Re: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams

[Don Simons]

Jean-Pierre, I'm sorry but I don't understand the question. The staff-jumping 
problem is not from the Soler quintet. Andre posted his original question to 
the MusiXTeX list on 6 September with this subject line (see below), and I 
responded the same day with a TeX fix.

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-
> bounces+dsimons=roadrunner@tug.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Pierre
> Coulon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 11:17 PM
> To: Werner Icking Music Archive 
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams
> 
> At which page and measure of the Anglès edition do you have this?
> 
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Don Simons wrote:
> 
> > I’ve more or less finished the Soler quintet transcription so now I’m
> > looking into this. But so far I’m hung up, because PMX needs to insert
> > the
> > \tbbl1 before the 1/16 note just before the staff jump, so it would
> > somehow have to look into the future to know that the multiplicity of
> > the beam was going to decrease right at the jump. It’s probably possible,
> but tricky.
> > After all, PMX has no trouble decreasing multiplicity when needed
> > within a non-staff jumping beam. So it must look ahead there, although
> > it is in the same voice. I’ll have to review that logic.
> >
> >
> >
> > --Don
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Don Simons [mailto:dsim...@roadrunner.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:36 PM
> > To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
> > Subject: RE: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams
> >
> >
> >
> > Andre, thanks very much for the report. I’ve compiled this with PMX 2.87
> and see that only minor corrections are needed to make it come out OK (see
> attachment). I’ll definitely put this on my PMX to-do list but I won’t be able
> to get serious about it until next week…I’m working on transcribing a Soler
> quintet for strings+harpsichord into a 2-harpsichord version, and I have
> another harpsichordist coming over on Saturday to play thru the first draft.
> >
> >
> >
> > --Don
> >
> >
> >
> > From: TeX-Music
> > [mailto:tex-music-bounces+dsimons=roadrunner@tug.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > Andre Van Ryckeghem
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:28 AM
> > To: Werner Icking Music Archive  >  >
> > Subject: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I know, we already discussed this, but perhaps this problem can be solved?
> >
> > In each bar in the example, the last note of the staaf crossing beam should
> be an 8th. It happen only in the 1st bar.
> >
> >
> >
> > Andre
> >
> > ===
> >
> > 2 2 3 8 3 8 0 0
> >
> > 1 1 20 0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > bt
> >
> > .\
> >
> > Abpe
> >
> > w5i
> >
> > [l+14 g1- cs ]j rb4 | [ d1 d+ ]j  rb4 | [u a1 za- ]j rb rb4 /
> >
> > rb8 [ju g1+ g zb g8 ] | rb8 [ju d8 zf ] rb |  rb1 [ju e c8 ze ] rb //
> >
> > r4d r4d r4d /
> >
> > ===
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Jean-Pierre
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Re: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams

[Jean-Pierre Coulon]

At which page and measure of the Anglès edition do you have this?

On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Don Simons wrote:

I’ve more or less finished the Soler quintet transcription so now I’m 
looking into this. But so far I’m hung up, because PMX needs to insert the 
\tbbl1 before the 1/16 note just before the staff jump, so it would somehow 
have to look into the future to know that the multiplicity of the beam was 
going to decrease right at the jump. It’s probably possible, but tricky. 
After all, PMX has no trouble decreasing multiplicity when needed within a 
non-staff jumping beam. So it must look ahead there, although it is in the 
same voice. I’ll have to review that logic.




--Don



From: Don Simons [mailto:dsim...@roadrunner.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:36 PM
To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
Subject: RE: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams



Andre, thanks very much for the report. I’ve compiled this with PMX 2.87 and 
see that only minor corrections are needed to make it come out OK (see 
attachment). I’ll definitely put this on my PMX to-do list but I won’t be able 
to get serious about it until next week…I’m working on transcribing a Soler 
quintet for strings+harpsichord into a 2-harpsichord version, and I have 
another harpsichordist coming over on Saturday to play thru the first draft.



--Don



From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-bounces+dsimons=roadrunner@tug.org] On 
Behalf Of Andre Van Ryckeghem
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:28 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive mailto:tex-music@tug.org> >
Subject: [Tex-music] more staff crossing beams



Hi all,



I know, we already discussed this, but perhaps this problem can be solved?

In each bar in the example, the last note of the staaf crossing beam should be 
an 8th. It happen only in the 1st bar.



Andre

===

2 2 3 8 3 8 0 0

1 1 20 0





bt

.\

Abpe

w5i

[l+14 g1- cs ]j rb4 | [ d1 d+ ]j  rb4 | [u a1 za- ]j rb rb4 /

rb8 [ju g1+ g zb g8 ] | rb8 [ju d8 zf ] rb |  rb1 [ju e c8 ze ] rb //

r4d r4d r4d /

===




--
Jean-Pierre

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music