Re: mkconfig mis-identifies windows

2014-12-09 Thread Frank McCormick

On 12/09/2014 07:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 19:14 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:

I've been running 21 for a while now and just noticed that
grub2-mkconfig misidentifies my Windows partition. It used to correctly
put Windows 7 in the grub.cfg...but now is calling it Windows Vista.
Not a big deal...but I thought someone should know. Is it worth a bug ?


Sure, I think it'd go against the os-prober package.




Bug 1172405 has been added to the database


--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

mkconfig mis-identifies windows

2014-12-09 Thread Frank McCormick

I've been running 21 for a while now and just noticed that
grub2-mkconfig misidentifies my Windows partition. It used to correctly 
put Windows 7 in the grub.cfg...but now is calling it Windows Vista.

Not a big deal...but I thought someone should know. Is it worth a bug ?

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Nitrogen

2013-07-08 Thread Frank McCormick


My favorite wallpaper setter Nitrogen has been orphanedso it's 
unavailable

from the repositories.

I run IceWm sometimes...and switch backgrounds quite often and nitrogen was
the only piece of software that did it for me.

Is there anyway I can get the last version for 19 ?

--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[SOLVED] Re: grub2-mkconfig not picking up all kernels on another partition

2013-06-24 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/23/2013 10:04 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/23/2013 08:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:

On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 03:54:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:

bash -x grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Post the result somewhere, then post the URL here. Sounds like an OS Prober 
issue, which is more problematic on UEFI than BIOS usually.

Try fpaste:

$ echo foo |fpaste
Uploading (0.1KiB)...
http://ur1.ca/ef6v3  ->http://paste.fedoraproject.org/20400/20331081




Further checking shows mkconfig IS putting all the kernels into 
grub.cfg

the problem is now grub is not displaying them! And it's happening on
19 and on 18.
Too tired tonight to pursue this further...I'll tackle it again tomorrow.

Thanks Chris and Matthew !






I checked grub.cfg again and it does contains all the kernels...so 
then I

stripped down /etc/default/grub.cfg to the bare minimum and lo and behold
all the kernels display.
I don't know which option or if any option was fouling up the 
display..but I am

happy even with the resulting bare bones menu.

Thanks

--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rsyslog

2013-06-15 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/15/2013 03:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:40 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

Update wants to replace rsyslog on my system- I have downgraded
rsyslog to
handle the "spamming log problem".


[root@franksfedora19 frank]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package rsyslog.i686 0:7.2.6-1.fc19 will be updated
---> Package rsyslog.i686 0:7.4.0-1.fc19 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution





Is it safe now to allow it to be upgraded ?

if you have updated to systemd 204-8, it ought to be safe.


I have.


If you have inflated logs from the SELinux accounts-daemon bug, then
rsyslog will still run the CPU to 100% for some time after the upgrade,
because it'll be writing the entire journal out to /var/log/messages;
but it will eventually complete and quiet down. Personally I recommend
pruning the journal first if you have a huge journal full of those
SELinux messages - if your system logs aren't that important to you, you
can safely just blow away the larger (over 10MB) files
in /var/log/journal and that should trim the journal down to a
reasonable size.



I chose to deleteseems to be running fine...but I'll keep an 
eye on it for a while.


Thanks

--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[SOLVED] Repairing truncated file

2013-06-04 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/04/2013 12:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:58:59 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:


Do you run ldconfig as root?

 Yes


What files /etc/ld.so.cache* do you have?

[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$ ls /etc/ld.so.cache*
/etc/ld.so.cache
[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$


What does "ldconfig -v" show about that library?

 This comes first
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib' given more than once
ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is truncated

then the list of the libraries it knows about.

That means the file does exist. How have you searched for the file?



Found it !!! I had been looking adjacent to the originalbut it 
was at the very bottom of the
list in the file manager I use (midnight commander) -  When you insisted 
the file did exist, I did another

search. It doesn't exist now...and ldconfig is happy:

[frank@franksfedora19 lib]$ sudo ldconfig -v
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib' given more than once
/usr/lib/iscsi:
libiscsi.so.1 -> libiscsi.so.1.0.10700
/usr/lib/llvm:
libLLVM-3.3.so -> libLLVM-3.3.so
libprofile_rt.so -> libprofile_rt.so
libLTO.so -> libLTO.so
   etc etc

The temporary file will never belong into any package (in case you try 
to run a query for its path).


I did and found nothing.


Thanks for all your help.



--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-04 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/04/2013 11:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:42 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/04/2013 01:07 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:

  The file that is there is libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4 along with two
symbolic links pointing to it.
So ldconfig did its job.  It appears that there is nothing wrong with
your installation.

  There must be something wrong as ldconfig keeps reporting this
truncated file
which doesn't exist :)


If you are not sure to which packages belongs a specific file you can
run a verification step like that:

  rpm -Vf /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4

where a file you are referencing has to exist.


That also reports nothing, so it appears rpm isn't aware of the
file/package
even though it has been erased and re installed a few times now.

I think some people are missing that the file does not actually exist
once the package install process is complete. To me, it sounds like an
ldconfig is somehow being run from the package's scriptlets before
extraction of the files from the RPM is actually complete.


This all came about after an update was aborted by a hardware 
failure. Unfortunately I don't recall
what I did after the aborted update...as it was several weeks ago. I 
**assume** I redid the update and after
the next package was handled, ldconfig was run for it.but the 
extraction/handling of files from qt-x11 had not been
completed.  The question now is how I get rid of that "/usr/lib/ 
is truncated" warning. Reinstalls and re-running

ldconfig after cache deletion doesn't work.


--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: updating 19

2013-06-04 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/04/2013 11:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:36 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

I attempted to update my 19 this morning...what does this mean ?

[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$ sudo yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
An update notice is broken, or duplicate, skipping:
updates-testing/FEDORA-2013-9550
[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960642


Good to know. I guess patience is a virtue :)



--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-04 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/04/2013 09:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:42:19 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:


  There must be something wrong as ldconfig keeps reporting this
truncated file which doesn't exist :)

Do you run ldconfig as root?

   Yes


What files /etc/ld.so.cache* do you have?


[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$ ls /etc/ld.so.cache*
/etc/ld.so.cache
[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$


What does "ldconfig -v" show about that library?

   This comes first
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib' given more than once
ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is truncated

then the list of the libraries it knows about.


It's _good_ that nothing is reported, because -Vf means "verify the
package this file belongs into".

The query to show a package a file belongs into is this:
  rpm -qf /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4


   [frank@franksfedora19 ~]$ rpm -qf /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4
qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686
[frank@franksfedora19 ~]




--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

updating 19

2013-06-04 Thread Frank McCormick

I attempted to update my 19 this morning...what does this mean ?

[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$ sudo yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
An update notice is broken, or duplicate, skipping: 
updates-testing/FEDORA-2013-9550

[frank@franksfedora19 ~]$


--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-04 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/04/2013 01:07 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:


 The file that is there is libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4 along with two
symbolic links pointing to it.
So ldconfig did its job.  It appears that there is nothing wrong with
your installation.


There must be something wrong as ldconfig keeps reporting this 
truncated file

which doesn't exist :)


If you are not sure to which packages belongs a specific file you can
run a verification step like that:

 rpm -Vf /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4

where a file you are referencing has to exist.



  That also reports nothing, so it appears rpm isn't aware of the 
file/package

even though it has been erased and re installed a few times now.

Is there a way to re build the info that rpm has ?


--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-03 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/03/2013 11:40 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 19:14 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/02/2013 06:50 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:


On 06/02/2013 02:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 13:23 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/02/2013 01:12 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

After an aborted yum update recently I began to notice
ldconfig
complaining about
a truncated file

Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
Installing : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686 1/1
/sbin/ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is
truncated

Verifying  : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686


I have tried to fine out which file contains the library but
yum
whatprovides doesn't
return any answers



   Further to this I found out the rpm file containing that
library is
:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686
and I re installed. However ldconfig is still complaining the
file is
truncated and the message has
that added "; 51a94e8f  on the end .


How to fix ..anyone ?

rm /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f

yum reinstall qt-x11


   I'll try removing it first.


  Doesn't work. Erased the offending files and re installed but
ldconfig
still complains about the truncated file.
And what is the ;51a94e8f on the end of the file ?

if  /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f doesn't exit , and qt-x11 is
correctly installed

rpm -V qt-x11
what says ?


Nothing at all.

/lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f  does not actually exist, at 
least not in /lib
The file that is there is libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4 along with two 
symbolic links pointing to it.
 Erasing all three, then erasing and re installing qt-x11xxx 
does nothing. As was
pointed out here already, the file name with those extra characters on 
the end is a temp
file created as part of the install procedure. If it actually exists on 
the disk , I can't find it.




ldconfig -i
don't fix it ?



 No it doesn't.



--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-03 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/03/2013 04:40 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:

On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:14:15PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

And what is the ;51a94e8f on the end of the file ?

This is one of temporary suffixes used to create temporary targets when
unpacking an update rpm.  If you are seeing something of that sort that
means that something got screwy and a rename to a "final" form did not
happen.  I have seen something of that sort on occasions when a package
update tried to replace directly a file with a symlink or vice-versa (or
another mixup of that sort).  What is really messed up in your case it
is not really possible to tell from what you are saying but something
definitely is.



Deleting the file..then removing the rpm and re installing it 
doesn't change anything.
Neither does deleting ldconfig's cache, or re installing GLIBC . It's a 
resistant error if nothing else.


The good new is it doesn't **seem** to affect any of the software I 
use on a
daily basis. If and when it does, I have 3 other partitions of usable 
Linux distros :)



--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-03 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/03/2013 09:36 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

On 06/03/2013 02:43 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/03/2013 01:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 19:14 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:


  Doesn't work. Erased the offending files and re installed but
ldconfig
still complains about the truncated file.
And what is the ;51a94e8f on the end of the file ?

Have you run out of disk space?


No 40% used.

Wild guess: You might have run out of memory due to /tmp on /tmpfs.

I have occasionally hit such issues during yum runs on low RAM machines.

Ralf


It's possible I guess...this machine only has one gig and even with 
barebones

windows managers will usually utilize the swap.
But that still begs the question how do I fix this truncated file ?


--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-03 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/03/2013 01:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 19:14 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:


  Doesn't work. Erased the offending files and re installed but
ldconfig
still complains about the truncated file.
And what is the ;51a94e8f on the end of the file ?

Have you run out of disk space?


   No 40% used.


[frank@localhost ~]$ df
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3   13831448 5178960   7943220  40% /
devtmpfs  501352   0501352   0% /dev
tmpfs 505224   0505224   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 505224 852504372   1% /run
tmpfs 505224   0505224   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs 505224   4505220   1% /tmp
/dev/sda5  222666372 9267220 202081700   5% /media/sda5
/dev/sda7  113656464 5472556 107028088   5% /media/sda7
/dev/sda2   13979216 5701136   7561300  43% /media/sda2

I have since  re installed glibc (for ldconfig) and no change.
I have Googled the problem but came up with almost nothing - maybe
I am using the wrong terms.


--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-02 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/02/2013 06:50 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/02/2013 02:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 13:23 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/02/2013 01:12 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

After an aborted yum update recently I began to notice ldconfig
complaining about
a truncated file

Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
   Installing : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686 1/1
/sbin/ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is truncated

   Verifying  : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686


I have tried to fine out which file contains the library but yum
whatprovides doesn't
return any answers


  Further to this I found out the rpm file containing that 
library is

:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686
and I re installed. However ldconfig is still complaining the file is
truncated and the message has
that added "; 51a94e8f  on the end .


How to fix ..anyone ?

rm /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f

yum reinstall qt-x11



  I'll try removing it first.



 Doesn't work. Erased the offending files and re installed but ldconfig
still complains about the truncated file.
And what is the ;51a94e8f on the end of the file ?



--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-02 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/02/2013 02:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Dom, 2013-06-02 at 13:23 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 06/02/2013 01:12 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

After an aborted yum update recently I began to notice ldconfig
complaining about
a truncated file

Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
   Installing : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686 1/1
/sbin/ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is truncated

   Verifying  : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686


I have tried to fine out which file contains the library but yum
whatprovides doesn't
return any answers



  Further to this I found out the rpm file containing that library is
:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686
and I re installed. However ldconfig is still complaining the file is
truncated and the message has
that added "; 51a94e8f  on the end .


How to fix ..anyone ?

rm /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f

yum reinstall qt-x11



  I'll try removing it first.

--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Repairing truncated file

2013-06-02 Thread Frank McCormick

On 06/02/2013 01:12 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:


After an aborted yum update recently I began to notice ldconfig 
complaining about

a truncated file

Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686 1/1
/sbin/ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is truncated

  Verifying  : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686


I have tried to fine out which file contains the library but yum 
whatprovides doesn't

return any answers




Further to this I found out the rpm file containing that library is 
:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686
and I re installed. However ldconfig is still complaining the file is 
truncated and the message has

that added "; 51a94e8f  on the end .


How to fix ..anyone ?


--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Repairing truncated file

2013-06-02 Thread Frank McCormick


After an aborted yum update recently I began to notice ldconfig 
complaining about

a truncated file

Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686 1/1
/sbin/ldconfig: file /lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4.8.4;51a94e8f is truncated

  Verifying  : 1:qt-x11-4.8.4-19.fc19.i686


I have tried to fine out which file contains the library but yum 
whatprovides doesn't

return any answers

Help ?

Thanks


--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: video players in 19

2013-05-29 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/29/2013 04:51 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:

On 05/29/2013 01:46 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
Is VLC or Mplayer available for 19 (32 bit). If so where. It isn't in 
Fedoras repositories

and I hesitate to install it from anywhere else.

I'm running a newly installed Beta

Thanks
--
--Cheers--


Rpmfusion works for me, at least for 64 bit vlc and ffmpeg. 
http://rpmfusion.org





   OK, that worked. Thanks..I had forgotten about rpmfusion.



--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

video players in 19

2013-05-29 Thread Frank McCormick
Is VLC or Mplayer available for 19 (32 bit). If so where. It isn't in 
Fedoras repositories

and I hesitate to install it from anywhere else.

I'm running a newly installed Beta

Thanks

--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Attempt to recover

2013-05-25 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/25/2013 05:24 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:

Being the stubborn person I am I am attempting to recover my 19 system.

I chrooted into 19 from 18 and ran package-clean --problems

.

I have reinstalled libxvmc...but for some reason the system still
thinks it's incomplete

Are you sure that you installed in the right system (rpm has an option -r)?
If yes then maybe a wrong version?


   No I have since reinstalled a long list of packages...and they are 
in the right system.



I than ran ldconfig

# ldconfig: File /lib/libqpdf.so.10.1.0 is empty, not checked.
ldconfig: File /lib/libdialog.so.11.1.0 is empty, not checked.
  
Does 'rpm -qf /lib/libqpdf.so.10.1.0' says that they belong to installed

packages?  Maybe these are just leftovers?


   Yes you're right there. They belong to packages I added later.



'rpm -Va' will test an integrity of all packages present in the current
database.  Redirect an output and check results later.  It is really
hard to guess what you possibly removed.  A trivial reason you are
failing to boot could be that you are attempting to use a new kernel for
which initramfs was not yet build.  This happens in %posttrans package
script and you apparently crashed before this had a chance to run.

 Michal


   I did rpm -Va.and the list is huge. There is apparently so much 
wrong now...I think
I'll wait until 19 Beta to reinstall it.  I didn't think an interrupted 
update could cause so much

trouble.


--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Attempt to recover

2013-05-25 Thread Frank McCormick


Being the stubborn person I am I am attempting to recover my 19 system.

I chrooted into 19 from 18 and ran package-clean --problems

This is what it spewed out



Unable to connect to dbus
Package libXvMC-1.0.7-6.20130524gite9415ddef.fc19.i686 has missing 
requires of config(libXvMC) = ('0', '1.0.7', '6.20130524gite9415ddef.fc19')
Package xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.21.6-1.fc19.i686 has missing requires of 
libXvMC.so.1
Package xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.3.3-1.fc19.i686 has missing requires 
of libXvMC.so.1


I have reinstalled libxvmc...but for some reason the system still thinks 
it's incomplete


I than ran ldconfig

# ldconfig: File /lib/libqpdf.so.10.1.0 is empty, not checked. ldconfig: 
File /lib/libdialog.so.11.1.0 is empty, not checked.



Any suggestions?

Thanks

--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Big problem with an update

2013-05-25 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/25/2013 12:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 23:01 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:


I am a relative newcomer to Fedora (I'm a Debian refugee) so my
knowledge of yum at the moment is pretty minimal.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how this can be fixed? The system
still boots fine

FWIW, the few times I got stuck in a case like that, I rpm -V'ed the
newer dupes, and if that resulted in an OK, you can do this:

rpm -e --justdb --noscripts (older version)

what that basically does is simply remove the entry from the RPM
database without running any scriptlets or actually deleting any files
from the filesystem.



   I wish now had waited rather than running tum complete transaction ( 
which it never did) as it
ended up marking the transaction files as invalid. It was then I ran 
package cleanup and that's

what left my partition unbootable.
Thanks for the suggestions anyway :)




--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Big problem with an update

2013-05-24 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/24/2013 11:39 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:

On 05/24/2013 11:08 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:

Tell us your "yum history"




Too late Christopher - found "package-cleanup --dupes" in the 
Fedora forums (and a suggestion
from another user on the regular list) - so I tried it - now the 19 
partition is unbootable :) So
it sort of solved my problem. Package cleanup ran into a bunch of what 
it said were zero-length files..dunno what it
did or didn't do with them..nothing I guess. But it appears some . 
many  or all were essential.


Anyway I can roll back time to a few hours ago :)




   A second problem Christopher is there is no history for tonight when 
it happened. I guess Yum/RPM writes

the file after/during the update process, which never ended properly.
The partition still boots but ends up with the message of no /boot/init 
so I get a sh-4.2 prompt on a read-only partition.

A fine state of affairs :)




--Cheers--
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Big problem with an update

2013-05-24 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/24/2013 11:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

Frank McCormick  wrote:


On 05/24/2013 11:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

Frank McCormick  wrote:


I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect
it's
a memory error)but anyway it
now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least
that what yum check all reports.
The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think

during

the verify stage.

This is a partial list of what "yum check all" reports:


Try

package-cleanup  --dupes


Yeah, that's what I found in the Fedora forums. So I tried it. Now
the partition won't boot.

package-cleanup --dupes removed the dupes..at least it said it
wasbut it also ran into a bunch of
files it said were zero-length...what it did about them I don't know.
Short version: the partition is now
unbootable. So I am back in Fedora 18...where I think I'll stay for a
while. I don't anticipate re-installing
19...at least not for a while.



The only comforting thing is that this same problem could happen no matter what 
version you're running.  :-)

Since F19 is beta it isn't a big deal IMHO.  I've had similar things go wrong, 
disk problems, and getting it fixed took time and effortbut I was able to 
recover.




  Yeah maybe I'll reinstall when 19 is released, Or maybe not.
Thanks anyway for the suggestion - it seems it's about the only thing 
that could be done

under the circumstances

--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Big problem with an update

2013-05-24 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/24/2013 11:08 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:

Tell us your "yum history"




Too late Christopher - found "package-cleanup --dupes" in the 
Fedora forums (and a suggestion
from another user on the regular list) - so I tried it - now the 19 
partition is unbootable :) So
it sort of solved my problem. Package cleanup ran into a bunch of what 
it said were zero-length files..dunno what it
did or didn't do with them..nothing I guess. But it appears some . many  
or all were essential.


Anyway I can roll back time to a few hours ago :)






--
--Cheers--

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Big problem with an update

2013-05-24 Thread Frank McCormick

On 05/24/2013 11:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

Frank McCormick  wrote:


I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect
it's
a memory error)but anyway it
now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least
that what yum check all reports.
The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think during
the verify stage.

This is a partial list of what "yum check all" reports:


Try

package-cleanup  --dupes



   Yeah, that's what I found in the Fedora forums. So I tried it. Now 
the partition won't boot.


package-cleanup --dupes removed the dupes..at least it said it 
wasbut it also ran into a bunch of
files it said were zero-length...what it did about them I don't know. 
Short version: the partition is now
unbootable. So I am back in Fedora 18...where I think I'll stay for a 
while. I don't anticipate re-installing

19...at least not for a while.

--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Big problem with an update

2013-05-24 Thread Frank McCormick
I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect it's 
a memory error)but anyway it
now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least 
that what yum check all reports.
The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think during 
the verify stage.


This is a partial list of what "yum check all" reports:



Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
SDL-1.2.15-8.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-7.fc19.i686
1:autocorr-en-4.0.3.3-3.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with 
1:autocorr-en-4.0.3.3-2.fc19.noarch

1:cups-1.6.2-7.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:cups-1.6.2-4.fc19.i686
1:cups-filesystem-1.6.2-7.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with 
1:cups-filesystem-1.6.2-4.fc19.noarch
1:cups-libs-1.6.2-7.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
1:cups-libs-1.6.2-4.fc19.i686
desktop-backgrounds-compat-19.0.0-2.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with 
desktop-backgrounds-compat-19.0.0-1.fc19.noarch
desktop-backgrounds-gnome-19.0.0-2.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with 
desktop-backgrounds-gnome-19.0.0-1.fc19.noarch
dialog-1.2-2.20130523.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
dialog-1.2-1.20121230.fc19.i686
dmraid-1.0.0.rc16-21.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
dmraid-1.0.0.rc16-20.fc19.i686
dmraid-events-1.0.0.rc16-21.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
dmraid-events-1.0.0.rc16-20.fc19.i686
dracut-027-46.git20130430.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
dracut-027-45.git20130430.fc19.i686
dracut-network-027-46.git20130430.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
dracut-network-027-45.git20130430.fc19.i686
glusterfs-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
glusterfs-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.i686
glusterfs-api-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
glusterfs-api-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.i686
glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.i686

1:grub2-2.00-18.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:grub2-2.00-16.fc19.i686
1:grub2-efi-2.00-18.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
1:grub2-efi-2.00-16.fc19.i686
1:grub2-tools-2.00-18.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 
1:grub2-tools-2.00-16.fc19.i686



The list goes on and on...


I am a relative newcomer to Fedora (I'm a Debian refugee) so my 
knowledge of yum at the moment is pretty minimal.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how this can be fixed? The system 
still boots fine


I wrote this message originally on the regular users list but at least 
one person took exception to it even though it's not an F19 problem 
specifically.


Thanks

--
--Cheers--

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test