test-perl-framework test fails for apache 2.0
Hi Stas, I installed apache httpd and the usual Apache::TestBundle. Finally when I run the tests, I get this error in ssl/http.t module Anyone has idea about what might be missing in the configuration or is it a bug in apache 2.0? This is the error I get:: --- ssl/http.response had protocol HTTP/0.9 (headers not sent?) at ssl/http.t line 27 dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 170) line 1, near 'int' $__val DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay (Missing operator before $__val?) -- Please help Abhishek
Re: test-perl-framework test fails for apache 2.0
Abhishek Khandelwal wrote: Hi Stas, I installed apache httpd and the usual Apache::TestBundle. Finally when I run the tests, I get this error in ssl/http.t module Anyone has idea about what might be missing in the configuration or is it a bug in apache 2.0? This is the error I get:: --- ssl/http.response had protocol HTTP/0.9 (headers not sent?) at ssl/http.t line 27 dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 170) line 1, near 'int' $__val DIED. FAILED tests 1-2 Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay (Missing operator before $__val?) -- May be you don't have LWP installed? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Re: test-perl-framework test fails for apache 2.0
Abhishek Khandelwal wrote: I am not sure about it? How do I check whether its installed or not? perl -MLWP -le 'print LWP-VERSION' In case it is not installed how do I install? would be from CPAN.. install LWP? yup -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Re: t_cmp oddities
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:56:06AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Yes, I'm aware of this problem too. I sometimes use a different workaround.
Using Geoff's one liner:
OK, I'll use this method.
Also William can you check what Test::More does to deal with this problem?
Eventually we may drop t_cmp completely and move into Test::More, whose API
is much reacher and you better use it from the very beginning instead of
Apache::TestUtil, if you can afford requiring Test::More.
All tests in the following script pass:
-
use Test::More tests = 2;
# Test scripts for Stas
is (
undef,
get_undef,
Retrieve undef from subroutine
);
my $rv = get_undef;
is (
undef,
$rv,
Retrieve undef from subroutine - use variable for
comparison
);
sub get_undef {
return;
}
-
I like that idea of adopting all of T::M. However, does T::M have a
comparable function to t_cmp that gives the expected and received
values? I *really* like the verbose output that t_cmp gives!
William
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
