Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Diana Tomchick

Hey RD,

If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for  
a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA  
office for next year?


Diana

On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:03 PM, RD Milhollin wrote:


Again Fritz,

I am not bashing anyone or any organization, just passing along my  
own views

on the question of the cost/benefits of TSA membership.

So, again, the enjoyment of camaraderie with others at TCR and  
various
caving activities is not tied to TSA membership. The Spring  
Convention is.


TSA as well as TCMA allows me to visit beautiful sites and caving  
areas
that I would not otherwise know of or be able to access : I agree  
that the
TCMA and also the TCC enables access to caves, but I don't see how  
the TSA

does, except through organizational contributions to land acquisition
activities, in which the TSA acts as a conduit only. At least there  
are no

administrative fees or overhead costs associated.

officers of the organizations deem is an appropriate amount for  
dues Why
would you avoid using your own judgement in estimating appropriate  
dues for
an organization you belong to. I suppose we all are becoming a  
nation of
followers, I just supposed cavers would be on the trailing edge of  
this

trend.

I feel that the more income the associations generate, the more  
involved
they can become with education, acquisition and conservation of our  
caves
and their inhabitants. Agreed, but there are two ways to make the  
equation
of income generation work. The current scheme seems to be few  
members with
high dues per member. One unintended (?) result of this policy is  
to keep
the organization closely held, meaning old-timers tend to dominate,  
which
makes it a conservative group, ie preservation of status quo/slow  
to change.
The alternative approach is to have a large membership base with  
small dues
per member. This approach could generate the same revenue, and  
involve more

cavers, new cavers, young cavers, as icing on top.

I justify membership costs by the degree of enjoyment derived,  
including
some of these dumb posts... I have been trying to point out that  
there is
not a causal link between this enjoyment and TSA membership. This  
list, for
instance is not owned by the TSA. It is made possible entirely  
through the

good graces of the list owner, Charles Goldsmith.

Now, more unsubstantiated views on the subject from cavers I have  
talked
with recently. One, a qualified candidate for the position of  
newsletter
editor for the UT Grotto, replied, somewhat surprised at my  
suggestion that

the UTG needed a newsletter, replied Why? We have the Texas caver.
Another, very involved Texas caver stated in confidence that the only
benefit you get from TSA membership is the TC. I know that the TSA  
members

who have stated opposing viewpoints are genuinely proud of their
organization and the work they see it as accomplishing. But I see  
it as
necessary to discount that dedication somewhat by the buy-in that  
members
of organizations usually get by belonging to a group, meaning it is  
slightly
more difficuly for them to view the organization objectively as  
whole from
inside. I, and others before me, are suggesting change, but it is  
going to

be hard to accomplish due to the nature of the organization
-Original Message-
From: Fritz Holt [mailto:fh...@townandcountryins.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:13 PM
To: RD Milhollin
Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
Subject: RE: [ot_caving] RE: TexasCaver


RD,

As an old timer and spelunker in years past, I can only speak for  
myself as
to the perceived benefits of TSA membership. I echo the thoughts of  
Charles
Goldsmith and Jerry Atkinson and I like your thoughts of wanting to  
belong
to a group of like-minded people with a common interest. Many of us  
march to
a different drummer which makes for some interesting commentary.  
This is
good. From kids to geezers, our common interests are somewhat out  
of the

norm but are a fun and satisfying pastime.



For me, whatever the cost of TSA membership may be, it is worth it  
for the
enjoyment of camaraderie with others at TCR, the spring convention  
and at
various caving activities. In addition, TSA as well as TCMA allows  
me to
visit beautiful sites and caving areas that I would not otherwise  
know of or
be able to access. I certainly realize that many cavers, especially  
younger
ones, may be on a tight budget and therefore I will go along with  
what the

officers of the organizations deem is an appropriate amount for dues.



I feel that the more income the associations generate, the more  
involved
they can become with education, acquisition and conservation of our  
caves
and their inhabitants. I justify membership costs by the degree of  
enjoyment
derived, including some of these dumb posts. My wife accused me of  
being a
Neanderthal and dumb as a post and this was before she knew that I  
liked

caves.

Fritz





Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Don Arburn
I don't believe he is looking to effect change. I believe he is  
looking for a reason for the TSA to exist, other than it giving us the  
Caver.


On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Diana Tomchick wrote:


Hey RD,

If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for  
a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA  
office for next year?


Diana







--- donarb...@mac.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Actually he is, re-read his last sentence.  He does not spell out what
change, just that he and others want change.

Charles

On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:
 I don't believe he is looking to effect change. I believe he is
 looking for a reason for the TSA to exist, other than it giving us the
 Caver.

 On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Diana Tomchick wrote:

  Hey RD,
 
  If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for
  a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA
  office for next year?
 
  Diana






 --- donarb...@mac.com




 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Don Arburn
We spoke at length this last weekend, yes he did state that in his  
email, and no I'm not defending his post, but the gist of the  
conversation was just what I said. I will now mind my own business.


On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:


Actually he is, re-read his last sentence.  He does not spell out what
change, just that he and others want change.

Charles

On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:

I don't believe he is looking to effect change. I believe he is
looking for a reason for the TSA to exist, other than it giving us  
the

Caver.

On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Diana Tomchick wrote:


Hey RD,

If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for
a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA
office for next year?

Diana







--- donarb...@mac.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com





Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Charles Goldsmith
Don, this is everyone's business that caves in our area, even
non-members of TSA, because anyone who is not a member has a reason,
and their input is just as valid :)

On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:
 We spoke at length this last weekend, yes he did state that in his
 email, and no I'm not defending his post, but the gist of the
 conversation was just what I said. I will now mind my own business.

 On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:

  Actually he is, re-read his last sentence.  He does not spell out what
  change, just that he and others want change.
 
  Charles
 
  On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:
  I don't believe he is looking to effect change. I believe he is
  looking for a reason for the TSA to exist, other than it giving us
  the
  Caver.
 
  On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Diana Tomchick wrote:
 
  Hey RD,
 
  If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for
  a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA
  office for next year?
 
  Diana
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --- donarb...@mac.com
 
 
 
 
  -
  Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 
 
 
  -
  Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
 




Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Don Arburn

Agreed. But I should let RD speak for himself.

On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:


Don, this is everyone's business that caves in our area, even
non-members of TSA, because anyone who is not a member has a reason,
and their input is just as valid :)

On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:

We spoke at length this last weekend, yes he did state that in his
email, and no I'm not defending his post, but the gist of the
conversation was just what I said. I will now mind my own business.

On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:

Actually he is, re-read his last sentence.  He does not spell out  
what

change, just that he and others want change.

Charles

On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:

I don't believe he is looking to effect change. I believe he is
looking for a reason for the TSA to exist, other than it giving us
the
Caver.

On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Diana Tomchick wrote:


Hey RD,

If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer  
for

a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA
office for next year?

Diana







--- donarb...@mac.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com




-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com








RE: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread RD Milhollin
Diane and Charles,

I don't know if you have followed the entire thread (name change and all)
but my argument has basically two components: that I and others feel that
there is not sufficient return on an individual level to justify $20
membership for the TSA; and that the situatiojn could be improved by
restructuring the format of the TEXAS CAVER into a digest of the best of
articles from the various Texas grotto newsletters. Go back and look at
today's posts with that in mind and see if that makes more sense. Perhaps I
didn't tie all that together sufficiently.

I don't want to run for office since I don't feel that membership is
justified. I would like to see change to make the organization available to
more people, and with a better grounded basis of benefit for the member.

Cheers.
RD

-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:17 PM
To: Don Arburn
Cc: Texas Cavers
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread


Actually he is, re-read his last sentence.  He does not spell out what
change, just that he and others want change.

Charles

On 1/22/08, Don Arburn donarb...@mac.com wrote:
 I don't believe he is looking to effect change. I believe he is
 looking for a reason for the TSA to exist, other than it giving us the
 Caver.

 On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Diana Tomchick wrote:

  Hey RD,
 
  If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for
  a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA
  office for next year?
 
  Diana






 --- donarb...@mac.com




 -
 Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread speleosteele
It reminds me of this:

The Story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
 
There were four people named EVERYBODY, SOMEBODY, ANYBODY, and NOBODY.  If 
there was an important job to be done, EVERYBODY was asked to do it.  EVERYBODY 
was sure SOMEBODY would do it.  ANYBODY could have done it but NOBODY did it.  
SOMEBODY got angry about that because it was really EVERYBODY'S job.  EVERYBODY 
thought ANYBODY could do it, but NOBODY realized that EVERYBODY wouldn't do it. 
 It ended up that EVERYBODY blamed SOMEBODY when NOBODY did what ANYBODY could 
have done.

 Diana Tomchick diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu wrote: 
 Hey RD,
 
 If you want to effect change in the TSA, why don't you volunteer for  
 a position in the organization and/or volunteer to run for a TSA  
 office for next year?
 
 Diana
 
 On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:03 PM, RD Milhollin wrote:
 
  Again Fritz,
 
  I am not bashing anyone or any organization, just passing along my  
  own views
  on the question of the cost/benefits of TSA membership.
 
  So, again, the enjoyment of camaraderie with others at TCR and  
  various
  caving activities is not tied to TSA membership. The Spring  
  Convention is.
 
  TSA as well as TCMA allows me to visit beautiful sites and caving  
  areas
  that I would not otherwise know of or be able to access : I agree  
  that the
  TCMA and also the TCC enables access to caves, but I don't see how  
  the TSA
  does, except through organizational contributions to land acquisition
  activities, in which the TSA acts as a conduit only. At least there  
  are no
  administrative fees or overhead costs associated.
 
  officers of the organizations deem is an appropriate amount for  
  dues Why
  would you avoid using your own judgement in estimating appropriate  
  dues for
  an organization you belong to. I suppose we all are becoming a  
  nation of
  followers, I just supposed cavers would be on the trailing edge of  
  this
  trend.
 
  I feel that the more income the associations generate, the more  
  involved
  they can become with education, acquisition and conservation of our  
  caves
  and their inhabitants. Agreed, but there are two ways to make the  
  equation
  of income generation work. The current scheme seems to be few  
  members with
  high dues per member. One unintended (?) result of this policy is  
  to keep
  the organization closely held, meaning old-timers tend to dominate,  
  which
  makes it a conservative group, ie preservation of status quo/slow  
  to change.
  The alternative approach is to have a large membership base with  
  small dues
  per member. This approach could generate the same revenue, and  
  involve more
  cavers, new cavers, young cavers, as icing on top.
 
  I justify membership costs by the degree of enjoyment derived,  
  including
  some of these dumb posts... I have been trying to point out that  
  there is
  not a causal link between this enjoyment and TSA membership. This  
  list, for
  instance is not owned by the TSA. It is made possible entirely  
  through the
  good graces of the list owner, Charles Goldsmith.
 
  Now, more unsubstantiated views on the subject from cavers I have  
  talked
  with recently. One, a qualified candidate for the position of  
  newsletter
  editor for the UT Grotto, replied, somewhat surprised at my  
  suggestion that
  the UTG needed a newsletter, replied Why? We have the Texas caver.
  Another, very involved Texas caver stated in confidence that the only
  benefit you get from TSA membership is the TC. I know that the TSA  
  members
  who have stated opposing viewpoints are genuinely proud of their
  organization and the work they see it as accomplishing. But I see  
  it as
  necessary to discount that dedication somewhat by the buy-in that  
  members
  of organizations usually get by belonging to a group, meaning it is  
  slightly
  more difficuly for them to view the organization objectively as  
  whole from
  inside. I, and others before me, are suggesting change, but it is  
  going to
  be hard to accomplish due to the nature of the organization
  -Original Message-
  From: Fritz Holt [mailto:fh...@townandcountryins.com]
  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:13 PM
  To: RD Milhollin
  Cc: texascavers@texascavers.com
  Subject: RE: [ot_caving] RE: TexasCaver
 
 
  RD,
 
  As an old timer and spelunker in years past, I can only speak for  
  myself as
  to the perceived benefits of TSA membership. I echo the thoughts of  
  Charles
  Goldsmith and Jerry Atkinson and I like your thoughts of wanting to  
  belong
  to a group of like-minded people with a common interest. Many of us  
  march to
  a different drummer which makes for some interesting commentary.  
  This is
  good. From kids to geezers, our common interests are somewhat out  
  of the
  norm but are a fun and satisfying pastime.
 
 
 
  For me, whatever the cost of TSA membership may be, it is worth it  
  for the
  enjoyment of 

Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Charles Goldsmith
You certainly do have a way with words :)

On 1/22/08, speleoste...@tx.rr.com speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote:
 It reminds me of this:

 The Story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.

 There were four people named EVERYBODY, SOMEBODY, ANYBODY, and NOBODY.  If 
 there was an important job to be done, EVERYBODY was asked to do it.  
 EVERYBODY was sure SOMEBODY would do it.  ANYBODY could have done it but 
 NOBODY did it.  SOMEBODY got angry about that because it was really 
 EVERYBODY'S job.  EVERYBODY thought ANYBODY could do it, but NOBODY realized 
 that EVERYBODY wouldn't do it.  It ended up that EVERYBODY blamed SOMEBODY 
 when NOBODY did what ANYBODY could have done.



Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread Don Arburn

On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Andy Grubbs wrote:


This is a reply I sent to Fritz, RD and John Brooks the other day

 If it wasnt for the organizations like NSS and TSA, American  
cavers would

still be flashlight toting spelunkers, instead of the robot diving,
Lechuguilla mapping,
geomicrobiological investigating, karst protecting, survey  
inventorying,

deep cave expeditionary speleonauts that we are


These things are due to their individual educations and drive for  
excellence, not the TSA.


I wasn't aware that Lechuguilla was a TSA project, and I'm fairly  
certain that survey inventorying is a TSS deal, and TCC and TCMA are  
really into karst protecting. I could be wrong but I thought the  
DepthX project was a NASA  Bill Stone deal, NOT TSA.



plus; we get to drink a lot of beer when we get together 


This is the result of the TCR.


This to me summs up the real benefit of caver organizations.


Such as the UT Grotto or Bexar Grotto or Maverick Grotto etc.?


Way too many
people can not see this for what it is.


The Texas Caver.


SiO2 is the sand on the beach and
the glass windshield in your car.  Try to drink fine wine out of a  
handful

of sand.


Um..., yeah.


AGG


Re: [Texascavers] TSA/Texas Caver Thread

2008-01-22 Thread speleosteele
Well, I didn't write it.  I saw it years ago and have hung on to it.

Bill 

 Charles Goldsmith wo...@justfamily.org wrote: 
 You certainly do have a way with words :)
 
 On 1/22/08, speleoste...@tx.rr.com speleoste...@tx.rr.com wrote:
  It reminds me of this:
 
  The Story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
 
  There were four people named EVERYBODY, SOMEBODY, ANYBODY, and NOBODY.  If 
  there was an important job to be done, EVERYBODY was asked to do it.  
  EVERYBODY was sure SOMEBODY would do it.  ANYBODY could have done it but 
  NOBODY did it.  SOMEBODY got angry about that because it was really 
  EVERYBODY'S job.  EVERYBODY thought ANYBODY could do it, but NOBODY 
  realized that EVERYBODY wouldn't do it.  It ended up that EVERYBODY blamed 
  SOMEBODY when NOBODY did what ANYBODY could have done.