Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
@ if (my $custom_config_path = custom_config_path()) { debug loading custom config data from: '$custom_config_path'; $custom_config_loaded++; +($candidate) = $candidate=~/^(.*)/; # launder for -T require $custom_config_path; huh? something is definitely wrong here - there is no $candidate in the scope of the current function, so this actually fails with errors. $ perl Makefile.PL -apxs /apache/2.0/prefork/perl-5.8.5/bin/apxs Global symbol $candidate requires explicit package name at lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm line 2080. --Geoff
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geoff 2004/10/28 07:33:56 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test Changes perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm Log: revert last change to keep things compiling sorry stas if you would have gotten to this quickly, but I thought it was a good idea to keep things in cvs compiling and gozer said you would be offline for a few days due to a crazy landlord or something :) --Geoff
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/t/security CAN-2004-0940.t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/10/25 06:04:14 Modified:perl-framework/t/conf extra.conf.in Added: perl-framework/t/htdocs/security CAN-2004-0940.shtml perl-framework/t/security CAN-2004-0940.t Log: Regression test for CAN-2004-0940, 1.3 mod_include overflow. hi joe :) I get the following failures on 1.3.32 but not on 1.3.33. t/modules/rewrite.t 222 9.09% 18 20 t/security/CAN-2004-0940.t11 100.00% 1 t/security/CAN-2004-0958.t92 22.22% 1 3 I think these are all recent additions from you. should each of these failures be skipped unless something like ( have_apache(1) have_min_apache_version(1.3.33) ) || ( have_apache(2) have_min_apache_version(2.0.XX) ) ? --Geoff
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/t/security CAN-2004-0940.t
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: I get the following failures on 1.3.32 but not on 1.3.33. t/modules/rewrite.t 222 9.09% 18 20 t/security/CAN-2004-0940.t11 100.00% 1 t/security/CAN-2004-0958.t92 22.22% 1 3 I think these are all recent additions from you. should each of these failures be skipped unless something like ( have_apache(1) have_min_apache_version(1.3.33) ) || ( have_apache(2) have_min_apache_version(2.0.XX) ) I don't think so -- it's detecting an actual legitimate failure. It's not that the test requires a new version to work right, it's that that particular version was broken. No sense obfuscating that fact. --Cliff
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
Geoffrey Young wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geoff 2004/10/28 07:33:56 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test Changes perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm Log: revert last change to keep things compiling sorry stas if you would have gotten to this quickly, but I thought it was a good idea to keep things in cvs compiling and gozer said you would be offline for a few days due to a crazy landlord or something :) That's exactly right. you did the right thing. I'm still relying on a anonymous friendly neighbour somewhere on the same block to get my oxygen. One day we will be able to get online in a matter of seconds... -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com