Re: Fedora 21 updates-testing report
On 08/20/2015 02:52 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: > Age URL > 201 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/F21/FEDORA-2015-1467 I'm assuming someone is working on making these useful again? (listing the package name) -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Release blocking deliverables for Fedora 23
On 09/02/2015 01:18 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi, > > in the past there was an issue with identification of deliverables > which block a Fedora release. We were dealing with this issue > specifically during Go/No-go meetings which is quite late for this > kind of decisions. > To solve this issue FESCo has started an activity [1] to identify > these deliverables in advance. The list of blocking (as well as some > non-blocking) deliverables for Fedora 23 is currently available on > Wiki page [2]. > > You might want to check the list [2] to make sure we have all the > blocking deliverables tracked. If you find anything what might not be > correct from your point of view, please let me know, so we can discuss > it. Thanks for your cooperation. > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1427 > [2] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/ReleaseBlocking/Fedora23 > > Regards, > Jan > I'm curious about the pxeboot/ kernel and initramfs components and the install.img file. I make use of these via cobbler directly, but I don't see any explicit mention of them. These components are necessary to build other ones, so perhaps it's not needed to call them out? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Weird behaviour of the file command in F23
On 09/23/2015 08:54 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running F23 will all updates, and I see a weird behaviour of the file > command: > > sudo file /var/log/dnf.rpm* > /var/log/dnf.rpm.log: data > /var/log/dnf.rpm.log-20150901: ASCII text > /var/log/dnf.rpm.log-20150906: ASCII text > /var/log/dnf.rpm.log-20150913: ASCII text > /var/log/dnf.rpm.log-20150921: ASCII text > > Why /var/log/dnf.rpm.log is a _data_ file, but the rotated logs of > /var/log/dnf.rpm.log are _ASCII_ files? There are some non-ASCII characters in /var/log/dnf.rpm.log for some reason, but not in the others. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23: # dnf update dnf* rpm* ==> no repos configured
On 09/23/2015 04:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 18:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi composed on 2015-09-23 16:28 (UTC-0600): >> >>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:15:59 -0400 >> >>> Felix Miata wrote: >> >>>> # dnf update dnf* rpm* >>>> ... >>>> Complete! >> >>>> # dnf repolist all >>>> # >> >>>> # dnf config-manager --set-disabled fedora updates updates- >>>> testing >>>> # >> >>>> # dnf repolist all >>>> # >> >>>> :-( >> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265336 >> >>> Downgrade dnf manually for now. >> >> Is the process as simple as dnf install --allowerasing dnf-1.1.1- >> 2.fc23, or >> are there lurking gotchas? > > Yes, the lurking gotcha being 'dnf doesn't work' :) > >> I fetched the 1.1.1-2 rpm, tried to use rpm >> --oldpackage, and got a complaint about missing python3-dnf. >> > Welcome back to 1996 ;) Yes, if you need to use rpm, you'll have to > make sure all the dnf subpackages are in the same rpm transaction. > > If you have yum-deprecated installed you should be able to downgrade > dnf with that, I think. > You can use dnf to downgrade dnf using local rpms, but you need several (dnf, dnf-conf, python3-dnf, etc.). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: acroread
On 10/07/2015 08:25 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Has anyone managed to install acroread (Adobe Reader) under Fedora-23beta? > FWIW - Since Adobe has abandoned development of Adobe Reader for Linux and presumably it's riddled with security issues, I've taken to installing the Windows version under wine if it is absolutely needed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora23 - TC9: it's not possible install vlc and ffmpeg
On 10/18/2015 02:37 PM, Dario Lesca wrote: It's not possible to test Fedora 23 Workstation without rpmfusion repository, because, for example, many of user multimedia file is not playable (mp3, avi, ecc). And now, rpmfusion it's not yet ready for f23, not even rawhide. I have must manually modify rpmfusion*repo to point it on f22 rpmfusion version to install some useful apps, like vlc or ffmpeg, but it's not the same thing. I believe F23 cannot release without a valid test of rpmfusion package, rpmfusion must ready some time before Fedora release for test many useful package. Yes, I know, rpmfusio is independent from Fedora, but IMHO Fedora It is closely linked to rpmfusion, without it it's not a usable distro. Or I'm wrong? Yes, you're wrong. This is entirely an rpmfusion issue and Fedora is not tied or beholden to it in any way. While it may be impossible for *you* and other rpmfusion users to test F23, there are a vast array of uses of Fedora that it now way require rpmfusion. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: rawhide report: 20150212 changes
On 02/12/2015 07:54 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Thu Feb 12 10:59:03 UTC 2015 xorg-x11-server-1.17.1-1.fc22 Shouldn't we be seeing fc23 builds now in rawhide? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
No VT2 shell available with F22
Just testing out a F22 install, and I can't switch to VT2 at all. Actually, only VT1 and VT4 appear to be active. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194015 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150218 nightly compose nominated for testing
On 02/18/2015 12:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event > for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this > nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly > release validation testing, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan > > Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: > https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/22 > > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download > locations, and enter results on the Summary page: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Summary > > The individual test result pages are: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Installation > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Base > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Server > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Cloud > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Desktop > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Security_lab > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Download > > Thank you for testing! > I'm having no luck with virtio networking under kvm, and perhaps X, with kernel 3.20 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194042 anyone else seeing this? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22 Workstation Beta TC6, Problem Yum <-> dnf ?
On 03/31/2015 11:43 AM, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > installed F22 Workstation Beta TC6 x86_64. Installed Yumex, run all Updates > via yumex (also Kernel...rc5..). > Opened xterm, run Yum update, the result is the following: > [joerg@linux ~]$ su > Passwort: > [root@linux joerg]# yum update > Abhängigkeiten werden aufgelöst > --> Transaktionsprüfung wird ausgeführt > ---> Paket dnf-yum.noarch 0:0.6.4-2.fc22 markiert, um installiert zu werden > --> Konflikt wird verarbeitet: dnf-yum-0.6.4-2.fc22.noarch kollidiert mit yum > --> Abhängigkeitsauflösung beendet > Fehler: dnf-yum conflicts with yum-3.4.3-155.fc22.noarch > Sie können versuchen, mit --skip-broken das Problem zu umgehen. > Sie könnten Folgendes versuchen: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest > [root@linux joerg]# > > Does anyone understand this? > Kind Regards > Part of this -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207726 I think -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!
On 03/31/2015 08:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 6 > (TC6) is now available for testing. > I'm trying a Server kickstart install on a VM with updates-testing enabled. It hangs near/at the end of package installing. top reports a crazy high load average (106) and machine basically locks up. systemd appears to be in D state. Last journalctl message is: unknown: proctitle="load_policy" -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!
On 03/31/2015 02:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 14:20 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/31/2015 08:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 6
>>> (TC6) is now available for testing.
>>>
>>
>> I'm trying a Server kickstart install on a VM with updates-testing enabled.
>> It hangs near/at the end of package installing. top reports a crazy high
>> load
>> average (106) and machine basically locks up. systemd appears to be in D
>> state. Last journalctl message is:
>>
>> unknown: proctitle="load_policy"
>
> Does it happen without u-t? What's the kickstart? Thanks!
>
It happens without u-t. More debugging seems to show a hang trying to access
the systemd process image:
http://sw.cora.nwra.com/tmp/Screenshot_vmf22_hang.png
But unclear if that is cause, or just symptom.
Next attempt to get more info resulted in a successful install, so yay, some
kind of race. It appears to be hanging in the post rpm transaction scriptlet
stuff and probably in the glibc.i686 %post scriptlet, which is
/usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade.i686 - and yay, a binary.
Seems to be here:
if (check_elf ("/proc/1/exe"))
verbose_exec (116, "/sbin/telinit", "/sbin/telinit", "u");
in check_elf()
But again, all IO seems to be stuck at this point, so could be symptom, not a
trigger.
Install is a x86_64 system, but I install some 32bit libraries as well.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
tar on nfs unhappy for me on rawhide
On rawhide, get lots of messages like: /usr/bin/tar: eigen-eigen-ffa86ffb5570/blas/testing/dblat3.f: Cannot utime /usr/bin/tar: eigen-eigen-ffa86ffb5570/blas/testing/sblat1.f: Cannot utime /usr/bin/tar: eigen-eigen-ffa86ffb5570/blas/testing/sblat2.f: Cannot utime when extracting into nfs mounted directories. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223565 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Need help reproducing gv display bug
I could use some help trying to reproduce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632511 (gv shows some horizontal white lines in a PS file), particularly from people with Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ graphics controllers. I don't have one and I haven't been able to reproduce it myself. Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Closed Bugs cc' on
On 12/18/2010 08:34 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > If you get added (cc'd) to a closed bug. > Does the maintainer still get to see the new comment\backtrace? > Being closed doesn't change anything about notifications (that I'm aware of). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Booting F15 Alpha TC1 as kvm guest
Has anyone been able to boot the F15 Alpha TC1 image as a kvm guest? On my CentOS 5.5 host I get some kind of kernel crash. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Booting F15 Alpha TC1 as kvm guest
On 02/11/2011 03:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Has anyone been able to boot the F15 Alpha TC1 image as a kvm guest? On my > CentOS 5.5 host I get some kind of kernel crash. > Ah, looks like I was running out of memory. Is it expected to work in 512MB of RAM on x86_64 anymore? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha TC2 Available Now!
On 02/15/2011 10:40 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/02/15 08:36 (GMT-0500) James Laska composed: > >> Good-bye install.img, hello initrd.img! > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/UnifiedInitrd > >> The installer no longer needs to locate where install.img is (network, >> DVD, HD). The content previously included in the stage#2 install.img >> file, is now included in the initrd.img. > > And goodbye to my to my customary installation method of loading installation > kernel and initrd from my many little 200M /boot partitions that don't have > room for being made larger. Good thing the two files needn't be located the > same place, but it makes keeping track of where they are more complex. I > guess I can use home's root or give home's root an install dir, and put even > kernel there too. Or, maybe on my user/local partition. Or, on a FAT or NTFS > partition?!?!? Hm, yeah, this is going to break koan as well, isn't it for systems with small /boot filesystems. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha TC2 Available Now!
On 02/15/2011 11:59 AM, Chris Lumens wrote: >> Hmm, also what does this do to PXE booting. IIRC there is a (relatively >> low) limit on the size of the initrd loaded by pxelinux. > > It's worked fine for me in all systems tested. > > - Chris Me too. Though if you don't have enough memory I got a traceback that was too big to fit on the screen so was hard to debug. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
yum reinstall hangs on F15
Can anyone else reproduce this? yum reinstall hangs on F15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678644 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: New selinux denials - systemd-tmpfiles
On 2/22/2011 9:08 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Anyone have any thoughts on whether this should be BZ'ed against > systemd or selinux? > I generally file against selinux-policy. The SE folks can bring in the systemd folks if needed. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: FC15 hang at Create User screen
On 2/26/2011 7:43 PM, David wrote: > Sorry please disregard my message. > For some idiotic reason I mistakenly was thinking F15 was released. > My apologies. Released or not, bugzilla is still the place for bug reports. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Busted networking on F15
I seem to have ended up with busted networking on my F15 machine after updating to latest development/15 (no updates-testing). dig and host can resolve IPs, but nothing else seems to be able to . Anyone else seen this? -Orion -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: rawhide package lag
On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They > don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable. This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n-1) builds automatically into rawhide? Might provide some additional testing. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: rawhide package lag
On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote: > >> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They >>> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable. >> >> This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n-1) >> builds automatically into rawhide? Might provide some additional testing. > > Testing of what? A target that isn't anything like well-defined. > People ought to test F-15. Rawhide is pretty much unimportant while F-15 > is being worked on. If that's the case, what's the point of NoFrozenRawhide? F15 builds will land in rawhide as soon as they are push to F15 stable, so why not push them to rawhide earlier? Seems like rawhide should always have the latest build. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Problems resolving hostnames
I'm having trouble resolving hostnames with certain clients on my F15 box. It appears perhaps to be an issue with my wireless DSL router returning bogus (empty) IPv6 queries. Has anyone else seen this? # ssh earth.cora.nwra.com ssh: Could not resolve hostname earth.cora.nwra.com: Name or service not known 10.471130 192.168.100.67 -> 192.168.100.1 DNS Standard query A earth.cora.nwra.com 10.471301 192.168.100.67 -> 192.168.100.1 DNS Standard query earth.cora.nwra.com 10.517326 192.168.100.1 -> 192.168.100.67 DNS Standard query response A 65.44.101.180 10.518840 192.168.100.1 -> 192.168.100.67 DNS Standard query response firefox and thunderbird are working fine. So is yum/curl. ssh and telnet fail. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Problems resolving hostnames
On 04/17/2011 08:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm having trouble resolving hostnames with certain clients on my F15 > box. It appears perhaps to be an issue with my wireless DSL router > returning bogus (empty) IPv6 queries. Has anyone else seen this? > > # ssh earth.cora.nwra.com > ssh: Could not resolve hostname earth.cora.nwra.com: Name or service not > known > >10.471130 192.168.100.67 -> 192.168.100.1 DNS Standard query A > earth.cora.nwra.com >10.471301 192.168.100.67 -> 192.168.100.1 DNS Standard query > earth.cora.nwra.com >10.517326 192.168.100.1 -> 192.168.100.67 DNS Standard query response > A 65.44.101.180 >10.518840 192.168.100.1 -> 192.168.100.67 DNS Standard query response > > firefox and thunderbird are working fine. So is yum/curl. ssh and > telnet fail. > ssh -4 earth works. So definitely an ipv6 issue. Question is, whose fault is this? Should the router's DNS resolver be returning something different? glibc or ssh handling it differently? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Busted networking on F15
Actually, very different issue. On 05/01/2011 12:26 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Same issue from both upgrade and netinstall from scratch. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691663 > > > Luya > > -- Original Message -- > From: Orion Poplawski > Date: Sat, Apr 2, 2011 / 3:49am GMT > > I seem to have ended up with busted networking on my F15 machine after > updating to latest development/15 (no updates-testing). dig and host > can resolve IPs, but nothing else seems to be able to . Anyone else > seen this? > -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Thunderbird F15 Update
On 07/19/2011 03:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Michael Cronenworth on 07/19/2011 04:36 PM wrote: >> I haven't discovered any conversations beside the one comment on the TB >> 5.0 bodhi update. > > Nevermind. After looking at *closed* tickets, I found it. > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4828 Seems like this is still broken though. I still see 3.1.11 in updates. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F16 Update Kernels fail to boot
On 08/24/2011 04:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > The fact that GRUB 2 by default won't install to a partition, and will > only do it if you use --force, is known. It's why anaconda can't install > the bootloader to a partition in Alpha. That will be fixed (by using > --force) in Beta. The bug for anaconda is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=730915 . Is there a way to workaround this in a kickstart file (other than running grub2-install --force (hd0,0) in %post) by using partitioning/boatloader options? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F16 Update Kernels fail to boot
On 08/25/2011 04:11 AM, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Is there a way to workaround this in a kickstart file (other than running >> grub2-install --force (hd0,0) in %post) by using partitioning/boatloader >> options? > > Just in case "(hd0,0)" isn't a typo, please note that grub2 numbers > partitions differently from grub1: sda1 is (hd0,1). Thanks for that. Funny that it is still hd0 though then. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: weird bash completion
On 08/29/2011 11:11 AM, John5342 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:14, Joachim Backes > wrote: >> Having a file in my home called :0-greeter.log >> >> If pressing "rm :", the bash completes: >> >> rm :\:0-greeter.log >> >> Two questions: >> >> 1. Why the : is escaped at second position? >> 2. Why the : is escaped at all? >> >> That's a known issue? > > I discovered the same thing with the '=' symbol in strings. I also > noticed today that if a file has spaces if i type "rm some" it > completes as "rm some file with spaces" rather than "rm some\ file\ > with\ spaces" as it used to. > This is often caused by the adobe reader bash completion file. I thought it was fixed with the latest bash-completion updates though. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Karma for pykickstart, lorax and anaconda
On 08/30/2011 02:56 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > As we're getting ready for the F16 Beta TC1, we need some karma to get > required updates into stable. Anyone know how to create a "bootloader stage1 target device" via kickstart? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Karma for pykickstart, lorax and anaconda
On 08/30/2011 04:34 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/30/2011 02:56 PM, Tim Flink wrote: >> As we're getting ready for the F16 Beta TC1, we need some karma to get >> required updates into stable. > > Anyone know how to create a "bootloader stage1 target device" via kickstart? > Ah, it's right there: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#bootloader although I was looking in the part section. biosboot isn't listed there. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1 > (RC1) is now available for testing. Trying to install on a ThinkPad X32. I get a udevadm setttle timeout and nm_client_get_devices error getting devices. Anyone else seen this? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On 09/15/2011 04:34 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: >>> As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1 >>> (RC1) is now available for testing. >> >> Trying to install on a ThinkPad X32. I get a udevadm setttle timeout and >> nm_client_get_devices error getting devices. Anyone else seen this? > > You might be hitting this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735866 Yeah, the problem seems to be that multiple causes that cause that symptom. In my case it appears that loading one of the network drivers hangs. udev is outputting lots of timeout killing modprobe and biosdevname lines. The modprobe lines appear to refer to the Intel Wireless 2200BG device and the CardBus bridge. Nothing is in the pcmcia slot. Any attempt to access network device info from the command line hangs. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On 09/15/2011 04:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 09/15/2011 04:34 PM, Tim Flink wrote: >> On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: >>>> As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1 >>>> (RC1) is now available for testing. >>> >>> Trying to install on a ThinkPad X32. I get a udevadm setttle timeout and >>> nm_client_get_devices error getting devices. Anyone else seen this? >> >> You might be hitting this: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735866 > > Yeah, the problem seems to be that multiple causes that cause that symptom. > In my case it appears that loading one of the network drivers hangs. udev is > outputting lots of timeout killing modprobe and biosdevname lines. The > modprobe lines appear to refer to the Intel Wireless 2200BG device and the > CardBus bridge. Nothing is in the pcmcia slot. Any attempt to access network > device info from the command line hangs. > I think I'm hitting this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738387 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Pre TC2 Test boot.iso
On 10/21/2011 01:06 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Tim Flink wrote: >> There are new builds for anaconda and lorax, so we all know what that >> means ... >>Pre-TC2 Test Installer Time! >> >> http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20111019_preTC2.x64.iso >> http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20111019_preTC2.x64.iso.sha256 >> >> If you're able to install, please add karma to anaconda: >> - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-16.22-1.fc16 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tim >> > > Hi. > > I am testing this anaconda with the flowing kickstart. > > http://200.19.149.225/itamar/web/ks5.cfg > > but anaconda doesn't reconize updates and updates-testing > > all other repositorys works, inclusing adobe and rpmfusion.; > > can you help me to fix this issue ? > > I am using f15 local repository from http://200.19.149.225/itamar/fedora/ > > How are you testing the F16 anaconda with F15? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)
On 01/27/2012 06:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: Until the rawhide repository gets all the converted rpms, use the f17-usrmove repository to update the system after the filesystem conversion and disable rawhide in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo Add f17-usrmove in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/f17-usrmove.repo [f17-usrmove] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f17-usrmove/latest/$basearch enabled=1 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 # yum clean all # yum upgrade Looks like a no-go with multilib: Error: Protected multilib versions: libacl-2.2.51-5.fc17.x86_64 != libacl-2.2.51-3.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: db4-4.8.30-7.fc17.x86_64 != db4-4.8.30-5.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: nspr-4.9-0.2.fc17.beta3.1.x86_64 != nspr-4.9-0.2.fc17.beta3.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: krb5-libs-1.10-1.fc17.x86_64 != krb5-libs-1.10-0.fc17.beta1.2.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libuuid-2.20.1-5.fc17.x86_64 != libuuid-2.20.1-4.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: nss-softokn-3.13.1-19.fc17.x86_64 != nss-softokn-3.13.1-17.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libattr-2.4.46-5.fc17.x86_64 != libattr-2.4.46-3.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libselinux-2.1.9-6.fc17.x86_64 != libselinux-2.1.9-3.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: nss-softokn-freebl-3.13.1-19.fc17.x86_64 != nss-softokn-freebl-3.13.1-17.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libdb-5.2.36-4.fc17.x86_64 != libdb-5.2.36-2.fc17.i686 I suppose I could add in the i386 repo... -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)
On 01/30/2012 12:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 01/27/2012 06:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: Until the rawhide repository gets all the converted rpms, use the f17-usrmove repository to update the system after the filesystem conversion and disable rawhide in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo Add f17-usrmove in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/f17-usrmove.repo [f17-usrmove] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f17-usrmove/latest/$basearch enabled=1 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 # yum clean all # yum upgrade Looks like a no-go with multilib: Error: Protected multilib versions: libacl-2.2.51-5.fc17.x86_64 != libacl-2.2.51-3.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: db4-4.8.30-7.fc17.x86_64 != db4-4.8.30-5.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: nspr-4.9-0.2.fc17.beta3.1.x86_64 != nspr-4.9-0.2.fc17.beta3.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: krb5-libs-1.10-1.fc17.x86_64 != krb5-libs-1.10-0.fc17.beta1.2.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libuuid-2.20.1-5.fc17.x86_64 != libuuid-2.20.1-4.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: nss-softokn-3.13.1-19.fc17.x86_64 != nss-softokn-3.13.1-17.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libattr-2.4.46-5.fc17.x86_64 != libattr-2.4.46-3.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libselinux-2.1.9-6.fc17.x86_64 != libselinux-2.1.9-3.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: nss-softokn-freebl-3.13.1-19.fc17.x86_64 != nss-softokn-freebl-3.13.1-17.fc17.i686 Error: Protected multilib versions: libdb-5.2.36-4.fc17.x86_64 != libdb-5.2.36-2.fc17.i686 I suppose I could add in the i386 repo... I added: [f17-usrmove-i386] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f17-usrmove/latest/i386 enabled=1 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 And got the following errors: Updating : coreutils-8.15-5.fc17.x86_64 7/223 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.T9mWTk: line 1: /usr/bin/grep: No such file or directory Updating : filesystem-3-1.fc17.x86_64 23/223 Error unpacking rpm package filesystem-3-1.fc17.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /bin: cpio: rename error: filesystem-3-1.fc17.x86_64: install failed error: filesystem-2.4.46-1.fc17.x86_64: erase skipped Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-okteta-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-kompare-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-kioslave-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-cervisia-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-kcachegrind-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-umbrello-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-kapptemplate-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 Non-fatal POSTTRANS scriptlet failure in rpm package kdesdk-kuiviewer-4.8.0-1.fc17.x86_64 filesystem-2.4.46-1.fc17.x86_64 was supposed to be removed but is not! Now I get: # ls -l / -bash: /bin/ls: No such file or directory Shutdown did not complete. Boot now fails with: dracut: Switching root switch_root: failed to execute /etc/init: Permission denied Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! even with enforcing=0 Anyone want any postmortem info before I reinstall the VM? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 17’s unified filesystem (/usr-move)
On 01/30/2012 10:38 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote: you forgot to convert with dracut before yum upgrade... right?? Yes, my bad. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!
On 02/09/2012 06:11 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: **IMPORTANT**: There were different versions of the TC2 install and live images which were overwritten prior to this announcement. I also briefly posted delta ISOs for some of these old images. Please make sure that the images you are using correspond to the currently posted checksum files. As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. I'm trying to do a koan driven vm install using the pxeboot images and the installer fails to boot with: dracut: FATAL: No or empty root= argument dracut: Refusing to continue Am I doing something obviously wrong? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!
On 02/10/2012 04:19 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:00:29PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 02/09/2012 06:11 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: **IMPORTANT**: There were different versions of the TC2 install and live images which were overwritten prior to this announcement. I also briefly posted delta ISOs for some of these old images. Please make sure that the images you are using correspond to the currently posted checksum files. As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. I'm trying to do a koan driven vm install using the pxeboot images and the installer fails to boot with: dracut: FATAL: No or empty root= argument dracut: Refusing to continue Am I doing something obviously wrong? yes ;) The rootfs is now in LiveOS/squashfs.img so when doing something like PXE boot or virt-install with --kernel and --initrd you also need to provide squashfs.img somehow and point dracut to it with root=live:... I think you can serve it up via http, but I haven't confirmed this myself. So, this is something koan is going to have to be taught then? If so I'll file a bug. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!
On 02/10/2012 04:19 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:00:29PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 02/09/2012 06:11 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: **IMPORTANT**: There were different versions of the TC2 install and live images which were overwritten prior to this announcement. I also briefly posted delta ISOs for some of these old images. Please make sure that the images you are using correspond to the currently posted checksum files. As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. I'm trying to do a koan driven vm install using the pxeboot images and the installer fails to boot with: dracut: FATAL: No or empty root= argument dracut: Refusing to continue Am I doing something obviously wrong? yes ;) The rootfs is now in LiveOS/squashfs.img so when doing something like PXE boot or virt-install with --kernel and --initrd you also need to provide squashfs.img somehow and point dracut to it with root=live:... I think you can serve it up via http, but I haven't confirmed this myself. Also, if it needs a new file to boot, shouldn't this be mentioned somewhere in the .treeinfo file? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta TC1 Available Now!
On 09/09/2010 05:46 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. This image (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/os/) appears to be useless for network/kickstart installs. I've pxe booted the images from there and downloaded the install.img from there as well (stage2=http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/os/images/install.img). I'm getting: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: anaconda-InstallationRepo-201009092144.i386. Please verify its path and try again vt3 log shows it trying to download http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml which does not exist. If I click continue I get: Error: Unable to read group information from repositories. This is a problem with the generation of your install tree. vt3 log again shows it trying to download the above repomd.xml. In my kickstart file I have: url --url=http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/development/14/i386/os which is my local mirror, but that appears to be ignored, presumably overridden by the stage2 argument. Expected or anaconda bug? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 1000 Bug Reports
On 09/29/2010 11:33 PM, test-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > That's actually pretty cool. Did Orion happen to have a script that > parsed a bugzilla csv or xml file to generate these stats? Would he mind > sharing it? > > -- John Watzke I'm afraid not. I have a bugzilla query that brings up all of the bug reports I ever posted. I saved the html file and did a bunch of sedding and awking to pull it out. If someone were to script this, I imagine using bugzilla xmlrpc stuff would be much better, but I really was just doing this as a one-off thing. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> dikshie wrote: >> >>> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide? >> >> Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of >> those just done recently was texlive. >> >> -- Rex >> >> > > Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? > It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a > typesetting language .. ;-) > >is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least > isolate this coupling ? > > > > [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at > least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible split that would make it optional. It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support. CC'ing R-owner (spot). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/01/2010 09:17 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >>> >>>Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? >>> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a >>> typesetting language .. ;-) >>> >>> is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least >>> isolate this coupling ? >>> >>> >>> >>>[1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at >>> least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). >> >> R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible split that >> would make it optional. It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe >> for >> generic latex support. >> >> CC'ing R-owner (spot). >> > > Unfortunately I install texive from upstream and there is no rpm ... > via tlmgr. You could provide your own stub rpm the provided it. Unfortunately, looks like R-devel currently requires tetex-latex, that should get fixed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Upgrading nightly install to rawhide
On 10/13/2010 12:12 PM, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote: > Hello guys, > > I used this image to install fedora: > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20101010.16.iso > > Then I installed yum install fedora-release-rawhide and enabled just > the rawhide repo via yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide update > such as explained in the wiki. > > For now I should just receive updates for rawhide yes? > > Well but when trying to update my system with yum update I get the > following conflicts and errors with broken deps. Can yum somehow > handle this or what do I have to do? > > The error output: > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/275073/ > > Regards > > robert systemd/upstart issue is tracked here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635323 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 14 under constant load
On 10/14/2010 05:29 PM, John Poelstra wrote: > Compared to Fedora 13 and Fedora 12, I'm noticing that on my Dell XPS > M1330 laptop, the system is under a load average of 1.0+ at all times... > even with no desktop applications open. > > Naturally this makes it run hotter and shortens the battery life. > > Are other people seeing this? How to diagnose further beyond 'top' or > system monitor? > > John Possibly relevant: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 14 under constant load
On 10/14/2010 05:58 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/14/2010 04:49 PM, John Poelstra wrote: >> That's what's so mysterious, very little CPU time or activity. > > I saw this at one point, and the kernel folks found it to be a load > balancing thing gone awry in the kernel. > > 2.6.35.6-33.rc1 seems to include a patch: > > - - Add sched-35-increment-cache_nice_tries-only-on-periodic-lb.patch, > another fix for excessive scheduler load balancing. > > That should be in kernel-2.6.35.6-39.fc14, which is in dist-f14. My > load went down and the laptop (also an M1330) has cooled down a bit, but > it is still above one usually. With 2.6.35.6-43.fc14.i686.PAE, after letting the machine quiet down a bit after logging in and starting up Firefox and Thunderbird: top - 10:45:59 up 8 min, 14 users, load average: 0.81, 1.65, 1.12 Tasks: 184 total, 2 running, 182 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 2.0%us, 0.8%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.0%id, 0.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Top causes for wakeups: 40.6% (117.7) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick 29.8% ( 86.4) firefox 5.9% ( 17.1) konsole 5.4% ( 15.6) PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad interrupt 3.7% ( 10.7) thunderbird-bin 3.6% ( 10.5) [ata_piix] Actually moving the mouse and typing seems to bring the load back up to 1. Never saw it go below .8 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 14 under constant load
On 10/14/2010 05:29 PM, John Poelstra wrote: > Compared to Fedora 13 and Fedora 12, I'm noticing that on my Dell XPS > M1330 laptop, the system is under a load average of 1.0+ at all times... > even with no desktop applications open. > > Naturally this makes it run hotter and shortens the battery life. > > Are other people seeing this? How to diagnose further beyond 'top' or > system monitor? > > John Also possibly relevant: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635813 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 14 under constant load
On 10/15/2010 11:28 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:18:37PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>>> >>> >>> Now I actually look at the load stats, I do seem to have something like >>> this problem, I just never noticed (I thought Poelcat was talking about >>> CPU load % at first): > > Although not in Adam's case, as he doesn't mention thunderbird, is there > any chance for any of you others that this article is relevant? > > http://perfprotector.blogspot.com/2010/08/thunderbird-3-is-it-really-all-yours.html > > > I'm not having the problem, but generally, I run mutt and opera with > openbox. > > Right now, with at least 8 rxvt-unicode terminals open, the load is > something like 0.45 as average. > > Yeah, I can get to that without tb or firefox, but that is still really high load. On earlier machines I can get to very load loads (< 0.1) with just terminals. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RPC idmapd?
On 10/14/2010 06:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Anyone know why RPC idmapd would take around 30 seconds to start > when booting fedora 14 from scratch, yet starts instantly if I stop > then start the service after the system is up? Presumably some service it needs is not yet available. You might try setting: RPCIDMAPDARGS=-vvv in /etc/sysconfig/nfs to get some more info. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide installation question
On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote: >> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda >> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer >> 3) Yum update from a test release >> 4) Yum update from previous release >> >> I prefer the first two methods. > > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken > dependency. > > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide? > > Qiang > I just want to say that I too miss the ability to do #1. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 10/01/2014 08:43 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1 > (TC1) is now available for testing. PXE Booting 21_Beta_TC1/Server on physical hardware with 1GB RAM. System appears to be running out of memory - but it seems to be all in use by the kernel, not userspace. Install seems to go fine on a VM. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 10/01/2014 12:39 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/01/2014 08:43 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: >> As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1 >> (TC1) is now available for testing. > > PXE Booting 21_Beta_TC1/Server on physical hardware with 1GB RAM. System > appears to be running out of memory - but it seems to be all in use by the > kernel, not userspace. Install seems to go fine on a VM. > Okay, this just turned out to be running out of RAM/swap, though it did lead me to an anaconda bug that was causing the installer to use more memory than needed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148618 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: which kernel?
On 10/04/2014 09:45 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote: I am confused, grub defaults to 3.16.1-301 but 3.16.3-302 is installed, . Timestamp shows 3.16.1 is newer.. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#Default_boot_menu_.28grub.29_entry_is_not_updated_with_new_kernels -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On 10/24/2014 01:36 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >>> As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 1 >>> (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including >>> changes, can be found at >>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:11 . Please see the >>> following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing >>> instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest >>> download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror >>> (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just >>> replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL. >> >> Since freenode is not working for me (netsplit), I have to ask here - there >> are no Workstation netinst images for RC1? Also I noticed there is no os/ >> directory for them. > > That's intentional. See > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-10-22/workstation.2014-10-22-15.00.html > I see Cloud is shipping a netinst image still. Does it make sense to ship multiple netinst images? Are they different in any way? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Big problems with the lpr or lp command in F21 since some days: only empty sheets are printed
On 10/29/2014 05:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Dear F21 testers, having big problems with printing using the lp or lpd command since 2 or 3 days: Only empty pages are printed. This happens for my real samsung printer or with a cups-PDF printer. On the other hand, printing to these printers from applications such as firefox, thunderbird,... (using the print menu) is OK. My F21 is fully updated. I downgraded already cups-client (current is cups-client-1.7.5-13.fc21.x86_64), but this did not help. Anybody has these problems too? Kind regards Joachim Backes I see this too. Please file a bug. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Can taskotron run rpmlint on packages?
Can taskotron run rpmlint on packages? Seems like this would be a useful thing to get into place. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Can taskotron run rpmlint on packages?
On 11/23/2014 02:10 PM, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: > Hi, > > Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Can taskotron run rpmlint on packages? Seems like this would be a >> useful thing to get into place. > > It does already - see > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results?testcase_name=rpmlint Nice, so, is there any way to be notified when one of my packages fails rpmlint? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F21 final RC2 - swap drive fail messages
On 12/06/2014 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 13:39 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Noticed a 'Fail' message flash across the screen during a boot, and so went looking in journalctl to find what it might have been. Supprise at what I did find. After some filtering I have pulled out: Dec 03 12:58:33 lx120e.htt-consult.com swapoff[1951]: swapoff: /dev/disk/by-uuid/732369cd-9f81-451e-800e-760bd8939df7: swapoff failed: Invalid argument Dec 03 12:58:33 lx120e.htt-consult.com systemd[1]: dev-disk-by\x2duuid-732369cd\x2d9f81\x2d451e\x2d800e\x2d760bd8939df7.swap swap process exited, code=exited status=255 Dec 03 12:58:33 lx120e.htt-consult.com systemd[1]: Unit dev-disk-by\x2duuid-732369cd\x2d9f81\x2d451e\x2d800e\x2d760bd8939df7.swap entered failed state. Dec 03 12:59:10 lx120e.htt-consult.com swapon[419]: swapon: /dev/sda4: swapon failed: Device or resource busy Dec 03 12:59:10 lx120e.htt-consult.com kernel: Adding 8388604k swap on /dev/sda4. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:8388604k SSFS Dec 03 12:59:10 lx120e.htt-consult.com systemd[1]: dev-sda4.swap swap process exited, code=exited status=255 Dec 03 12:59:10 lx120e.htt-consult.com systemd[1]: Failed to activate swap Swap Partition. Dec 03 12:59:10 lx120e.htt-consult.com systemd[1]: Unit dev-sda4.swap entered failed state. What are these messages reporting? Free shows I have swap space. Of course with 4Gb memory, I have not done enough on the system to get it to try and use swap space. Is the disk GPT-formatted? I think there's some kind of known bug where some code that auto-detects swap partitions on GPT disks can cause swap activation/de-activation operations to run twice, which causes error messages but no real functional problems. Perhaps this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017509 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fedup and distro-sync
On 12/12/2014 01:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The other path you can take is to try and convince wwoods to have > fedup do distro-sync. The bug reports for that are > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892061 and h > ttps://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/issues/21 . Given that wwoods filed > https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/issues/21 himself, I'm guessing he'd > welcome a patch. Apparently redhat-upgrade-tool (which appears to be a fork of fedup) doesn't use distro-sync either, despite the fact that there is NO attempt to make sure package versions in RHEL7 are greater than RHEL6, which leads to total carnage: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173713 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fedup and distro-sync
On 12/15/2014 04:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > - Original Message - >> On 12/12/2014 01:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> The other path you can take is to try and convince wwoods to have >>> fedup do distro-sync. The bug reports for that are >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892061 and h >>> ttps://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/issues/21 . Given that wwoods filed >>> https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/issues/21 himself, I'm guessing he'd >>> welcome a patch. >> >> Apparently redhat-upgrade-tool (which appears to be a fork of fedup) doesn't >> use distro-sync either, despite the fact that there is NO attempt to make >> sure >> package versions in RHEL7 are greater than RHEL6, which leads to total >> carnage: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173713 > > As described in the bug, they do use preupgrade assistant for it. For > Fedora, there's proposed change to include preupgrade assistant in > Fedora too. Though I'm not sure if Fedora content will cover it too. > > Jaroslav I have no idea how the issue up not updating a package to the version in the new release (and thus missing deps in binaries) would be solved in preupgrade assistant. And that is also noted now in the bug. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Firefox white text with GTK+ 3.15.4
On 01/26/2015 12:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I figure a lot of people are going to run into this shortly, so if > you're running Rawhide and you see lots of white text on Firefox UI > elements - tab bar titles, buttons, menus - after updating to GTK+ > 3.15.4, I've filed it already: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185999 > > thanks folks! > I seem to be having issues with it as well with a wxPython 3 app on KDE. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl
On 02/27/2014 12:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Fedora is considering XFS as their default file system. They support >>> three primary architectures: x86_64, i686, and armv7hl. Do XFS devs >>> have any reservations about XFS as a default file system on either >>> i686, or arm? >> >> As Dave said, we rely on others to do ARM testing for the most part, >> though I've certainly jumped in and debugged some issues from time >> to time. >> >> It'd be super if Fedora could run the xfstests test suite on arm >> as part of QE. I'd be more than happy to help get that started >> if people are interested. > > I don't know that Fedora QA has the resources to do this, but I'll cc the > Fedora test@ (QA) arm@ lists. If these are highly automatable tests it might > be possible, if they have the hardware. More likely I think it's that we need > some ARM community folks to look at splitting up some of this work. > > I'm not sure yet what concerns the ARM group might have with XFS either as > this hasn't been decided, but the Fedora Server product working group is > slightly leaning toward XFS by default. Performance and CPU hit wise on > x86_64, XFS seems to match up well with ext4 and maybe even a bit better > ratio of throughput/CPUtime for booting workload (systemd is parallel!) so if > were the same on ARM XFS could work out slightly better for them. > > > Chris Murphy > I'm sure many people have much better info on this - but back in the day, running XFS on LVM (on md?) on i686 was not a good idea due to issues running out of stack space. I don't know if this has changed in any way, or if arm is better in this regard. But that would be my concern. I think RHEL6 doesn't support xfs on i686, and RHEL7 has dropped i686 completely it seems. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: new f19/f20 images
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/16/2014 03:18 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > First big gotcha... > > With at least the x86_64 kde live image... if you install, you get > the kernel-debug as default boot entry. > > Not sure if this is all live images, or what is causing it, but it > seems pretty bad. ;( > > Thanks to bitlord for spotting this! > > kevin I saw this with the XFCE spin, but forgot to report it :( - -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNPVWYACgkQORnzrtFC2/tzxACg113u7UKsAE3q33k+XlLtANJ6 /pIAoKe8O/Pp3bKx8CVAsH0uL61ffoM7 =GBWp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: what in fedora rawhide replaces "pdftk" for extracting pages from PDF file?
On 04/22/2014 08:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2014-04-22 at 18:39 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:37:26AM +0200, drago01 wrote: >>> Port pdftk to openjdk? > >> I am not sure if there is really anything to port. At >> http://www.pdflabs.com/docs/install-pdftk-on-redhat-or-centos/ >> you can find pdftk-2.02-1.el6.src.rpm. I do not now about rawhide >> but out of curiosity I tried on a Fedora 20 installation: >> >>rpmbuild --rebuild pdftk-2.02-1.el6.src.rpm >> >> OTOH after light testing >> pdftk binary seems to work just fine and it appears to be somwewhat >> faster then the one from pdftk-1.44-11.fc19.x86_64 (the last one >> available on Fedora 64-bits mirrors) although I did not try to do any >> measurements. > > So pdftk 2.02 already port to openjdk ! , > we could undeprecated pdftk [1] and update to 2.02, checking pdftk.spec > from 2.02 is pretty cool spec No, it isn't. It still uses gcj, still bundles lots of java. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Error creating Xfce's Live image - Remmina
On 04/29/2014 10:17 AM, poma wrote: ... Remmina https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina Update to the latest git commit 26b814a, build with the latest libvncserver git commit 646f844 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092243 ... Guys, would you pick up Remmina. Thanks. poma The bigger problem is that upstream appears to have become unresponsive. No commits in 7 months and lots (145) of open bug reports. https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina Compiling the current git master of remmina fails as it requires the current git master of freerdp which is not in rawhide. Not very impressed with how this project handles API changes. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Mozilla Thunderbird
On 04/29/2014 10:22 PM, poma wrote: # rpm -i thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libldap60.so()(64bit) is needed by thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64 libldif60.so()(64bit) is needed by thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64 libprldap60.so()(64bit) is needed by thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64 libxul.so(xul24)(64bit) is needed by thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64 # rpm -qlp thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm | grep 'libldap60.so\|libldif60.so\|libprldap60.so\|libxul.so' /usr/lib64/thunderbird/libldap60.so /usr/lib64/thunderbird/libldif60.so /usr/lib64/thunderbird/libprldap60.so /usr/lib64/thunderbird/libxul.so Is this so-called recursive installation? :) Gustavo offered one possible solution! poma Ref. Error: Package: thunderbird-24.4.0-2.fc21.i686 (rawhide) Requires: libxul.so(xul24) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091295 Rebuilding thunderbird from rawhide generates broken dep: Requires: libxul.so(xul24)(64bit) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088001 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=886622 Reported: 2014-04-15<- - replace unmaintained dependency generator scripts with rpmdeps wrappers http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpm.git/commit/?id=7aa67a4 Thunderbird tries to filter out all requires that it provides. It tries to pass a giant space separated string of filenames to /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides. This used to work but now generates: warning: Recognition of file "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/thunderbird- . d-24.5.0-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib64' (File name too long) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093183 Do we want to still support this or does thunderbird need to change? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Error creating Xfce's Live image - Remmina
On 05/20/2014 03:19 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, I would like to upgrade the current Fedora rawhide packages for FreeRDP and Remmina to the latest git snapshot. I regularly use Remmina and one of my packages require a fairly up to date FreeRDP. Currently, if I've investigated correctly, the only consumers of FreeRDP are the RDP plugin of Remmina, the RDP plugin of Guacamole and RPMFusion's VLC (?). I'm already comaintainer for FreeRDP and maintainer for Guacamole. From what I've read there's not much interest in FreeRDP/Remmina, so I would like to maintain/co-maintain the whole stack along with Guacamole. Would it be acceptable for the people here an update in Rawhide to the current git snapshots? I can ask for Remmina permissions in pkgdb if it's ok for everybody. Works for me. Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Package test help
On 06/20/2014 11:31 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Can someone help me test package "ttfautohint-gui"? I get SIGILL constantly from it. Please help me test by download and install to see if it can be launched up and behave like other GUI programs. If you meet the same problem please send me the abrt folder to me. Starts and seems to run fine for me. ttfautohint-gui-1.1-1.fc20.x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3520 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!
On 09/05/2014 01:03 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) is now available for testing. Minor nit, but can we try for consistent naming? Thanks. We've had: F21a-TC1/ 21-Alpha-T2/2014-07-21 01:59- 21-Alpha-TC3/ 2014-08-23 03:32- 21-Alpha-TC4/ 2014-08-26 04:58- 21-Alpha-TC5/ 2014-08-30 04:38- and now: 21_Alpha_TC6/ 2014-09-05 06:06- -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!
On 09/05/2014 01:03 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) is now available for testing Doing a virt-install of Workstation, anaconda is segfaulting on startup. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: "Pane is dead" if the TC6 anaconda is started, and some other effect
On 09/08/2014 03:21 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi TC6 testers, 1. immediately after the TC6 anaconda is started (using the Workstation/netinstaller/x86_64 ISO, burned to CD, running under VirtualBox), anaconda stops with the message: "Pane is dead" in the main window. No log available in /var/log. Anybody has similar effects? Yup - anaconda segfaults for me under KVM. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: "Pane is dead" if the TC6 anaconda is started, and some other effect
On 09/08/2014 02:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 10:03 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 09/08/2014 03:21 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi TC6 testers, 1. immediately after the TC6 anaconda is started (using the Workstation/netinstaller/x86_64 ISO, burned to CD, running under VirtualBox), anaconda stops with the message: "Pane is dead" in the main window. No log available in /var/log. Anybody has similar effects? Yup - anaconda segfaults for me under KVM. Has anyone filed a bug report yet? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139015 I'll try to add some useful information -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: updated kernel not used by default
On 09/14/2014 08:38 AM, Joshua Andrews wrote: On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Chris Murphy mailto:li...@colorremedies.com>> wrote: Got a bug where the upgraded kernel isn't being booted by default. I'm not exactly sure why, or what release criteria to use, so I set it to final based on it being a security concern. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141414 Seems to me a mismatch between: /etc/sysconfig/kernel DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-core and the kernel-core scriptlet not setting the kernel flavor to "core". Not sure which of them should change to match the other. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 08/13/2012 01:59 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. Could not do PXE/kickstart install. Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847831 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!
On 08/16/2012 07:46 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. I appear to be completely unable to boot this kernel under kvm x86_64. Anyone else seeing this? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!
On 08/16/2012 10:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 08/16/2012 07:46 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. I appear to be completely unable to boot this kernel under kvm x86_64. Anyone else seeing this? I appear to have bunged up the download the first time somehow. Redownloaded and am off (well, not really, it's still failing to boot but the kernel does start). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 18 static network working?
On 10/04/2012 02:38 PM, Scott Poore wrote:
Has anyone tried setting network manually (static instead of DHCP) in
the newUI or in a ks.cfg?
In both cases, for me anyway, the host comes up using DHCP.
Has anyone else seen this? Or is this not yet implemented/enabled?
I just tried a kickstart of F18 Beta TC1 and I'm seeing the same issue.
I'm using this line in my ks.cfg:
network --bootproto=static --gateway=192.168.122.1 --ip=192.168.122.181
--nameserver=192.168.122.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0
But, /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 shows this:
BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
ONBOOT="yes"
This is while doing an iso based install to a KVM guest with virt-install:
virt-install --connect=qemu:///system \
--network=bridge:virbr0 \
--initrd-inject=./${VMNAME}.ks \
--extra-args="ks=file:/${VMNAME}.ks $EXTRAARGS" \
--name=$VMNAME \
--disk path=$DISKIMAGE,format=qcow2,size=8 \
--ram 1024 \
--vcpus=1 \
--check-cpu \
--hvm \
--location=$OSIMG \
--vnc --video=vga
So, is that a function of newUI setting networking out of KS?
Thanks,
Scott
Please file a bug.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Install didn't bring in libreoffice-langpack-en
Just did a test kickstart install of F18. Used the "@libreoffice" group for package selection, but I didn't get libreoffice-langpack-en installed. Anyone know why? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Install didn't bring in libreoffice-langpack-en
On 11/09/2012 12:00 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) said: Just did a test kickstart install of F18. Used the "@libreoffice" group for package selection, but I didn't get libreoffice-langpack-en installed. Anyone know why? What version of anaconda & lorax were in the tree you installed from? (This just had fixes come across very recently, they may not be in the nightly tree.) Bill These were with the Beta TC7 images. So I guess I'll wait for the next set. Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: newer kernels can't see \ HDMI
On 02/13/2013 06:10 PM, Per Bothner wrote: [again somewhat off-topic.] I have 60" Mitsubishi TV connected to the HDMI output of a home-brew box running MythTV on Fedora 17. I have not been able to do any updates lately for fear of losing the one kernel that can see the Mitsubishi. FYI - yum won't replace the running kernel. You can also change the install_only limit in /etc/yum.conf to keep more around for testing if you want, but the first point is the main one. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
On 05/01/2013 07:13 AM, nonamedotc wrote: F19 x86_64 beta TC1 falls to an emergency shell during boot on a Virtualbox VM I tried. Bug report filed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958436 Anyone else see this? Yes, with f19 development tree. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) can't mount nfs
I'm afraid I have absolutely no time before I have to leave, but: mounting nfs from the installer seems to be broken all of a sudden from 19-Beta to Final TC2. Getting: mount.nfs4: mount(2): No such device. I've been doing modprobe nfs in %pre for a while now (though mainly for EL6 I think). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dracut hang in %posttrans of Rawhide kernel install?
On 07/16/2013 10:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 12:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 08:30 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 00:09:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Has anyone else seen this? Any ideas on the cause, for a bug report? I didn't see the problem, but I have /etc/crypttab on my system. Hum. Well, still can't make it fly here. Here's what I get from 'strace -o dracut.strace dracut /boot/initramfs-3.11.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc20.x86_64.img 3.11.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc20.x86_64' . So this seems to be caused by the same thing that's giving me problems shutting down and suspending: an NFSv4 mount I have in /etc/fstab . Trying to figure out what's going on with that now. FWIW - I'm having nfs4 problems on rawhide as well - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984115 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: cronie rpm error
On 9/26/2013 2:43 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9wvQS9: line 2: fg: no job control error: %preun(cronie-1.4.11-1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package cronie error: cronie-1.4.11-1.fc20.x86_64: erase failed yeah, it's getting pulled. Will need rpm -e --noscripts to remove when the time comes. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: maintaining minimal
On 9/27/2013 6:27 PM, Felix Miata wrote: I'm not having any luck figuring out how Yum can be limited to installing only hard dependencies when any given package is installed, avoiding "nice to have" things that take time to install and update that I'll never use. If this is covered in the yum.conf man page I missed it. In zypper's zypp.conf this is done via InstallRecommends = no. In Mageia, --no-suggests is used with urpmi. How is it handled in Fedora? In Fedora, there are only hard dependencies - no suggests. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Distribution sizes
On 10/10/2013 11:05 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:52:47AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: I'd be nice to have a way to create a local caching "server" that's used by local clients automatically. If a requested package isn't available, the local server gets it from a remote mirror, the client gets the package, yet then it's cached on the server for other clients. Something that just works like this out of the box. Like this https://fedorahosted.org/intelligentmirror/ Probably needs updating. One could also configure Squid or even Apache to effectively do the same thing without any additional software -- see for example http://website-security.info/linux_repository_proxy FWIW - I still use the abandoned InstantMirror locally and still really like it. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
On 10/10/2013 4:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/10/13 21:27, Rex Dieter wrote: Ed Greshko wrote: I download and install LibreOffice directly from their site and there is no failure. The installed packages from Fedora exhibit the failure. Since I'm not a packager/maintainer I'd like to understand how could that happen? Upstream's kde integration... is different/lacking (last I looked, it still built against deprecated kde3 stuff). I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been, introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora? Yes. Fedora packages will be using different libraries as well - upstream probably bundles a bunch of stuff. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: KDM Fedora 20
On 10/16/2013 09:51 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: Did an F20 install with KDE. When I went to System Settings to set auto login like I always do, it was missing. So I discovered ssdm was the display manager, and kdm not even installed. So I installed KDM, configured auto-login as usual, it still wouldn't do auto-login. I discovered I had to change my display-manager to kdm instead of ssdm. Because using KDE, is ssdm still suppose to be the display manger or should kdm had been chosen instead? Or at least the configuring done like normal like it was kdm, and work *with* ssdm instead? The intent is to shift to sddm from kdm for KDE: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM You might want to comment here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998542 I can't use it due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007067 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: springframework - there is no package for F20
On 12/05/2013 05:49 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:05 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: Are there any chances to have this packages [1] for Fedora 20? I know it's only about release number but I don't feel comfortable with packages not targeted at my current system release. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035257 Hi Mateusz, The package failed to build from source (FTBFS) during the mass rebuild[1], and therefore isn't available in the F20+ repositories. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993376 The maintainer should've fixed this up, but hasn't done it yet. You'll have to wait until he does. You can help the maintainer out by co-maintaining the package. It's one of the ways you get sponsored as a fedora packager if you aren't one already: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer I've made a first attempt to fix, but it still doesn't build. This one will need a committed maintainer I think. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
python F23 update testing needed
I've just submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 This update does two things: - Updates python to version 2.7.11 - Splits out the python macros into separate packages It would be helpful if packagers would try building python packages with these packages installed. Plus just testing of python 2.7.11. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: python F23 update testing needed
On 03/31/2016 11:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 21:48 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I've just submitted >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >> >> This update does two things: >> >> - Updates python to version 2.7.11 >> - Splits out the python macros into separate packages > > Is that going to break builds for packages which rely on the macros but > don't depend on the new macro subpackage? No (if it does, it's a bug). redhat-rpm-config and python2/3-devel should have the appropriated requires to bring in the proper macros. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: python F23 update testing needed
On 04/01/2016 08:58 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/31/2016 11:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 21:48 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> I've just submitted >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >>> >>> This update does two things: >>> >>> - Updates python to version 2.7.11 >>> - Splits out the python macros into separate packages >> >> Is that going to break builds for packages which rely on the macros but >> don't depend on the new macro subpackage? > > No (if it does, it's a bug). redhat-rpm-config and python2/3-devel should > have the appropriated requires to bring in the proper macros. I'll also note that this has been in place for quite a while now in F24+, just now back-porting to F23. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Weird bluetooth dependencies in F24 if trying to remove all bluetooth packages
On 04/09/2016 03:46 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi all F24 testers, I don't have any bluetooth hardware on my box, so I tried to remove all *bluetooth* packages: sudo dnf remove *bluetooth*. But dnf will remove a lot of additonal packages: This is probably clean_requirements_on_remove in action. See lots of similar discussions for details... -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: system upgrade problems
problem with installed package mozc-2.23.2815.102-8.fc31.x86_64 - package mozc-2.23.2815.102-8.fc31.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.17()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both protobuf-3.11.2-1.fc32.x86_64 and protobuf-3.6.1-9.fc32.x86_64 - package libarcus-4.4.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package libarcus-4.4.0-1.fc32.x86_64 Problem 20: problem with installed package ibus-mozc-2.23.2815.102-8.fc31.x86_64 - package ibus-mozc-2.23.2815.102-8.fc31.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.17()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both protobuf-3.11.2-1.fc32.x86_64 and protobuf-3.6.1-9.fc32.x86_64 - package libcompizconfig-1:0.8.16-3.fc32.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package libcompizconfig-1:0.8.16-2.fc31.x86_64 Problem 21: package zypper-log-1.14.32-1.fc32.noarch requires zypper = 1.14.32-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libzypp.so.1712()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libzypp.so.1712(ZYPP_plain)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package libzypp-17.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires zypp-common = 17.16.0-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both zypp-common-17.22.0-1.fc32.noarch and zypp-common-17.16.0-1.fc32.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package zypper-log-1.14.32-1.fc32.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package zypp-common-17.16.0-1.fc32.noarch Problem 22: package kiwi-systemdeps-9.19.5-1.fc32.x86_64 requires zypper, but none of the providers can be installed - package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libzypp.so.1712()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libzypp.so.1712(ZYPP_plain)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package libzypp-17.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires zypp-plugins = 17.16.0-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both zypp-plugins-17.22.0-1.fc32.noarch and zypp-plugins-17.16.0-1.fc32.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package zypp-plugins-17.16.0-1.fc32.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package kiwi-systemdeps-9.19.5-1.fc32.x86_64 Problem 23: problem with installed package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 - package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libzypp.so.1712()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package zypper-1.14.32-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libzypp.so.1712(ZYPP_plain)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package libzypp-17.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires zypp-tools = 17.16.0-1.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both zypp-tools-17.22.0-1.fc32.x86_64 and zypp-tools-17.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package zypp-tools-17.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
QA:Updates_Testing
The page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing mentions nothing about modular repos. So the following bugzilla notice from bodhi: FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-8561dc3e3f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-8561dc3e3f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Is not particularly helpful as you need to enable the updates-testing-modular repo. I'm assuming it would be best to mention that in that page - but maybe someone has a different idea about how to handle modular updates? - Orion -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
