Re: Begging your pardons,

2001-12-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 12:30 PM


> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 PM
> >
> > but is anyone familiar with the following failure cases on win32?
> >
> > modules\access..FAILED tests 4, 20-21, 24, 26, 28, 30, 38, 55, 72, 89,
> 106-1
> > 07, 123-124, 141, 154, 168, 170, 175, 192, 209, 226, 277, 290, 304, 306,
> 311, 32
> > 8, 345, 362
> > Failed 31/408 tests, 92.40% okay
> >
> > modules\dav.FAILED test 4
> > Failed 1/14 tests, 92.86% okay
> >
> > modules\negotiation.FAILED tests 1-3, 24-26, 70-72
> > Failed 9/98 tests, 90.82% okay
> >
> [ ... ]
> 
> I didn't have dav nor ssl set up, but with the latest cvs apache-2 all the
> access and negotiation tests passed on my Win98 machine. I've seen in
> some cases that a failure in an early test may cause latter tests to
> fail that otherwise would have passed (eg, by running tests individually).

I've seen this as well... dav failed just the one bit, and then started failing
near entirely for me.  Seems the test suite, or the server, is only semistable.
I tend to suspect the test suite :)

OTOH, the negotiation tests are most definately the result of my recent patches
to the server, and I need to look at those cases in-depth, to see how the tests
(or what I've gone and broke.)  Certainly new tests are needed for the several
ForceLanguagePriority options.  Ken's proposing that the document size test
becomes optional, in which case these will change once again.  And I've 
suggested
that we allow the old behavior [of falling back on the order the client has
presented the accept-langauage] as an option, which will change it again.

Hopefully all the details are threshed out soon.  The patch couldn't wait - the
multilanguage error documents were really hurting us.

Bill




Re: Begging your pardons,

2001-12-30 Thread Randy Kobes

- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 PM
Subject: Begging your pardons,


>
> but is anyone familiar with the following failure cases on win32?
>
> modules\access..FAILED tests 4, 20-21, 24, 26, 28, 30, 38, 55, 72, 89,
106-1
> 07, 123-124, 141, 154, 168, 170, 175, 192, 209, 226, 277, 290, 304, 306,
311, 32
> 8, 345, 362
> Failed 31/408 tests, 92.40% okay
>
> modules\dav.FAILED test 4
> Failed 1/14 tests, 92.86% okay
>
> modules\negotiation.FAILED tests 1-3, 24-26, 70-72
> Failed 9/98 tests, 90.82% okay
>
[ ... ]

I didn't have dav nor ssl set up, but with the latest cvs apache-2 all the
access and negotiation tests passed on my Win98 machine. I've seen in
some cases that a failure in an early test may cause latter tests to
fail that otherwise would have passed (eg, by running tests individually).

best regards,
randy kobes




Re: Begging your pardons,

2001-12-29 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> 
> but is anyone familiar with the following failure cases on win32?

all tests were passing for me on win32 before i left on 12/23.
(i won't have access to a win32 box again until 1/4.)
for ssl tests to pass, this line needs to be commented out of
t/conf/ssl/ssl.conf until the broken scoreboard seeding is fixed:
SSLRandomSeed connect builtin

make sure everything is up-to-date and squeeky clean.