Re: [Tex-music] Re: pmx - Postscript hairpins in 2 inputblocks

2004-01-19 Thread Christian Mondrup
Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote:
As you know it, pmx can use D< ... D< only in the same input block. But
when you introduce a meter change, you need two separate blocks. So, you
can't use the pmx command D< and you have to code the crescendos with inline
TeX commands.
This means that i cannot have postscript hairpins on this?
As far as I can see you _do_ get postscript hairpins with Olivier's in-line 
TeX expressions. To verify that you may try commenting out the pmx 'Apl' 
directive and see what happens when you TeX compile the outcome of the 
pmxab processing step.

Bye
--
Christian Mondrup, Computer Programmer
Scandiatransplant, Skejby Hospital, University Hospital of Aarhus
Brendstrupgaardsvej, DK 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Phone: +45 89 49 53 01 - http://www.scandiatransplant.org
___
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


[Tex-music] Re: pmx - Postscript hairpins in 2 inputblocks

2004-01-18 Thread Andre Van Ryckeghem
> As you know it, pmx can use D< ... D< only in the same input block. But
when you introduce a meter change, you need two separate blocks. So, you
can't use the pmx command D< and you have to code the crescendos with inline
TeX commands.

This means that i cannot have postscript hairpins on this?

Andre

___
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music