Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
 Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
 status is unclear:
 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985

A follow up to this: a boot.iso with a proposed fix for this bug is
available at http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso . If you were
affected by this issue, please test this and let us know if it works
okay. Even if you weren't affected by the bug, if you have a bit of
spare time, it would be valuable if you can try the boot.iso and just
confirm it works alright on non-affected systems (as long as you can get
to the graphical portion of the install process, that's fine: you don't
need to actually install).

Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-16 Thread He Rui
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
  Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
  status is unclear:
  
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
 
 A follow up to this: a boot.iso with a proposed fix for this bug is
 available at http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso . If you were
 affected by this issue, please test this and let us know if it works
 okay. Even if you weren't affected by the bug, if you have a bit of
 spare time, it would be valuable if you can try the boot.iso and just
 confirm it works alright on non-affected systems (as long as you can get
 to the graphical portion of the install process, that's fine: you don't
 need to actually install).
 
 Thanks!

Good news! This boot.iso works nicely on my workstation (ATI
Technologies Inc RV620 LE [Radeon HD 3450]) which had to disable kms on
previous Alpha builds. Will update it on the bug report.


Thanks!
Hurry

-- 
Contacts

Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe 
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-16 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
 Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
 status is unclear:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985

 A follow up to this: a boot.iso with a proposed fix for this bug is
 available at http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso . If you were
 affected by this issue, please test this and let us know if it works
 okay. Even if you weren't affected by the bug, if you have a bit of
 spare time, it would be valuable if you can try the boot.iso and just
 confirm it works alright on non-affected systems (as long as you can get
 to the graphical portion of the install process, that's fine: you don't
 need to actually install).

Just added my results to bz#596985 (starting with c#87) -
unfortunately RC4 and this boot.iso result in the same for me (HD
5850): blank screen. Wondering if c#90 is of any significance.

-- red
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 11:22 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have an ATI Mobility Radeon X300 based laptop (x86) and tried to
 boot the boot.iso by using livecd-iso-to-disk but the installer could
 not see the image (CD/DVD not present, other options NFS, local disk -
 not including the USB device, URL, etc) once the laptop booted from
 usb. It did not make it as far as X. Is it necessary to burn a DVD to
 try this test? I'm trying the live CD next but that wasn't part of the
 test.

Shouldn't happen like that, but that sounds like a different bug. Not
entirely sure what, though. We do have all the test results we need now,
though, so you can stand down - thanks for trying!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread François Cami
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
 status is unclear:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985

 Two reporters in the bug - John Reiser and Mike Chambers - and one
 reporter from the list - Rui He,
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-August/092583.html -
 report that the screen is blanked when the installer starts X on various
 Radeon adapters when booted with default options. The system is still
 running and you can switch to a virtual console to get logs - see
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985#c36 - but the screen
 is permanently blank until reboot. When booted with 'basic video driver'
 - which, due to an anaconda bug, actually results in the use of the
 radeon driver, but with kernel modesetting disabled - the installer is
 able to run X normally, for all three. One further reporter, Chuck
 Forsberg -
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-August/092581.html -
 had problems with both default and 'basic video mode' (radeon+UMS).

 Jerome Glisse reports that he was able to start X and see the display in
 the installer with one or some of his own test cards.

 What we need here is more data. So it would be really useful if everyone
 on this list with a Radeon video adapter could test this. It's fairly
 quick and easy and doesn't require you to actually complete an install.
 Just get the boot.iso for RC3 (currently) or RC4 (later today, likely) -
 the boot.iso for RC3 is at
 http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Alpha.RC3/Fedora/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso
  or 
 http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Alpha.RC3/Fedora/i386/os/images/boot.iso
  - boot it, and see if you can make it to the graphical stage of the 
 installation process. Please reply here, and if you observe the same problem 
 as the reporters, add your details to the bug report (also test the 'basic 
 graphics driver' choice, and report whether you used rc3 or rc4, and x86-64 
 or i386). Thanks!

OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

Cheers

François
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
the impact of this is.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

 Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
 monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
 the impact of this is.

Just tested the boot.iso you mentioned earlier on an Acer laptop 
(TM6465WLMi) with an ATI X1300 videocard and it fails miserably when X 
is started. The screen becomes totally greenish it first fading to 
something more white. Looks quite scary so I quickly took a photo and 
switched of the laptop. Picture here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~pjl/tmp/F14_screen_with_X_started.jpg

Regards,
Patrick

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread François Cami
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Patrick Lists
fedora-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
 On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

 Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
 monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
 the impact of this is.

 Just tested the boot.iso you mentioned earlier on an Acer laptop
 (TM6465WLMi) with an ATI X1300 videocard and it fails miserably when X
 is started. The screen becomes totally greenish it first fading to
 something more white.

What happens when you add radeon.modeset=0 on the CD command line?

--
fdc
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

 Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
 monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
 the impact of this is.

Also tested a box with a Gigabyte X58 board and an ATI HD 5970 PCI-E 
card and when X starts the screen goes black then I see a popup from the 
monitor that no signal was detected. Then nothing. The screen stays 
black and the led on the monitor goes orange which is basically saying 
it's got nothing to do. The monitor is an Iiyama Prolite B2409 HDS 
connected via a DVI cable.

Regards,
Patrick
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/13/2010 12:12 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
 On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

 Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
 monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
 the impact of this is.

 Also tested a box with a Gigabyte X58 board and an ATI HD 5970 PCI-E
 card and when X starts the screen goes black then I see a popup from the
 monitor that no signal was detected. Then nothing. The screen stays
 black and the led on the monitor goes orange which is basically saying
 it's got nothing to do. The monitor is an Iiyama Prolite B2409 HDS
 connected via a DVI cable.

Maybe the output of lspci -v of the card is of use:

09:00.0 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Device 689c
Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc Device 2042
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 55
Memory at d000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Memory at fb6e (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
I/O ports at 8e00 [size=256]
Expansion ROM at fb60 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [58] Express Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [a0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [100] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=010 
?
Capabilities: [150] Advanced Error Reporting
Kernel driver in use: radeon
Kernel modules: radeon

Will also try radeon.modeset=0 and report back.

Regards,
Patrick


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 08/12/2010 01:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
 status is unclear:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985

 Two reporters in the bug - John Reiser and Mike Chambers - and one
 reporter from the list - Rui He,
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-August/092583.html -
 report that the screen is blanked when the installer starts X on various
 Radeon adapters when booted with default options. The system is still
 running and you can switch to a virtual console to get logs - see
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985#c36 - but the screen
 is permanently blank until reboot. When booted with 'basic video driver'
 - which, due to an anaconda bug, actually results in the use of the
 radeon driver, but with kernel modesetting disabled - the installer is
 able to run X normally, for all three. One further reporter, Chuck
 Forsberg -
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-August/092581.html -
 had problems with both default and 'basic video mode' (radeon+UMS).

 Jerome Glisse reports that he was able to start X and see the display in
 the installer with one or some of his own test cards.

 What we need here is more data. So it would be really useful if everyone
 on this list with a Radeon video adapter could test this. It's fairly
 quick and easy and doesn't require you to actually complete an install.
 Just get the boot.iso for RC3 (currently) or RC4 (later today, likely) -
 the boot.iso for RC3 is at
 http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Alpha.RC3/Fedora/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso
  or 
 http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Alpha.RC3/Fedora/i386/os/images/boot.iso
  - boot it, and see if you can make it to the graphical stage of the 
 installation process. Please reply here, and if you observe the same problem 
 as the reporters, add your details to the bug report (also test the 'basic 
 graphics driver' choice, and report whether you used rc3 or rc4, and x86-64 
 or i386). Thanks!

Using nomodeset allows x to start on a:

$ lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD 
2600 Series]

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/13/2010 12:04 AM, François Cami wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Patrick Lists
 fedora-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl  wrote:
 On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

 Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
 monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
 the impact of this is.

 Just tested the boot.iso you mentioned earlier on an Acer laptop
 (TM6465WLMi) with an ATI X1300 videocard and it fails miserably when X
 is started. The screen becomes totally greenish it first fading to
 something more white.

 What happens when you add radeon.modeset=0 on the CD command line?

I see this twice. Don't know if that's relevant but just in case:
Detecting hardware
Waiting for hardware to initialize
Detecting hardware
Waiting for hardware to initialize

Then it wants to start X, screen goes black, flickers a couple of times 
and then the kernel crashes.

Pictures here:

http://www.xs4all.nl/~pjl/tmp/20100813_001.jpg
http://www.xs4all.nl/~pjl/tmp/20100813_002.jpg
http://www.xs4all.nl/~pjl/tmp/20100813_003.jpg
http://www.xs4all.nl/~pjl/tmp/20100813_004.jpg

Regards,
Patrick




-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/13/2010 12:23 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
[snip]
 Using nomodeset allows x to start on a:

 $ lspci | grep VGA
 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD
 2600 Series]

Is nomodeset different from radeon.modeset=0? In other words should I 
test this too besides radeon.modeset=0?

Regards,
Patrick

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for testing: F14 Alpha RC3/RC4 with Radeon graphics adapters

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/13/2010 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 23:59 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
 On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:

 OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
 I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.

 Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
 monitor, but the testing is still useful to help us figure out how wide
 the impact of this is.

 Just tested the boot.iso you mentioned earlier on an Acer laptop
 (TM6465WLMi) with an ATI X1300 videocard and it fails miserably when X
 is started. The screen becomes totally greenish it first fading to
 something more white. Looks quite scary so I quickly took a photo and
 switched of the laptop. Picture here:
 http://www.xs4all.nl/~pjl/tmp/F14_screen_with_X_started.jpg

 Interesting. Seems somewhat different from the reported bug, though.
 Could you test one of the RC3.1 live images and see if they do the same?
 Thanks!

Acer laptop TM6465WMLi with X1300:

The RC3.1 x86_64 live image boots fine into KMS mode. I can see the 
Fedora logo getting whiter in steps from bottom left towards the top 
right. I used a cd that was too small for the image (used overburn) so 
didn't get to the actual desktop. If that's important let me know and 
I'll burn it on a dvd.

Regards,
Patrick
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test