Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
Thirteen years ago I published an article in The Texas Caver titled “TSS: Secrecy, Sharing, and Responsibility.” It outlined many of the topics touched on in this thread. I presented information on how and why TSS releases data and the interest of the average Texas caver in that data. Not much has changed since I wrote that article. If any of you are curious, you can find it at http://www.karstportal.org/node/11616. George George Veni, PhD Executive Director National Cave and Karst Research Institute 400-1 Cascades Avenue Carlsbad, New Mexico 88220-9215 USA Office: 575-887-5517 Mobile: 210-863-5919 Fax: 575-887-5523 gv...@nckri.org<mailto:gv...@nckri.org> www.nckri.org<http://www.nckri.org> From: Texascavers [mailto:texascavers-boun...@texascavers.com] On Behalf Of via Texascavers Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 17:38 To: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy Meador's files ended up at the Brisco Center for American History in Austin. I've been making regular trips there to capture the information and archive it properly. At least he made some plans to have it stored somewhere though I have no idea how it ended up there. It's certainly not easy to access or use at it's present location. Jerry Atkinson. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:18 PM, via Texascavers <texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:texascavers@texascavers.com>> wrote: Right on, Diana. Texas Cavers should understand a case in point: all the accurate and valuable cave data acquired by Tom Meador. Fortunately, Tom published quite a bit. However a great deal more vanished after his death. Tom would have been really pissed. I do understand the important role that secrecy can and should play in the time between discovery and real protection of the resource. The quandary comes when you find something truly exceptional and cannot conceive of any way to preserve it short of secrecy or blowing the entrance shut. I have certainly been there. If no one can see it, is it still beautiful? If you found it and told no one, is your own life still significant? I have actually asked myself those questions. DirtDoc ___ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:Texascavers@texascavers.com> | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers ___ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
Regardless of landowner relations and what-have-you—if you keep all of your data to yourself, regardless of the field, whether it be cave surveying, exploration, geology, physics, biology, chemistry, etc., and you never publish it or deposit it in an accessible, reputable and continuing database, then you might as well treat it as if the data never was collected and the exploration never happened. There’s a reason why the noted explorers of yore fought tooth and nail to be the first ones to report their discoveries, and why scientists live by the “publish or perish” dogma. Priority means publicity means lasting fame, and typically also means funds ($$$) to continue your work. Just because you were the first person to discover something means absolutely nothing to the world if you weren’t the first person to publicize the work—ask any professional scientist or explorer. Also, once you’re dead and gone, there’s no guarantee that your heirs won’t just dump all that “caving garbage” into the nearest dumpster. Diana ** Diana R. Tomchick Professor Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Rm. ND10.214A Dallas, TX 75390-8816 diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu (214) 645-6383 (phone) (214) 645-6353 (fax) > On Oct 15, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Pete Lindsley via Texascavers >wrote: > > Great comments, Travis! > > Since I moved out of the state I have worked with the TSS to go through my > Texas cave files and archive what they wanted. On some large maps that were > going to be scanned, I asked for a digital copy back after scanning. In the > case of ancient material, like the Powell's Cave original survey data, I did > not ask for digital copies back in return since the data was in good hands. > Of course during the file reviews some additional information was passed on > to the new leaders of some current projects both in and out of Texas. So just > a TSS review of old cave files while you are still kicking can be a great > help to the historical archive of the cave and can contribute to work being > done today that you thought you finished 50 years ago. > > I also support paying very close attention to the cave owner's request when > they allow you onto their private property. I think the TSS can play an > important part in keeping up good owner relationships. When I started caving > in 1960 all we had was Bulletin 10 on Texas Caves, published in 1947 as I > recall. But by the 1960s almost all of these caves were either closed or had > been long forgotten during land owner changes. So each time we visited the > new owner we had to re-establish that personal level of communication to gain > access. Some access took over a decade to get back in. One time I was in the > position of re-visiting a cave that I had gated and the new owner was > complaining that some
Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
Meador's files ended up at the Brisco Center for American History in Austin. I've been making regular trips there to capture the information and archive it properly. At least he made some plans to have it stored somewhere though I have no idea how it ended up there. It's certainly not easy to access or use at it's present location. Jerry Atkinson. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:18 PM, via Texascaverswrote: > > Right on, Diana. > > Texas Cavers should understand a case in point: all the accurate and valuable > cave data acquired by Tom Meador. Fortunately, Tom published quite a bit. > However a great deal more vanished after his death. Tom would have been > really pissed. > > I do understand the important role that secrecy can and should play in the > time between discovery and real protection of the resource. > > The quandary comes when you find something truly exceptional and cannot > conceive of any way to preserve it short of secrecy or blowing the entrance > shut. I have certainly been there. > > If no one can see it, is it still beautiful? > > If you found it and told no one, is your own life still significant? > > I have actually asked myself those questions. > > DirtDoc > > ___ > Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com > Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ > http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers ___ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
I have heard it said that if you explore a cave but do not survey, take photos and/or write it up, then it didn't happen. That may be true from the perspective of the wider caver community and posterity, but the effect on the cave will likely be irrevocable. Unless no one ever goes there again, then some time in the future when other cavers rediscover your scoop, they will find footsteps where there should be none. Very few caves are active enough to erase all evidence of prior human passage. When those future cavers see that someone has been there before them, they will wonder who and when, and it will at least somewhat diminish their triumph. I've been in that situation, and though those were still significant discoveries, I always wonder who was there before and why no record was made. Mark Minton mmin...@caver.net ___ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
Right on, Diana. Texas Cavers should understand a case in point: all the accurate and valuable cave data acquired by Tom Meador. Fortunately, Tom published quite a bit. However a great deal more vanished after his death. Tom would have been really pissed. I do understand the important role that secrecy can and should play in the time between discovery and real protection of the resource. The quandary comes when you find something truly exceptional and cannot conceive of any way to preserve it short of secrecy or blowing the entrance shut. I have certainly been there. If no one can see it, is it still beautiful? If you found it and told no one, is your own life still significant? I have actually asked myself those questions. DirtDoc ___ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
Great comments, Travis! Since I moved out of the state I have worked with the TSS to go through my Texas cave files and archive what they wanted. On some large maps that were going to be scanned, I asked for a digital copy back after scanning. In the case of ancient material, like the Powell's Cave original survey data, I did not ask for digital copies back in return since the data was in good hands. Of course during the file reviews some additional information was passed on to the new leaders of some current projects both in and out of Texas. So just a TSS review of old cave files while you are still kicking can be a great help to the historical archive of the cave and can contribute to work being done today that you thought you finished 50 years ago. I also support paying very close attention to the cave owner's request when they allow you onto their private property. I think the TSS can play an important part in keeping up good owner relationships. When I started caving in 1960 all we had was Bulletin 10 on Texas Caves, published in 1947 as I recall. But by the 1960s almost all of these caves were either closed or had been long forgotten during land owner changes. So each time we visited the new owner we had to re-establish that personal level of communication to gain access. Some access took over a decade to get back in. One time I was in the position of re-visiting a cave that I had gated and the new owner was complaining that some
[Texascavers] Secrecy
I was originally attracted to caving not just because of my interest in the natural world but also because of the inherent "wildness" of caves and the degree to which others avoid such places. Ditto for my interest in jungles, snakes, and other creepy crawlies. "Wildness" implies a lack of control by anyone; so, in pursuit of my interests I generally ignore artificial constraints such as laws and property rights other than to the extent that it is impractical to do otherwise. You can probably guess that I am a big fan of both Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, so my opposition to cave secrecy, speleopolitics, and unnecessary gates amounts to complete disdain. If caves were filled with gold as some lunatics presume then secrecy might be justified, but caves are just holes in the ground filled with mud and darkness. Yes, there are sometimes rare organisms, archeological artifacts, and delicate speleothems that need to be protected, but on the whole caves are holes of such forbidding aspect that 99% of the populace would prefer to be anywhere else. Like an interest in handling deadly reptiles, caving is an activity for the self selected few. On the whole cavers have an excellent record of commitment to conservation; so, except in regard to very specific time and places I find the culture of cave secrecy to be absolutely ridiculous. The American people have grown fat, weak, and dissolute. We try to protect our children from every conceivable harm and attempt to instill cultural constraints that are utterly at odds with our instincts. As a result one Palestinian kid with a rock can now beat an entire army composed of so called civilized people. This does not bode well for the future, which is why if a few brave kids with candles want to jump the fence and crawl into a hole in search of gold it is OK with me. It is even OK with me if they write their names on the wall as people have been doing for at least the last 35,000 years. When they get to the drop they will either stop or die. That is OK with me too. Out of that group a tiny percentage with brains may decide to learn about geology and ropes. Some might even be clever enough to infiltrate a grotto or search the internet for coordinates. More power to them. I have grown tired of seeing the hairy butts of my contemporaries in the hot tub. I want to see some firm young flesh decorated with rope burns and bruises. I want to see the fire in their eyes as they describe their latest discovery. That will never happen if our culture of secrecy excludes all who do not adhere to the outmoded doctrines of our faith. Sleazeweazel In a message dated 10/15/2015 12:00:42 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, texascavers@texascavers.com writes: Message: 1 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:02:18 + (UTC) From: Karen Perry via TexascaversTo: "texascavers@texascavers.com" Subject: Re: [Texascavers] historic posting Message-ID: <513649672.275913.1444838538393.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Granted I am not caving any more but this overly secret concept of hiding cave locations in the caver community has never made sense to me. I think you should share your files. They are a part of caver history and need to become a part of the record for future generations. Too much has already been lost due to out dated, needless, paranoid mindsets. Just my 2 cents,Karen Perry From: Greg Passmore via Texascavers To: texascavers@texascavers.com Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:28 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] historic posting Many years ago I made 25 copies of a bunch of cave maps from my files and sold them to fellow cavers for exactly my copying costs (100 pages for $5). For this I got yelled at for years, was given an award for the worst behaving caver, and I was accused of copyright violations. All that over a handful of cave maps lost in old files. This censorship has helped keep new Texas cavers in the dark about all the great caves that have been lost or forgotten in this state. It has also been instrumental in the decision not to release my cave files (even to the TSS), which account for over 16 file drawers of cave locations, maps, photos and articles. I would like to get all this stuff out for the next generation of cavers, but I am very cautious since the dying generation of cavers responsible for this nonsense are still (barely) around. (rant over) ___ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
Re: [Texascavers] Secrecy
of sharing data with the TSS if nothing else.. I also just felt like I should put in my 2 cents J Travis From: Texascavers [mailto:texascavers-boun...@texascavers.com] On Behalf Of via Texascavers Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:05 PM To: texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: [Texascavers] Secrecy I was originally attracted to caving not just because of my interest in the natural world but also because of the inherent "wildness" of caves and the degree to which others avoid such places. Ditto for my interest in jungles, snakes, and other creepy crawlies. "Wildness" implies a lack of control by anyone; so, in pursuit of my interests I generally ignore artificial constraints such as laws and property rights other than to the extent that it is impractical to do otherwise. You can probably guess that I am a big fan of both Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, so my opposition to cave secrecy, speleopolitics, and unnecessary gates amounts to complete disdain. If caves were filled with gold as some lunatics presume then secrecy might be justified, but caves are just holes in the ground filled with mud and darkness. Yes, there are sometimes rare organisms, archeological artifacts, and delicate speleothems that need to be protected, but on the whole caves are holes of such forbidding aspect that 99% of the populace would prefer to be anywhere else. Like an interest in handling deadly reptiles, caving is an activity for the self selected few. On the whole cavers have an excellent record of commitment to conservation; so, except in regard to very specific time and places I find the culture of cave secrecy to be absolutely ridiculous. The American people have grown fat, weak, and dissolute. We try to protect our children from every conceivable harm and attempt to instill cultural constraints that are utterly at odds with our instincts. As a result one Palestinian kid with a rock can now beat an entire army composed of so called civilized people. This does not bode well for the future, which is why if a few brave kids with candles want to jump the fence and crawl into a hole in search of gold it is OK with me. It is even OK with me if they write their names on the wall as people have been doing for at least the last 35,000 years. When they get to the drop they will either stop or die. That is OK with me too. Out of that group a tiny percentage with brains may decide to learn about geology and ropes. Some might even be clever enough to infiltrate a grotto or search the internet for coordinates. More power to them. I have grown tired of seeing the hairy butts of my contemporaries in the hot tub. I want to see some firm young flesh decorated with rope burns and bruises. I want to see the fire in their eyes as they describe their latest discovery. That will never happen if our culture of secrecy excludes all who do not adhere to the outmoded doctrines of our faith. Sleazeweazel In a message dated 10/15/2015 12:00:42 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, texascavers@texascavers.com writes: Message: 1 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:02:18 + (UTC) From: Karen Perry via Texascavers <texascavers@texascavers.com> To: "texascavers@texascavers.com" <texascavers@texascavers.com> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] historic posting Message-ID: <513649672.275913.1444838538393.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Granted I am not caving any more but this overly secret concept of hiding cave locations in the caver community has never made sense to me. I think you should share your files. They are a part of caver history and need to become a part of the record for future generations. Too much has already been lost due to out dated, needless, paranoid mindsets. Just my 2 cents,Karen Perry From: Greg Passmore via Texascavers <texascavers@texascavers.com> To: texascavers@texascavers.com Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:28 AM Subject: Re: [Texascavers] historic posting Many years ago I made 25 copies of a bunch of cave maps from my files and sold them to fellow cavers for exactly my copying costs (100 pages for $5). For this I got yelled at for years, was given an award for the worst behaving caver, and I was accused of copyright violations. All that over a handful of cave maps lost in old files. This censorship has helped keep new Texas cavers in the dark about all the great caves that have been lost or forgotten in this state. It has also been instrumental in the decision not to release my cave files (even to the TSS), which account for over 16 file drawers of cave locations, maps, photos and articles. I would like to get all this stuff out for the next generation of cavers, but I am very cautious since the dying generation of cavers responsible for this nonsense are still (barely) around. (rant over) ___ Texascavers mailing list | http