Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-22 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM,   wrote:
> Please take me off cave tex...thanks
>


Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-21 Thread mmcart1061
Please take me off cave tex...thanks
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith 
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:39:32 
To: Mark Alman
Cc: Rod Goke; TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

No matter what type of archive you use, be it tape, external drive,  
online storage, offline internal drives or cd/DVD, it's imperative to  
have redundancy and test your backups routinely.   Any large company  
does this.  Also, never store both copies in the same location.  A  
house fire is terrible, but you wouldn't want to lose both copies at  
once.

I'm in the process of setting up a mirrored raid setup over a VPN, and  
while my offsite storage isn't ideal for a true disaster due to  
distance, I feel I'm reasonably protected.  You ideally want 50 miles  
separation for disaster recovery site and I'm at about 15

Anyway, you can easily mix and match media, copy on an external drive  
and also on an internal.  Or external and DVD

A backup is only as good as your last tested restore.  Nothing is  
worse than trying to restore some lost data and your backup drive  
fails, or the cd isn't readable.  It's important to test your backups  
routinely.

Charles



On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Mark Alman  wrote:

> Because they crash, too, Rod.
>
> I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is  
> lost now.
>
>
> Mark
>
> From: Rod Goke 
> To: TexasCavers 
> Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
>
> Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard  
> disk drives instead?
>



RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Rod Goke
It's good to know about this service in case you ever need it and can afford it, but you can buy a lot of external drives for multiple backups at less cost than one data recovery operation of this type.Rod-Original Message-
From: Louise Power 
Sent: Dec 19, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Mark Alman , rod.g...@ieee.org, Texas Cavers 
Subject: RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data






Depending on how much your data is worth to you, I can personally recommend
 
http://www.drivesaversdatarecovery.com/
 
In 2006, my hard drive at work crashed taking all my data with it. Our IT guy pulled the disk and sent it to Drive Savers Data Recovery. Their estimate was between $428-1985. It came in around $1400-1700. But it was worth it. We got back four DVDs within a week with all my data on it.  Check out their site. They can retrieve almost anything.
 
For those of you who are Federal Employees, they have a GSA contract.
 
Louise 

List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:28:47 -0800From: texascav...@yahoo.comTo: rod.g...@ieee.org; texascavers@texascavers.comSubject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data



Because they crash, too, Rod.
 
I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is lost now.
 
 
Mark



From: Rod Goke To: TexasCavers Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AMSubject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data







Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard disk drives instead?  		 	   		  


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Rod Goke
That's why it's good to buy extra external hard drives and make multiple copies. It doesn't have to be very expensive. I recently bought a used 100GB external USB drive for $20 and a used 200GB external Firewire/USB drive for $40. Both of these were purchased from individuals on Craigslist, appeared to be in excellent physical condition and have functioned properly in the testing I have done. Several months ago, I bought several used 20GB internal drives for $5 each from the Goodwill Computer Store (ComputerWorks) and found that they also tested good. For new, larger capacity drives, you frequently can find good buys by watching the weekly sales at Fry's Electronics (http://www.frys-electronics-ads.com/). For, example, about a week ago you could have bought either a 320GB external USB drive or a 500GB internal SATA drive for about $50.Rod-Original Message-
From: Mark Alman 
Sent: Dec 19, 2009 9:28 AM
To: Rod Goke , TexasCavers 
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

Because they crash, too, Rod.
 
I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is lost now.
 
 
Mark



From: Rod Goke To: TexasCavers Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AMSubject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data







Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard disk drives instead? 

  

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Charles Goldsmith
I'd be happy to help out.  Web updates are easy, anything else I need
to be aware of?

Charles

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:48 AM,   wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Would you be interested in being on the NSS Nominating Committee? I'm the
> chairman. I need someone Web savvy to update the Web Site now and then.
> Ellie can get access for you.
>
> Hope so.
>
> Bill
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> 
> From: Charles Goldsmith 
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:39:32 -0600
> To: Mark Alman
> Cc: Rod Goke; TexasCavers
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
> No matter what type of archive you use, be it tape, external drive, online
> storage, offline internal drives or cd/DVD, it's imperative to have
> redundancy and test your backups routinely.   Any large company does this.
>  Also, never store both copies in the same location.  A house fire is
> terrible, but you wouldn't want to lose both copies at once.
> I'm in the process of setting up a mirrored raid setup over a VPN, and while
> my offsite storage isn't ideal for a true disaster due to distance, I feel
> I'm reasonably protected.  You ideally want 50 miles separation for disaster
> recovery site and I'm at about 15
> Anyway, you can easily mix and match media, copy on an external drive and
> also on an internal.  Or external and DVD
> A backup is only as good as your last tested restore.  Nothing is worse than
> trying to restore some lost data and your backup drive fails, or the cd
> isn't readable.  It's important to test your backups routinely.
> Charles
>
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Mark Alman  wrote:
>
> Because they crash, too, Rod.
>
> I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is lost
> now.
>
>
> Mark
>
> 
> From: Rod Goke 
> To: TexasCavers 
> Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
>
> Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard disk
> drives instead?
>


RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Louise Power

Depending on how much your data is worth to you, I can personally recommend

 

http://www.drivesaversdatarecovery.com/

 

In 2006, my hard drive at work crashed taking all my data with it. Our IT guy 
pulled the disk and sent it to Drive Savers Data Recovery. Their estimate was 
between $428-1985. It came in around $1400-1700. But it was worth it. We got 
back four DVDs within a week with all my data on it.  Check out their site. 
They can retrieve almost anything.

 

For those of you who are Federal Employees, they have a GSA contract.

 

Louise
 


List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:28:47 -0800
From: texascav...@yahoo.com
To: rod.g...@ieee.org; texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data





Because they crash, too, Rod.
 
I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is lost now.
 
 
Mark





From: Rod Goke 
To: TexasCavers 
Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data









Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard disk drives 
instead? 
  

Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread speleosteele
Charles, 

Would you be interested in being on the NSS Nominating Committee? I'm the 
chairman. I need someone Web savvy to update the Web Site now and then. Ellie 
can get access for you. 

Hope so.

Bill

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith 
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:39:32 
To: Mark Alman
Cc: Rod Goke; TexasCavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
No matter what type of archive you use, be it tape, external drive,  
online storage, offline internal drives or cd/DVD, it's imperative to  
have redundancy and test your backups routinely.   Any large company  
does this.  Also, never store both copies in the same location.  A  
house fire is terrible, but you wouldn't want to lose both copies at  
once.

I'm in the process of setting up a mirrored raid setup over a VPN, and  
while my offsite storage isn't ideal for a true disaster due to  
distance, I feel I'm reasonably protected.  You ideally want 50 miles  
separation for disaster recovery site and I'm at about 15

Anyway, you can easily mix and match media, copy on an external drive  
and also on an internal.  Or external and DVD

A backup is only as good as your last tested restore.  Nothing is  
worse than trying to restore some lost data and your backup drive  
fails, or the cd isn't readable.  It's important to test your backups  
routinely.

Charles



On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Mark Alman  wrote:

> Because they crash, too, Rod.
>
> I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is  
> lost now.
>
>
> Mark
>
> From: Rod Goke 
> To: TexasCavers 
> Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
>
> Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard  
> disk drives instead?
>



Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Charles Goldsmith
No matter what type of archive you use, be it tape, external drive,  
online storage, offline internal drives or cd/DVD, it's imperative to  
have redundancy and test your backups routinely.   Any large company  
does this.  Also, never store both copies in the same location.  A  
house fire is terrible, but you wouldn't want to lose both copies at  
once.


I'm in the process of setting up a mirrored raid setup over a VPN, and  
while my offsite storage isn't ideal for a true disaster due to  
distance, I feel I'm reasonably protected.  You ideally want 50 miles  
separation for disaster recovery site and I'm at about 15


Anyway, you can easily mix and match media, copy on an external drive  
and also on an internal.  Or external and DVD


A backup is only as good as your last tested restore.  Nothing is  
worse than trying to restore some lost data and your backup drive  
fails, or the cd isn't readable.  It's important to test your backups  
routinely.


Charles



On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Mark Alman  wrote:


Because they crash, too, Rod.

I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is  
lost now.



Mark

From: Rod Goke 
To: TexasCavers 
Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard  
disk drives instead?




Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Mark Alman
Because they crash, too, Rod.

I have a $150 100GB ext. HD paperweight with a bunch of data that is lost now.


Mark





From: Rod Goke 
To: TexasCavers 
Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 3:23:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data


Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard disk drives 
instead? 


  

Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Chris Vreeland


On Dec 18, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Robert Tait wrote:

I use a service, that back up my hard drive over the internet.  The  
one I use is http://mozy.com/, but there are several out there.   
Costs me less than $100 to have a frequently updated image of my  
laptop hard drive (automatic, transparent, and encrypted).


If you can afford it, this is a good short-term hedge against  
disaster, for mission-critical files. I am not going to trust (long  
term) a for-profit business with archiving my files. What if they  
don't turn a profit and shut down one day?



 I spread sever CDs of Austin cave trips around back in 2000, I have  
no clue how they were stored, or if they still work.


My hard drive has to get bigger every couple of years.



The rate at which hard drive storage is expanding vs. cost, I've found  
that my data isn't doubling at quite the prevailing rate for hard  
drives, so I've been able to move to the next affordable size up in  
hard drives without it being a headache since I first seriously  
started storing data on computers, in about 2001. I think the  
progression at home has been 20GB> 60GB> 120GB> 250GB> 500GB. All for  
around $100.00-$150.00 each time. (wait until the size you need isn't  
the biggest & best -- there's always a sweet-spot just below huge  
that's affordable Compare 2TB to 1TB disks in price, right now)


As to backing up -- I have two internal drives. 1 is system & software  
only. The other is data only. The point to that being a nuke & pave of  
the system drive does not have to be accompanied by the gnashing of  
teeth over data. I have 2 external drives in the house, which are  
mirrors (backed up daily & weekly) of the two internal drives. This is  
a hedge against drive failure, only. I also back up all RAW files from  
the camera to DVD, as well as some other mission-critical data,  
like .AIF files from 24-track studio recordings, that were expensive.


Lastly, I have removable drives that I occasionally back all this up  
to (every couple months, when I remember, or when there's a huge  
project that needs backing up) that live off site. If my house burns  
down/is burgled, I hope that these drives don't fail simultaneously. :-)


I have some data CD's that are approaching the 10-year mark now, so  
I'll be curious to dig them out & see how they're doing, at some point  
on a slow day. I certainly don't trust them as a sole source for  
critical files.





PS.. I wonder if one day, people will start backing up digital  
images on Kodachrome, for archival storage...  never mind.


*pours 40*

*snif*

Chris

Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-19 Thread Rod Goke
Why archive data on CDs or DVDs at all? Why not use external hard disk drives instead? They're getting cheaper in dollars/gigabyte all the time, and one drive can store the equivalent of a large collection of CDs and DVDs. It's easy to copy the entire content from one external drive to another, so you can easily back up your entire archival data collection and store separate copies in separate safe locations if you get 2 or more drives for this purpose. Similarly, whenever your archival drives become old enough that you suspect they might become too obsolete or unreliable, you can copy your archived data to a newer external hard drive much more quickly and easily that you can copy a large collection of CDs or DVDs. If you want to minimize cost and your data collection isn't large enough to require the storage capacity of a new state-of-the-art disk drive, then consider buying some smaller capacity used drives from Craigslist or the Goodwill Computer Store (ComputerWorks). Also, if you want to use multiple external disk drives (e.g., for storing multiple copies in different locations or for archiving different kinds of data on separate disks) and if you intend to store some of these drives a long time before you expect to access them, then you probably can save money by buying multiple "internal" disk drives (as opposed to "external" drives) plus one or two external drive enclosures. You then mount each internal drive in an external enclosure just long enough to copy data to it, and then you remove the drive from the enclosure and pack it safely away for long term storage. This is practical primarily for long term archiving of data you don't expect to update or otherwise access any time soon. Similarly, it's a good way to archive a "cloned" copy of the original internal disk content of a new computer before you begin doing anything to modify it (in case you ever need to restore the computer's internal disk to its original state, and your "restore" CDs/DVDs no longer work). Sometimes lower capacity used internal disk drives suitable for this purpose can be purchased very cheaply.Rod

-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread Robert Tait
I use a service, that back up my hard drive over the internet.  The one I
use is http://mozy.com/, but there are several out there.  Costs me less
than $100 to have a frequently updated image of my laptop hard drive
(automatic, transparent, and encrypted).   I would not call this archival,
per se, but it's useful to have.  ALL of my digital images going back to the
shots I started taking in '98 are on my laptop.

 I spread sever CDs of Austin cave trips around back in 2000, I have no clue
how they were stored, or if they still work.

My hard drive has to get bigger every couple of years.

Now that I am shooting video, there simply is not room on my laptop hard
drive, so I have installed a 1 Tb raid array in the basement of my ex wifes
house that is connected to the internet.  The array has dual mirrored hard
drives, if one fails, we have redundant backup.  A mirror of
THAT drive is located at my Son's house.  As the drives start to fail, we
simply replace them.  It's not as cheap as CDs, but as drive technology
changes, and drive interfaces change we can leapfrog with the technology.

I can also give people read only access to specific directories.

Again, throwing money at a problem helps.  Not foolproof. A virus could wipe
out my raid arrays, poor data management could corrupt the data. But it's
worked so far... :)


My, two cents from upstate New York

Cheers y'all

Rob

PS.. I wonder if one day, people will start backing up digital images
on Kodachrome, for archival storage...  never mind.


Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread Preston Forsythe
A few years ago I visited the American Mountaineering Club in Golden, CO. Spent 
some time in the archival library. Climate, humidity and fire control are very 
important for long term preservation of our important work. There is indeed an 
art and science to archives, and the librarian there would be glad to discuss 
this with anyone. I took lots of notes hopefully of use in planning CRF's new 
library at Hamilton Valley.  I think the librarian had a masters degree in 
archiving material.

Preston


  - Original Message - 
  From: John P Brooks 
  To: texascavers@texascavers.com 
  Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 3:11 PM
  Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data


I have kept paper copies of the Texas Caver around for over 30  


Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread John P Brooks
I have kept paper copies of the Texas Caver around for over 30 yearsthere 
hasn't been any degradation, other folded corners or slight yellowing of the 
paperand I haven't had to make new copies every 10 years or so..and 
unlike digital copies which may, by the admissions below, not be around in 30 
years...I suspect my boxes of Texas Cavers will out live me.

--- On Fri, 12/18/09, Glen Goldsmith  wrote:


From: Glen Goldsmith 
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
To: texascavers@texascavers.com
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 10:41 AM






http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Expected_lifespan

In short, Mixon is right - you'll have to copy the contents of a CD-R/DVD-R 
pretty often.  More so than 20 years though.  I've read an article, can't 
remember where - that said a CD-R that could last 10 years was pretty good.  
Organizing cd/dvd's by age seems like a good idea for this.  Who's got the time 
for that though?

In the process of moving, I was able to get data off of CD-R's (single speed, 
gold backed)  as late as 1996.  Silver backed single speed CD-RW's written 
around this time were completely unreadable, causing me to lose some data from 
that era.

Just don't be fooled that they'll last 20 or 30 years.  In my personal 
experience, they don't.

Glen

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Mark Minton  wrote:
>        David Locklear said:
>
>>I think the next hurdle is to develop a laptop that doesn't use batteries,
>> and uses a crank and some kind of power saving device not affected by
>> storage.
>
>        Why not make your computer solar powered?  I don't know the expected
> lifetime of solar panels, but ones stored dry and in the dark might last a
> long time.  Take them and your archived computer out into the sun and let
> 'er rip.  Presumably there will still be sunshine, unless the future is a
> Matrix sort of world.  ;-)  Actually, electricity will still likely be used
> and available in some form for a long time.  Just provide a simple set of
> terminals on your computer and any power source of the future with the
> proper voltage and amperage should work.  The bigger problem would be
> communicating anything 500 years into the future.  What language would you
> use?
>
>        Bill Mixon said:
>
>>Anyway, there wouldn't be any convenient way to get the data out of the
>> computer, even if you could read it on screen.
>
>        It seems likely that some sort of scanning technology will be around
> for quite a while.  Assuming the language on the screen could be understood,
> it shouldn't be too much trouble to scan it, or take the equivalent of
> movies of it, and then convert that into whatever the current digital format
> is.  Again the bigger problem would be making the archived output
> meaningful.  Pictures might be better than anything written.
>
> Mark
>
> You may reply to mmin...@caver.net
> Permanent email address is mmin...@illinoisalumni.org
>
> -
> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
>
>






Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread Glen Goldsmith
My cd's were in a cd case, with about 100 others.  It stayed zipped up in my
about 98% of the time.  That's a good article, I read it then but then,
haven't ordered any.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Louise Power wrote:

>  Clover,
>
> Has she said anything about the gold archival CDs and DVDs? There's an
> interesting article on choosing archival media (written in 06, but with
> updates) at
>
>
> http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/10/30/how-to-choose-cddvd-archival-media
>
> Louise
>
> --
> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:34:44 -0700
> From: cclam...@swca.com
> To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
> Subject: RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
>
>
> My sister in-law is an archival librarian with the State library in
> Austin.  She was just railing on CDs & DVDs and how "archivally poor" they
> are for permanent data storage, even when kept in the most pristine "air &
> light tight" conditions in an archival library.
>
> She and the state library still swear by microfiche and other silver coated
> films for permanent archival data storage.
>
> Ah technology at its finest!
>
> Clover Clamons
> cclam...@swca.com
>
>
>  ------
> *From:* John Greer [mailto:jgr...@greerservices.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 18, 2009 11:27 AM
> *To:* Texas Cavers
> *Subject:* Fw: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
>
>  For those interested, we burned data onto a "permanent" DVD for a friend
> a year ago. They left it open in the office under florescent lights. It is
> now defunct. Apparently everybody but us knew that florescent lights destroy
> CD/DVDs.
>
> John
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Glen Goldsmith 
> *To:* texascavers@texascavers.com
> *Sent:* Friday, December 18, 2009 9:41 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data
>
>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Expected_lifespan
>
> In short, Mixon is right - you'll have to copy the contents of a CD-R/DVD-R
> pretty often.  More so than 20 years though.  I've read an article, can't
> remember where - that said a CD-R that could last 10 years was pretty good.
> Organizing cd/dvd's by age seems like a good idea for this.  Who's got the
> time for that though?
>
> In the process of moving, I was able to get data off of CD-R's (single
> speed, gold backed)  as late as 1996.  Silver backed single speed CD-RW's
> written around this time were completely unreadable, causing me to lose some
> data from that era.
>
> Just don't be fooled that they'll last 20 or 30 years.  In my personal
> experience, they don't.
>
> Glen
>


RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread Louise Power

Clover,

 

Has she said anything about the gold archival CDs and DVDs? There's an 
interesting article on choosing archival media (written in 06, but with 
updates) at

 

http://adterrasperaspera.com/blog/2006/10/30/how-to-choose-cddvd-archival-media

 

Louise
 


List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:34:44 -0700
From: cclam...@swca.com
To: Texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data




My sister in-law is an archival librarian with the State library in Austin.  
She was just railing on CDs & DVDs and how "archivally poor" they are for 
permanent data storage, even when kept in the most pristine "air & light tight" 
conditions in an archival library.
 
She and the state library still swear by microfiche and other silver coated 
films for permanent archival data storage.
 
Ah technology at its finest!
 
Clover Clamons
cclam...@swca.com
 



From: John Greer [mailto:jgr...@greerservices.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Texas Cavers
Subject: Fw: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data



For those interested, we burned data onto a "permanent" DVD for a friend a year 
ago. They left it open in the office under florescent lights. It is now 
defunct. Apparently everybody but us knew that florescent lights destroy 
CD/DVDs. 
 
John
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Glen Goldsmith 
To: texascavers@texascavers.com 
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Expected_lifespan

In short, Mixon is right - you'll have to copy the contents of a CD-R/DVD-R 
pretty often.  More so than 20 years though.  I've read an article, can't 
remember where - that said a CD-R that could last 10 years was pretty good.  
Organizing cd/dvd's by age seems like a good idea for this.  Who's got the time 
for that though?

In the process of moving, I was able to get data off of CD-R's (single speed, 
gold backed)  as late as 1996.  Silver backed single speed CD-RW's written 
around this time were completely unreadable, causing me to lose some data from 
that era.

Just don't be fooled that they'll last 20 or 30 years.  In my personal 
experience, they don't.

Glen
  

RE: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread Clover Clamons
My sister in-law is an archival librarian with the State library in
Austin.  She was just railing on CDs & DVDs and how "archivally poor"
they are for permanent data storage, even when kept in the most pristine
"air & light tight" conditions in an archival library.
 
She and the state library still swear by microfiche and other silver
coated films for permanent archival data storage.
 
Ah technology at its finest!
 
Clover Clamons
cclam...@swca.com
 



From: John Greer [mailto:jgr...@greerservices.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Texas Cavers
Subject: Fw: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data


For those interested, we burned data onto a "permanent" DVD for a friend
a year ago. They left it open in the office under florescent lights. It
is now defunct. Apparently everybody but us knew that florescent lights
destroy CD/DVDs. 
 
John
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Glen Goldsmith <mailto:glen.goldsm...@gmail.com>  
To: texascavers@texascavers.com 
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Expected_lifespan

In short, Mixon is right - you'll have to copy the contents of a
CD-R/DVD-R pretty often.  More so than 20 years though.  I've read an
article, can't remember where - that said a CD-R that could last 10
years was pretty good.  Organizing cd/dvd's by age seems like a good
idea for this.  Who's got the time for that though?

In the process of moving, I was able to get data off of CD-R's (single
speed, gold backed)  as late as 1996.  Silver backed single speed
CD-RW's written around this time were completely unreadable, causing me
to lose some data from that era.

Just don't be fooled that they'll last 20 or 30 years.  In my personal
experience, they don't.

Glen



Fw: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread John Greer
For those interested, we burned data onto a "permanent" DVD for a friend a 
year ago. They left it open in the office under florescent lights. It is now 
defunct. Apparently everybody but us knew that florescent lights destroy 
CD/DVDs.

John


- Original Message - 
From: Glen Goldsmith
To: texascavers@texascavers.com
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Expected_lifespan

In short, Mixon is right - you'll have to copy the contents of a CD-R/DVD-R 
pretty often.  More so than 20 years though.  I've read an article, can't 
remember where - that said a CD-R that could last 10 years was pretty good. 
Organizing cd/dvd's by age seems like a good idea for this.  Who's got the 
time for that though?

In the process of moving, I was able to get data off of CD-R's (single 
speed, gold backed)  as late as 1996.  Silver backed single speed CD-RW's 
written around this time were completely unreadable, causing me to lose some 
data from that era.

Just don't be fooled that they'll last 20 or 30 years.  In my personal 
experience, they don't.

Glen


Re: [Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-12-18 Thread Glen Goldsmith
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#Expected_lifespan

In short, Mixon is right - you'll have to copy the contents of a CD-R/DVD-R
pretty often.  More so than 20 years though.  I've read an article, can't
remember where - that said a CD-R that could last 10 years was pretty good.
Organizing cd/dvd's by age seems like a good idea for this.  Who's got the
time for that though?

In the process of moving, I was able to get data off of CD-R's (single
speed, gold backed)  as late as 1996.  Silver backed single speed CD-RW's
written around this time were completely unreadable, causing me to lose some
data from that era.

Just don't be fooled that they'll last 20 or 30 years.  In my personal
experience, they don't.

Glen

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Mark Minton  wrote:
>David Locklear said:
>
>>I think the next hurdle is to develop a laptop that doesn't use batteries,
>> and uses a crank and some kind of power saving device not affected by
>> storage.
>
>Why not make your computer solar powered?  I don't know the
expected
> lifetime of solar panels, but ones stored dry and in the dark might last a
> long time.  Take them and your archived computer out into the sun and let
> 'er rip.  Presumably there will still be sunshine, unless the future is a
> Matrix sort of world.  ;-)  Actually, electricity will still likely be
used
> and available in some form for a long time.  Just provide a simple set of
> terminals on your computer and any power source of the future with the
> proper voltage and amperage should work.  The bigger problem would be
> communicating anything 500 years into the future.  What language would you
> use?
>
>Bill Mixon said:
>
>>Anyway, there wouldn't be any convenient way to get the data out of the
>> computer, even if you could read it on screen.
>
>It seems likely that some sort of scanning technology will be
around
> for quite a while.  Assuming the language on the screen could be
understood,
> it shouldn't be too much trouble to scan it, or take the equivalent of
> movies of it, and then convert that into whatever the current digital
format
> is.  Again the bigger problem would be making the archived output
> meaningful.  Pictures might be better than anything written.
>
> Mark
>
> You may reply to mmin...@caver.net
> Permanent email address is mmin...@illinoisalumni.org
>
> -
> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
>
>


[Texascavers] Re: archiving your cave data

2009-11-16 Thread Mark Minton

David Locklear said:

>I think the next hurdle is to develop a laptop that doesn't use 
batteries, and uses a crank and some kind of power saving device not 
affected by storage.


Why not make your computer solar powered?  I don't know the 
expected lifetime of solar panels, but ones stored dry and in the 
dark might last a long time.  Take them and your archived computer 
out into the sun and let 'er rip.  Presumably there will still be 
sunshine, unless the future is a Matrix sort of 
world.  ;-)  Actually, electricity will still likely be used and 
available in some form for a long time.  Just provide a simple set of 
terminals on your computer and any power source of the future with 
the proper voltage and amperage should work.  The bigger problem 
would be communicating anything 500 years into the future.  What 
language would you use?


Bill Mixon said:

>Anyway, there wouldn't be any convenient way to get the data out of 
the computer, even if you could read it on screen.


It seems likely that some sort of scanning technology will 
be around for quite a while.  Assuming the language on the screen 
could be understood, it shouldn't be too much trouble to scan it, or 
take the equivalent of movies of it, and then convert that into 
whatever the current digital format is.  Again the bigger problem 
would be making the archived output meaningful.  Pictures might be 
better than anything written.


Mark

You may reply to mmin...@caver.net
Permanent email address is mmin...@illinoisalumni.org 



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com