[STATUS] (perl-framework) Wed Nov 3 23:45:43 EST 2004
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $] Stuff to do: * finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if framework failed) * change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g., t/modules/access.t) to *not* do that; instead, have Makefile.PL prepare appropriate subdirectory configs for them. Why? So t/TEST can be used to test a remote server. * problems with -d perl mode, doesn't work as documented Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 12:58:33 +0800 Subject: Re: perldb Tests to be written: * t/apache - simulations of network failures (incomplete POST bodies, chunked and unchunked; missing POST bodies; slooow client connexions, such as taking 1 minute to send 1KiB; ...) * t/modules/autoindex - something seems possibly broken with inheritance on 2.0 * t/ssl - SSLPassPhraseDialog exec: - SSLRandomSeed exec:
[STATUS] (flood) Wed Nov 3 23:45:37 EST 2004
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13, 2001 milestone-01: Tagged July 11, 2001 (tag lost during transfer) RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: * Everything needs to work perfectly Other bugs that need fixing: * I get a SIGBUS on Darwin with our examples/round-robin-ssl.xml config, on the second URL. I'm using OpenSSL 0.9.6c 21 dec 2001. * iPlanet sends Content-length - there is a hack in there now to recognize it. However, all HTTP headers need to be normalized before checking their values. This isn't easy to do. Grr. * OpenSSL 0.9.6 Segfaults under high load. Upgrade to OpenSSL 0.9.6b. Aaron says: I just found a big bug that might have been causing this all along (we weren't closing ssl sockets). How can I reproduce the problem you were seeing to verify if this was the fix? * SEGVs when /tmp/.rnd doesn't exist are bad. Make it configurable and at least bomb with a good error message. (See Doug's patch.) Status: This is fixed, no? * If APR has disabled threads, flood should as well. We might want to have an enable/disable parameter that does this also, providing an error if threads are desired but not available. * flood needs to clear pools more often. With a long running test it can chew up memory very quickly. We should just bite the bullet and create/destroy/clear pools for each level of our model: farm, farmer, profile, url/request-cycle, etc. * APR needs to have a unified interface for ephemeral port exhaustion, but aparently Solaris and Linux return different errors at the moment. Fix this in APR then take advantage of it in flood. * The examples/analyze-relative scripts fail when there are less than 5 unique URLs. Other features that need writing: * More analysis and graphing scripts are needed * Write robust tool (using tethereal perhaps) to take network dumps and convert them to flood's XML format. Status: Justin volunteers. Aaron had a script somewhere that is a start. Jacek is working on a Mozilla application, codename Flood URL bag (much like Live HTTP Headers) and small HTTP proxy. * Get chunked encoding support working. Status: Justin volunteers. He got sidetracked by the httpd implementation of input filtering and never finished this. This is a stopgap until apr-serf is completed. * Maybe we should make randfile and capath runtime directives that come out of the XML, instead of autoconf parameters. * We are using apr_os_thread_current() and getpid() in some places when what we really want is a GUID. The GUID will be used to correlate raw output data with each farmer. We may wish to print a unique ID for each of farm, farmer, profile, and url to help in postprocessing. * We are using strtol() in some places and strtoll() in others. Pick one (Aaron says strtol(), but he's not sure). * Validation of responses (known C-L, specific strings in response) Status: Justin volunteers * HTTP error codes (ie. teach it about 302s) Justin says: Yeah, this won't be with round_robin as implemented. Need a linked list-based profile where we can insert new URLs into the sequence. * Farmer (Single-thread, multiple profiles) Status: Aaron says: If you have threads, then any Farmer can be run as part of any Farm. If you don't have threads, you can currently only run one Farmer named Joe right now (this will be changed so that if you don't have threads, flood will attempt to run all Farmers in serial under one process). * Collective (Single-host, multiple farms) This is a number of Farms that have been fork()ed into child processes. * Megaconglomerate (Multiple hosts each running a collective) This is a number of Collectives running on a number of hosts, invoked via RSH/SSH or maybe even some proprietary mechanism. * Other types of urllists a) Random / Random-weighted b) Sequenced (useful with cookie propogation) c) Round-robin d) Chaining of the above strategies Status: Round-robin is complete. * Other types of reports Status: Aaron says: simple reports are functional. Justin added a new type that simply prints the approx. timestamp when the test was run, and the result as OK/FAIL; it is called easy reports (see flood_easy_reports.h). Furthermore,
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestMM.pm
At 10:35 AM 11/4/2004, Geoffrey Young wrote:
-TEST_VERBOSE ?= 0
+TEST_VERBOSE = 0
why not if (WIN32) {} then?
do win32 environments add some magic WIN32 environment variable I can check
in the Makefile? if they do and we can work around them that's cool with me.
If I had to guess, this borks anything but gmake. Test for that.
Bill
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestMM.pm
If I had to guess, this borks anything but gmake. Test for that. I had asked on #asf about this and somebody (I forget who) said that the make manpage on minortaur (some bsd variant) supports ?= as well. from looking at that it seems to be the manpage for pmake, which I guess is some other make variant. so limiting it to gmake at least would seem to wipe out bsd folks. a little digging on my own at the time made it seem like solaris make is really gmake, so between linux, solaris, and bsd a decent case was being made that most unix make variants to support the syntax. of course, that list of 3 was hardly exhaustive :) anyway, this just isn't my area, so I'm happy to defer to others that grok all this SA-type stuff. but if most unix-variants support ?=, or if there is another more universal way to work around the issue, I would hate to see the correct behavior only for unix people using gmake. --Geoff
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestMM.pm
At 11:23 AM 11/4/2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: If I had to guess, this borks anything but gmake. Test for that. I had asked on #asf about this and somebody (I forget who) said that the make manpage on minortaur (some bsd variant) supports ?= as well. from looking at that it seems to be the manpage for pmake, which I guess is some other make variant. so limiting it to gmake at least would seem to wipe out bsd folks. Ok, looks good for pmake, yes... however... a little digging on my own at the time made it seem like solaris make is really gmake Well, the way you have it installed perhaps. But attempting this against /usr/ccs/bin/make it most definately blows up. , so between linux, solaris, and bsd a decent case was being made that most unix make variants to support the syntax. of course, that list of 3 was hardly exhaustive :) Hardly. The man page for hpux 11 make makes no mention of ?= nor does AIX 5.1. you are 2 for 5. Explicitly fails on native make(s) on AIX 5.1, HPUX 11, Solaris 2.6. Please find another solution. Bill p.s. simple test I used... TERM ?= uberterm all: echo $(TERM)
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestMM.pm
Geoffrey Young wrote: a little digging on my own at the time made it seem like solaris make is really gmake, so between linux, solaris, and bsd a decent case was being made that most unix make variants to support the syntax. of course, that list of 3 was hardly exhaustive :) Umm, on all the solaris systems I've used make is in fact not gmake, there are a number of solaris specific differences. This is at least true on solaris 2.6 through solaris 8. I'm not sure about 9 or 10. -garrett
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestMM.pm
a little digging on my own at the time made it seem like solaris make is really gmake Well, the way you have it installed perhaps. But attempting this against /usr/ccs/bin/make it most definately blows up. ok. I actually don't have a solaris box to try on - I just went to sun's support site and saw that the manpage for make was gmake (at least the one that google first pointed me toward :) , so between linux, solaris, and bsd a decent case was being made that most unix make variants to support the syntax. of course, that list of 3 was hardly exhaustive :) Hardly. The man page for hpux 11 make makes no mention of ?= nor does AIX 5.1. you are 2 for 5. yeah, not good. Explicitly fails on native make(s) on AIX 5.1, HPUX 11, Solaris 2.6. Please find another solution. well, the solution at the moment is to not have a solution - cvs has been reverted, so unless a real solution can be found it will remain a minor nit. p.s. simple test I used... TERM ?= uberterm all: echo $(TERM) the gmake manual suggests that ?= is equivalent to ifeq ($(origin TEST_VERBOSE), undefined) TEST_VERBOSE = 0 endif so that might make for a good test - the gmake manual didn't speficially say that origin was explicit to it, but then again it didn't mention ?= either :) --Geoff
