Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:27 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > yeah, that's how I'd do it. But actually, I don't run Rawhide
> > anywhere.
> > I tend to switch to the upcoming release soon after the branch event. 
> 
> Do you mean switching by reinstalling?

no, I rarely reinstall. For instance, right now I'm running F14 -
basically, F14 release version. I'll stick with F14 until F15 branches
from Rawhide. Then I'll yum update to F15.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-26 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:13 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> > On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> > >> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
> > >> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
> > >> 3) Yum update from a test release
> > >> 4) Yum update from previous release
> > >>
> > >> I prefer the first two methods.
> > >
> > > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release,
> > because
> > > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> > > dependency.
> > >
> > > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> > >
> > > Qiang
> > >
> 
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:21 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I just want to say that I too miss the ability to do #1.
> 
> Why not try to regain the ability? :) Let's work together to see if it
> is possible.

This is partly a question of whether Rawhide *should* be an installable
release.  For me, one way of answering that would be to ask the
installation developers whether they intend (and are able) to actively
support/maintain an installable rawhide in addition to the active
Branched release (Fedora 14).

For test, I'd much prefer focusing our energy on ensuring the Branched
release meets the Fedora release criteria.  Part of which includes using
different package repos during installation.  Using the branched release
installation images to install a rawhide package set is a perfectly
valid way to install rawhide packages.

Thanks,
james


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Christoph Frieben
2010/10/26 Qiang Li:
> It sounds good. However, would the anaconda contained in boot.iso of the
> most recent install media be too old to support rawhide installation?
> Or, would it be better to grab boot.iso from fedora branched repo, e.g.
> http:///fedora/development/14/x86_64/os/images ?  Have you
> done it like this before?

Yes, indeed, that's the way I proceed when I want to install rawhide
from scratch
and there is no boot.iso image in the rawhide tree. Btw, it is
sufficient and probably
preferrable, too, to simply -add- the rawhide repo. However,
unresolvable conflicts
may occur, but they are rather due to a broken rawhide tree and not due to
anaconda being too old. As I said earlier, grab the most -recent- boot.iso which
actually is the one in ../14/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso. The latest
spin dates back
to yesterday.

~ C
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread He Rui
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:40 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> > 2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> > > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> > 
> > You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
> > rawhide repo during the repo customization stage of anaconda. This
> > approach will work most of the time.
> > 
> > ~C
> 
> It sounds good. However, would the anaconda contained in boot.iso of the
> most recent install media be too old to support rawhide installation?
> Or, would it be better to grab boot.iso from fedora branched repo, e.g.
> http:///fedora/development/14/x86_64/os/images ?  Have you
> done it like this before?
> 
> Looking forward to your reply.
> 
> Qiang

Hi Qiang,

Either boot.iso is ok for installing rawhide, just remember to change
the package repo to point to rawhide. I used to install rawhide by using
boot.iso of previous releases/pre-releases, and it worked as expected. 


Thanks, 
Hurry 

-- 
Contacts

Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe 
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> 2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> 
> You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
> rawhide repo during the repo customization stage of anaconda. This
> approach will work most of the time.
> 
> ~C

It sounds good. However, would the anaconda contained in boot.iso of the
most recent install media be too old to support rawhide installation?
Or, would it be better to grab boot.iso from fedora branched repo, e.g.
http:///fedora/development/14/x86_64/os/images ?  Have you
done it like this before?

Looking forward to your reply.

Qiang

-- 
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No. 17 YuQuan Road
XiaoGan HuBei 432100
China
E-mail:  liqi...@hbvtc.edu.cn

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> yeah, that's how I'd do it. But actually, I don't run Rawhide
> anywhere.
> I tend to switch to the upcoming release soon after the branch event. 

Do you mean switching by reinstalling?

Qiang
-- 
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No. 17 YuQuan Road
XiaoGan HuBei 432100
China
E-mail:  liqi...@hbvtc.edu.cn

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:43 -0400, James Laska wrote:

> Your preferences are no longer available.
> 
> 1) If you'd like to try installing rawhide directly, you're welcome to
> roll your own images (to get started, check out
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_build_a_Rawhide_ISO_image_for_testing)
>  
> 2) Same as above, if you'd like to roll your own live image for Rawhide,
> check out the process we use when creating images for test days
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/Live_Image)
> 
> > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because
> > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> > dependency. 
> 
> I'm not sure the previous options work around these issues.  Rawhide is
> not guaranteed to be free to dependency failures.
> 

Thanks for providing these two useful article. I'll take a try.  

> >  What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> 
> Just as Adam documented, I install F-13 (or current F-14), install
> fedora-release-rawhide and yum --enablerepo=rawhide update.
> 

I did it this way before. I just want to see if there is another way to get 
this job done.

Qiang
-- 
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No. 17 YuQuan Road
XiaoGan HuBei 432100
China
E-mail:  liqi...@hbvtc.edu.cn

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li

> On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> >> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
> >> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
> >> 3) Yum update from a test release
> >> 4) Yum update from previous release
> >>
> >> I prefer the first two methods.
> >
> > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release,
> because
> > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> > dependency.
> >
> > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> >
> > Qiang
> >

On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:21 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I just want to say that I too miss the ability to do #1.

Why not try to regain the ability? :) Let's work together to see if it
is possible.

Qiang

-- 
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No. 17 YuQuan Road
XiaoGan HuBei 432100
China
E-mail:  liqi...@hbvtc.edu.cn

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/25/10 11:57 AM, Qiang Li wrote:
> What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?

Take the boot.iso from the previous release or test release.  Pass it a
'repo=' to a rawhide mirror.  You'll use the install /images/ from
the previous release, but the bits you install will be from rawhide.

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkzGBDsACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVADwCfXmZ0xfe1qpdvoIA2AzZcLoa3
MHoAmwQf2FUvwdBzPD7bOE2FyS1rUjZn
=mnh3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:43 -0400, James Laska wrote:

> > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because
> > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> > dependency. 
> 
> I'm not sure the previous options work around these issues.  Rawhide is
> not guaranteed to be free to dependency failures.

Yeah, I'd say it's actually easier to deal with broken deps by doing the
install-stable-and-update-to-rawhide method than installing rawhide
directly, because the installer really doesn't give you many tools to
deal with broken deps. And if the broken deps are a big enough problem,
we won't actually be able to compose a working Rawhide installer.

> > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> 
> Just as Adam documented, I install F-13 (or current F-14), install
> fedora-release-rawhide and yum --enablerepo=rawhide update.

yeah, that's how I'd do it. But actually, I don't run Rawhide anywhere.
I tend to switch to the upcoming release soon after the branch event.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Christoph Frieben
2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?

You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
rawhide repo during the repo customization stage of anaconda. This
approach will work most of the time.

~C
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:57 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> > 
> > > My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
> > > applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily anaconda build from
> > > James Laska, or using live installer after fedora 14 is released and
> > > before fedora 15 has branched? 
> > 
> > Install Fedora 14, then install the fedora-release-rawhide package to
> > provide the Rawhide repos, enable them, and do 'yum update'.
> > -- 
> > Adam Williamson
> > Fedora QA Community Monkey
> > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
> > http://www.happyassassin.net
> > 
> 
> Hi, Adam,
> 
> As I mentioned above, 
> 
> > 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
> > 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
> > 3) Yum update from a test release 
> > 4) Yum update from previous release 
> > 
> > I prefer the first two methods.

Your preferences are no longer available.

1) If you'd like to try installing rawhide directly, you're welcome to
roll your own images (to get started, check out
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_build_a_Rawhide_ISO_image_for_testing)
 
2) Same as above, if you'd like to roll your own live image for Rawhide,
check out the process we use when creating images for test days
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/Live_Image)

> I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because
> it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> dependency. 

I'm not sure the previous options work around these issues.  Rawhide is
not guaranteed to be free to dependency failures.

> What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?

Just as Adam documented, I install F-13 (or current F-14), install
fedora-release-rawhide and yum --enablerepo=rawhide update.

Thanks,
James


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> If I choose No. 1, this article says "Daily Anaconda builds are no
> longer automatically available in Rawhide, only in Branched code.
> Pre-Alpha Anaconda code is generally not testable, and it is important
> to test the installer that will appear in the next release (since it
> cannot easily be fixed after distribution media has been created)
> rather
> than the release after the next release. Installer images can be
> provided on demand for test days if they are needed but not
> automatically available; please contact James Laska.". I don't know
> how to contact James Laska. 

Heh, I didn't know that I was a recommended contact for this task.  I'll
go out on a limb and say that I'm not the right person to ask about
creating nightly installation rawhide images. :)

I've updated the wiki with the process QA uses when rawhide installation
images are needed for community test events.

Thanks,
James


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
>> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
>> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
>> 3) Yum update from a test release
>> 4) Yum update from previous release
>>
>> I prefer the first two methods.
>
> I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because
> it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
> dependency.
>
> What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
>
> Qiang
>

I just want to say that I too miss the ability to do #1.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> 
> > My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
> > applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily anaconda build from
> > James Laska, or using live installer after fedora 14 is released and
> > before fedora 15 has branched? 
> 
> Install Fedora 14, then install the fedora-release-rawhide package to
> provide the Rawhide repos, enable them, and do 'yum update'.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> 

Hi, Adam,

As I mentioned above, 

> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
> 3) Yum update from a test release 
> 4) Yum update from previous release 
> 
> I prefer the first two methods.

I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, because
it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken
dependency. 

What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?

Qiang

-- 
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No. 17 YuQuan Road
XiaoGan HuBei 432100
China
E-mail:  liqi...@hbvtc.edu.cn

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:

> My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
> applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily anaconda build from
> James Laska, or using live installer after fedora 14 is released and
> before fedora 15 has branched? 

Install Fedora 14, then install the fedora-release-rawhide package to
provide the Rawhide repos, enable them, and do 'yum update'.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Rawhide installation question

2010-10-25 Thread Qiang Li
Hi,

I would like to do a fresh rawhide installation and referred to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide. Four ways are mentioned
in this article,
1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer
3) Yum update from a test release 
4) Yum update from previous release 

I prefer the first two methods. 

If I choose No. 1, this article says "Daily Anaconda builds are no
longer automatically available in Rawhide, only in Branched code.
Pre-Alpha Anaconda code is generally not testable, and it is important
to test the installer that will appear in the next release (since it
cannot easily be fixed after distribution media has been created) rather
than the release after the next release. Installer images can be
provided on demand for test days if they are needed but not
automatically available; please contact James Laska.". I don't know how
to contact James Laska.

If I choose No. 2, this article says "This method only works after
Fedora 13 is released, and before Fedora 14 has branched. See the
release schedule for appropriate timing. Once branched, follow the
instructions at Branched.". According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/14, Fedora 14 had branched on
2010/07/27. Then I followed the instruction and checked
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched. This article describes
how to install branched fedora which is not what I want.

My question is what option I have if the first two ways are not
applicable? Ask for boot.iso that contains daily anaconda build from
James Laska, or using live installer after fedora 14 is released and
before fedora 15 has branched? 

Any suggestion would be appreciated.

Qiang
-- 
Qiang Li
HuBei Polytechnic Institute
No. 17 YuQuan Road
XiaoGan HuBei 432100
China
E-mail:  liqi...@hbvtc.edu.cn

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test