Re: [fedora-arm] FC22 on PI2
Ok, I run x86_64 FC22 here on the desktop now. I have done some manipulation to install both the older gui and command option fedora arm-installer, I have a need for both. I would be good if both types can be provided as separate packages. They can run separately. http://vk4tux.duckdns.org/fai.jpg Thankyou I look forward to mainstream FC22 on the PI2. Adrian ... vk4tux On 31/05/15 20:58, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Adrian wrote: When will source : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F22/Installation '--target=TARGET - target board [A10-OLinuXino-Lime|A20-OLinuXino-Lime|A20-OLinuXino-Lime2|A20-OLinuXino_MICRO|Bananapi|Bananapro|beaglebone|Cubieboard|Cubieboard2|Cubietruck|Mele_A1000|Mini-X|none|novena|panda|riotboard|trimslice|wandboard_dl|wandboard_quad|wandboard_solo] ' Include the PI2 please? Looking forward to install FC22 on the PI2 Thankyou When we have it working, we're working ATM to get a remix done, and upstream support in F-23. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
This procedure works in f22 Workstation TC-3 install x86_64 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_22_VirtualBox Tom Gilliard satellit Tom, Thankyou very much, that worked a treat * all good here now. Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
On 10/05/15 00:49, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote: Yes, Below is why I asked the question ; [root@fedora22desk ~]# /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory [root@fedora22desk ~]# root@fedora22desk ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox Name: VirtualBox Version : 4.3.26 Release : 3.fc22 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Sat 09 May 2015 23:43:00 AEST Group : Development/Tools Size: 61244411 License : GPLv2 or (GPLv2 and CDDL) Signature : RSA/SHA1, Wed 06 May 2015 20:46:45 AEST, Key ID 81c9b42397f4d1c1 Source RPM : VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.src.rpm Build Date : Wed 06 May 2015 20:36:21 AEST Build Host : builder02.kwizart.net Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager: kwizart Vendor : rpms.kwizart.net URL : http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox Summary : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware Description : A general-purpose full virtualizer and emulator for 32-bit and 64-bit x86 based PC-compatible machines. [root@fedora22desk ~]# yum install akmod-VirtualBox kernel-devel-$(uname -r) akmods systemctl restart systemd-modules-load.service I got Konsole output [root@fedora22desk ~]#yum install akmod-VirtualBox kernel-devel-$(uname -r) Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf install akmod-VirtualBox kernel-devel-4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64'. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. To transfer transaction metadata from yum to DNF, run: 'dnf install python-dnf-plugins-extras-migrate && dnf-2 migrate' Last metadata expiration check performed 1:08:35 ago on Sun May 10 00:16:35 2015. Package akmod-VirtualBox-4.3.26-2.fc22.x86_64 is already installed, skipping. Package kernel-devel-4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 is already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! [root@fedora22desk ~]#akmods Checking kmods exist for 4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 [ OK ] [root@fedora22desk ~]# [root@fedora22desk ~]#systemctl restart systemd-modules-load.service Job for systemd-modules-load.service failed. See "systemctl status systemd-modules-load.service" and "journalctl -xe" for detai ls. [root@fedora22desk ~]#systemctl status systemd-modules-load.service ●systemd-modules-load.service - Load Kernel Modules Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-modules-load.service; static; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed(Result: exit-code) since Sun 2015-05-10 01:25:33 AEST; 20s ago Docs: man:systemd-modules-load.service(8) man:modules-load.d(5) Process: 5599 ExecStart=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-modules-load (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 5599 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: Starting Load Kernel Modules... May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd-modules-load[5599]: Failed to insert 'vboxdrv': Exec format error May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd-modules-load[5599]: Failed to insert 'vboxnetflt': Exec format error May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd-modules-load[5599]: Failed to insert 'vboxnetadp': Exec format error May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: Failed to start Load Kernel Modules. May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: Unit systemd-modules-load.service entered failed state. May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service failed. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
On 10/05/15 00:14, František Zatloukal wrote: Hi, running "sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup" should help. Command is same even with systemd. The vboxdrv command would not be translated in systemd, as it is the init.d service file executed directly & not a 'service' cmd. . Even if systemd had vboxdrv.service the above command would not translate to starting it. Konsole output [root@fedora22desk ~]#cd /lib/systemd/system Konsole output [root@fedora22desk system]#ls | grep virt libvirtd.service libvirtd.socket libvirt-guests.service virtlockd.service virtlockd.socket [root@fedora22desk system]#ls | grep vbox [root@fedora22desk system]# -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
Yes, Below is why I asked the question ; Konsole output [root@fedora22desk ~]# /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory [root@fedora22desk ~]# Konsole output root@fedora22desk ~]#rpm -qi VirtualBox Name: VirtualBox Version : 4.3.26 Release : 3.fc22 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Sat 09 May 2015 23:43:00 AEST Group : Development/Tools Size: 61244411 License : GPLv2 or (GPLv2 and CDDL) Signature : RSA/SHA1, Wed 06 May 2015 20:46:45 AEST, Key ID 81c9b42397f4d1c1 Source RPM : VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.src.rpm Build Date : Wed 06 May 2015 20:36:21 AEST Build Host : builder02.kwizart.net Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager: kwizart Vendor : rpms.kwizart.net URL : http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox Summary : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware Description : A general-purpose full virtualizer and emulator for 32-bit and 64-bit x86 based PC-compatible machines. [root@fedora22desk ~]# On 10/05/15 00:14, František Zatloukal wrote: Hi, running "sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup" should help. Command is same even with systemd. 2015-05-09 16:05 GMT+02:00 Adrian <mailto:vk4...@bigpond.com>>: On 09/05/15 23:47, Adrian wrote: Result Code: NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005) Did /etc/init.d/vboxdrv get replaced by something in systemd ? Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- *Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal* *Web:* frantisek.zatloukalu.eu <http://frantisek.zatloukalu.eu> -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
On 10/05/15 00:05, Adrian wrote: On 09/05/15 23:47, Adrian wrote: Result Code: NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005) Did Konsole output /etc/init.d/vboxdrv get replaced by something in systemd ? Adrian ... vk4tux Anyhow I installed the akmod etc with dependencies as suggested, but still have the issue and cannot use it. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
On 09/05/15 23:47, Adrian wrote: Result Code: NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005) Did Konsole output /etc/init.d/vboxdrv get replaced by something in systemd ? Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Virtualbox on FC22
On 09/05/15 23:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2015-05-09 at 23:30 +1000, Adrian wrote:
Does anyone have Virtualbox working
on FC22 ?
yes now we got on rpmfusion :
VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm
* Mon May 04 2015 Sérgio Basto - 4.3.26-3
- Added diff_smap_4.patch from https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13961 ,
may fix problems for kernel >= 3.19 , I still need disable 3D to run
plasma 5
( https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=64452&start=15#p320557 )
Thankyou I am trying this one and get
Result Code:
NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005)
Component:
Machine
Interface:
IMachine {480cf695-2d8d-4256-9c7c-cce4184fa048}
when starting a XPvdi
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Virtualbox on FC22
Does anyone have Virtualbox working on FC22 ? Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: FC22 KDE5 Application Edit
What command did you run Ed (option etc) On 08/05/15 20:54, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/08/15 15:09, Adrian wrote: I did a fedup from fedora 21. live & learn, did not expect that. FWIW, I just did a fedup from F21-->F22 on a test system. There was no issue. The menu editor was installed in F21 and remained installed on F22. On 08/05/15 16:31, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/08/15 07:30, Adrian wrote: Well it was not installed , thankyou What version/how did you install? I know this was a problem in during the early releases...but thought it was fixed. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: FC22 KDE5 Application Edit
I did a fedup from fedora 21. live & learn, did not expect that. On 08/05/15 16:31, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/08/15 07:30, Adrian wrote: Well it was not installed , thankyou What version/how did you install? I know this was a problem in during the early releases...but thought it was fixed. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: FC22 KDE5 Application Edit
Konsole output Well it was not installed , thankyou Konsole output [root@fedora22desk ~]#kmenuedit bash: kmenuedit: command not found [root@fedora22desk ~]#dnf provides kmenuedit Last metadata expiration check performed 1:09:29 ago on Fri May 8 08:16:37 2015. kmenuedit-5.2.2-1.fc22.x86_64 : KDE menu editor Repo: updates-testing kmenuedit-5.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64 : KDE menu editor Repo: fedora [root@fedora22desk ~]#dnf install kmenuedit Last metadata expiration check performed 1:09:50 ago on Fri May 8 08:16:37 2015. Dependencies resolved. === Package Arch Version Repository Size === Installing: kmenuedit x86_64 5.3.0-1.fc22 fedora 462 k Transaction Summary === Install 1 Package Total download size: 462 k Installed size: 1.1 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: kmenuedit-5.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm 1.3 MB/s | 462 kB 00:00 --- Total 209 kB/s | 462 kB 00:02 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Installing : kmenuedit-5.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64 1/1 Verifying : kmenuedit-5.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64 1/1 Installed: kmenuedit.x86_64 5.3.0-1.fc22 Complete! [root@fedora22desk ~]# It works, strange how it did not get called in as dependency with the general kde install I did. Thankyou again Adrian ... vk4tux On 08/05/15 09:15, Ed Greshko wrote: On 05/08/15 06:50, Adrian wrote: Well I cant get it to fly here. Does anyone know the command line equivalent to execute so I can troubleshoot please ? kmenuedit -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: FC22 KDE5 Application Edit
On 08/05/15 02:09, Dan Mossor wrote: On 05/07/2015 08:23 AM, Adrian wrote: 'Edit Applications' from left click on K button popup menu item does not function ? Anyone alse seeing this ? Cannot edit KDE menu. Adrian ... vk4tux Works for melatest F22 package set (as of this morning). Dan Well I cant get it to fly here. Does anyone know the command line equivalent to execute so I can troubleshoot please ? thankyou Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
FC22 KDE5 Application Edit
'Edit Applications' from left click on K button popup menu item does not function ? Anyone alse seeing this ? Cannot edit KDE menu. Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Grub, which Kernel to boot
On 17/12/14 17:01, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 23:34 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote: Hi when I boot F21, there is in the Grub boot menue displayed in the top position Kernel 3.17.4-300.fc21 x86_64 and in the second position is Kernel 3.17.4.302.fc21 x86_64 Is this ok? Should it not be vice versa? Did you originally install quite early, around Alpha time? Was there a gui for this config? There was one some time back perhaps for grub & not grub2. Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: F21-beta issues with NetworkManager and tunX
Adam Williamson writes: > If you can pinpoint a fairly straightforward 'install, do X, and weird > thing Y happens' flow, I'd file a bug - probably against NetworkManager > indeed - with the instructions to reproduce. Thanks! I did a reinstall. And yes, NetworkManager attempts to manage the tun0 device created by OpenVPN. Here are my steps: - boot boot.iso - do absolute minimal install - login as root - yum install dnf - dnf install openvpn - nmcli the primary ethernet into a static configuration Here I encounter a weirdness, NetworkManager does not setup a default route. I manually add a default route, at which point another default route is immediately created with extra parameters "proto static metric 1024". So I delete the route I created, leaving the new one. Setup my openvpn, which creates a tun0 device and adds 0/1 and 128/1 routes by itself. However, a ip route reveals that the 0/1 route is missing. nmcli d status reports that tun0 is managed. Manually adding the 0/1 route does not stick. I close openvpn, and the tunnel. nmcli c show shows a new connection uuid for that tun0 connection. I nmcli c delete that connection. I nmcli n off, and then modify NetworkManager.conf adding no-auto-default=* and ignore-carrier=* and repeat. Same issue happens. I modify NetworkManager to add keyfile to the plugins, and a [keyfile] entry specifying tun0 as an unmanaged interface. This now gets me to the point where NetworkManager leaves tun0 alone (something I didn't have to do in F20) and my OpenVPN tunnel works. There in an issue that the reinstall process revealed. Note now, I am no longer removing ifcfg-enpXs0 and doing everything via nmcli, as opposed to before where I only used NetworkManager with the keyfile plugin and had my setup totally in system-connections. As I mentioned above, I no longer have a default route being set up. I don't know why. A full install to the gnome desktop reveals that when I login, absolutely no network icon appears in the top right, but when I add my default route (as mentioned above) a new default route is created with the exact same route and "proto static metric 1024" and immediately I see the network icon appear in the top right of my desktop. I have yet to migrate my the nmcli modified ifcfg-enpXs0 setup to my old keyfile-only setup, to see if that still causes issues with the default route, but at this point things are working, it's just that as I said, the takeaway is: NetworkManager in F21 tries to manage tunX devices, unless explicitly told not to, unlike F20. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: F21-beta issues with NetworkManager and tunX
Adam Williamson writes: > Um. Why did you think you need to do this? NM controls networking on > Fedora installs by default for several releases. It > uses /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* as a configuration source - > the presence of these files does not indicate that you're not using > NetworkManager, they are perfectly valid configuration for NM. > > I can't answer your ultimate question, but I think this possibly > unnecessary step may be muddying the waters a bit. Well, it's just the purist OCD in me. I'll try a reinstall without doing so. I do _concretely_ feel that NetworkManager is doing something new for F21 which it didn't do before, which is jumping on new tunX interfaces that show up, which in my case are created by OpenVPN. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F21-beta issues with NetworkManager and tunX
Hello all, Did a fresh install of Fedora 21 beta via boot.iso (essentially, so not a Workstation flavour). Transferred my F20 configuration over, to the best of my ability, this involved: - removing /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* and moving my networking to be controlled by NetworkManager - NetworkManager.conf: [main] plugins=keyfile no-auto-default=* ignore-carrier=* - setup my (static) wired ethernet using nmcli and place it in the home zone (connectivity works!) - the default firewall zone is public However this is where I get issues. I create openvpn tunnels manually. In Fedora 20 this meant: - a routing entry was added specifing how to route directly to the remote endpoint (to avoid a circularity where the yet to be established tunnel attempts to send it's packets over itself) - a tunX device was created - a 0/1 and 128/1 route was added to go over said tunnel as not to disturb the default route In Fedora 21 weird stuff happens. It seems that NetworkManager tries to managed the newly created tunX device, and my created routes change from under me. I mitigated this by adding a [keyfile] entry in my NetworkManger.conf to set tunX devices for small X to be unmanaged. I have no problem with this, per se, as this is not particuarly out-of-the-box setup. However, perhaps the parties involved with F21 networking can inform me as what higher level configuration I can perform to get this working more elegantly. Thank you. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Ark > unrar ?
On 13/11/14 22:04, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:49:59 +1000, Adrian wrote: FC21 KDE desktop, with unrar installed , unrar or "unar"? That was it, removed unrar, installed unar and all good.. thank you. Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Ark > unrar ?
FC21 KDE desktop, with unrar installed , Ark complains it cannot find 'lsar' when opening a rar archive. Anyone else seen this ? 'Loading the archive /var/www/lighttpd/dvrptr/dfu/dfu-loader.rar failed with the following error: Failed to locate program lsaron disk.' Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch
Is there a particular url link available for the new yum with command formats & options available please ? Adrian Fewster On 13/11/14 08:57, Bodhi Zazen wrote: You can "fix" this with yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;) IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap between releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up the various releases may become divergent. FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have been resolved. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
infinality-noarch repo
yum-config-manager --disable infinality-noarch Above is necessary to enable some installs noticed today ; [root@fedora21desk ~]# yum install alsa-plugins-pulseaudio http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/21/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found Trying other mirror. http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/21/noarch/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found Trying other mirror. One of the configured repositories failed (Infinality - noarch), and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work "fix" this: 1. Contact the upstream for the repository and get them to fix the problem. 2. Reconfigure the baseurl/etc. for the repository, to point to a working upstream. This is most often useful if you are using a newer distribution release than is supported by the repository (and the packages for the previous distribution release still work). 3. Disable the repository, so yum won't use it by default. Yum will then just ignore the repository until you permanently enable it again or use --enablerepo for temporary usage: yum-config-manager --disable infinality-noarch Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Adding GNOME ....
Ok, I went from the Gnome desktop in workstation to KDE, with |yum groupinstall"KDE Plasma Workspaces"| with no issue. I installed the rc4 just before official beta release. [root@fedora21desk yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-updates.repo [updates] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f$releasever&arch=$basearch enabled=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgcheck=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [updates-debuginfo] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates - Debug failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/debug/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-debug-f$releasever&arch=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [updates-source] name=Fedora $releasever - Updates Source failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/SRPMS/ metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f$releasever&arch=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 metadata_expire=6h gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch skip_if_unavailable=False [root@fedora21desk yum.repos.d]# So I understand I will keep updating, and the system will become 'final release' when that happens auto with updates, or is anything else needed ? I really like what I see so far, it feels like a release not a beta I am using. Adrian ... vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Adding GNOME ....
What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ? Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd
On 04/11/14 12:45, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 12:23 +1000, Adrian wrote: -Original Message- From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2014 10:18 AM To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd maybe try fedup --clean (I think you may need fedup --clean --product=(something) , which is a bug in fedup :>) Looking good, it is taking off ; [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --clean resetting bootloader config removing boot images removing downloaded packages removing miscellaneous files [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --network 21 --instrepo https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Server/x86_64/os setting up repos... I resolved all dependency issues. As a follow-up now from the windows box , on reboot the packages were installing to a point until empty descriptor sections started appearing, and then it all came to a grinding halt. Are you sure it actually halted? Sometimes the console output seems to start getting messed up, but switching to ctrl-alt-f2 and back again makes it appear again, and the process has been continuing all the while. It's *really* a bad idea to just abort out of an upgrade in the middle, I'd never do so without leaving it at least a few hours to see if it was really stuck. You may be correct, maybe I should have waited longer, but all the line verbose and percentage vanished leaving the frames etc, hence causing the confusion until a static screen of empty brackets or frames etc was leftover, with no sigh of activity. i am emailing from FC21 RC4 now , which I am building back up from backups etc. I hope I can just install the appropriate release to sync the repo's with the FC21 final release, when the time comes. I am enjoying FC21 so far and appreciate all the hard work done. Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd
-Original Message- From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2014 10:18 AM To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd > maybe try fedup --clean (I think you may need fedup --clean > --product=(something) , which is a bug in fedup :>) Looking good, it is taking off ; [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --clean resetting bootloader config removing boot images removing downloaded packages removing miscellaneous files [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --network 21 --instrepo https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Server/x86_64/os setting up repos... I resolved all dependency issues. As a follow-up now from the windows box , on reboot the packages were installing to a point until empty descriptor sections started appearing, and then it all came to a grinding halt. Reboot was unsuccessful with a kernel panic situation. I am downloading https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-21_Beta-4.iso Is there a later ver beta than this ? I really want the full install iso if available ? , to start again. Luckily I have everything backed up that I need later. Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd
maybe try fedup --clean (I think you may need fedup --clean --product=(something) , which is a bug in fedup :>) Looking good, it is taking off ; [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --clean resetting bootloader config removing boot images removing downloaded packages removing miscellaneous files [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --network 21 --instrepo https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Server/x86_64/os setting up repos... PlexRepo/x86_64 | 951 B 00:00:00 PlexRepo/x86_64/primary | 5.4 kB 00:00:00 fedora/21/x86_64/metalink | 36 kB 00:00:00 fedora/21/x86_64 | 3.8 kB 00:00:00 fedora/21/x86_64/group_gz | 232 kB 00:00:00 fedora/21/x86_64/primary_db | 17 MB 00:00:21 instrepo | 3.7 kB 00:00:00 instrepo/group_gz | 113 kB 00:00:00 instrepo/primary_db | 1.4 MB 00:00:01 kk7ds-ham-apps | 951 B 00:00:00 kk7ds-ham-apps/primary | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free/21/x86_64 | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free/21/x86_64/group_gz | 1.6 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free/21/x86_64/primary_db | 438 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates/21/x86_64 | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates/21/x86_64/group_gz | 1.6 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates/21/x86_64/primary_db | 438 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree/21/x86_64 | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree/21/x86_64/group_gz | 1.0 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree/21/x86_64/primary_db | 123 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/21/x86_64 | 3.3 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/21/x86_64/group_gz | 1.0 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/21/x86_64/primary_db | 123 kB 00:00:00 updates/21/x86_64/metalink | 3.0 kB 00:00:00 updates/21/x86_64 | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 updates/21/x86_64/primary_db | 1.2 kB 00:00:00 getting boot images... .treeinfo | 1.1 kB 00:00:00 vmlinuz-fedup | 5.5 MB 00:00:07 initramfs-fedup.img | 40 MB 00:00:22 setting up update... fedora/21/x86_64/group | 1.6 MB 00:00:05 instrepo/group | 701 kB 00:00:01 rpmfusion-free/21/x86_64/group | 10 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates/21/x86_64/group | 10 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree/21/x86_64/group | 3.9 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/21/x86_64/group | 3.9 kB 00:00:00 PlexRepo/x86_64/filelists | 344 kB 00:00:00 fedora/21/x86_64/filelists_db | 25 MB 00:00:56 instrepo/filelists_db | 1.2 MB 00:00:02 kk7ds-ham-apps/filelists | 9.0 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free/21/x86_64/filelists_db | 364 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates/21/x86_64/filelists_db | 364 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree/21/x86_64/filelists_db | 128 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/21/x86_64/filelists_db | 128 kB 00:00:00 updates/21/x86_64/filelists_db | 586 B 00:00:00 finding updates 100% [=] WARNING: potential problems with upgrade pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.x86_64 (no replacement) requires itext-2.1.7-21.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by itext-2.1.7-27.fc21.noarch) google-chrome-stable-34.0.1847.137-1.x86_64 (no replacement) requires libgcrypt-1.5.3-2.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by libgcrypt-1.6.1-7.fc21.x86_64) monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-3.fc19.x86_64 (replaced by monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.x86_64) requires monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-3.fc19.x86_64 (replaced by monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.x86_64) monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-3.fc19.x86_64 (replaced by monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.x86_64) requires vala-0.22.1-1.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by vala-0.26.1-1.fc21.x86_64) java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0-45.fc20.x86_64 (no replacement) requires libgcj-4.8.3-7.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by libgcc-4.9.1-11.fc21.x86_64) pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.x86_64 (no replacement) requires libgcj-4.8.3-7.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by libgcc-4.9.1-11.fc21.x86_64) gtkd-2.0.0-46.20140301gitaf01da8.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by gtkd-2.3.2-49.fc21.x86_64) requires gtkd-2.0.0-46.20140301gitaf01da8.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by gtkd-2.3.2-49.fc21.x86_64) libdvdcss2-1.2.13-7.fc20.x86_64 (no replacement) requires glibc-2.18-16.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by glibc-2.20-5.fc21.x86_64) sinjdoc-0.5-16.fc20.x86_64 (no replacement) requires libgcj-4.8.3-7.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by libgcc-4.9.1-11.fc21.x86_64) GraphicsMagick-1.3.20-3.fc20.x86_64 (no replacement) requires jbigkit-libs-2.0-10.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by jbigkit-libs-2.1-2.fc21.x86_64) GraphicsMagick-1.3.20-3.fc20.x86_64 (no replacement) requires libwebp-0.3.1-3.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by libwebp-0.4.2-1.fc21.x86_64) warning: /var/cache/system-upgrade/fedora/packages/GConf2-3.2.6-11.fc21.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 95a43f54: NOKEY fedup.yum WARNING: Public key for GConf2-3.2.6-11.fc21.x86_64.rpm is not installed (1/2771): GConf2-3.2.6-11.fc21.x86_64.rpm | 1.0 MB 00:00:01 (2/2771): Judy-1.0.5-10.fc21.x86_64.rpm | 125 kB 00:00:00 (3/2771): LibRaw-0.16.0-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm | 296 kB 00:00:00 (4/2771): ModemManager-1.4.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm | 689 kB 00:00:00 (5/2771): ModemManager-glib-1.4.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm | 217 kB 00:00:00 Adrian Fewster -- test mail
Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd
Someone else mentioned something similar on IRC (unless that was you). It looks to me most like a mirror sync issue of some kind, nothing fedup specific. Could you see if a 'yum clean all' fixes it up? Thanks! No luck ; [root@fedora20desk ~]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit Cleaning repos: PlexRepo fedora kk7ds-ham-apps rpmfusion-free rpmfusion-free-updates rpmfusion-nonfree : rpmfusion-nonfree-updates updates Cleaning up everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --network 21 --instrepo https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Server/x86_64/os setting up repos... getting boot images... .treeinfo | 1.1 kB 00:00:00 setting up update... finding updates 95% [== ] Downloading failed: failure: repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. http://fedora.mirror.uber.com.au/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found http://mirror.as24220.net/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found http://mirror.crucial.com.au/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found [root@fedora20desk ~]# Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] URGENT testing request: fedup and systemd
[root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --instrepo https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Server/x86_64/os --network 21 setting up repos... instrepo | 3.7 kB 00:00:00 instrepo/group_gz | 113 kB 00:00:00 instrepo/primary_db | 1.4 MB 00:00:02 getting boot images... .treeinfo | 1.1 kB 00:00:00 vmlinuz-fedup | 5.5 MB 00:00:12 initramfs-fedup.img | 40 MB 00:00:24 setting up update... fedora/21/x86_64/group | 1.6 MB 00:00:01 instrepo/group | 701 kB 00:00:01 rpmfusion-free/21/x86_64/group | 10 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates/21/x86_64/group | 10 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree/21/x86_64/group | 3.9 kB 00:00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates/21/x86_64/group | 3.9 kB 00:00:00 PlexRepo/x86_64/filelists | 344 kB 00:00:00 Downloading failed: failure: repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. http://fedora.mirror.uber.com.au/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found http://mirror.as24220.net/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found http://mirror.crucial.com.au/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found [root@fedora20desk ~]# Tried different option order ; [root@fedora20desk ~]# fedup --product=nonproduct --network 21 --instrepo https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Server/x86_64/os setting up repos... getting boot images... .treeinfo | 1.1 kB 00:00:00 setting up update... finding updates 95% [== ] Downloading failed: failure: repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. http://fedora.mirror.uber.com.au/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found http://mirror.as24220.net/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found http://mirror.crucial.com.au/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/repodata/7eaec4c24ede32e125547d2ff7b2bdc98c709f3454315f135e9bcd2be80e217e-filelists.sqlite.xz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found [root@fedora20desk ~]# Adrian Fewster -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: The output of the command "df" (without any param) omits the line for the root filesystem
- Original Message-R eply-to: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Subject: Re: The output of the command "df" (without any param) omits the line for the root filesystem Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:05:09 +0100 On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:45:19 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > > Anybody sees this too? > > > > Yes, I'm. I haven't noticed that earlier but now I can confirm that / > (root) is not on the list produced by df. [root@fedora18desk ~]# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on rootfs 51606140 14153444 34831256 29% / devtmpfs 2012424 0 2012424 0% /dev tmpfs2023644 204 2023440 1% /dev/shm tmpfs2023644 11568 2012076 1% /run tmpfs2023644 0 2023644 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/sdb3 51606140 14153444 34831256 29% / tmpfs2023644 100 2023544 1% /tmp /dev/sdc1 488375968 226626948 261749020 47% /mnt/Windows /dev/sda5 488384508 345283804 143100704 71% /mnt/Backup /dev/sdb1 495844155779314465 34% /boot /dev/sdb5 184253516 24822156 150071744 15% /home [root@fedora18desk ~]# uname -r 3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64 [root@fedora18desk ~]# vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Install of beta f18 on bl685c g1 blade freezes
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Adrian wrote: > xdriver=vesa acpi=off replacing quiet in linux No way. Made as you suggested brings to startx failed like this screenshot and no input accepted at all: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvNlJ2Y2dnZnVPbFU Did you leave nomodeset off the line? vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Install of beta f18 on bl685c g1 blade freezes
-Original Message- From: Gianluca Cecchi Reply-to: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Subject: Install of beta f18 on bl685c g1 blade freezes Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:02:34 +0100 Tried graphial and text but they both freeze... See for text https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvQlpTYmVKUUlYTmM tried nomodeset and leaving off quiet but no way... Anything to further understand...? No keyboard at all.. Had similar issue; xdriver=vesa acpi=off replacing quiet in linux line, got me to graphical install. vk4tux -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
