fc32 python-zarr-2.8.0-1.fc32 radare2-5.2.1-1.fc32 rpkg-macros-2.0-1.fc32 tkrzw-0.9.7-1.fc32 Details about builds: R-RMariaDB-1.1.1-1.fc32 (FEDORA-2021-5695acefa3) Database Interface and 'MariaDB' Driver Update Information: Update to latest version ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 25 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.1.1-1 - Update to latest version (#1949016) * Mon Jan 25 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1.0-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1949016 - R-RMariaDB-1.1.1 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949016 R-RPostgres-1.3.2-1.fc32 (FEDORA-2021-bc0a9948e3) Rcpp Interface to PostgreSQL Update Information: Update to latest version ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 25 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.3.2-1 - Update to latest version (#1948467) References: [ 1 ] Bug #1948467 - R-RPostgres-1.3.2 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948467 R-bitops-1.0.7-1.fc32 (FEDORA-2021-aee224d1e2) Functions for Bitwise operations Update Information: new version ChangeLog: * Sun Apr 25 2021 josef radinger - 1.0.7-1 - bump version *
Re: tty broken after "latest" upgrade
You beat me to it. I can confirm your observation. I was set to post the draft below: I updated my Rawhide 24-hours ago. Since then, I lost textual output. I can see the GRUB menu and the Plymouth screen. After those, no texts show up any more -- only the blinking cursor remains. I can tell that there is activity on the machine because the cursor keeps moving around (changing lines like it is printing out stuff, only I can't see any texts). Some commands execute as expected (without visuals, that is). For example, "clear" sends the cursor back to the top-left corner of the screen; but I do not see the text while typing. The phenomenon is strange. So, I went on to download the latest rawhide ISO (Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.iso). The installation went fine (graphics and all). However, after installing, I am back to the same phenomena. This behaviour implies that one or more recent packages in rawhide repositories have bugs. Has anyone experienced this recently? Perhaps I should investigate further. Regards Onyeibo On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:38:59 + (UTC) George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > I ran a system upgrade late last night and at reboot noticed a major > problem with tty (possibly). > > I run this system with the multi-user target active, which means I > get a text based invitation to login and have to start X manually. > This is NOT a new change. > > Instead of seeing text "printed" on the screen, I see nothing. It's > like the text is invisible. This situation happens near the time of > the font change for the various boot messages. After this change, > nothing appears except for a blinking "text" cursor. This happens > with and without the "nomodeset" boot command line operand present. > All the ttys are affected so I doubt that it's an X problem. Hitting > enter acts like I entered a blank userid. I visualize logging in and > then starting X. This works and I get an X session, windowmaker in my > case. ALL the other ttys behave the same... no characters appear > except for the cursor. I don't see anything obvious in the output of > "journalctl -x -b0". > > This system is at the "latest" Fedora 35 (x86_64) upgrades installed. > > I'm kinda lost as to just where this problem "lives". Any/all help, > hints, tips, suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Best regards, > > George... > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
tty broken after "latest" upgrade
Hi, I ran a system upgrade late last night and at reboot noticed a major problem with tty (possibly). I run this system with the multi-user target active, which means I get a text based invitation to login and have to start X manually. This is NOT a new change. Instead of seeing text "printed" on the screen, I see nothing. It's like the text is invisible. This situation happens near the time of the font change for the various boot messages. After this change, nothing appears except for a blinking "text" cursor. This happens with and without the "nomodeset" boot command line operand present. All the ttys are affected so I doubt that it's an X problem. Hitting enter acts like I entered a blank userid. I visualize logging in and then starting X. This works and I get an X session, windowmaker in my case. ALL the other ttys behave the same... no characters appear except for the cursor. I don't see anything obvious in the output of "journalctl -x -b0". This system is at the "latest" Fedora 35 (x86_64) upgrades installed. I'm kinda lost as to just where this problem "lives". Any/all help, hints, tips, suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, George... ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] 2021-04-26 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-04-26 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! Fedora 34 is signed off, so let's do a final status check and make sure everything's good to go, and check in on other items too. If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Fedora 34 status and pre-release actions 3. Outstanding proposals 4. Test Day / community event status 5. Open floor -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210425.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 108/189 (x86_64), 63/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210424.n.0): ID: 869845 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869845 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210424.n.0): ID: 869617 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869617 ID: 869618 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869618 ID: 869619 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869619 ID: 869620 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869620 ID: 869622 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869622 ID: 869623 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869623 ID: 869624 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869624 ID: 869625 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869625 ID: 869626 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869626 ID: 869627 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869627 ID: 869629 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869629 ID: 869631 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869631 ID: 869632 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869632 ID: 869634 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869634 ID: 869635 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869635 ID: 869636 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869636 ID: 869637 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869637 ID: 869638 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869638 ID: 869639 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869639 ID: 869640 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869640 ID: 869644 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869644 ID: 869658 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869658 ID: 869663 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869663 ID: 869670 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869670 ID: 869671 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869671 ID: 869673 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869673 ID: 869674 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869674 ID: 869675 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869675 ID: 869683 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869683 ID: 869692 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869692 ID: 869693 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869693 ID: 869694 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869694 ID: 869695 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869695 ID: 869711 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869711 ID: 869712 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869712 ID: 869724 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud **GATING** URL:
Re: F33 upgrade to F34 fails to boot on VMWare Fusion
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 14:37, Sergio Correia wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:36 AM Barry Scott wrote: >> >> I have a working F33 VM that I run using VMWare Fusion 12.1.1. >> >> I used dnf system-upgrade download/reboot to do the upgrade. >> >> When the VM rebooted I see it stuck: >> >> [ OK ] Finished Wait for udev To COmplete Deveice initialization >> [ *** ] (2 of 2) A start job is running for >> /dev/mapp...fedora_localhost--live-root (55s / no limit) >> > > Perhaps it's the issue reported in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945596 ? I have retested this upgrade an d its working fine now. Barry > > Sergio > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 3:18 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > > > On 23/04/2021 16:57, Peter Robinson wrote: > [snip] > > > > There's the RPi4 that will work in 32 bit mode and it is available > > with 2-8gb of RAM, there's i.MX6 devices with 2+gb of RAM, there's the > > Jetson TK1 and related devices that have 4Gb of RAM as well as the arm > > based OLPC devices which have between 1 and 4Gb of RAM depending on > > the SKU. > > > Is RPi4 support documented anywhere? > I have wanted to test running Fedora Server, but never did as going from > the ARM page [0] to the linked documentation [1] to the RPi4 [2] and it > just says that it's not supported (as of 30 October 2019). > > I would be interested in testing Fedora Server on an RPi4 if it's > actually supposed to be supported. It works just fine for the server type use cases, I improved a lot of the early boot process and stabilised a number of pieces of the early boot as part of F-34, there's still no accelerated graphics, until that lands I won't mark it as supported as it generates too many support queries. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+
On 23/04/2021 16:57, Peter Robinson wrote: [snip] There's the RPi4 that will work in 32 bit mode and it is available with 2-8gb of RAM, there's i.MX6 devices with 2+gb of RAM, there's the Jetson TK1 and related devices that have 4Gb of RAM as well as the arm based OLPC devices which have between 1 and 4Gb of RAM depending on the SKU. Is RPi4 support documented anywhere? I have wanted to test running Fedora Server, but never did as going from the ARM page [0] to the linked documentation [1] to the RPi4 [2] and it just says that it's not supported (as of 30 October 2019). I would be interested in testing Fedora Server on an RPi4 if it's actually supposed to be supported. [snip] [0] https://arm.fedoraproject.org/ [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_4 -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @mefuller:matrix.org https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210425.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210424.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210425.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 45 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.05 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 2.93 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 4.20 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210425.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box Image: Comp_Neuro live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Comp_Neuro-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.iso Image: Python_Classroom live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.iso Image: Security live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.iso Image: Scientific vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box Image: Scientific vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Python_Classroom vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Vagrant-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Scientific_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: nginx-1:1.20.0-2.module_f35+11909+00a8df65 Summary: A high performance web server and reverse proxy server RPMs:nginx nginx-all-modules nginx-filesystem nginx-mod-http-image-filter nginx-mod-http-perl nginx-mod-http-xslt-filter nginx-mod-mail nginx-mod-stream Size:4.01 MiB Package: python-omemo-backend-signal-0.2.6~beta-2.fc35 Summary: A backend for python-omemo offering compatibility with libsignal RPMs:python3-omemo-backend-signal Size:38.78 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: R-V8-3.4.1-1.fc35 Old package: R-V8-3.4.0-2.fc34 Summary: Embedded JavaScript and WebAssembly Engine for R RPMs: R-V8 Size: 2.12 MiB Size change: 219.30 KiB Changelog: * Sat Apr 24 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 3.4.1-1 - Update to latest version (#1952839) Package: R-brio-1.1.2-1.fc35 Old package: R-brio-1.1.1-1.fc35 Summary: Basic R Input Output RPMs: R-brio Size: 211.51 KiB Size change: 1.83 KiB Changelog: * Sat Apr 24 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.1.2-1 - Update to latest version (#1952923) Package: R-callr-3.7.0-1.fc35 Old package: R-callr-3.6.0-1.fc35 Summary: Call R from R RPMs: R-callr Size: 440.63 KiB Size change: 9.19 KiB Changelog: * Sun Apr 25 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 3.7.0-1 - Update to latest version (#1951665) - Rename check conditional to bootstrap Package: R-later-1.2.0-1.fc35 Old package: R-later-1.1.0.1-3.fc34 Summary: Utilities for Scheduling Functions to Execute Later with Event Loops RPMs: R-later R-later-devel Size: 775.34 KiB Size change: -12.46 KiB Changelog: * Sat Apr 24 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.2.0-1 - Update to latest version (#1952974) Package: R-lokern-1.1.9-1.fc35 Old package: R-lokern-1.1.8.1-4.fc34 Summary: Kernel Regression Smoothing with Local or Global Plug-in Bandwidth RPMs: R-lokern Size: 572.69 KiB Size change: 14.50 KiB Changelog: * Sat Apr 24 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.1.9-1 - Update to latest version (#1949305) Package: R-parsedate-1.2.1-1.fc35 Old package: R-parsedate-1.2.0-8.fc34 Summary: Recognize and Parse Dates in Various Formats RPMs: R-parsedate Size: 266.08 KiB Size change: -7.87 KiB Changelog: * Sun Apr 25 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.2.1-1 - Update to latest version (#1951667) Package: R-reticulate-1.19-1.fc35 Old package: R-reticulate-1.18-2.fc34 Summary: R Interface to 'Python' RPMs: R-reticulate Size: 4.50 MiB Size change: -889.37 KiB Changelog: * Sat Apr 24 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.19-1 - Update to latest version (#1951995) Package: R-sfsmisc-1.1.11-1.fc35 Old package: R-sfsmisc-1.1.10-1.fc35 Summary: Utilities from 'Seminar fuer Statistik' ETH Zurich RPMs: R-sfsmisc Size: 701.56 KiB Size change: 272 B Changelog: * Sat Apr 24 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.1.11-1 - Update to latest version (#1948489) Package: R-viridisLite-0.4.0-1.fc35 Old package: R-viridisLite-0.3.0-10.fc34 Summary: Colorblind-Friendly Color Maps (Lite Version) RPMs: R-viridisLite Size: 1.25 MiB Size change
Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+
> > If there is documentation or marketing that gives the impression that > > Workstation on 32-bit ARM is some sort of > > priority/"supported"/recommended/blocking/whatever environment, it > > should be changed. > > The whole arm.fedoraproject.org website makes it seem like that. We > actually *don't* have a site for AArch64 stuff at all, as far as I can > tell. In most cases for things like Workstation/Server they're on the main pages, for other pieces they're linked from the Alternate Architectures page [1] which is linked from near the Spins/Labs but overall it's quite disjointed and could likely just be linked directly from the various spins pages. [1] https://alt.fedoraproject.org/alt/ ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210425.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210424.0): ID: 869605 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869605 ID: 869612 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869612 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210425.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210424.0): ID: 869591 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869591 ID: 869598 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/869598 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
