Re: tetex 2.0 auf SuSE 8.1 (was: Compiling 2.0)

2003-02-11 Thread Daniel Büchner
Am Die, 2003-02-11 um 10.07 schrieb Axel Thimm:
 Hallo Daniel,
 
 wie baust du denn tetex, über rpms? Könntest du die src.rpm von
 http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/tetex/ ausprobieren (Anleitung steht auf der
 Seite)? Bei SuSE 8.1 dürften sogar die binary rpms gehen, da die glibc
 kompatibel ist.
 
Hi Axel
Built from tar.gz (either gcc 3.2.1. and 3.2.2.from
/usr/source/packages...) - make all/world works fine  without any
trouble (no mistakes) until entering oxdvik (builts without oxdivk and
subsequently xdvi compile something -- but texhash / -config start to
complain bitterly about missing xdvi...)

From the message:
...
/usr/lib/libXpm.so.4: undefined reference to `_fxstat' collect2: ld
returned 1 exit status
...

I would think that ther might be some trouble with gcc (as it is said to
compile with gcc 2.95...) - but as I said: I'm not really a programmer,
and don't really know where to look for hints...

I'm not sure whether I like to download from the above site - just a bit
too much, my telephone bill is already outragous...

Thanks so far
Daniel
-- 

~~~ curach bhan publications  // Daniel Buechner
~~~ Roelveder Strasse 15  // D-58091 Hagen  //   Germany
~~~ Fon: +49-(0)2337-8172//   Fax: +49-(0)2337-8031

~~~ http://www.curach-bhan.de




dvipdft is missing?

2003-02-11 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
Hi all,

We, tetex maintainers of Debian, got the bug which said
that teTeX 2.0 included dvipdfm but a wrapper script
dvipdft was missing (in the teTeX 2.0 source tree).

civic:~/misc/pack/teTeX/ORIG$ tar ztvf tetex-src-2.0.tar.gz | grep dvipdft
civic:~/misc/pack/teTeX/ORIG$ 

Apparently, dvipdft was referenced in a manual page of dvipdfm.
Is there any chance that dvipdft will be included in teTeX?

Best regards,2003.2.12(Wed)

-- 
 Debian Developer  Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima